Five-Year Intelligence Assessment: Terror Threat Driven By Instability In Middle East, Africa

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

EILEEN SULLIVAN | December 25, 2008 09:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Dec. 12, 2008 file photo, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff speaks at the London School of Economics in London. The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasing Internet savvy, says a new intelligence assessment obtained by The Associated Press. Earlier this month, Chertoff said the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction remains "the highest priority at the federal level." (AP Photo/Matt Dunham, File)

WASHINGTON — The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasing Internet savvy, says a new intelligence assessment obtained by The Associated Press.

Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear attacks are considered the most dangerous threats that could be carried out against the U.S. But those threats are also the most unlikely because it is so difficult for al-Qaida and similar groups to acquire the materials needed to carry out such plots, according to the internal Homeland Security Threat Assessment for the years 2008-2013.

The al-Qaida terrorist network continues to focus on U.S. attack targets vulnerable to massive economic losses, casualties and political "turmoil," the assessment said.

Earlier this month, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction remains "the highest priority at the federal level." Speaking to reporters on Dec. 3, Chertoff explained that more people, such as terrorists, will learn how to make dirty bombs, biological and chemical weapons. "The other side is going to continue to learn more about doing things," he said.

Marked "for official use only," the report does not specify its audience, but the assessments typically go to law enforcement, intelligence officials and the private sector. When determining threats, intelligence officials consider loss of life, economic and psychological consequences.

Intelligence officials also predict that in the next five years, terrorists will try to conduct a destructive biological attack. Officials are concerned about the possibility of infections to thousands of U.S. citizens, overwhelming regional health care systems.

There could also be dire economic impacts caused by workers' illnesses and deaths. Officials are most concerned about biological agents stolen from labs or other storage facilities, such as anthrax.

"The threat of terrorism and the threat of extremist ideologies has not abated," Chertoff said in his year-end address on Dec. 18. "This threat has not evaporated, and we can't turn the page on it."

Story continues below
advertisement

These high-consequence threats are not the only kind of challenges that will confront the U.S. over the next five years.

Terrorists will continue to try to evade U.S. border security measures and place operatives inside the mainland to carry out attacks, the 38-page assessment said. It also said that they may pose as refugees or asylum seekers or try to exploit foreign travel channels such as the visa waiver program, which allows citizens of 34 countries to enter the U.S. without visas.

Long waits for immigration and more restrictive European refugee and asylum programs will cause more foreigners to try to enter the U.S. illegally. Increasing numbers of Iraqis are expected to migrate to the U.S. in the next five years; and refugees from Somalia and Sudan could increase because of conflicts in those countries, the assessment said.

Because there is a proposed cap of 12,000 refugees from Africa, officials expect more will try to enter the U.S. illegally as well. Officials predict the same scenario for refugees from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Intelligence officials predict the pool of radical Islamists within the U.S. will increase over the next five years due partly to the ease of online recruiting means. Officials foresee "a wave of young, self-identified Muslim 'terrorist wannabes' who aspire to carry out violent acts."

The U.S. has already seen some examples of these homegrown terrorists. Recently five Muslim immigrants were convicted of plotting to massacre U.S. soldiers at Fort Dix in a case the government said demonstrated its post-Sept. 11 determination to stop terrorist attacks in the planning stages.

The Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah does not have a known history of fomenting attacks inside the U.S., but that could change if there is some kind of "triggering" event, the Homeland assessment cautions.

A 2008 Interagency Intelligence Committee on Terrorism assessment said that Hezbollah members based in the U.S. do local fundraising through charity projects and criminal activity, like money laundering, smuggling, drug trafficking, fraud and extortion, according to the homeland security assessment.

In addition, the cyber terror threat is expected to increase over the next five years, as hacking tools become more sophisticated and available. "Youthful, Internet-savvy extremists might apply their online acumen to conduct cyber attacks rather than offer themselves up as operatives to conduct physical attacks," according to the assessment.

Currently, Islamic terrorists, including al-Qaida, would like to conduct cyber attacks, but they lack the capability to do so, the assessment said. The large-scale attacks that are on al-Qaida's wishlist _ such as disrupting a major city's water or power systems _ require sophisticated cyber capabilities that the terrorist group does not possess.

But al-Qaida has the capability to hire sophisticated hackers to carry out these kinds of attacks, the assessment said. And federal officials believe that in the next three to five years, al-Qaida could direct or inspire cyber attacks that target the U.S. economy.

Counterterrorism expert Frank Cilluffo says the typical cyber attack would not achieve al-Qaida's main goal of inflicting mass devastation with its resulting widespread media coverage. However, al-Qaida is likely to continue to rely on the Internet to spread its message, said Cilluffo, who runs the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington University.

Officials also predict that domestic terrorists in the forms of radical animal rights and environmental extremists will become more adept with explosives and increase their use of arson attacks.

WASHINGTON — The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasi...
WASHINGTON — The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasi...
 
Comments
261
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- smag I'm a Fan of smag permalink

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff is I am sure smarter than I. However I have a very low regard for his professionalism and his assesments. I can't put my finger on it but given the fact that he was in place during Katrina....well that speaks volumes. I realize that most of the blame went to Federal Emergency Management Agency and of course Bush but something tells me there aint no boady in charge in the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 12/29/2008


@Michale32086 . . .

That the complexities of the middle east elude you is obvious.

Morgoth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 AM on 12/28/2008

The complexities of the economic meltdown elude him as well. Conservatives do not like complexities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 12/28/2008
photo

"The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa..."

and who is driving instability in the Middle East and Africa? U.S. policies have done much to destabilize these regions for decades. So, U.S. driven instability in Middle East and Africa are driving the ter.r.or.ist threat to the U.S., and the U.S. continues to destabilize those regions, driving the t.e.ror.ist threat to the U.S., so the U.S. continues to destabilize those regions...and on and on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 12/28/2008
photo

@realpolitic

}}}}}
Yes, because the Middle East was unstable a thousand years ago means we bear no responsibility for the turmoil in the Middle East today. That is an example of very astute reasoning. I am surprised Michale is not on Bush's diplomatic team. I guess we will have to all go back in a time machine before we can address the problems in the Middle East.
{{{{{

Did I say that the US bears NO RESPONSIBILITY??

No, I did not.. And the only way you can win this argument is to try and put words in my mouth.

I simply stated that the USA is not SOLELY responsible for the instability in the Middle East.

A FACT that ya'all on the hysterical Left just cannot seem to grasp...

Michale.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 12/27/2008

I thought you were on the hysterical left not long ago. The fact that we are no solely responsibility for the turmoil does not lessen our responsibility as the principal actor to bring peace there. We have to again begin the hard work of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Probably at least 90% of the population here must agree that Bush has been a total failure on the Israeli-Paletinian issue. He did not even have talks until last year between the parties.


Regarding the temperature graphs, here are some updated graphs of temperature anomalities. Each year is being compared to the average of the base years between 1951 and 1980. Before when we talked about this, I said each year was being compared to the previous year. I was wrong. But at that time, you only showed the first graph and not the tabular one which explains the comparisan.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A.lrg.gif
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A.txt

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

Terror Threat Driven By Instability In Middle East, Africa
The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasing Internet savvy,


Well, Duh....


and this report cost how much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 AM on 12/27/2008

"Poorly secured nuclear material in the former Soviet Union, or secrets from a scientist in Pakistan could help build a bomb that detonates in Paris. The poppies in Afghanistan become the heroin in Berlin. The poverty and violence in Somalia breeds the terror of tomorrow."
[Barack Obama]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 12/26/2008

N.o. f.u.c.k.i.n.g. s.h.i.t.!!!! A secluded LDS 8 yr old in Texas could have come to that conclusion without five years and millions of wasted dollars spent. Thanks for stating the obvious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

What happened to the Yellow, Red, Green, Purple, Hot Pink terrist codes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 12/26/2008

Days since color-coded terror threat system was initiated: 2235

Days the terror threat color was at green or blue: 0

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

Five-Year Intelligence Assessment: If you hit a bonfire with a broom, sparks will fly and burn down the whole backyard.
Since the outgoing administration does not care about Intelligence-assessments (Downing Street Memo, one example) it should be obvious that all talk is for naught until this part of US-history has come to a conclusion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 PM on 12/26/2008

Terror Threat Driven By zi0nist and oiI Wars in the Middle East, Africa

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

which is exactly the way the U.S. has wanted it for decades.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 AM on 12/28/2008
photo

@Nickesq

}}}}}}
...the fact that instability in the Middle East is our doing.
}}}}}}

Really???

So, what caused the instability a thousand years ago?? Two thousand???

Anyone who blames the USA for the instability is simply exhibiting ignorance and bigotry...

Michale.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 12/26/2008

Yes, because the Middle East was unstable a thousand years ago means we bear no responsibility for the turmoil in the Middle East today. That is an example of very astute reasoning. I am surprised Michale is not on Bush's diplomatic team. I guess we will have to all go back in a time machine before we can address the problems in the Middle East.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

@CyrusBeaucephus

}}}}
before we started stealing their resources? Simple enough for you
{{{{

Yer kidding, right??

Sorry, but that simply displays complete and utter bigotry and total ignorance of the region and the history..

Michale.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 12/26/2008

Michale, you use the phrase "bigotry" much to easily. You use it to silence any disagreement with your simplistic ideas. Tell us your thoughts about the Middle East and its history. While, much of the blame lies with their own leadership, it can not be denied that many in the Middle East point to America as a culprit in the region. So, we can be less of a culprit by backing forces of moderation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

@realpolitic

}}}}
We like free speech, just not stupid talk!
{{{{

TRANSLATION: "Only speech that agrees with me is considered 'free speech'. Anything that DOESN'T agree with me is 'stupid talk'..."

And you really think you are a liberal???

Amazing....

Michale.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 12/26/2008

No, sometimes I agree with "stupid talk." Michale, even liberals are discerning. Believe it or not, we, or I in this case, do not give all thoughts or utterances equal weight. That concept is the invention of Bill O'Reilly where he gives the reasoning of some climate change deniers equal weight with scientists who studies point to climate change caused by man. "Balance" is the mantra of the far right to introduce their ridiculous ideas, for example, that the New Deal prolonged the Great Depression. (I know that is probably your very next argument.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

@CyrusBeaucephus

}}}}
before we started stealing their resources? Simple enough for you?
{{{{

Yer kidding, right??

People have been killing each other in the region long before you, I or this country was even born..

I'll let you in on a little secret.. But...SHHHHHH Don't tell anyone..

Not everything wrong in this world is the fault of Bush and Republicans.

I know, I know... Such a radical concept, eh???

But that's logic for ya...

Michale......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 12/26/2008

Michale, you break down arguments to such simplicities and straw man arguments that they can be barely be recognized. You must watch a lot of Bill O'Reilly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 12/27/2008

Who are US going to war with now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 12/26/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect