GOP: White House Ruined Bailout Deal

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURIE KELLMAN | December 12, 2008 07:29 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Dec. 12, 2008. Corker, a key Republican negotiator, said the Bush administration undercut his negotiating power with the UAW by making clear from the start that the industry would get an emergency life line if talks with Congress collapsed. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — When the auto bailout talks collapsed, Sen. Bob Corker won by losing.

The freshman Republican from Tennessee represented conservative Republicans who opposed the $14 billion rescue package passed by the House and saw Senate negotiations as one last chance to bludgeon organized labor before the GOP minority shrinks and Democrats expand their control of government.

Corker late Thursday pushed the United Auto Workers toward a firm date in 2009 by which wages and benefits would be reduced to match those of foreign manufacturers _ a demand that by all accounts was the deal-killer.

That may not have been an accident, according to the key Democrat in the room. Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd had high praise for Corker, but suggested that the freshman senator may have been used by more-senior Republicans with little to gain from a deal with UAW.

"If perfection was supposed to be his goal, he was sent on a mission he could never complete," Dodd said of Corker.

Labor balked, talks abruptly ended and to no one's surprise, Republicans swiftly helped sink the House-passed rescue package.

By the time the sun rose on Friday, the 110th Congress had left town _ possibly for good _ and President George W. Bush was ready to find another way using the Treasury, the Federal Reserve or both to get billions of dollars in loans to the auto companies.

During the two-year session, the first in a dozen years that Democrats controlled the House and the Senate, the ruling majority failed to make good on a raft of promises because of opposition from Bush.

Story continues below
advertisement

But on the rescue package this week, Bush was with them _ if only because he was unwilling to let the industry, and the 3 million jobs that depend on it, perish on his watch.

What Democrats didn't have was support from conservative Republicans with little to lose from making a target of organized labor and bucking their own lame duck president.

The sticking point, all sides agreed, was Republicans' demand for a specific date, and labor's refusal to give one, by which cuts would be made to bring unionized workers' pay into line with that at nonunion U.S. plants of Japanese carmakers.

"It became really an impossible condition to meet, both politically and economically," Dodd, D-Conn., told reporters Friday. Dodd said that if he had agreed and presented such a deal to his Democratic colleagues, "there would have been a riot."

Whether used by senior colleagues or not, Corker raised his profile and won the respect of Republicans and the trust of some Democrats _ particularly Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. Corker only joined the committee in January, but Dodd's respect will give him more than a normal freshman senator's clout as the auto industry's fate and the economy consume the opening months of the 111th Congress and President-elect Barack Obama's administration.

Even with an expanded majority and control of the White House, Democrats still will need Republicans to reach the 60 votes needed to block filibusters. That and his new visibility could make Corker a bigger-than-average fish in the shrinking Republican caucus.

The multimillionaire freshman senator _ whose state is home to General Motors, Nissan and soon Volkswagen plants _ said he carried only goodwill into the talks and felt disappointed that they collapsed "three words away" from a deal.

"You can't believe how close we were," said Corker, 56. "It's pretty surreal to me that we haven't reached an agreement."

He said he was seeking a deal that would effectively allow automakers to go into bankruptcy without using that term or acquiring its stigma. And he accused the White House of undercutting his negotiating power by making clear that, if the talks failed, Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson would consider throwing the companies a financial lifeline from the $700 billion financial bailout passed earlier.

Earlier, Bush had declared that money off-limits to the automakers, which initially strengthened Corker's hand.

UAW President Ron Gettelfinger, however, saw little reason to negotiate further with White House money on the way, Corker said.

"I think it being known that the White House at the end of the day would probably blink probably helped keep us from a deal," Corker told reporters.

___

Associated Press Writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — When the auto bailout talks collapsed, Sen. Bob Corker won by losing. The freshman Republican from Tennessee represented conservative Republicans who opposed the $14 billion rescue...
WASHINGTON — When the auto bailout talks collapsed, Sen. Bob Corker won by losing. The freshman Republican from Tennessee represented conservative Republicans who opposed the $14 billion rescue...
 
Comments
997
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
photo

So much for the conservative concept of "keeping gubment off our backs".

I wonder why conservatives hate that union workers make more money than non-union workers? Why do they want to redistribute the wealth made by union workers?

Also, conservatives CLAIM to be about self-regulation of industry. Seems to me that's exactly what Unions do- they are a private, non-governmental, solution to the enforcement of labor laws.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 12/15/2008
- Jp2 I'm a Fan of Jp2 permalink

I don't know why everyone can't see why the UAW can't agree to this deal.It comes dow2n to one thing 800,000 thousand retirees. That the transplants don't have.So the only way to have parity is one of two ways.
1) Active workers cut their from 27.00 to 10.00 an hour

2) 800,000 thousand retirees lose their healthcare and pensions that some have worked up to fifty years for

What choice did did the union have but to say no.

If Corker really is concerned about being competitive why dosen't he ask for congress and all federal employees give up their benefits what with the government 10 trillion in debt we can't afford them either!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 12/15/2008

Right-to-work apologists ruined the auto rescue plan. The desparately seek to defund the left so they will continue to attack labor unions and tort reform until Jesus comes home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 12/15/2008

We have yet to see if Paulson will throw the automakers a life line. He is probably aware of any number of other banks and insurers about to go belly up, and cannot steady his nerves enough to let go of any of the remaining $17B he has at his disposal over the next 4 weeks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 12/15/2008



Granted the Big 3 did not modernize, but allowing them to fail should not be an option. After giving a bail-out worth hundreds of billions of dollars to financial institutions without question or conditions it is difficult to imagine, at a time when economists and lawmakers are advocating extending benefits as a response to the financial crisis, why a $15 billion dollar bridge loan is out of the question if the UAW will not meet their demands. The auto makers are not asking for a bail-out. But that is not what this is about.

Apparently some republicans would rather play politics than save 3-million jobs. Their real goal is weakening the unions. It is political pay back against organized labour. If conservatives can ultimately take down the UAW, one of the strongest unions in the nation, it would send a strong message to the other unions. However they are picking the wrong battle at the wrong time.

A $15 billion bridge-loan will hardly make a dent compared to the seven-hundred billion dollars the Treasury Department handed over to the financial sector which is not a loan. With the economy in peril and millions out of work this is not the time for political-payback. Not only are they compounding the problem they are part-n-parcel. As long as the republicans continue on this path they will stay in the minority for a generation or more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 12/14/2008

If the U.S. auto industry goes belly up, the GOP could be looking at another 40 years
as the minority party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 12/14/2008

Wel so much for the Bush 'SAVE' with the bailout money. The GOP Senator indicated on CBS that his proposal was under consideration by Paulson and Bush, so who's on first again? The bailout money will accomplish the goals of the Rethugs down under, of Union Busting, as well as the wishes of Cheney...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 12/14/2008
- RstJ I'm a Fan of RstJ permalink

Except so far, no bailout money has actually materialized, and Bush has flitted off (secretly, as always) to Iraq. This reminds me of all the stories about how the auto deal was "close" which, naturally, resulted in it going down in flames.

This administration has never hesitated to use executive power when it wants something. So why all the thoughtful contemplation now? Does anyone truly believe that if President Cheney, even in his last days, wanted that money to go to Detroit, it would be there already?

It's starting to look like they'll treat GM and Chrysler like Lehman.

RstJ

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 12/14/2008

Its best to learn how to survive on the bear minimum, it will only get worst. Credit cards are next on the chopping block.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 12/14/2008

Being conservative with money is smart, but let's not lose our vision and American spirit. Americans can build a rip-roaring economy again (for someone other than the bailout recipients). We just need to hold President elect Obama, and our elected reps in Congress accountable for good decisions and vote out any who fail to deliver positive results. We also need to get the money out of elections and have only publicly funded elections so that the Congress is working for the average American again, and not the highest bidders.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 12/14/2008

"...so that the Congress is working for average American again...".

They're *OUR* lobbyists, dammit.

Most of them seem to have forgotten that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 12/14/2008

The GOP leadership are r@ping and pillaging EVERYONE funny they moved beyond the brown people to their own.

Crashing the economy, and grinning all the while.

Remember to the GOP a middle-class income is five million dollars.

If your not in that income bracket your not protected. Even if you are a republican. There's no loyalty among thieves I hear. The American people are the peasant class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 12/14/2008

The squabble over when the concessions will take effect seems a bit moot. GOP actually sank a bailout because the workers were being paid too much? That's insane. I'm starting to suspect that there will not be one thing that GOP will allow through congress without a fight and, as a result, we're not going to see much getting done. I also suspect that they will suddenly discover they have oversight responsibilities and scream and shout for an investigation everytime Obama leaves the toilet seat up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 12/14/2008

For the last 8 years Bush has proven more than once he is King Midas in reverse.
Why should this change in his last month ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 AM on 12/14/2008

Lol!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 12/14/2008
photo

It's called legacy.

Being labeled by his contemporaries and history as the one who let 3 million+ jobs go down the drain for reneging on a mere paltry 5% of the bailout sum given to the real thieves (700B to the REMFs) is not what he has in mind.

He can claim he doesn't care until he turns blue in the face (a pleasant prospect, no?) but in the end, EVERY President cares about his legacy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 12/15/2008

Corker/Shelby/Sessions/Vitter/Sanford are the same thing: Senators focusing on their patches of ground. It's easy to blame GWB, everybody else does...

They are not thinking of the nation nor the people. They'll feel good on the way home, but they'll all be greeted by scared and angry people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 AM on 12/14/2008

Oh, and Stabenow et al. aren't focusing on their patch of ground? Why is it commendable for them to blindly serve their constituents' interests? Michigan lawmakers for years resisted any kind of modernization, stonewalling against stricter gas mileage requirements, with the Big 3 screaming "It can't be done! We can't improve our gas mileage that quickly!" Well, the foreign automakers already had, and unlike the Big 3, they reward forward thinking and technological advances, and will be well-positioned when the Big 3 fold.

Have Detroit and Michigan lawmakers been thinking of the nation and the people for all these years?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 12/14/2008

the foreign automakers will not be well positioned when the big 3 collapse. all of the supply chains they rely on will collapse without the big 3's business. that points to the fundamental short sightedness of the senatorial republican position and the stakes here. that's why even dick cheney went up to capitol hill and invoked hoover's name. this isn't about rewarding a lack of ingenuity. it's about avoiding a very real and immediate catastrophe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 12/14/2008

Of course not and neither does the UAW. The UAW is a dinosaur , .
GM is TOO big to be viable and it is not right that a UAW retired person makes more money than a working stiff in other unions.
The truth is this , the auto companies gave the store away years back when they were making a lot of money and the UAW took it.
I work for an auto supplier and let me tell you, the big three are a disgrace, management AND labor. They are a lazy bunch that squeezes their suppliers and they themselves are totally inefficient. It is funny, when a guy is on welfare EVERYONE berates him, but when an union guy barely works and gets highly paid, he is an "American worker" that needs full protection. BS .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 12/14/2008
- lylo I'm a Fan of lylo permalink

You know what?
Good for them.
Good for the Rethugs who hate being in the Senate so much that they are willing to take out a huge chunk of the economy just to be sure that they are voted out.
I can't wait for Toyota to crumble and pull out of KY. Mitch is going to cry!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 12/14/2008
photo

You live in a delusion. The Big 3 are done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 AM on 12/14/2008

Nice to see someone else here who realizes that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 12/14/2008

I hope Tennessee's non-union auto workers "appreciate" what their junior Senator almost did TO them.

Traditionally, non-union wages and union wages tend to scale upward in tandem, so when Corker demands the UAW accept a pay cut, he's essentially guaranteeing that his non-union auto industry constituents would be receiving little or no pay raise next year either.

Be careful what you ask for, Senator, that blade cuts both ways.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 AM on 12/14/2008

Bush ruined everything? Duh! Where has this guy been the last eight years?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 AM on 12/14/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect