Belgian Government Collapses After Botched Bank Bailout
BRUSSELS, Belgium — Belgium's king met behind closed doors with elected officials Saturday in an attempt to resolve a political crisis that has frozen action on dire economic problems including the sale of the country's largest bank.
The government has been trying to sell much of the bank, Fortis, to France's BNP Paribas. Fortis was forced to seek government help during tight credit conditions and was eventually carved up. Thousands of jobs could be lost if the sale to Paribas goes awry.
But Belgian shareholders who have seen their stakes become nearly worthless challenged the sale and won a decision by a Belgian appeals court, which ruled Dec. 12 that they should have been consulted on any major deals.
The country's highest court said Friday that it had indications that Prime Minister Yves Leterme's government had tried to influence the appeals court decision.
Leterme denied he had done anything wrong but offered to resign, saying the allegations made it impossible to continue the government's work.
The government has halted work while King Albert II weighs whether to reject the resignation, call for early elections or explore ways to form a new government based on the current legislature.
The crisis effectively freezes all government work. Apart from Fortis, the government is also dealing with a general collective bargaining agreement between employers and workers and the latest attempts to foster cooperation perennially bickering Dutch- and French-speakers.
"The king will have to untie this knot," said Elio Di Rupo, chairman of the French-speaking Socialists, part of the ruling coalition.
Albert met with Jo Vandeurzen, who resigned as justice minister Friday and with the leaders of the House of Representatives and Senate.
Leterme heads a coalition of Christian democrats, liberals and socialists, split into Dutch- and French- speaking parties.
All the ruling parties said they hoped to avoid early elections because stability was needed to react during the global economic crisis. But opposition parties insisted Leterme could not stay in office because interference in a court case would be a direct violation of the separation of powers, a cornerstone of parliamentary democracy.







Loading comments…






RAF CASERT | December 20, 2008 12:52 PM EST |
Compare other versions »Compare and versions