Top Evangelical Resigns After Backing Gay Marriage

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Top Evangelical Resigns After Backing Gay Marriage stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ERIC GORSKI | December 11, 2008 08:05 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

An outspoken and polarizing voice in conservative Christian politics resigned effective Thursday from the National Association of Evangelicals after a radio interview in which he voiced support for same-sex civil unions and said he is "shifting" on gay marriage.

The Rev. Richard Cizik's comments _ made on a Dec. 2 "Fresh Air" broadcast on National Public Radio _ triggered an uproar that led to his stepping down as NAE vice president of governmental affairs.

A fixture in Washington for nearly three decades, Cizik has played a key role in bringing evangelical Christian concerns to the political table. But in recent years, he earned enemies in the movement for pushing to broaden the evangelical agenda. His strongest focus was on "creation care," arguing that evangelicals have a biblical responsibility to the environment that includes combatting global warming.

The Rev. Leith Anderson, a Minneapolis-area pastor who serves as NAE president, said Thursday the group is not backing away from its environmental stances. Cizik's resignation was necessary, he said, because some of his answers in the radio interview did not reflect NAE values and convictions.

"Any organizations that speak to controversial issues are going to have critics," Anderson said. "What was different this time was our individuals and organizations felt there was a loss of credibility for him clearly espousing our positions and values. When you lose that, it's very difficult to re-establish."

Cizik did not immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday. The NAE said in a statement that Cizik had expressed regret, apologized and "affirmed our values."

The NAE is an umbrella group for tens of thousands of churches and organizations.

Anderson said a "combination of things" Cizik said in the interview led to his downfall, including this comment on gay marriage: "I'm shifting, I have to admit. In other words, I would willingly say I believe in civil unions. I don't officially support redefining marriage from its traditional definition, I don't think."

Story continues below
advertisement

Coming off the passage last month of amendments barring gay marriage in three states, some evangelicals took that as a slap in the face, said David Neff, editor of Christianity Today magazine and a member of the NAE executive committee.

"He seemed to be abandoning the one thing where evangelical activists felt they had actually made a difference this time around," Neff said.

Anderson said others were troubled that Cizik discussed nuclear weapons as a foreign-policy issue when he could have focused on religious freedom or human trafficking _ issues he has championed.

Still others were disappointed Cizik volunteered that he voted for Barack Obama in the Democratic primaries, Anderson said. Cizik also hinted that he voted for Obama in November.

"I don't want anybody to think, because I'm the lobbyist in chief for the National Association of Evangelicals, that because I voted one way or the other, I can't represent their concerns," Cizik said. "So, I believe I can. I happen to think in the primary it was the best choice. People disagreed."

Anderson said the problem wasn't necessarily that Cizik backed Obama, but that he answered the question at all as a representative of a group that remains neutral on candidates.

"He wishes he could do the interview again," Anderson said. "I wish he could do the interview again. As we discussed it, he realized how difficult this would be and resignation was probably best for him and NAE."

One of Cizik's fiercest critics has been Focus on the Family, the Colorado Springs, Colo.-based evangelical group founded by James Dobson. Last year, Dobson and other Christian conservatives unsuccessfully pressured the NAE to silence Cizik about global warming.

"It was time for him to go," Tom Minnery, a Focus on the Family senior vice president, said Thursday. "He no longer represents the view of evangelicalism. He has not represented those views for some time."

More tradition-minded evangelical activists believe an environmental focus distracts attention from abortion and gay marriage, or they don't believe in global warming or that human activity causes it.

___

On the Net:

http://www.nae.net

An outspoken and polarizing voice in conservative Christian politics resigned effective Thursday from the National Association of Evangelicals after a radio interview in which he voiced support for sa...
An outspoken and polarizing voice in conservative Christian politics resigned effective Thursday from the National Association of Evangelicals after a radio interview in which he voiced support for sa...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
219
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

There are 4,557 churches in California fighting Prop 8 in the supreme court. (California Council of Churches v. Mark D. Horton) I'm sure Cizik won't be abandoned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 01/10/2009

In a religion where lying is a sin, a man is punished for telling the truth. Speaks volumes for the NAE, I think.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 12/16/2008
- greysells2 I'm a Fan of greysells2 41 fans permalink
photo

Actually, I'm thinking some more as to how come clergy can access the non ecclesiastic component of marriage. When two people are married by clergy they get a twofer. 1] a marriage recognized by the state and 2] a marriage solemnized by a church. The clergyman has a license from the state to perform marriages and the marriage is "reported" to the state afterwords in a civil register of marriages. I think fees are payable. This was all done as a convenience as distances and isolation were great and clergy were respected pillars in the community. This approach blurs the separation of church and state but provided some order to this important function.

So following my plan, the clergy's role would revert to to the simpler and more clear - 2} a marriage solemnized by a church. The clergy get out of being a servant of the state and have the sole role of officiating in a marriage sanctioned by their church.

nota bene... A clergyman never officiates the ending of a marriage. The State does that. And common law marriages are neither sanctioned by a church or a state but are nonetheless legal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 12/13/2008
- greysells2 I'm a Fan of greysells2 41 fans permalink
photo

I assume all Evangelicals believe the God loves all people, straight and gay. So being on God's side and Him on ours, we need to find a solution that works which includes loving gays in the Christian Community. Try this one. There is only one kind of marriage that the State recognizes - [Civil] marriage by a justice of the peace. Everyone gets married that way. Everyone including all those that were previously married under the old rules. Remarriage could be an occasion of great rejoicing and renewal. My wife and I are up for it. And if would help solve this problem it is worth it.

Since we have separation of Church and State, churches are free to do what the want additionally including remarrying members in any manner they choose and within their own rules. The Constitution protects worship so no one could force a church to do anything it did not want to do. Individuals are free to participate in whatever ceromonies they want. some churches will want to marry gays. Some wont. So now what do we have? Everyone who wants to marry can do so. Those who want a [church] wedding in addition can do so. The State is out of churche business. And the churches are out of the States business. All marriages are equal. No one is harmed and no one is hurt. Sounds Christian to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 12/13/2008
photo

That sounds reasonable to me. My husband and I had a JP come over to out place in Boston to marry us. No religion was used, and that is how we wanted it.

Originally in Massachusetts, the Puritans had all marriages performed as civil marriages, and churches did not perform them. Rev. Peter Gomes of the Harvard Divinity school researched this, and I think it did help to make the distinction between the legal status and religious status while the gay marriage debate was fought in the Massachusetts legislature.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 12/13/2008
photo

The decision to resign must have been a heartfelt and soul searching one. My prayers go out to this courageous man.

I am sure he will find a welcoming new home in Christendom as the greater Church embraces a more inclusive biblical view of many of the issues that are dear to him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 12/13/2008
- joceeco I'm a Fan of joceeco 17 fans permalink
photo

Correction= Jesus would condemn Focus on the Family if He were alive!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 AM on 12/13/2008
- greysells2 I'm a Fan of greysells2 41 fans permalink
photo

I don't he would condemn but he might disagree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 12/13/2008
- joceeco I'm a Fan of joceeco 17 fans permalink
photo

Good for Cizik. he will see the benefits of leaving any group that is in play with "Focus on the Family." If Jesus were alive he would comdemn Focus on the Family and that hateful leader of theirs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 AM on 12/13/2008
- Rockwell I'm a Fan of Rockwell 65 fans permalink
photo

"Reverand Billy Bob! Reverand Billy Bob!"

"Slow down brother Cletus. What's happened?"

"I just heard Reverand Cizik on the Radio going all tree huggin and queer marrying and everything!!"

"Its too early for focus on the family."

"No No! He was on NPR"

"He's such a Jesus freak with his love your neighbor and love God's planet rubbish"

"indeed"

"Now take the paneling nails and shove them under your fingernails while reading aloud the complete published works of Pat Robertson.­"

"W-what?! Why?!"

"as punishment for listening to NPR"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 AM on 12/13/2008
- luvobama I'm a Fan of luvobama 246 fans permalink

What if everyone was just nice? Starting with me. Or you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 12/13/2008
- Rockwell I'm a Fan of Rockwell 65 fans permalink
photo

Um, ok. I give. What would happen if everyone was nice?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 AM on 12/13/2008

I applaud this man's courage because these people are like a pack of wolves when you don't fall in line.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 12/13/2008

Too little. Too late.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 AM on 12/13/2008
- MaybeMilo I'm a Fan of MaybeMilo 40 fans permalink
photo

These guys eat their young.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 12/12/2008

But who do their young eat?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 AM on 12/13/2008
- HHarvey I'm a Fan of HHarvey 28 fans permalink
photo

AHhhhh... yet again we hear from the "Focus on the Family" cult. I've never seen a group of individuals so completely brainwashed. "Think like we do or your out!" This organization started out with a simple premise of family values that has now escalated into a full fledged christian militia. If anyone needs to go Mr. Dobson it's you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 12/12/2008
- WolfLady I'm a Fan of WolfLady 21 fans permalink
photo

One tiny word of common decency, and the fundie hyena pack turns on their own, snarling and snapping and ripping out throats.

How unsurprising.

~WolfLady~

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 PM on 12/12/2008
- Taan I'm a Fan of Taan 7 fans permalink

People who maintain they are Christians seem to have the greatest difficulty with the three simple admonitions of their religious text: Love thy neighbor. Do unto others. And judge not. The last one appears to be their biggest hurdle. Nowhere in the bible do we find what today we consider the traditional nuclear family. Today's heterosexual marriage is facing over 50% chance of survival . The offshoots of which fill our jails and prisons; fill court dockets with battered and abused wives and children; people foster homes with rejects; and produce the matrix for society's ills. Their homophobia is channeled through legal venues in elections to register their disdain for gays and gay marriage. The latter have no impact whatsoever on straight families. It simply involves a county clerk issuing a piece of paper. This matter does not concern school children or their curriculum. The whole objection by the right is made of cheesecloth and bears no relation to reality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 12/12/2008
- slaxx I'm a Fan of slaxx 37 fans permalink
photo

good post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 AM on 12/13/2008
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 72 fans permalink

And here on this section we have an advertisement recommending to us,"Show your Love & Pride".

Not possible with new laws. We are outlaws...­..........­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 12/12/2008
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 72 fans permalink

Like they say, "He no longer represents the view of evangelica­lism." He doesn't hate enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 12/12/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect