Josh Hartnett Wins "Steamy" Sex Libel Suit

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

December 11, 2008 08:44 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

LONDON — Hollywood actor Josh Hartnett has won 20,000 pounds ($30,000) in libel damages from a British newspaper that claimed he engaged in "steamy shenanigans" in a public area of a London hotel.

The tabloid Daily Mirror claimed in a September article that Hartnett and an unknown woman had a steamy encounter in the library of the Soho Hotel that was caught on CCTV.

Lawyer Victoria Jolliffe for the newspaper's publisher acknowledged Thursday that the allegations were false. Jolliffe told London's High Court that the newspaper apologized for any "distress, hurt and embarrassment" it had caused.

Hartnett's lawyer says the actor plans to donate the damages money to charity.

The 30-year-old star of "Pearl Harbor" and "Sin City" is appearing onstage in "Rain Man" in London.

LONDON — Hollywood actor Josh Hartnett has won 20,000 pounds ($30,000) in libel damages from a British newspaper that claimed he engaged in "steamy shenanigans" in a public area of a London hote...
LONDON — Hollywood actor Josh Hartnett has won 20,000 pounds ($30,000) in libel damages from a British newspaper that claimed he engaged in "steamy shenanigans" in a public area of a London hote...
 
Comments
9
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

For those of you that are sick of the paparazzi and want to get your own back peacefully and with an element of humour, take a look at my blog and see what you think of it. All comments (provided they are clean) will be published. http://smokinghotcoffee.blogspot.com/2008/12/paparazzi-where-should-privacy-line-be.html let see how the paparazzi like it. It's time for a revolution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 12/12/2008

Isn't he supposed to be gay?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 12/12/2008
photo

Good for Josh. I love Josh Hartnett. Sadly, it is not reciprocated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 12/11/2008

Hey marymansour-- Hartnett won the money because that stuff DIDN'T happen. As Barbra Streisand would say, "Don't Believe What You Read" (necessarily).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 12/11/2008
photo

I'm glad. Love Hartnett and frankly didn't read the article in toto. My bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 12/11/2008
photo

Who's Josh what's-his-name?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 12/11/2008

I dunno.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 12/11/2008
photo

Josh Hartnett is a very hot man. Sorry he tore up the library but that was one lucky woman in there with him. There must have been a whole lot of shakin' goin' on for 30,000 in damages. : - }

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 12/11/2008

buy a dictionary. Look up Libel, damages, allegations and false. Then reread the story above.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 12/11/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect