AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

FRANK BASS and RITA BEAMISH | December 21, 2008 10:07 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits in the calendar year 2007, an Associated Press analysis reveals.

The rewards came even at banks where poor results last year foretold the economic crisis that sent them to Washington for a government rescue. Some trimmed their executive compensation due to lagging bank performance, but still forked over multimillion-dollar executive pay packages.

Benefits included cash bonuses, stock options, personal use of company jets and chauffeurs, home security, country club memberships and professional money management, the AP review of federal securities documents found.

The total amount given to nearly 600 executives would cover bailout costs for 53 of the 116 banks that have so far accepted tax dollars to boost their bottom lines.

Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services committee and a long-standing critic of executive largesse, said the bonuses tallied by the AP review amount to a bribe "to get them to do the jobs for which they are well paid in the first place.

"Most of us sign on to do jobs and we do them best we can," said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. "We're told that some of the most highly paid people in executive positions are different. They need extra money to be motivated!"

The AP compiled total compensation based on annual reports that the banks file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The 116 banks have so far received $188 billion in taxpayer help. Among the findings:

_The average paid to each of the banks' top executives was $2.6 million in salary, bonuses and benefits.

Story continues below
advertisement

_Lloyd Blankfein, president and chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, took home nearly $54 million in compensation last year. The company's top five executives received a total of $242 million.

This year, Goldman will forgo cash and stock bonuses for its seven top-paid executives. They will work for their base salaries of $600,000, the company said. Facing increasing concern by its own shareholders on executive payments, the company described its pay plan last spring as essential to retain and motivate executives "whose efforts and judgments are vital to our continued success, by setting their compensation at appropriate and competitive levels." Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday declined to comment beyond that written report.

The New York-based company on Dec. 16 reported its first quarterly loss since it went public in 1999. It received $10 billion in taxpayer money on Oct. 28.

_Even where banks cut back on pay, some executives were left with seven- or eight-figure compensation that most people can only dream about. Richard D. Fairbank, the chairman of Capital One Financial Corp., took a $1 million hit in compensation after his company had a disappointing year, but still got $17 million in stock options. The McLean, Va.-based company received $3.56 billion in bailout money on Nov. 14.

_John A. Thain, chief executive officer of Merrill Lynch, topped all corporate bank bosses with $83 million in earnings last year. Thain, a former chief operating officer for Goldman Sachs, took the reins of the company in December 2007, avoiding the blame for a year in which Merrill lost $7.8 billion. Since he began work late in the year, he earned $57,692 in salary, a $15 million signing bonus and an additional $68 million in stock options.

Like Goldman, Merrill got $10 billion from taxpayers on Oct. 28.

The AP review comes amid sharp questions about the banks' commitment to the goals of the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), a law designed to buy bad mortgages and other troubled assets. Last month, the Bush administration changed the program's goals, instructing the Treasury Department to pump tax dollars directly into banks in a bid to prevent wholesale economic collapse.

The program set restrictions on some executive compensation for participating banks, but did not limit salaries and bonuses unless they had the effect of encouraging excessive risk to the institution. Banks were barred from giving golden parachutes to departing executives and deducting some executive pay for tax purposes.

Banks that got bailout funds also paid out millions for home security systems, private chauffeured cars, and club dues. Some banks even paid for financial advisers. Wells Fargo of San Francisco, which took $25 billion in taxpayer bailout money, gave its top executives up to $20,000 each to pay personal financial planners.

At Bank of New York Mellon Corp., chief executive Robert P. Kelly's stipend for financial planning services came to $66,748, on top of his $975,000 salary and $7.5 million bonus. His car and driver cost $178,879. Kelly also received $846,000 in relocation expenses, including help selling his home in Pittsburgh and purchasing one in Manhattan, the company said.

Goldman Sachs' tab for leased cars and drivers ran as high as $233,000 per executive. The firm told its shareholders this year that financial counseling and chauffeurs are important in giving executives more time to focus on their jobs.

JPMorgan Chase chairman James Dimon ran up a $211,182 private jet travel tab last year when his family lived in Chicago and he was commuting to New York. The company got $25 billion in bailout funds.

Banks cite security to justify personal use of company aircraft for some executives. But Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., questioned that rationale, saying executives visit many locations more vulnerable than the nation's security-conscious commercial air terminals.

Sherman, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said pay excesses undermine development of good bank economic policies and promote an escalating pay spiral among competing financial institutions _ something particularly hard to take when banks then ask for rescue money.

He wants them to come before Congress, like the automakers did, and spell out their spending plans for bailout funds.

"The tougher we are on the executives that come to Washington, the fewer will come for a bailout," he said.

___

On the Net:

SEC Filings & Forms: http://www.sec.gov

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act: http://www.treas.gov/initiatives/eesa/

Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits in the calendar year 2007, an Associated Press analysis reveals. T...
Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits in the calendar year 2007, an Associated Press analysis reveals. T...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
239
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- MsRy I'm a Fan of MsRy 2 fans permalink

So the wealthy are motivated by huge sums of money but we the (former) middle and working classes are supposed to be motivated by threats of hunger and homelessness.

Nice game if you're on the winning team I guess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 12/21/2008
- dandypuddin I'm a Fan of dandypuddin 179 fans permalink
photo

and the dangling carrot, health care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 12/21/2008

no top exec. is worth that type of money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 12/21/2008

As Rachel Maddow so aptly put it:
(paraphrasing)
"...So, the taxpayer is subsidizing the dividends to shareholde­rs... Rewarding them (and top execs) for the fabulous job that the banks have done, at milking us for Billions..­."

Great Job Pauli!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 12/21/2008

HOPEFULLY SOME OF THE REASONS WILL SURFACE AT THE MADOFF & Co. TRIALS

NO ONE WANTED TO “KNOW”

From New York to Geneva, corruption is rampant and complex on Wall Street, including the process of accumulation of this much cash..
-
http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/12/is-madoff-really-anomaly.html
-

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 12/21/2008
- BadHaBritt I'm a Fan of BadHaBritt 6 fans permalink
photo

The next economic phase is also very predictable, though you don't hear anything about it. The Chinese economy will have to feed it's own rapidly growing consumer society, having token over the lead from the USA. China with such a large manufacturing base and surplus of wealth will have to rely on it's own domestic market while the USA becomes poorer and poorer. This is the time for US companies to start developing niche products to manufacture and sell to the Chinese, who's incomes will start to rise. The Chinese will initially favor their own products until a large enough section of middle class looks for a new style of product. Much like the USA middle class buying European products because they are different and prestigious. All this is very predictable and should be planned for now. Somehow we have to get back to a more closed fiscal system that keeps the dollar circulating within the country rather than letting the vast majority of it go overseas to the detriment of our middle class.

One day intellectual sanity will return.
Till then !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 12/21/2008
- BadHaBritt I'm a Fan of BadHaBritt 6 fans permalink
photo

For gods sake wake up. 98% of the peaple, both democrats and republicans are getting constantly screwed by the wealthy elite. They control the flow and use of most of the money within the USA.
No one ever changes anything, the only thing that changes is the noise from the so called intelligent section of the 98% but things just keep on going without change. It is amazing that so many people who have very little except a burning ambition to be one of the rich 2% buy all the bullsh*t telling them that all the problems are caused by the Unions and corporate profits are the only thing that matters, even if it means they are unemployed because all the manufacturing is done overseas.
The only people who have fully benefited from this practice are the top 2% but too many people still don't really get it. As soon as most of the industrial production was moved overseas the revolving fiscal system within this country, money going up the ladder and then back down again, started to break down. Now a very large part of our wealth goes out of the country and very little returns. All this was very predictable, I don't know why the media act like it's such a surprise other than they're only interested in the petty minutia that makes money for the networks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 12/21/2008
photo

"...whose efforts and judgments are vital to our continued success...­"
Excuse me?

If they take tax bail out money, the top management should be Fired due to Lack of Success!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 12/21/2008
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 34 fans permalink
photo

What did our government do?
Again and again...
A Total Embarrassment!

Whoever approved it Board? Accountable!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 12/21/2008
- Stilts9 I'm a Fan of Stilts9 44 fans permalink
photo

What a bunch of pigs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 12/21/2008

Well, I'd say we have a clearcut case of failed corporate governance here.

What reason could there be for not even now linking bonuses to sustained financial performance? There's some explaining to do towards shareholders and congress why this year's compensation has not been given based on the lessons to be drawn from the meltdown.

The international instutite of finance and the Corrigan report have made clear statements concerning the criteria for compensation. Why were these recommendations not applied?

I am not amused. But, to be honest, I am also not surprised. Does that imply that I am losing faith fast? And assuming I am, who would be to blame for that? In a world of self-reliance, it must be myself, of course. I am to blame for not being enough of a pragmatic idealist. I really should trust boardroom gentlemen agreements a lot more, shouldn't I? These people have a reputation to lose, don't they? Apparently, they don't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 12/21/2008
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 34 fans permalink
photo

I am not amazed, but Board members should be accountable, if they approved it...
Investors, shareholde­rs... time to stand up! exclude those employee shareholde­rs...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 12/21/2008
photo

Agree. Buying shares doesn't make a dividend a certainty. No profit, no dividend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 12/21/2008
photo

There is a record of every single foreclosure. If the money had gone to pay those off, the banks would have gotten their money back, but the right way. By keeping people in their homes so they could continue to pay their mortgages. Giving it to the ones who created the problem is mostly backwards thinking. The way it is now, the banks are getting what amounts to free money, a payback for bad practices, a bonus for being greedy. One thing is for certain. They won't pay anything out until they are forced to. It's time for Bush to step aside so maybe Obama has a chance to correct this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 12/21/2008
- gcallaghan I'm a Fan of gcallaghan 52 fans permalink
photo

The @sshats getting bonuses ought to put it aside so they can lawyer up when the chips fall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 12/21/2008
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 208 fans permalink
photo

Hey, it's just Bush looking out for the interests of his base.

Like he said, he looks around, and sees the haves... and the have mores. Some people call them the elite... he calls them his base.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 12/21/2008

A fool and his money are soon parted. Not hard to figure out who the fool is in this scenario. When you give your money to crooks and liars do not be surprised when they steal it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 12/21/2008
photo

Pony up for yer big fat bonus boys!!! It will be your last! Because regulation is a coming, and you will pay for the damage you did to the U.S. of A. Oh yeah, hope you enjoy your nice long stay in the gray bar hotel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 12/21/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect