RCA Dome Implosion In Indianapolis (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - RCA Dome Implosion In Indianapolis (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HuffPost/CNN
First Posted: 12-20-08 11:54 AM   |   Updated: 01-20-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

The 24-year-old RCA Dome, home of the Indianapolis Colts, was demolished this morning. The site will be used as an expansion for the adjacent Indiana Convention Center.

Indystar.com has details on the plans for the RCA Dome implosion:

>> About 800 holes have been drilled into the dome where explosive charges will be placed.


>> Some neighboring buildings will be covered with fabric to protect them from dust and debris.


>> Police will set up a large safety perimeter around the RCA Dome before its implosion.


WATCH:



Visit WISH-TV's site for more footage of the RCA Dome implosion.

The 24-year-old RCA Dome, home of the Indianapolis Colts, was demolished this morning. The site will be used as an expansion for the adjacent Indiana Convention Center. Indystar.com has details on t...
The 24-year-old RCA Dome, home of the Indianapolis Colts, was demolished this morning. The site will be used as an expansion for the adjacent Indiana Convention Center. Indystar.com has details on t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
124
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- alexpaul I'm a Fan of alexpaul 4 fans permalink

STEVEN....­....

here are 70 yes seventy reasons why the offical story is a lie.......­...
i gotta run.......­..

http://independentsunbound.blogspot.com/2007/06/70-reasons-to-doubt-official-story-of.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 12/21/2008
- alexpaul I'm a Fan of alexpaul 4 fans permalink

this building BUILDING 7 was brought down by controlled demolition­..........­.....

does anyone want to dispute this after looking at this 10 second clip???

DONT BE FU CK ING STUPI.....­.USE YOUR BRAINS....­..MY 3 YR OLD CAN TELL THE DIFFERENCE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlZAoqKMx44&feature=related

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 12/21/2008
photo

Tsk, tsk, tsk. You want to disprove something, you have to get the report and find out what the structual engineers got wrong. But, you're going to need an education first. Why don't you start there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 12/21/2008
- alexpaul I'm a Fan of alexpaul 4 fans permalink

listen
there really is no argument here
the nist report is a joke
wtc7 fell because of "thermal expansion" first time in history...­..

if you wanna know the truth ill help you if you want to argue .i dont have time ....
this is too obvious

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 12/21/2008
- alexpaul I'm a Fan of alexpaul 4 fans permalink

omg im sorry.....­....heres the carsh site of flight 93 and live news broadcast.­......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99rcYiG_Syw

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 12/21/2008

Cmon people... 9-11 Truthers are you kidding me??? Did you ever once think that maybe that two Boeing 767's full of JET FUEL slammed into each tower going like 500 mph had anything to do with the WTC coming down.

I don't know, just a thought...

WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 12/21/2008
photo

What, you're gonna believe your lying eyes? Not very postmodern.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 12/21/2008
- alexpaul I'm a Fan of alexpaul 4 fans permalink

yes at first.....­...the you have to realize that planes dont fly 500mph at 1000 feet its impossible because of the wind resistance­...

second most of the jet fuel burned off almost emmediately or those people wouldnt be standing in the holes.....­...3rd...j­et fuel is 4/5ths kerosine..­.propane burns hotter meaning your bbq would melt everytime you had a pary......­.....

you wake up!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 12/21/2008
photo

I knew you had no idea what you were talking about, but you're really broadcasting it now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 12/21/2008
- DFC I'm a Fan of DFC permalink

Sigh...

It did not implode. It was made to collapse.

There is a difference-- a significant difference. It would be accurate to say the structure was explosively collapsed, since a sequence of explosive charges were implemented to allow gravity to prevail upon the stored energy in the structure (energy exerted in assembling it). "Implosion" is a misnomer, apparently borrowed by the demolition industry (or perhaps more likely coined by the popular media) to more floridly describe what in essence is nothing more than a technically sophisticated controlled collapse, i.e., release of stored energy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 AM on 12/21/2008
- oxygen I'm a Fan of oxygen 26 fans permalink
photo

let me get this straight - the misnomer was "borrowed by the demolition industry" .... if true whom was it then taken from? ones who have an intuitively obvious self right to use the word implosion "correctly" are people like? army officials, submariner­s,chemists­, physicists, geologists, etc.. am I right there?

outside of that your post was exceedingly clear except I would have added more definition to the gravity part:

gravity is a manifestation of heat loss, that heat loss eventually being completely pulled into dark matter via dark energy and at a time when we as humans, will no longer exist in any way, shape or form - forever

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 AM on 12/21/2008

We get that you know all the science. Implode Explode, Blown up, blown down. End result is the same.
So what about the Twin Towers did they get blown up or Structurally fail after the planes' impact?(pancake theory) and don't forget about the other WTC building that "collapsed" without being hit by a plane. OK go apply your best science to this question.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 AM on 12/21/2008

look like the triplet towers coming down

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 12/21/2008
- gaebolgaes I'm a Fan of gaebolgaes 16 fans permalink

dats wut me say. it looks just like those buildings the planes supposedly ran into on 911..when they fell down..and you say "explosives" were used? hhhmmmm!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 12/21/2008
- Kevbo68 I'm a Fan of Kevbo68 6 fans permalink
photo

It's just like our economy!
It's just like *.* (wildcard).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 12/20/2008

OH MY Gawd...It came down just like the Twin Towers!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 12/20/2008
- Lib2daBone I'm a Fan of Lib2daBone 3 fans permalink

So how is this different from the Twin Towers falling down on their own footprint?

Oh.. I know... there was no little man with a bullhorn standing on the rubble.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 PM on 12/20/2008
- Jared137 I'm a Fan of Jared137 3 fans permalink

LOl Lib! Hooray for America! Hooray for the cowboy on the rubble! We bow to the criminals and mobsters that have taken over our democratic government! Hooray for Evangelical Republicans who are destroying the earth!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 12/20/2008

I'm torn. I mean I like a good implosion as much as the next guy, but the expense of any stadium is huge. That said, how many of these "inflata-domes" are left in North America? BC Place Stadium will be replacing their roof with a retractable; the Kingdome in Seattle was imploded, nobody uses the Pontiac Silverdome anymore, the Vikings are the only tennant left in the Metrodome in Minneapolis and they're looking to get a new stadium. I think the only one still in use and without plans for either modification or abandonment is the Carrier Dome at Syracuse University. The inflatable domed stadium is an example of a failed technology so I can't really fault them for living with it for 24 years and getting rid of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 12/20/2008
- DMcD I'm a Fan of DMcD 11 fans permalink
photo

Sorry , but for me at least , all the fun has been taken out of watching buildings come crushing down , since 911. No kick here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 12/20/2008
- DogTown I'm a Fan of DogTown 9 fans permalink
photo

Looks like the WTC falling down...Hum­mmm?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 12/20/2008
- alexpaul I'm a Fan of alexpaul 4 fans permalink

read......­....

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/therm3.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.rense.com/general75/thrm.htm&usg=__ikNcqspMDXAmhIMbzUIaVXZrOUE=&h=429&w=407&sz=42&hl=en&start=7&tbnid=UXwFl2HFR7JznM:&tbnh=126&tbnw=120&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dwtc%2Bthermite%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 12/20/2008
- max08 I'm a Fan of max08 49 fans permalink

Did they bring it down with jet fuel?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 12/20/2008
- alexpaul I'm a Fan of alexpaul 4 fans permalink

no they used bic lighters like the ones in building 7

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 12/20/2008
- Jared137 I'm a Fan of Jared137 3 fans permalink

That's a good one!

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7025/3128/1600/cartoon-WTC-RumsfeldBushCheneyLAUGHTER---jetfuel.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 12/20/2008

With oil prices at record lows, it would have been foolish and feckless not to have used jet fuel which is only going for about $1.25 a gallon now.

The WTC towers were brought down by under 10,000 gallons of fuel which would cost only $12,500 instead of $20,000,000 or so using explosives like Thermite.

So I am pretty sure they used

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 12/20/2008

thermite is an oxidizing incendiary. not an explosive. (youtube it)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 12/20/2008
- Anciano I'm a Fan of Anciano 17 fans permalink
photo

Stop wasting our tax dollars on pro sports. Billionaires expect us to pay for the playground for their steroid apes to throw balls back and forth in? Take the money and build hospitals and schools.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 12/20/2008
- tbrnotb I'm a Fan of tbrnotb 18 fans permalink

Right on. How many millions did you spend on a facility that last just 24 years? And it was used what.....m­aybe 12 or 15 times a year (not counting rock concerts). And they built this ediface to lure a team from Baltimore, who lured a tead from Cleveland.

So, just 24 years later, they really "needed" a new stadium. Probably to keep the millionaire owners happy to make even more millions. Or what? They would move to another town.
How much did the new stadium cost, Indy? How much just to blow this thing up?

And by the way, how's your school system? I'm sure they could be in need of a few extra million.,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 12/20/2008
- Gidster I'm a Fan of Gidster 218 fans permalink
photo

The reason that they built a new stadium in Indianapolis was, the old one did not have large enough sky boxes for owners and celebs etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 12/20/2008
photo

The Governor (Bush's B itch Mitch Daniels) sold my toll road to foreign corporations and all I got was this lousy video.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 12/20/2008
- chavo I'm a Fan of chavo 3 fans permalink

You do realize they most of these new stadium initiatives on ballots, and 9 out of 10 times they'll pass rather easily.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 12/20/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect