AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

FRANK BASS and RITA BEAMISH | December 21, 2008 10:07 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits in the calendar year 2007, an Associated Press analysis reveals.

The rewards came even at banks where poor results last year foretold the economic crisis that sent them to Washington for a government rescue. Some trimmed their executive compensation due to lagging bank performance, but still forked over multimillion-dollar executive pay packages.

Benefits included cash bonuses, stock options, personal use of company jets and chauffeurs, home security, country club memberships and professional money management, the AP review of federal securities documents found.

The total amount given to nearly 600 executives would cover bailout costs for 53 of the 116 banks that have so far accepted tax dollars to boost their bottom lines.

Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services committee and a long-standing critic of executive largesse, said the bonuses tallied by the AP review amount to a bribe "to get them to do the jobs for which they are well paid in the first place.

"Most of us sign on to do jobs and we do them best we can," said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. "We're told that some of the most highly paid people in executive positions are different. They need extra money to be motivated!"

The AP compiled total compensation based on annual reports that the banks file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The 116 banks have so far received $188 billion in taxpayer help. Among the findings:

_The average paid to each of the banks' top executives was $2.6 million in salary, bonuses and benefits.

Story continues below
advertisement

_Lloyd Blankfein, president and chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, took home nearly $54 million in compensation last year. The company's top five executives received a total of $242 million.

This year, Goldman will forgo cash and stock bonuses for its seven top-paid executives. They will work for their base salaries of $600,000, the company said. Facing increasing concern by its own shareholders on executive payments, the company described its pay plan last spring as essential to retain and motivate executives "whose efforts and judgments are vital to our continued success, by setting their compensation at appropriate and competitive levels." Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday declined to comment beyond that written report.

The New York-based company on Dec. 16 reported its first quarterly loss since it went public in 1999. It received $10 billion in taxpayer money on Oct. 28.

_Even where banks cut back on pay, some executives were left with seven- or eight-figure compensation that most people can only dream about. Richard D. Fairbank, the chairman of Capital One Financial Corp., took a $1 million hit in compensation after his company had a disappointing year, but still got $17 million in stock options. The McLean, Va.-based company received $3.56 billion in bailout money on Nov. 14.

_John A. Thain, chief executive officer of Merrill Lynch, topped all corporate bank bosses with $83 million in earnings last year. Thain, a former chief operating officer for Goldman Sachs, took the reins of the company in December 2007, avoiding the blame for a year in which Merrill lost $7.8 billion. Since he began work late in the year, he earned $57,692 in salary, a $15 million signing bonus and an additional $68 million in stock options.

Like Goldman, Merrill got $10 billion from taxpayers on Oct. 28.

The AP review comes amid sharp questions about the banks' commitment to the goals of the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), a law designed to buy bad mortgages and other troubled assets. Last month, the Bush administration changed the program's goals, instructing the Treasury Department to pump tax dollars directly into banks in a bid to prevent wholesale economic collapse.

The program set restrictions on some executive compensation for participating banks, but did not limit salaries and bonuses unless they had the effect of encouraging excessive risk to the institution. Banks were barred from giving golden parachutes to departing executives and deducting some executive pay for tax purposes.

Banks that got bailout funds also paid out millions for home security systems, private chauffeured cars, and club dues. Some banks even paid for financial advisers. Wells Fargo of San Francisco, which took $25 billion in taxpayer bailout money, gave its top executives up to $20,000 each to pay personal financial planners.

At Bank of New York Mellon Corp., chief executive Robert P. Kelly's stipend for financial planning services came to $66,748, on top of his $975,000 salary and $7.5 million bonus. His car and driver cost $178,879. Kelly also received $846,000 in relocation expenses, including help selling his home in Pittsburgh and purchasing one in Manhattan, the company said.

Goldman Sachs' tab for leased cars and drivers ran as high as $233,000 per executive. The firm told its shareholders this year that financial counseling and chauffeurs are important in giving executives more time to focus on their jobs.

JPMorgan Chase chairman James Dimon ran up a $211,182 private jet travel tab last year when his family lived in Chicago and he was commuting to New York. The company got $25 billion in bailout funds.

Banks cite security to justify personal use of company aircraft for some executives. But Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., questioned that rationale, saying executives visit many locations more vulnerable than the nation's security-conscious commercial air terminals.

Sherman, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said pay excesses undermine development of good bank economic policies and promote an escalating pay spiral among competing financial institutions _ something particularly hard to take when banks then ask for rescue money.

He wants them to come before Congress, like the automakers did, and spell out their spending plans for bailout funds.

"The tougher we are on the executives that come to Washington, the fewer will come for a bailout," he said.

___

On the Net:

SEC Filings & Forms: http://www.sec.gov

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act: http://www.treas.gov/initiatives/eesa/

Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits in the calendar year 2007, an Associated Press analysis reveals. T...
Banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits in the calendar year 2007, an Associated Press analysis reveals. T...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
239
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
photo

and yet the rupublican outrage is union wages.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 12/21/2008

Have you heard Limbaugh ranting about the auto union?

Someone should tell him he sounds like he's rabid.

I'm not kidding. He sounds completely demented.

How stupid are the working slobs who listen to this guy and agree with him?

God.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 12/21/2008
- Vyvjala I'm a Fan of Vyvjala 14 fans permalink

gush limpwad is a cancerous cyst on the anal sphincter of humanity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 12/21/2008

He is rabid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 12/21/2008

Yes, those dirty UAW guys are getting $24 an hour! What an outrage. A CEO is thinking constantly, every minute, rarely sleeping, even on his yacht, and deserves at least $8,000 an hour. So what if the company tanks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 12/21/2008
- Samalabear I'm a Fan of Samalabear 73 fans permalink
photo

Motivate these "top executives" by stripping them down to nothing and make them work. It's not like there's a lot of jobs out there right now. Goldman-Sachs as an entity needs to eat major humble pie. Maybe they can connect with the real world again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 12/21/2008
- sej100 I'm a Fan of sej100 28 fans permalink

Instead of auditing them an serving them with penalties and firing those who made the worst decisions our representatives in government provide them with a reward. But those of us who lost savings after doing all that the government told us to do get the proverbial shaft.

Perhaps ALL our representatives and the current administration should be held accountable with hearing on their actions and audits conducted on all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 12/21/2008
- Karma7 I'm a Fan of Karma7 5 fans permalink

The Fed, a privately owned corporation, hasn’t been audited since their creation in 1913.

The US treasury is like a free ATM for its owners

"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." -- Henry Ford

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 12/21/2008
photo

So if I'm already rich I get a bonus for doing a crappy job? Damn, this free market system is complicated...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 12/21/2008
- Bigidea I'm a Fan of Bigidea 5 fans permalink

Loot, Loot, Loot while you can. Long live capitalism, Long live blind capitalism, Long live Grab all you can capitalis, Long live Bush. News Flash: GW Bush is canonised as the patron saint of the Wall Street.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 12/21/2008
- wsblake I'm a Fan of wsblake 9 fans permalink

Once again leave it to Congress to do exactly opposite of what the people want. In 2006 we vote them in to end the war, what do they do- basically tell us to " go cheney ourselves." Then, this year most Americans said absolutely no to wall street bailout. Congress of course does the opposite. What 's the next step? Ask yourself America- now what do we do? I say, time and options are running out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 12/21/2008

That vote was the one vote that will destroy the middle class and poor of America.

Instead of saving the economy, it is the transfer of all wealth to the rich.
Think of how many homes are being lost. How many small businesses. The Middle classes' retirement savings.

By this time next year you will see how great the divide has become between the wealthy and the rest of the population. In a few more years, America will look like most "developing" countries where the few wealthy families own and control everything. And I do mean everything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 12/21/2008

Let's do a reality check. How many Rs has it taken to bring the Senate to an absolute standstill? 41? How many filibusters have there been in the Senate this term? 93? You are right, we sent Ds to DC to get us out of Iraq, but we didn't send 60 to the Senate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 12/21/2008
- trudem2 I'm a Fan of trudem2 12 fans permalink

This TARP money should be demanded back. It should be re-distributed with strict guidelines as to its use and the right of oversight. Why the ____ wasn't this done in the first place?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 12/21/2008
- Chillinout I'm a Fan of Chillinout 125 fans permalink
photo

It was a bait and switch by Paulson. There was oversight built in for Paulson to buy toxic mortgages. Paulson then decided to disperse the money differently, effectively voiding the oversight. Congress had better put a lot more strings on the second half of the money than they did on the first half.

The auto industry has to jump through all kinds of hoops to get a measly seventeen billion dollars, (relatively), and Wall Street basically gets handed a blank check for $350 billion so far.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 12/21/2008

It's much, much more than $350 billion. That was only the TARP money.

There was another separate $145 billion for AIG and billions more for Fannie and Freddie.

Then there's the 2 Trillion the Fed's are "loaning" and won't disclose who to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 12/21/2008

He did disburse the money differently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 12/21/2008
- slinkymom I'm a Fan of slinkymom 152 fans permalink
photo

The Dems are now saying they are going to force the remaining TARP money to be used for foreclosure assistance. I pray to God they are really going to do the right thing with the rest of the that money.

What I wouldn't give for a chance to throw my shoes at Bush, Paulson, Rove, Cheney...... I don't think I have enough shoes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 12/21/2008

We could go to Good Will and buy some more!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 12/21/2008
photo

The "bailout" is an extended Madoff scheme, difference is that his "bailout" was directed to the super griddy, the end goal is the same - more rich people will be included in the federal bailout, NONE of them actually, really needing it; those they DO will just keep on PAYING in the FREE MARKET system. To the governors credit - there is something for the people, a modest try to get something back from all the taxpayers money, some kind of regulation that "stops" the credit companies to do what they NEVER should of been able to do, increase interest terms, redefine conditions of the loans on their own pleasure. BUT, this will take effect in 2010 or 2011 so the bailout banks will still be capable of doing what they do best - BANK WAY ROBBERY! I guess WE all deserve it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 12/21/2008

guillotine!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 12/21/2008

Shocking ! We'll show 'em, let make sure autoworkers cut their pay to minimum wage!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 12/21/2008
- hapiguy I'm a Fan of hapiguy 15 fans permalink

America the Beautiful, what is mine, what is yours is mine...sad indeed,,,GREED rings

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 12/21/2008

Hey suckers, aren't you happy your taxes go to executive multi-million dollar pay packages and bonuses instead of universal healthcare or unemployment benefits?

Keep handing it over, the yachts and helicopters cost lots of money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 12/21/2008
- ymax I'm a Fan of ymax 3 fans permalink

It makes me sick, just reading the story.
I don't make enough mony to enjoy a nice vacation once a year but my TAX DOLLARS are being used for bonuses for multi millionaires.
What a way to finish your term in office, you are the worst President EVER.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 12/21/2008
photo

Snakes in suits! Anyone surprised!?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 12/21/2008
- marinade I'm a Fan of marinade 48 fans permalink

Consider voting out incumbent members of Congress. They are not up to their jobs.

Congress enables the rampant corporate corruption.

Barney Frank "said the bonuses tallied by the AP review amount to a bribe "to get them to do the jobs for which they are well paid in the first place.""

Hey, get a clue, members of Congress, the bankers would have done it for less! If you're going to bribe them, try to be smart about it! The only thing Congress knows how to do is waste money and the corporate crooks know how to work them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 12/21/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect