Obama Media Strategy Insight: Ignore The Page, Politico

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Media Strategy Insight: Ignore The Page, Politico stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 12-18-08 11:10 AM   |   Updated: 01-18-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Gibbs Media

So, the paragraph that everyone's dining out on from this weekend's coming New York Times Magazine profile of President-elect Obama's communications guru Robert Gibbs appears to be this one:

The paradox of this scene was that the Obama campaign's communications strategy was predicated in part on an aggressive indifference to this insider set. Staff members were encouraged to ignore new Web sites like The Page, written by Time's Mark Halperin, and Politico, both of which had gained instant cachet among the Washington smarty-pants set. "If Politico and Halperin say we're winning, we're losing," Obama's campaign manager, David Plouffe, would repeat mantralike around headquarters.

Now, look. I think you're really kidding yourself if you think the Obama campaign straight-up ignored the Politico. I'm quite sure they were dutifully fed the Obama camp's talking points on a regular basis. Nevertheless, the statement "If Politico and Halperin say we're winning, we're losing" is not entirely hyperbolic.

Some examples? Roger Simon's repeated, dubious defenses of Sarah Palin's debate performances come to mind as precisely the sort of content that caused the Obama campaign precisely zero concern. Simon penned a addlepated valentine to Palin's debating that basically boiled down to: "By not soiling herself onstage, Palin was the big winner." He followed it up with similarly goopy, out-of-the-loop defenses on TV, such as this exchange with Chris Matthews:

MATTHEWS: Here she is, Governor Palin, on the office of the vice presidency. Here she is.


(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GOV. SARAH PALIN (R-AK), VICE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE: Of course, we know what a vice president does. And that's not only to preside over the Senate and will take that position very seriously also. I'm thankful the Constitution would allow a bit more authority given to the vice president if that vice president so chose to exert it in working with the Senate and making sure that we are supportive of the president's policies and making sure too that our president understands what our strengths are.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: OK. I want to know what you both think about what 00 I mean, I thought for a moment I was hearing "precious bodily fluids" there.

(LAUGHTER)

Story continues below
advertisement

MATTHEWS: All of a sudden, a candidate -- a candidate for president -- vice president of the United States is talking about a new expansive role for the vice presidency in presiding over the Senate.

Roger, you have been defending her performance tonight. Explain what she is up to here.

SIMON: You know, that was like the 86th minute of the debate or something.

MATTHEWS: Yes. I was paying attention.

SIMON: Yes. Was America?

Ha ha. As it turns out, America was paying attention, silly goose! The debate had been billed as THE geek show of the political season, after all! Polls conducted by CBS and CNN after the debate declared Biden the decisive, double-digit winner, and, at her next opportunity, comedienne Tina Fey leveled Palin's performance by putting all the things that Simon missed in his analysis (especially Palin's strategy of answering questions with answers that did not in any way relate to the question) on high-contrast display. Americans paid attention to that, too! What Americans managed to reject in large numbers was the notion that Palin's debate performance elevated her, or her ticket, in any meaningful way.

Of course, that the Obama camp ignored "The Page" makes even more sense, because The Page is just an incoherently written website geared towards tricking people into making as many ad-revenue-generating clicks as possible. But, specific to the matter of "if they say we're winning, we're losing," I recall noting a well-documented example of this phenomenon. In a week where John McCain said multiple conflicting things on the state of the economy, got slagged by a slew of prominent conservatives for selecting Palin, complained about the rough treatment he received on The View, had one surrogate banished for suggesting that he lacked the acumen to run a corporation, had another surrogate make a perplexing statement about how the candidate had invented the Blackberry, and topped it all off by picking a bizarre fight with Spain, Mark Halperin declared in the biggest and most colorful fonts he could muster that "McCain Wins The Week."

So, yeah. I'd totally put The Page on fade, too. And now that the election is over, I'd wager that most people are following this aspect of Robert Gibbs' media strategy.

So, the paragraph that everyone's dining out on from this weekend's coming New York Times Magazine profile of President-elect Obama's communications guru Robert Gibbs appears to be this one: The para...
So, the paragraph that everyone's dining out on from this weekend's coming New York Times Magazine profile of President-elect Obama's communications guru Robert Gibbs appears to be this one: The para...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
103
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

Time is a pretentious supermarket tabloid.

Politico is a mindless right wing tool.

Other than that, they are OK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 12/21/2008

I can't stand Politico and Halperin. They're worse than Fox News if you ask me.

Gibbs is the man.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 12/20/2008
- 1murillo I'm a Fan of 1murillo 24 fans permalink

El Politico - just as McClatchy - is extremely easy to link to. The site is consistently right(wing) yet it's made its way onto MSNBC, HuPo, Yahoo and other common sites.

To have a story about "ignore Politico" is perfect for Politico. Politico can proudly stand with the FoxN, WashTimes and others by pointing to their importance and respect ("the Obama team dislikes us so you know we're righteous conservatives."

At the same time, Politico can only be helped with the free advertising it gets by these stories.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 12/19/2008

Just to give credit where credit is due, didn't Politico break the Palin $150,000 wardrobe story?

Maybe it's a case of even a blind squirrel finding a nut once in a while, but I get the impression that if Politico had thought the story would go viral like it did, they might have passed on it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 12/19/2008
- DMHendrix I'm a Fan of DMHendrix 93 fans permalink
photo

well, Jean Cummings did and she's a contributor to Politico in addition to other things. She's not really one of the tabloid guys like Smith, Martin & Simon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 12/20/2008
- boston2008 I'm a Fan of boston2008 4 fans permalink
photo

THE PAGE: "The Media gave Obama a pass and didn't criticized him" POLITICO: "...Obama rather go work out then go to CHURCH!!!...." = AN EXTENSION OF FOX NEWS... FOX NEWS WANNA B'S!!! LOL.. POLITICO is trying to proove that they're not in the tank for obama so they go out of their way to smear him.. lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 12/19/2008

The Politico in particular is a horrible little site.

It sucks in readers w/ a faux sense of professionalism in its layout and it's writers apparent access to info -- but it's all filtered thru a strong right wing bias in its choice of "stories" (Obama Doesn't Go to Church Every Sunday!), it's illogic (Obama Must Have Known Everything Rev. Wright Said Even Tho He Didn't Actually Go to Services!), & utter pandering to their old bosses, Republicans like McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 12/19/2008

And I'd add the Daily Kos to that list -- hysterics abound there, across the board.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 12/19/2008

and MSNBC for that matter

"I am so going to write a nasty blog p[ost about you" -- Comic book Guy

http://loomisnews.wordpress.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 12/19/2008
- robeson I'm a Fan of robeson 24 fans permalink
photo

Obama Media Strategy Insight: Ignore The Page, Politico, Fox

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 12/19/2008
- Territc I'm a Fan of Territc 2 fans permalink

Yup. Ignore them!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 AM on 12/19/2008
- Savanna I'm a Fan of Savanna 30 fans permalink

Yes, if they were right John McCain would be President. It was amazing during the election that in their poll Obama was ALWAYS losing. It was always a mystery how that happened.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 12/19/2008
- snruB I'm a Fan of snruB 5 fans permalink
photo

LOL

Mark Halprin is an assclown

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 AM on 12/19/2008
- majorteddy I'm a Fan of majorteddy 7 fans permalink

I second that motion. In the week that John McCain made the statement about the fundamentals of the economy being strong and self destructed in a dozen other ways Mark Halperin said that he won the week over Obama. HUH !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 AM on 12/19/2008
- DMHendrix I'm a Fan of DMHendrix 93 fans permalink
photo

Mark Halperin is like the Eddie Haskell of "faux" news. I agree with Gibby...whatever he says, believe the opposite. Plus, his voice is like nails on a chalkboard.

The Politico is the National Enquirer of the political scene...except the actual N.E. is more reliable. Ben Smith, Jonathan Martin (Karl Rove's fanclub President) and Roger Simon are sensationalists, not journalists. I can't figure out why on earth MSNBC (Matthews particularly) gives them so much face time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 AM on 12/19/2008

We wouldn't want to insult the National Enquirer - LMAO! Mark Halperin and the Politico crew are neocon tools who deserve to be ignored indefinitely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 AM on 12/19/2008
photo

Why would you insult the Enquirer that way?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 AM on 12/21/2008
- truelie I'm a Fan of truelie 8 fans permalink

I remember Halperin and the fools at Politico insisting that Obama can't win "big states, working White, Latino etc... thus he can't win the general election". Look who the Prez-elect is, fools! He not only won Ohio and PA, he won IN, NC, and VA and FL. Did he need to win Kentuckcy and WVA's working White to win the GE? Idiots! They were saying 95% White Iowans were not "working White". They were White and working but they were not from Ohio and PA, thus not qualified? What idiots! They obviously got stuck on stupid. We all should leave them there. Who's the President-elect again?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 12/18/2008
- neesy08 I'm a Fan of neesy08 18 fans permalink
photo

For those of you who hate Politico, why? I know republicans who hate Politico, as they think it is too left leaning. What part of the Blog do you read? They have a little bit of everything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 12/18/2008

I don't "hate" politico, I just think it's annoying and a lot of the blogerss are a waste of time.....all inuendo, "unnamed sources" , analysis that is more often very much off the mark. Like another poster says, often comprised of what the certain poster is thinking that day. They do have merit in getting some info fast, but I don't know who told them they could do analysis. "Obama Church Watch", etc....kind of getting beltway Perez Hilton-y. Heh, I remember reading from Ana Marie Cox recently "I don't believe anything politico says", which is true for me to some extent....I think they are the beltway town gossips. But again, some gossip is good. I just read the bloggers "posts" for the day (all of them basically echoeing what the other says on a particular story, though they do publish some disagreements) and the "analysis" , which is often dreadful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 12/18/2008

When a republican complains that something is "left leaning" that can mean either the website hasn't committed hardcore to being decisively biased (like free republic or druge.) or that there are reliable unbiased reporters and they are trying to pressure the editors to make them go center-right in their reporting. In the case of politico, its the former.

One example is before the Dem convention, Politico featured big stories hyping the fact that Obama hadn't broken 50%, and hammed up suggestions that he hadn't "closed the deal". These stories were shown all over the other blogs, even on this one. After Obama broke 50%, Politico ceased ALL poll stories. After polls showed Palin dragging down McCain, they did no poll stories. After polls showed a major electoral blowout brewing, again, they did no poll stories, or even made any mention. In fact they did no poll stories AT ALL up until the election. The only polls they even mentioned (sporadically at that) were county specific, in very few key states. They did however feature stories about ACORN voter fraud and the infamous "Bradley effect". Most of their stories tend to take cheap shots at Obama's team or congressional Dems. Not a place breaming with journalistic integrity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 AM on 12/19/2008
- mocha59 I'm a Fan of mocha59 23 fans permalink
photo

Sounds like fixed news to me!!!! Well said!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 12/19/2008

I agree with every word InspiredByTruth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 12/20/2008
photo

Give me a break. Politico is the Internet's version of Fixed News. They have maybe one person on staff who might slightly lean to the left. The rest of their reporting is like Fixed news, based on lies, rumors and innuendo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 12/19/2008
- nellie I'm a Fan of nellie 491 fans permalink
photo

Jaw Jaw Jaw and Spin Spin Spin.

That about covers it. If you want opinion, read the editorial page of a newspaper or buy a magazine. Or talk to a neighbor. At least you'll get a little depth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 12/19/2008
- DMHendrix I'm a Fan of DMHendrix 93 fans permalink
photo

Mainly because they suck really really bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 AM on 12/19/2008

oh yeah, remember another article from Politico that was complete garbage...a week or two before the election, Politico did a story called "Barack Obama's Mystery Man", which of course got linked on the aol/yahoo page. It was a story filled with inuendo, about a "friend" of Obama's, who he spent mysterius time with....basically, I think it was a security guy who was also a friend of Obama's/worked out with him, but the framining of the story was so deliberate, as if it was "another one of Obama's associations". Whatever, politico.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 12/18/2008
- Shzron1946 I'm a Fan of Shzron1946 3 fans permalink

I am patting myself on the back for recognizing extreme bias early on and not even bothereing to read Politico or the Page--FOX News was for comic relief.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 12/18/2008



Shzron (?? Sharon)

You wrote "I am patting myself on the back..."

Life would be very boring for you if you were to become stranded on a desert island.

I imagine you would then be pining for a copy of Politico washing up on the beach to provide some comic relief from boredom with yourself.

COGITO, ERGO SUM.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 12/19/2008
- Max01 I'm a Fan of Max01 5 fans permalink

So LordKelvin not only is playing Descartes Jr, but now tries to guess Shzron=Sharon.
LadyKelvin...not a deep thinker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 12/19/2008

heh, I remember Mark Halperin's post debate analysis (they had him on ABC nightly news, as the only person providing analysis on the debate the day after on that show) for Sarah Palin...he declared her the second coming of Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan. Politico is entertaining at times (and sometimes they get info fast), but their "analysis" pieces are always so wrong. And it seems to be frequented by a lot of freepers in the comments section...a lot from the birth certificate conspiracy set and such. It's annoying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 12/18/2008

I guess I meant third coming...lol. Oh yeah, and Politico WAS helpful in some things to the Obama campaign, but it was silly stuff like the McCain houses gaffe...and afterwards, Politico tried to defend McCain on it once they saw it was bad, so whatever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 12/18/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect


svn