Arne Duncan: Obama's Education Secretary

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Arne Duncan: Obama's Education Secretary stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Associated Press | 12/16/08 05:32 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Education Secretary-designate Arne Duncan smiles as President-elect Barack Obama make the announcement, Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2008, at the Dodge Renaissance Academy in Chicago. (AP Photo)

CHICAGO — President-elect Barack Obama announced Arne Duncan, the head of the Chicago school system, as education secretary Tuesday and declared that failing to improve classroom instruction is "morally unacceptable for our children."

"When it comes to school reform, Arne is the most hands-on of hands-on practitioners," Obama said, making the announcement at a school that he said has made remarkable progress under Duncan's leadership.

"He's not beholden to any one ideology, and he's worked tirelessly to improve teacher quality," Obama said.

Duncan stood nearby, the latest member to be named to the Cabinet of the president-elect. His appointment is subject to Senate confirmation.

"No issue is more pressing than education. ... It is the civil rights issue of our generation," Duncan said in brief remarks.

Obama combined his announcement with a brief news conference in which he refused to say whether he supports the idea of a special election to fill the Senate seat he recently vacated.

Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich has the power to make the appointment, but he was arrested last week and charged with, in effect, trying to enrich himself by appointing a new senator who could help him financially or politically.

Some Democrats have called for a special election, while others prefer to wait for Blagojevich to resign, a step that would allow Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn to appoint a new senator. The second alternative would ensure the seat remains in Democratic hands, and on a faster timetable than a special election would allow.

Story continues below
advertisement

Obama cut off a reporter who sought to ask a question about Rep. Rahm Emanuel, the incoming White House chief of staff, who was reportedly heard on a federal wiretap talking with an aide to Blagojevich about potential Senate replacements. The president-elect said he has not been able to confirm that is the case.

Neither Obama nor Emanuel has been accused of any wrongdoing, and the president-elect has said he will make the results of an internal investigation into the matter public soon.

The appointment of Duncan left a handful of Cabinet appointments yet to be made public, and in response to a question, Obama hinted broadly a Republican would be among them.

The posts yet to be filled include secretaries for the departments of Labor, Transportation, Agriculture and Interior, where officials have said Democratic Sen. Ken Salazar of Colorado has been tapped. Nor has Obama named leaders for the intelligence agencies, or a trade representative.

So far, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a holdover from the Bush administration, is the only Republican member of the incoming Cabinet.

On the economy, the president-elect said the Federal Reserve was "running out of ammunition" in terms of lowering interest rates to combat the recession. He said it was "absolutely critical" that his economic recovery program be put into place to deal with what he called the toughest time economically since the Great Depression.

The Fed was expected to announce the latest in a series of rate cuts later in the day.

Obama spoke of Duncan in glowing terms _ and joked that his longtime friend, a former professional basketball player in Australia, had the superior jump shot.

"In just seven years, he's boosted elementary test scores here in Chicago from 38 percent of students meeting the standards to 67 percent. The dropout rate has gone down every year he's been in charge."

On a key standardized test, Obama said, "the gains of Chicago students have been twice as big as those for students in the rest of the state."

Duncan would take over a sprawling department that has focused during the Bush administration in winning passage and then implementing the president's signature No Child Left Behind education program.

That effort has proven controversial, with supporters saying it is making progress in improving student skills, while local officials complain it focuses too much attention on standardized tests.

Obama said it was time for Washington to move beyond "tired debates" such as whether to approve the use of vouchers for students to attend private schools.

"We cannot continue on like this. It is morally unacceptable for our children and economically untenable for America," said the president-elect.

Duncan has run the country's third-biggest school district since 2001, pushing to boost teacher quality and to improve struggling schools and closing those that fail.

The news conference took place at the Dodge Renaissance Academy on Chicago's West Side, a facility that Duncan shut down and then reopened. Obama and Duncan visited the school together in 2005.

A 44-year-old Harvard graduate, Duncan has played pickup basketball with Obama since the 1990s. Duncan co-captained the Harvard basketball team and played professionally in Australia before beginning his education career.

He ran a nonprofit education organization on Chicago's South Side before going to work in Chicago schools under former superintendent Paul Vallas, now the New Orleans schools chief.

Duncan's nomination will please reform advocates who wanted a big-city schools chief who has sought to hold schools and teachers accountable for student performance; they had backed Duncan or New York's Joel Klein.

These advocates have squared off against teachers' unions in a contentious debate among Democrats over whom Obama should choose. Unions, an influential segment of the party base, wanted a strong advocate for their members such as Obama adviser Linda Darling-Hammond, a Stanford University education professor.

Yet Duncan's nomination may please the unions, who have said Duncan seems willing to work with them.

"Arne Duncan actually reaches out and tries to do things in a collaborative way," Randi Weingarten, head of the 1.4 million-member American Federation of Teachers, said in an interview earlier this month.

Obama managed during his campaign to avoid taking sides in the debate, which centers on accountability and the fate of President George W. Bush's No Child Left Behind law. Duncan also has tried to appeal to both factions; he signed competing manifestos from each side earlier this year.

CHICAGO — President-elect Barack Obama announced Arne Duncan, the head of the Chicago school system, as education secretary Tuesday and declared that failing to improve classroom instruction is ...
CHICAGO — President-elect Barack Obama announced Arne Duncan, the head of the Chicago school system, as education secretary Tuesday and declared that failing to improve classroom instruction is ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
623
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)

I'm not happy with "More of the same" All this testing and privatization is BAD. I was hoping for Linda Darling-Hammond. She would have gotten us back on the right track. Stop spending money on testing and put the money into education.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 12/24/2008
photo

I like this article the most...

http://www.truthout.org/121708R

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 12/17/2008
photo

Here is a link to a great article on the success of the Chicago Charter schools under Duncan with numbers instead of all the the subjective opinions I see on this blog. It is quite a success story if you look at Chicago Charter schools compared to Chicago district schools.

http://www.ppionline.org/documents/chicagocharter_0601.pdf

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 AM on 12/17/2008
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 AM on 12/17/2008

Thank you for the subjective PDF infomercial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 12/17/2008

Infomercial is exactly what it should be called. It does not report on all the failures, the high turnover rates etc. Again, you must be careful and consider who wrote/created the site. It was created as a promotional tool so of course it makes the Charter School in Chicago look like the greatest thing since sliced bread.

Perhaps the Senate confirmation hearing will look very deeply into this appointment and perhaps they will simply pass it. In the immediate future, for those of us in the trenches in Chicago maybe this will be a good thing. Time will tell the true story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 12/17/2008

There are many problems in the Chicago Public School under the leadership of Arne Duncan and Rufus Williams, formerly under Michael Scott and ultimately under Mayor Richard Daley.

The Board has disassembled the early childhood education programs so that only tuition based preschools, which cost about $200/week, offer full day programs. Even Headstart programs have been affected.

There is a significant disparity in curriculum, facilities and programs along selective admission school/ neighborhood school lines, also in funding new and renovateing facilities along racial and socio-economic lines.

Not all selective admission schools are created "equal", compare the funding and programs of Northside College Prep and Walter College Prep to that of King College Prep and Brooks College prep. The former located north in the city in predominately white communities, the latter located south in the city in predominately black communities.

Any and all new construction of schools has occurred in areas of the city enjoying non-black gentrification population growth.

Many schools don't have enough books or desks for each student. Often the books that are available are outdated.

Students with special needs are often poorly served as teachers and administrators ignore and disregard IEP/504 plans.

The Board has ignored the very sobering college graduation rates of CPS students.
Obama, Duncan and Daley are all recipients of prestigious private elementary and secondary education. They benefited for the "not so secret" of educational success.
Could this be why the Obama, Duncan and Daley children have not attended CPS?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 12/17/2008
- PR1 I'm a Fan of PR1 permalink

SPELLINGS FRAUD: Senators and Congress initiate fraud inquiry as Spellings rushes to leave Washington.
FOR RELEASE:

The Margaret Spellings' regime will soon be under investigation by Congress due to Spellings' involvement in the induced fraud by Western Seminary and collusion with its accreditation agencies, the Association of Theological Schools (ATS) and the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU). A key Senator has begun the process to instigate an inquiry and is anticipated to coordinate efforts with another Senator and house members.

It appears Spellings is rushing to leave Washington before her mess blows up even further.

Department destroys evidence.

On October 30th and November 4th two lawsuits were filed and served against Margaret Spellings and the Department of Education over their cover up of academic fraud and collusion with ATS and NWCCU.

A third lawsuit will be served on Spellings and others over their concealment and/or destruction of evidences to aid and abet Western, ATS, and NWCCU as well as further allegations of misconduct and intentional misrepresentation. Spellings' administration is using taxpayers' dollars to help special interest accreditation agencies who in turned helped the school to harm the student, Randy Chapel, and his family. School is using various law firms and insurance money to deal with their mess.

Arne has been advised, read more at www.educationalfraud.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 12/16/2008

I eagerly await hearing from our new Secretary of Education. But I am not optimistic that he will be any more insightful or effective than those who've preceded him. I fear that he, like other establishment education leaders, will fail to acknowledge the proverbial elephant in the room: the model of secondary school education that continues to persist in this country (and which increasingly is permeating down to the elementary level) is, as Bill Gates has correctly stated, "obsolete."

We must acknowledge the huge, increasing disconnect that exists between this outdated secondary school model, to which even the best public and private schools cling, and the realities of today’s world. The future of our children – and our nation – depends on the introduction of a genuinely new education model, designed in and fit for the 21st century.

By many measures much of the rest of the industrialized world has caught or passed by us in secondary education. The good news, however, is that those who are beating us in the education race are doing so with the same old 20th century model we use. So, if we act now to take the initiative to create a new, 21st century secondary school model, then our high school graduates can once again become the best educated in the world. President Obama and Secretary Duncan must move us beyond our myopic focus on attempting to fix that which clearly needs replacing.

Alan Shusterman, Founder
School for Tomorrow
www.schoolfortomorrow.net

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 12/16/2008
- pvo I'm a Fan of pvo permalink
photo

American Federation of Teachers (members include Frank McCourt, Einstein) had just released a statement today (see link below) in support of Obama's Choice.

http://aft.org/presscenter/releases/2008/121608.htm

It's not that simple to pinpoint the reasons why schools are failing. Even though what individual parents, and students do on a daily basis (along with underpaid, inspiring, idealistic teachers ) account for the majority of the the schools' success, there are lots of room for improvement for some other educators, thus the necessary school reform....

Another sad fact is that the educational system in the US is pretty unimpressive compared to many much poorer countries (with much less technological resources/­advances). Once upon a time, the excuse was: "The US is the only country in the world that offers comprehensive, compulsory education to everyone under 18". That argument is no longer valid....It's probably worthwhile to take an honest, hard look at ALL stakeholders (teachers, parents, students) AND the political, socio-economical circumstances they are surrounded and brought up with. Not a simple thing to solve with the incredibly heterogeneous tapestry of a land called America.

Let's see what the results will be before judging the choice Obama made. The problems with our educational system are actually far older and more complex than the wars in the Middle East.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

Too bad that will take some of the wind out of the sales of the naysayer knowitalls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

Sorry for they typo "sails" of course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 12/16/2008

That does not take the wind out. It is the type of politically correct statement that is expected from what is a political organization.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 12/16/2008

The mis-education of the children of Chicago and the United States.

I want you to understand one irrefutable fact. Arne and Barack know what works in educating children-the very attributes found at the private schools they attended and their children attend. If you decrease class size, give teachers and staff the resources and tools they need to work with, provide consistent ancillary services in the form of counseling, social work and school nursing. Provide school environments that are clean, safe and comfortable the children and employees will have a positive attitude and gladly attend.


Instead, Arne ran schools that had gross overcrowding, teachers who had no access to basic educational tools like textbooks, copying, computers. The school buildings are often nasty, bathrooms have no toilet paper or soap, the walls are crumbling and much worse. Of course this happens more so in the minority/lower socio-economic communities. What once was the greatest Early Childhood program in the nation is now the biggest joke (oh yeah, it is run-down by Valerie Jarret’s mother). There are not enough social workers and school nurses to provide appropriate services. There has been a marked increase in the dropout rates, increase in teen pregnancy and spread of sexually transmitted disease. The children are taught the test but not how to think.

And in the words of Barack, “We are putting together one of the best basketball playing cabinets ever.”

Priorities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

It's all socioeconomic and you know it. In affluent communities public schools are good and in poor areas they are bad. It does not have to do with how much money is even spent on schools it has more to do with the income of the parents.

Throwing money at schools has just not worked. DC schools spend almost as much as any school district in the country but they still have some of the worse schools.

Obama and Duncan should look at the model Ireland used to increase education from the early grades up to secondary school.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 12/16/2008
- stell I'm a Fan of stell 20 fans permalink

No, it's a white vs. non-white thing. It's social. White parents don't want their kids living around blacks or going to school with them. The economic argument is a scapegoat. Poverty is a form of violence. In the last forty-five years when blacks were formally allowed civil rights, the schools haven't been adequate, so when was this magical time Obama says that we need to return to. When did D.C. for example ever have a school system that served blacks. IT'S NOT A COINCIDENCE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 12/16/2008

Enlighten me, does Ireland has a documented history of race based educational and economic discrimination? I am sure that the educational system there has many fine points but we have to remember that the goal of public education in the US was not to expand the options of the poor and working class to include those enjoyed by the elite, but to train workers from an agricultural economy to an industrial one.

I agree that throwing money is not the answer, but affirm that applying the same effective measures from the private schools attended by Duncan ( University of Chicago Laboratory School) and Obama (Panohou School, Honolulu) would suffice.

I suspect that the policies and practices employed by these institutions mirror those of the employed in the 16 or 30 OECD nations that bested our students in science and the 23 of 30 nations who bested our average 15 year old's math score.

Our nation is in trouble and a major facet of the problem is the lack of quality education on a national level. It has to be addressed by serious people prepared to take serious action. Tnere is nothing in Duncan's resume to suggest that he is that person.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 12/17/2008
- stell I'm a Fan of stell 20 fans permalink

Priorities is right. I maintain that they know what needs to be done, so it isn't a question of ability, it's one of will. How will we fund it? Where there is a will and a true recognition of need, there is a way. The system is self-destructive. Is it a coincidence that those that are served worst by their education system are black? I don't think so. It is by design.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 12/16/2008

In Chicago we call it the mis-education of black children, especially black males. And Arne Duncan has led the charge for the last 7 years and will now run the nation into the same mis-education.

They know what works but will not implement it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 12/16/2008
- stell I'm a Fan of stell 20 fans permalink

If the per pupil cost is the same or higher for a public school student as opposed to a private school student, then why don't we bulldoze all of the public schools, and put everyone in private schools? They could even get government grants to expand their campuses.

Answer: They school system is the way it is by design. There is the ability to make it world class, but there is a lack of will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 12/16/2008
- stell I'm a Fan of stell 20 fans permalink

What's lacking isn't the ability to make every school world-class, it's the will.

That can be fixed by incentivizing everything. Recruit current heads of private schools, and the top college graduates nationwide by quadrupling their pay through incentives, and doing the same with teachers. The common thread is you increase base pay and make the incentives very worthwhile.

If education is as important as Obama says it is, there will be no problem finding the money for this alongside the few trillion that was found in the couch to bailout billion dollar companies that know better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 12/16/2008

While I like the idea of more pay, I have to caution you that your idea is full of cr@p.

Everything has an effect on student scores; teacher training, teacher ability, class size, student intelligence, etc. Improvements in any of these have an effect on the outcome, on test scores and grades. A point here, a point there, it's all good. That's what we work for.

But the key difference, the limiting factor, the bottleneck, is the student (whether you call it attitude or effort). It swamps every other consideration.

Students range from hostile to uncooperative to apathetic to engaged to over-achieving. At the one extreme, students ditch and antagonize and disrupt and refuse to cooperate; they usually drop out, or keep going with a lot of failure. At the other extreme, they fight for every grade, attend every class, turn in every assignment, and go to college.

It barely matters which exact teachers they had. They determine their outcome.

Some teachers can turn around kids headed for failure, or at least some of them. Unfortunately, there is no sure method for achieving this. It's human to human, one at a time. High expectations and kind words have no impact on some students.

The quality of teachers makes a difference, absolutely. But the intent and attitude and behavior of the student is far more significant to their success or failure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 12/16/2008
- stell I'm a Fan of stell 20 fans permalink

With all due respect that sounds like a cop-out. Students have a variety of different maladies, such as ADHD, etc. That shouldn't be an excuse to just give up. Your critique borders on a thinly-veiled shot at what are euphemistically called "inner city" kids, or "the "socio-economically disadvantaged". If what you're implying is that those kids are not intelligent, or smart, that's all the more reason to get them the most help possible.

So what do you suggest be done about "those" kids?

Reform school?

Wendy Kopp of Teach for America has said that it isn't about the single parent homes either. Student's don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care. Every person, every student has a talent. I would support the increase of job corps programs. There are

If the country would neglect Hurricane Katrina, why wouldn't they neglect Hurricane Katrina's kids? If a person even treat you right, why would they teach you right?

A poison creates it's own antidote. The seeds of the destruction of system of White Supremacy are sown in it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 12/16/2008
- stell I'm a Fan of stell 20 fans permalink

If private schools are so superior, and we have Wharton and Harvard Business School, and UIC, why is the country's economy in the shape it's in? Why have we been talking about the same problems with education for decade after decade, while the system perpetuates itself?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 PM on 12/16/2008

for superkollider:

[I may be double-posting, but I think the original disappeared...]

"In Arizona, supporters of public charter schools will be disappointed with the latest standardized test results reports the The Arizona Republic. AIMS scores for sophomores at charter schools continue to lag dramatically behind their counterparts in district schools.

Test results released this week by the state showed that just 36 percent of charter-school sophomores passed math on the Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards test, compared with 73 percent at traditional schools. About half of the charter-school sophomores passed reading and writing vs. 77 percent at district schools."

These were the results at the end of the first decade of charter schools in Arizona, in 2005. The last couple of years have been the same (though I can't find the original sources right this minute).

Charters are supposed to allow for innovative, creative teaching that public school teachers don't do, and prove how lost the public schools are.

Didn't turn out that way, did it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

What does that have to do with drastically increasing graduation rates?

You don't account that many charter schools are in troubled areas and I don't see you list district schools in the same areas for comparison. Most likely you are comparing all schools including suburban districts and not comparing inner city district to inner city charter schools comparison.

Where is the link so I can see all the data?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 PM on 12/16/2008

"What does that have to do with drastically increasing graduation rates?"

The graduation rates you listed included public schools! It proves nothing positive about charters. You need disaggregated numbers to make any claim either direction. (But since the number of public school students is much greater than the number of charter school kids, you can be certain that most of that gain was in the public schools.)

The standardized test numbers I gave you are for all public schools (rich and poor) compared to all charter schools (rich and poor).

Here's the link:
http://educationwonk.blogspot.com/2005/07/public-charter-schools-disappointment.html

The defenders of charters always claim that the disparity in scores between schools is due to teachers, not SES. That is one of the main bits of "proof" for the "failure" of public schools. But as soon as they have charters in inner cities they acknowledge what everyone already knew: inner city kids don't achieve as high, on the average.

You can't have it both ways.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 12/16/2008

"Based on real statistics not your anecdotal evidence AZ went from a graduation rate of 59.3% in 1996 to 77.6% so obviously charter schools led to some of that improvement no matter what your opinion is."

Those statistics include the public schools, which have far more students than the charters. It does not disaggregate the data, so any inference you make is unsupported. And almost certainly wrong.

Here are some more concrete charter statistics:

"In Arizona, supporters of public charter schools will be disappointed with the latest standardized test results reports the The Arizona Republic:

AIMS scores for sophomores at charter schools continue to lag dramatically behind their counterparts in district schools.

Test results released this week by the state showed that just 36 percent of charter-school sophomores passed math on the Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards test, compared with 73 percent at traditional schools. About half of the charter-school sophomores passed reading and writing vs. 77 percent at district schools."

It doesn't look good for charters, and they've been given a good chance. Lots of money for many years.

BTW: KQSK, this is a conversation, not a competition. Trash-talking is juvenile and counterproductive. If you insist on engaging in it, make sure you have come better prepared.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 12/16/2008
- WildBill I'm a Fan of WildBill 4 fans permalink

Ask Mr. Obama if he sent his two daughters to CPS schools.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 12/16/2008

He didn't. CPS schools were in such horrible shape it's going to take a long time to reform them. Same as most of the rest of the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 12/16/2008

If the schools are not good enough for his kids, what has Mr. Duncan accomplished in Chicago?

Do we want to have the nation enjoy the high school graduation rate? The hugh per child expenditure, perhaps the need to pay children to perform in school?

I don't get it, where is the change and fresh thinking?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 12/16/2008

And the public school where Arne sent his children had an extra classroom aid paid by private donations. Wouldn’t that be great if every school could do that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

This is always a foolish argument because anyone who can afford it usually sends their kids to private schools because they are better. Add the fact that Obama was always in office when his daughters were school age and it's also a security issue for politicians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 12/16/2008


I am the product of Chicago Public Schools (CPS) and went to high school with Michelle Obama. I have worked for Chicago Public Schools since that time. I have survived many superintendents, chief officers or what ever you call the person in the leadership position at CPS.

The appointment of Arne Duncan to the role of Secretary of Education is a huge mistake. Mr. Duncan does not have the credentials, the experience, or the knowledge base to run CPS and definitely not the nations education system.

Let us first consider his credentials, history and experience:

Did not attend CPS; attended private schools
Bacholors Degree in Sociology
Profession­-basketbal­l player and playmate of Barack
Has never taught a class, grade school, high school or college. He tutored at an after school program with his mother.

What he did have was a lineage that provided him with a silver spoon and placed him in a position to receive patronage positions.

I encourage everyone to do his or her own research and please DO NOT BELIEVE THE HYPE. The media reports are skewed and create a rose colored picture of Arne’s accomplishments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 12/16/2008

While feedback from someone who works in CPS is appreciated, it seems pretty dishonest to list his profession as "basketball player" when he did that from 1987 to 1991, then worked in education since 1992. While his connections certainly helped him get the job (as they always do), he certainly seems to have enough experience to dismiss the idea that his selection was nothing more than patronage.

As I pointed out earlier today, while teaching experience would be nice for an education secretary, out of the last eight to hold that position only three have worked as teachers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 12/16/2008
- pupbayer I'm a Fan of pupbayer 23 fans permalink

Richard Daley appointed him. 'nuff said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 12/16/2008
photo

I guess you don't include that he was CEO of the 3rd largest school system in the country for 7 years with mostly positive results. This is the type of pick that so many people were pining for an Obama guy, who is not a Washington insider and has new ideas.

Some people are never happy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 PM on 12/16/2008

Basket player is listed as his profession. I am not making that up. As for his education experience, he tutored after school.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 12/16/2008

Again, don't believe the hype. All that is glitters is not golden. Check into the real statistics; the media and CPS are not telling the entire story and both are known to cook the books.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 12/16/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect