GOP Signals Heated Confirmation Battle Over Holder

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - GOP Signals Heated Confirmation Battle Over Holder stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12-11-08 06:10 PM   |   Updated: 01-11-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Holder

More signs have emerged that Eric Holder's nomination for Attorney General will face a bitter committee fight as Republican Senators on Thursday criticized Holder's work in the Clinton White House and even attempted to tie him to disgraced Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich

Addressing the Senate during what was ostensibly a session to debate the auto industry bailout, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ) both took to the floor to raise objections not just to the current date for confirmation hearings, which they would like to delay, but to various episodes from Holder's past.

Grassley came first, charging that Holder is "not a nominee free and clear of issues." He went on to recite a laundry list of conservative complaints with some of the Clinton Justice Department actions in which Holder took part.

"For example," Grassley began, "there are red flags about Mr. Holder's judgment and independence, including his role in securing pardons or clemency for an unrepentant billionaire fugitive tax cheat like Marc Rich or terrorists like members of the FALN [Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional] and the Weather Underground. A lot of people, including this senator, have found these facts to be troubling... In addition, Mr. Holder has been in private practice since he left the Clinton Justice Department over eight years ago. It's important that we know what Mr. Holder has been doing in those eight years, which cases he's been involved with and who his clients are, what speeches he's made and so forth.

In addition, the Iowa Republican, towards the end of his speech, made what appears to be an effort to tie Holder to Rod Blagojevich, claiming that the disgraced Illinois Governor sought Holder's legal services.

"Public reports have just emerged that in 2004, the Governor of Illinois hired or sought to hire Mr. Holder," he said. "We... need time to learn what that is all about Mr. Holder has not provided the committee with all of this information yet."

Roughly twenty minutes later, Kyl took to the floor to echo many of the same criticisms.

"Bear in mind, this is the Attorney General of the United States, and an individual who has some controversy in his past," he said. "He was involved in the pardons of members of the FALN organization by President Clinton, the pardons of Pincus Green [who fled the U.S. with Marc Rich], Susan Rosenberg and Linda Sue Evans. He was involved in the very controversial raid in Miami by the border patrol agents to take young Elian Gonzales into custody."

Story continues below
advertisement

Kyl went on to note that these matters may not constitute enough of a black mark on Holder's resume to deny him confirmation. Instead, he said, the committee needed time to look into the issues rather than move quickly on the nomination.

Then, however, Kyl did something one is not likely to see on the floor of the U.S. Senate every day, quoting prominent progressive legal writer Glenn Greenwald, who also expressed reservations about Holder's role in the Rich pardon.

"I am not alone," Kyle said. "Others have written -- Richard Cohen, for example, wrote in 'The Washington Post' that Eric Holder should not be the Attorney General. I don't know whether he's right or not, but the questions that he raises need to be examined. Glenn Greenwald wrote in the 'Salon' Magazine that his involvement with Rich pardon was substantial, continuous and concerted, much, much more than peripheral -- end of quote."

The complaints by these two Senators -- both of whom sit on the Judiciary Committee -- come one day after the ranking Republican on that committee, Sen. Arlen Specter, also raised objections to an expedited nomination process and concerns with Holder himself. Combined, it may not be enough to derail Holder's path towards becoming attorney general. In fact, it was reported that Obama introduced the nomination only after he was sure he had the votes for it to pass through committee (and, subsequently, the Senate). But it should make for a contentious and dramatic hearing.

Update - 6:30PM ET: It continues... Shortly after Kyl, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) took to the floor to raise the very same objections to Holder's nomination. The Oklahoma Republican, moreover, drew a fairly clear line in the sand declaring, in essence, that the GOP will do everything in its power to hold up the appointment if it doesn't get more time to look through relevant material.

"If it's insisted that we go early, earlier than we're prepared, so that we can truly ask the questions that we think the country would need us to ask," said the Senator, "then I think we'll have a difficult time ever moving that nomination and that should not be the case."

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat on the committee, reminded Coburn that the time between the announcement of Holder's nomination (December 1) and the actual hearing (scheduled for January 9) will be longer than what the Senate used to consider the nominations of past attorney generals, including Janet Reno, Alberto Gonzales and Michael Mukasey. Coburn responded by saying the Senate made a mistake in not taking its time to deliberate over Gonzales.

More signs have emerged that Eric Holder's nomination for Attorney General will face a bitter committee fight as Republican Senators on Thursday criticized Holder's work in the Clinton White House and...
More signs have emerged that Eric Holder's nomination for Attorney General will face a bitter committee fight as Republican Senators on Thursday criticized Holder's work in the Clinton White House and...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
511
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
- IsidoroRDL I'm a Fan of IsidoroRDL 4 fans permalink
photo

As to the confirmation hearing on Eric Holder is Michael Isikoff's cover story in Newsweek, "The Fed Who Blew the Whistle," and the general issue of pardons, amnesties and similar measures for violation of Congressional mandates. The evidence confirms that Eric Holder’s past policies were the base on which former White House Counsel, and then Attorney General Gonzales used to direct DOJ, i.e. the pardon of Marc Rich and other actions to usurp accountability was not an anomaly, but a pattern and practice.

I have experience of litigating against the polices of Eric Holder at DOJ during the ‘90, and later when he was a typical Beltway attorney/lobbyist. Thus I oppose his confirmation, see http://capwiz.com/congressorg/sbx/f/?aid=12313551&r=1.

In summary, the Senate cannot confirm him because evidence confirm that as a Beltway attorney/lobbyist he has been the linchpin in a criminal conspiracy to obstruct the rights of a father and retaliate against an attorney for litigating to enforce federal statutory rights in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1202, and 1513.

Thus, as a US. citizen and Nam Vet who took the oath 44 years ago to defend and protect the Constitution from, "all enemies, foreign and domestic," irrespective of being a Republican, Democrat, or Independent each Senator must act now to restore the Rule of Law and assure compliance by DOJ with the mandate of separation of power and checks and balances. Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., isidoror@e­arthlink.n­er

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 01/02/2009
photo

For any one who cares about the Constitution please read

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE4D81530F936A15757C0A9669C8B63

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 12/13/2008
- conniec I'm a Fan of conniec 3 fans permalink

Grassley: "Public reports have just emerged that in 2004, the Governor of Illinois hired or sought to hire Mr. Holder,"
__________­__________­__________­__
Oh my goodness, Senator, you mean Blago actually "hired or sought to hire" Holder. CRIMINAL!!! (Are you sure that maybe Blago wasn't just THINKING about hiring Holder? Even MORE CRIMINAL!!) And exactly WHY does this cast a shadow on Holder? He is, after all, a lawyer, and was, after all, you know, DOING HIS JOB.
__________­__________­__________­__

Also Grassley: "there are red flags about Mr. Holder's judgment and independence, including his role in securing pardons or clemency for an unrepentant billionaire fugitive tax cheat like Marc Rich ..."
__________­__________­________

Marc Rich is a sleezeball, but perhaps if he "got religion," maybe DubYa will give him a medal - you know, kind of like Chuck Colson?!? Get a clue, Mr. Grassley..­.you make me ashamed of being from Iowa.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 12/12/2008
- illinoisan I'm a Fan of illinoisan 24 fans permalink
photo

Isn't it true that Iowa abutts the state that Blagojevich governs? Hmmmmmmm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 12/12/2008
- conniec I'm a Fan of conniec 3 fans permalink

OK, ya got me...I was BORN in Chicago 61 years ago (don't live there now)...

I confess - that alone makes me just as guilty as Blago (by Republican standards)­... Slap the cuffs on me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 12/12/2008
- Figerre I'm a Fan of Figerre 7 fans permalink

Once again - the GOP says one thing and does another. Trust? can they even spell it? Why should Holder be tarred and feathered for something he ADMITTED was a mistake. What do they want? a hair shirt?

Keep in mind - these are the guys that spent the Clinton surplus and voted us into debt. Set up the DoJ as Cheney/Rove's personal hiring palace? eliminated the Civil Rights lawyers to replace them with Bob Jones University faux-lawyers. It will take a BIG shovel to clean out that Aegean Stable -- and Holder comes qualified with both the law and gloves to do the job.

the GOP is NOT ever going to get over losing the White House, so they are going to be as nasty as possible as soon as possible to prove that they can. Whoa, boys, do you think that is going to help you in 2010? when you lily-white WASPS go out and try to get the middle to vote for you? after the auto bailout collapse? Pay backs are hell - hope you are ready.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 12/12/2008
- hpjake I'm a Fan of hpjake 2 fans permalink

Mr. Holder, in my estimation, is a sleaze-bag lawyer, who could work for the mob as easily as he could work for Barack Obama. He is a lawyer of men, not of laws.

David Iglesias, Republican, Hispanic, on the other hand, is a lawyer dedicated to the truth - to the point of putting a great job secondary to what is right. No-one will ever say that of Mr. Holder.

If P.E. Obama wants to bring change to Washington, then nominating his own version of Alberto Gonzales as A.G. demonstrate Obama's deeds belie his own words.

You expected what ?? Change?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 12/12/2008

Nice unsubstantiated rant there...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 12/12/2008
- KeysDan I'm a Fan of KeysDan 23 fans permalink

So much for that "reaching out", tired of the fighting, post-partisan stuff. The Republicans have dug in, and, unlike Congressional Democrats, find ways to get their way, and without qualms to filibuster or threaten to do so. Enough for Reid to cave.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 12/12/2008

Here we go again, the Republicans flexing the muscles, stomping their feat, and inflating their chests, ready for war ... haven't they done enough damage to our country in the past 8 years to last a decade or two?

I don't understand why that all won't just sit down, and shut up, and let Obama pull us out of this crisis! Their continued obstructionism will only drag their party further into the mud, if that's at all possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 12/12/2008
- DWP I'm a Fan of DWP 2 fans permalink

Has anyone listed the "good things" he has done? Maybe that list compared with the list of questionable pardons might shed a different light on things. As for Obama "hiring" so many people who were in the Clinton Administration and this not being consistent with change, in order to facilitate the change he has to do that. I have worked (rather low level) in Administrations who brought in all new people and it was close to comical. Obama is first and foremost a pragmatist. He wants to get things done. He will have the vision of change. The people who work for him will carry out the change and they will know how to do it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 12/12/2008
- Lynn Voedisch - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Lynn Voedisch 20 fans permalink
photo

My God, now Blagojevich has become so toxic that even if he called someone up and inquired about legal services it's a black mark against the law firm. What's next the pizza deliver service he used? This is patently ridiculous. Discuss Holder's qualifications and his role in the Rich pardon, but don't drag the monster-du-jour into this. Pretty soon little kids are going to see Blago under the bed at night. it's gotten insane.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 12/12/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 63 fans permalink

Look, I'm a republican but it is my country and Obama will be my president. Maybe a democrat can explain why a candidate for change [I get it and don't object] is appointing one Clinton retread after another?

Even a republican will acknowledge that there are alot of astute and competent democrats who could bring fresh blood and new perspectiv­e...nothin­g wrong with that and everyone gets vetted by the Senate.

We all get our partisan blood flowing now and then, but in the end we are all in it together, democrat and republican. Why aren't we getting some fresh faces nominated at the highest levels of government?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 12/12/2008
photo

Maybe a democrat can explain why a candidate for change [I get it and don't object] is appointing one Clinton retread after another?
----------­----------­-------
Because they are the ones available with experience. I am quite sure there are lots of competent democrats who can bring fresh blood into the government, but they don't have the experience Obama needs in this time of crisis.

Do you really want a bunch of newbies trying to sort this mess out? I know I don't.

And, there's nothing wrong with Holder. He didn't "negotiate the pardon" for Rich as the news is reporting. He simply signed off on it. There's a huge difference there.

Then there's the ridiculous "guilt by association" because he may have spoken to Blago back in 2004 (before he was under investigation for anything).

Do you Republicans have any idea how stupid you sound? You are like a bunch of children h ell bent on breaking all the toys because someone took your favorite toy away form you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 12/12/2008
- jcwtts1 I'm a Fan of jcwtts1 148 fans permalink
photo

I think you ask a reasonable question. Here is a reasonable answer. When Clinton was elected he came in with a democratic house and senate. He came from the outside into a culture of Washington and knew very very little about how to make the trains run. What I mean by that is that he struggled with the nuts and bolts of process, all political bureaucratic processes. His first two selections for AG were rejected and forced to resign. Not because they were incompetent but because they had domestic help issues. Zoe Baird the first female nominee for AG was asked if she ever hired an illegal worker for any domestic issue. I believe her nanny had documentation problems. The second one was asked if she had ever failed to pay the social security task for someone employed in their home. These two example dramatically weakened the President, dramatically through off his timetable and hamstrung him off the bat. This is just one of about a thousand example of how the inexperienced (in Washington) team of people and nominees destroyed the first two years of the Clinton Presidency. An incoming president has 18 months. 18 months to govern and attempt to make change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 12/12/2008
- vedder110 I'm a Fan of vedder110 7 fans permalink
photo

Very reasonable answer. Thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 12/12/2008
- jcwtts1 I'm a Fan of jcwtts1 148 fans permalink
photo

After that the House and senate are up for reelection and no one does anything but campaign. So in the 18 months Obama has, he needs people who can make the trains run. He needs people who, when they enter office and look around the DOJ and begin to undo the catastrophic harm Bush and Gonzalez did to the department, and he needs an economic team that is ready to rock and roll before we, as a nation, slip into the abyss. For FP he needs people who can manage the wars, both of them, immediately, get us out of Iraq responsibly, and not leave us open to Al Queada attacks in 8 months like what happened to Bush. Obama needs experienced people to help him actually govern. What he brings as change is that he isn't scared to hear dissident opinions. He is persuadable and informed, and if you come with a good argument, better than his, he'll listen. That alone is a seismic change in how policy will be accomplished. Further, the power of the president is that everyone elses power derives from their closeness and access to the President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 12/12/2008
- jcwtts1 I'm a Fan of jcwtts1 148 fans permalink
photo

People who may, at their core, be more conservative than Obama, will want to please him, and want access to him. That is like currency in Washington. In order to get access and to maintain closeness you do what the president wants you to do. If we were in less turbulent times, if the world didn't seem to actually be spinning off its axis, we might be able to start with rookies (and by the way you'll see a stronger position on domestic policy of new faces and different ideas). What you will also see is that even with a Clintonian secretary there will be Obama deputies. Very few Cabinet appointments stay 4 years let alone 8. The deputies will take over starting two years in. I hope my argument sounds reasonable and makes sense. Good question.

Peace,

J

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 12/12/2008
- cadsuch I'm a Fan of cadsuch 2 fans permalink

Please try to remember that these appointments are not LIFE jobs! He can appoint somebody different a week later!

Its just makes more sense to realize that all you people attacking Obama before he has even been sworn in to office.

And the people who claim he has such low credibility can begin explaining why all the news media publications who backed McCain are now selling more magazines and newspappers with pictures of Obama on the front page and the front cover, and advertisements for Obama gold coins and Obama table ware.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 12/12/2008
- djgonebad I'm a Fan of djgonebad 8 fans permalink
photo

They'll grab onto anything!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 12/12/2008
- edwcorey I'm a Fan of edwcorey 18 fans permalink

I'm against Holder, too.

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/130163.html

All drug warriors are idiots or beneficiaries of the war on drugs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 12/12/2008
photo

I am sorry I read this article and I am just not buying some slanted opinion as factual.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 12/12/2008
- edwcorey I'm a Fan of edwcorey 18 fans permalink

Which part of it did you not understand? The article was pretty explicit as to what are facts and what are opinions. (According to a December 1996 report in The Washington Times excerpted at TalkLeft, Holder ... wanted to "make the penalty for distribution and possession with intent to distribute marijuana a felony, punishable with up to a five-year sentence."­) I don't care if he wanted to make it a five-minute sentence, I'd be against him wasting my tax dollars to build up gang violence and terrorism financing so some cowboys could claim to be fighting crimes that shouldn't exist. Check these out:

http://www.iowamedicalmarijuana.org/documents/nc1contents.aspx

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/DEA_encouraged_drug_trade_says_Morales_1106.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 12/12/2008
- vedder110 I'm a Fan of vedder110 7 fans permalink
photo

I think that the Republican opposition to Eric Holder is pretty baseless overall; however, while I think Eric Holder will be a significant improvement for the Justice Department compared to the past 8 years, he takes a couple of positions that disappoint me.

The first is his significant support for increasing the disastrous War on Certain Drugs (as mentioned by Reason and others). Does Obama really think that he, and society, would have been better off by him being arrested for non-violent drug usage (a prosecution that would have been fully supported by his own Attorney General appointment)? Some people say that education is our biggest civil rights issue, and while that may be true, the disproportionate targeting of the War on Certain Drugs against minorities is right up there.

Second issue of concern is his support for many of the Justice Department actions taken during the Bush Administration, even though he came out against the Patriot Act and the administration as a whole. He publicly disagreed with Colin Powell in supporting Donald Rumsfeld's claim that Gitmo detainees were not POWs to be treated as prisoners of war and not entitled to protection under the Geneva Convention. http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/02/holder//).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 12/12/2008
- vedder110 I'm a Fan of vedder110 7 fans permalink
photo

This is another classic quote: "The World Trade Centers aflame, the pictures of the Pentagon, and any time some petty bureaucrat decides that his or her little piece of turf is being invaded, get rid of that person. Those are the kinds of things we have to do." Sounds a lot like the Justice Department under Gonzalez http://www.thenation.com/blogs/state_of_change/3845644).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 12/12/2008
- vedder110 I'm a Fan of vedder110 7 fans permalink
photo

One more great quote: "The truth of the matter is that marijuana is a significant problem for the city," said Mr. Holder in an interview. "Crack cocaine still drives most of the violence in this city, but marijuana violence is increasing. We need to nip it in the bud." http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/11/18/21472/4166)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 12/12/2008
- goldnchyl I'm a Fan of goldnchyl 9 fans permalink
photo

At what point does responsible challenge to government cross over into the unpatriotic? I don't think I can take much more GOP whining. It's sickening, really.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 12/12/2008
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 63 fans permalink

Oh, and democrats didn't do it to republican nominees? Get a grip and grow up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 12/12/2008
- judiNJ I'm a Fan of judiNJ 53 fans permalink
photo

Well, look at the nominees..­.... Gonzalas, John Ashcroft (now also being investigated) to name just two and lobbiest for every anti group imaginable­..... yikes, Bush filled the government with hundreds of crazed right wingers. No wonder the Dems held them up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 12/12/2008
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 216 fans permalink

Republicans will attempt to filibuster every candidate no matter how qualified.
Democrats meanwhile only trying to stop Bush's most unqualified people, such as that woman who called Bush the "smartest man I've ever met"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 12/12/2008
- Char59 I'm a Fan of Char59 11 fans permalink

Who checks the checkers? What are these Repubs backgrounds, who is checking their backgrounds? Since they are so hell bent on screening Holder, I want to know what qualifies them to check him and I want to know what is hidden in their closet. I think everyone's background should come to light, yes Sen Grassley , and Sen Jon Kyl ..........­yours!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 12/12/2008
- Revee I'm a Fan of Revee 4 fans permalink

You are right. As we learned just recently, Newt Gingrich was having an affair at the same time when Clinton was being skewered!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 12/12/2008
- vedder110 I'm a Fan of vedder110 7 fans permalink
photo

Having an affair is one thing. Having an affair with a White House intern is another. It's an abuse of power just like a professor having an affair with a TA. It's certainly deserving of at least a formal censure by Congress. Witness intimidation, perjury, and obstruction of justice deserve impeachment. Just because the Republicans made a mockery of the Clinton impeachment doesn't mean that it was undeserved. Even Russ Feingold supported the justification of the proceedings (he voted to acquit eventually). Bush and Cheney also deserve to be impeached (the time for censure has long passed).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 12/12/2008
- Anciano I'm a Fan of Anciano 17 fans permalink
photo

Dear Mr. President whom we worked our asses off to elect you we expected something different than you opening up the Clinton's Christmas card list to pick your cabinet.
Might I suggest Patrict Fitzgerald as the best A.G. choice?
Sic him on Bush, Cheney and all their cohort.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 12/12/2008
- chasmader I'm a Fan of chasmader 3 fans permalink
photo

Excellent Idea!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 12/12/2008
- bluekatz I'm a Fan of bluekatz 13 fans permalink

Fitzgerald is not a good choice either. Can he pick someone that has experience but neutral, no ties to DC. I think its time to get someone who is new with no dirt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 12/12/2008

No Fitzy in D.C. We need him here in Chicago to battle the bad guys here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 12/12/2008
- GrainOSand I'm a Fan of GrainOSand 269 fans permalink
photo

Expectations huge!

Realities -- tragic, somber, perilous, challenging, dangerous, yet, inspiring, pregnant with promising potential for a great rush of movement forward as a nation into a new paradigm of existence, a better version of the previous, void of corruption, hegemony, hubris, greed, hate, grift and graft, and most importantly, uplifting for all. If this ship should go down, it will not be Obama's fault, we were damn near submerged when he won. Never forget that, no matter what happens. Now buckle in tight for it is about to get serious in here. The work to get him elected was fractional at best concerning the cure for what ails us. His appointments do not bother me for they are consistent with transformative change -- old dogs learning new tricks in the face of daunting peril that has their name on it. Obama is one bad brother -- never forget that either. It is said in black communities that to achieve the same level of accomplishment that a white counterpart achieves -- you have to work at least twice as hard. Barack Obama is one million times the politician, and more importantly, the human, that Bush is. Is he corruptible and capable of erring? To quote my brother the late Isaac Hayes, you damn right! However, he had to know that about himself to rise to the level he has. One thing the press can never report on is the psychology of the man. They don’t know -- by design.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 12/12/2008
- starlady7 I'm a Fan of starlady7 28 fans permalink

Beautifully written!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 12/12/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect