NPR Announces Layoffs, Show Cancellations

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - NPR Announces Layoffs, Show Cancellations stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post   |  Danny Shea
First Posted: 12-10-08 03:05 PM   |   Updated: 01-10-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Npr Logo

NPR Interim President & CEO Dennis Haarsager announced plans to reduce 7% of its workforce and cancel two shows, "News & Notes" and "Day to Day" in a memo to staff Wednesday afternoon. The memo outlines NPR's financial difficulties and explains the rationale for eliminating 64 employees and canceling the two shows:


Today, we are announcing the cancellation of News & Notes and Day to Day, and significant budget reductions across the organization. These cuts include the elimination of 64 filled and 21 unfilled positions, many of which are associated with the two cancelled programs.


Positions have also been eliminated across NPR, including reporting, editorial, and production staffs; station services; digital media; research; communications; and administrative support. Overall, this is a 7% reduction in NPR's current workforce.


It is important for you to understand why we chose to cancel News & Notes and Day to Day, and the implications for programming strategy and commitments. Neither program was attracting sufficient levels of audience or national underwriting necessary to sustain continued production under these tough financial circumstances.

Haarsager also announced that he will be staying on for six months as Executive VP to assist incoming CEO Vivian Schiller with the transition.

Full memo below:

To the staff of NPR:


Over the past few months, we have all witnessed the deterioration of the national economy. NPR is not immune to this severe downturn, and our revenue sources will be affected. A sharp drop in our current and projected corporate underwriting has compelled us to reduce expenses immediately. This memo describes our plan to ensure that NPR will weather this economic crisis.


NPR's Financial Environment

Story continues below
advertisement

In late spring, we began to see a decrease in NPR corporate sponsorship, which makes up nearly a third of our operating budget. While we made budget cuts at that time and continued to do so as the economy faltered, all our revenue sources are under pressure. Corporate sponsorship has decreased even more sharply since mid-September. All industries, including the financial, automotive, and media industries, historically our biggest underwriters, are cutting back significantly. Additionally, the philanthropic foundations and major donors who support NPR are cautiously watching the economy and their future giving is uncertain. The manageable $2 million budget deficit we projected in July for Fiscal Year 2009 has now risen to a projected $23 million deficit.


It is clear that this serious financial situation can't be responsibly resolved through short-term or temporary cuts. Rather, we must take measures that provide long-term savings, and that preserve our effectiveness and ability to generate vital income in the years ahead.


NPR's Budget Reduction Plan

Today, we are announcing the cancellation of News & Notes and Day to Day, and significant budget reductions across the organization. These cuts include the elimination of 64 filled and 21 unfilled positions, many of which are associated with the two cancelled programs.


Positions have also been eliminated across NPR, including reporting, editorial, and production staffs; station services; digital media; research; communications; and administrative support. Overall, this is a 7% reduction in NPR's current workforce.


It is important for you to understand why we chose to cancel News & Notes and Day to Day, and the implications for programming strategy and commitments. Neither program was attracting sufficient levels of audience or national underwriting necessary to sustain continued production under these tough financial circumstances.


Given the publicity that surrounded the bequest from Joan B. Kroc in 2003, it is understandable to wonder why NPR doesn't draw on it at this time. Legal restrictions severely limit expenditure of the NPR endowment, which includes most of the bequest made by Mrs. Kroc. Fortunately, even though the endowment lost value and did not generate earnings for this year, the NPR Foundation was able to fund a separate $10 million distribution against what NPR had budgeted for FY 2009. The NPR Board also authorized us to access up to $15 million from the NPR operating reserves, allowing us to cope with the immediate situation and limit the depth of the cuts to staff and programs.


In November, we sent a memo to all staff relaying our need to address growing budget concerns. In return, we received thoughtful budget suggestions from staff members across the organization. We reviewed them all, and investigated options such as furloughs and fringe benefit reductions. In the end, we concluded that it was necessary to eliminate some activities completely to achieve the long-term savings we require while protecting our core mission.


Laying off valued colleagues was a difficult decision and the last thing we wanted to do. You may have been directly affected by today's announcement or work closely with someone who was. These cuts are based on the nature of positions, not a judgment of the contributions of those who are losing their jobs. We are losing talented and hardworking staff. The cuts are a reflection of the difficult economic times we are being forced to confront, and we know you will give those who are losing their jobs your personal support.


The show-related positions will end March 20, 2009, the date of both programs' final broadcast. This date allows stations the necessary time to adjust their program schedules. Most of the remaining affected positions will end on January 12, 2009. All affected employees will receive payout of accrued and unused vacation time. Regular employees will receive NPR's standard severance which is one day of severance for every month they have been continuously employed by NPR, to a maximum of 125 days, or about 6 months of pay. Regular staff will also be eligible for up to 6 months of continued health, dental, and vision insurance coverage and outplacement assistance.


In addition to these programming and staff changes, we are greatly restricting the budget for discretionary expenses such as travel, NPR-sponsored events, conferences, training, and consultants in FY09. We have eliminated all FY09 merit increases for the senior team, which includes all vice presidents and executive staff. All other staff will receive their January merit increases as planned. (Severance packages for affected employees will include their January 1 salary increases.)


I have personally focused on the alignment of NPR's senior team, our current executive position vacancies, and the roles of our senior vice presidents, in an effort to better align work and make changes that will contribute to the net savings for NPR. This resulted in the decision to reclassify several positions: Ellen Weiss, VP for News; Kathleen Jackson, VP for HR; and Joyce Slocum, VP for Legal Affairs and General Counsel are promoted to the SVP level. Debra May Hughes, Executive Director of Public Interactive, is promoted to VP. These changes were made to better reflect the scope of their responsibilities and contributions. Three of these were title changes and did not involve a change in pay.


Additionally, the Board of Directors has asked me to stay on as an Executive VP during the first six months of new CEO Vivian Schiller's transition. I have also made a decision to eliminate the Senior Vice President of Strategy and Partnerships position, and Dana Davis Rehm has accepted a new role as SVP of Marketing, Communications, and External Relations. This expanded position replaces the currently vacant VP of Marketing and Communications.


The Future

We believe, but cannot guarantee, that our budget plan and the one-time infusion of funds from the reserves will allow us to weather economic declines over the rest of FY09 and into FY10. We also see promise in digital underwriting, which makes up 12% of our total corporate sponsorship revenues and has actually seen an increase of 9% to date as on-air sponsorships have fallen. While this trajectory must be read with caution, it is nonetheless a good sign. NPR is losing revenue, not audience or relevance. To the contrary, our audience has continued to grow in the face of declining journalism investments elsewhere in the nation.


We are encountering immediate budget challenges, yet we have just completed a year of near-record audience levels on-air, online, and on mobile platforms. NPR will always be deeply committed to providing audiences and stations with the best reporting and story-telling in America. With public radio's expansion into digital media and continued on-air excellence, we are poised for even greater relevance in the future. Now more than ever, the nation is looking to NPR to better understand the extraordinary events occurring in the world. Stations are depending on NPR for our trademark storytelling and superb journalism. We ask each of you to dig deep and hold fast to the mission that has made this organization great, and your fierce dedication to the 882 stations, more than 26 million listeners, and 8 million online users who want NPR to be part of their lives for generations to come.


Please join Mitch Praver and me to discuss this announcement, today from 4:00-4:30 p.m. in Boardrooms East/West. You can also watch the Intranet for remote listening and video options. Additional information on today's announcement can be found in a FAQ posted to the Intranet homepage.


Sincerely,

Dennis Haarsager

Interim President and CEO

NPR Interim President & CEO Dennis Haarsager announced plans to reduce 7% of its workforce and cancel two shows, "News & Notes" and "Day to Day" in a memo to staff Wednesday afternoon. The memo outl...
NPR Interim President & CEO Dennis Haarsager announced plans to reduce 7% of its workforce and cancel two shows, "News & Notes" and "Day to Day" in a memo to staff Wednesday afternoon. The memo outl...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
292
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 (6 pages total)

>Neither program was attracting sufficient levels of audience or national underwriting necessary to sustain continued production under these tough financial circumstances.

How sad. NPR and even more so, PBS are so dependent on underwriting that there's precious little distinguishing them from commercial outlets any more. Well, make that pretty classy commercial outlets. Still, this quote nails it. We get to see 'The NewsHour' because it draws in an audience that certain advertisers want to reach. Quality has something to do with it, but not everything. And you'll never see an investigative report on Archer Daniels Midland coming from Jim Lehrer unless there's a front-page scandal they can't ignore.

Personally, I think it'd be a really interesting piece of reporting to see a series on exactly what PBS and NPR 'underwriters' are hoping to get for their money. Or maybe a piece about why you shouldn't believe what you hear in advertisements - and how to tell when they're lying.

Public broadcasting should be different. Public broadcasting used to be a lot more different than it is today. Sigh...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 12/10/2008
- Clare53 I'm a Fan of Clare53 14 fans permalink

sigh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 12/10/2008

I only listen to npr; news & notes is my favorite show. I thought Farai Chideya was one of the more popular npr journalist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 12/10/2008
- Bashley I'm a Fan of Bashley 14 fans permalink
photo

I did, too! This is truly heart-breaking. :(

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 12/10/2008
- Clairvaux I'm a Fan of Clairvaux 63 fans permalink
photo

NPR uses NWO orange and blue in their logo.

That's interesting ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 12/10/2008

National Propaganda Radio, good bye and good riddance. You want truly progressive balanced media, tune into Pacifica Radio and Amy Goodman's Democracy Now! truly PUBLIC radio funded entirely on private donations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 12/10/2008

I understood no part of your comment. What is it about NPR that you find so disagreeable? Are you suggesting that it's biased in the wrong direction? What exactly is "progressive balanced media"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 12/10/2008

That's the reaction I had. From that comment I got nothing more than this person hates NPR but no idea which way they seem to feel the "propaganda" is leaning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 12/10/2008
- BigCheese I'm a Fan of BigCheese 2 fans permalink
photo

It's the left's version of Rush Limbaugh -- but with crappier production values and a much smaller audience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 12/10/2008
photo

For more information, see the very informative blog NPR Check:

http://nprcheck.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 12/10/2008
- OttoMann I'm a Fan of OttoMann 5 fans permalink

Why "good riddance"? Did you ever actually listen to either show? Do you even know what their content was? There was nothing even remotely propagandistic about either of the two shows that were cancelled.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 12/10/2008

After having taken a course during matriculation in mass communications, my ear is somewhat attuned to propaganda. I have heard things on NPR that curdled my blood. Distortions, cropped quotes with right wing spin added for good measure, their coverage is NOT liberal NOR progressive but the beauty is they have succeeded, as has the New York Times of convincing most listeners that they are "liberal". Here's a quote about the NYT that I find appropos to NPR as well:
."[I] never saw a foreign intervention that the [New York] Times did not support, never saw a fare increase or a rent increase or a utility rate increase that it did not endorse, never saw it take the side of labor in a strike or lockout, or advocate a raise for underpaid workers. And don't let me get started on universal health care and Social Security. So why do people think the Times is liberal?"
New York Times reporter John Hess

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 12/13/2008
- toypiano I'm a Fan of toypiano 12 fans permalink
photo

Pacifica Radio is a great progressive resource overall. I'm less enthusiastic about Amy Goodman/DN because of the sometimes-­amateurish way they report opinions as facts and get hostile at criticism. But DN will often cover stories that the MSM completely buries or ignores, which is important and necessary, so I'm glad it exists.

NPR is really strong and often great, but their news coverage can be maddening -- they are too fond of using Bush administration and corporate releases as a basis for stories and neglect the progressive side of things. Our fave local affiliate (shoutout to the mighty KUOW!) kicks a$$ and has a lot of local news and public affairs programming, which is excellent. We're fortunate to have such a strong public station and local non-commercial community radio stations as well.

I get my news from as many different sources as I can in the time I have. NPR is a big part of that and I'm sorry they had to make budget cuts. I've never heard of News&Notes, and Day to Day was often excellent but inconsistent in its appeal (to me), so I can't say that I'll miss either show. For what that's worth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 12/10/2008

NPR uses distortions and omissions in their reportage. I have heard them cover Clinton with incredible bias, from cropping and distorting a speech she made to blacks during the primaries to slanting a report about her Hispanic base using "man-on-the-street" interviews with drunkards. (One reporter remarked that the two Hispanic voters, supposedly representative of Clinton's base, might not be able to get to the polls because the timing would interfere with their bar drinking time, really. That incredibly biased!) When reporting labor news, their panel guests are entirely representative of the investor class with one token right wing think tank "labor specialist". And I never hear NPR promoting a truly progressive candidate until AFTER an election or when that person is not in a position to affect a major change in policy. How often does NPR promote PROGRESSIVE taxation? Or a return to the Fairness Doctrine? The two arguably most important progressive planks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 12/13/2008

I cursed out loud when I read this. Day to Day is my favorite daily NPR show - not to mention it is broadcast from Los Angeles (where I live) and reflects the local a bit more than most NPR shows. Now I feel extra guilty for not supporting this year!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 12/10/2008
- acmes I'm a Fan of acmes 3 fans permalink

you should frankly. Everyone always waits for someone else to donate. Pledge drives are a pain but if people just donated, the pledge drives would disappear. THink of how much you spend on your daily paper and ask yourself if you don't get better information from the radio.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 12/10/2008
- BigCheese I'm a Fan of BigCheese 2 fans permalink
photo

If you are truly getting better information from NPR than you do from your daily paper, it's time to switch to a better newspaper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 12/10/2008
photo

I am really sorry to hear this! I like both the shows, especially Day to Day. I wonder what they'll replace them with.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 12/10/2008

NPR produces a lot of different shows. They should have let us listeners and contributors vote for the shows we definitely want to keep; and, for those that we would like to see dumped. That would have been more democratic; and, a potential fundraiser if you had to make a pledge in order to cast the votes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 12/10/2008

But we do vote for which shows to keep by listening to them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 12/10/2008

No, you don't vote just by listening, you vote by donating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 12/10/2008

I am sorry to hear this. NPR is one of the few media outlets worth listening to regularly. I like Day to Day. I found it a welcome change from the earlier programming in that time slot. I guess this is just the beginning of alot of unwelcome changes to life as we have known it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 12/10/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect