Five-Year Intelligence Assessment: Terror Threat Driven By Instability In Middle East, Africa

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Five-Year Intelligence Assessment: Terror Threat Driven By Instability In Middle East, Africa stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

EILEEN SULLIVAN | December 25, 2008 09:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Dec. 12, 2008 file photo, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff speaks at the London School of Economics in London. The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasing Internet savvy, says a new intelligence assessment obtained by The Associated Press. Earlier this month, Chertoff said the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction remains "the highest priority at the federal level." (AP Photo/Matt Dunham, File)

WASHINGTON — The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasing Internet savvy, says a new intelligence assessment obtained by The Associated Press.

Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear attacks are considered the most dangerous threats that could be carried out against the U.S. But those threats are also the most unlikely because it is so difficult for al-Qaida and similar groups to acquire the materials needed to carry out such plots, according to the internal Homeland Security Threat Assessment for the years 2008-2013.

The al-Qaida terrorist network continues to focus on U.S. attack targets vulnerable to massive economic losses, casualties and political "turmoil," the assessment said.

Earlier this month, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction remains "the highest priority at the federal level." Speaking to reporters on Dec. 3, Chertoff explained that more people, such as terrorists, will learn how to make dirty bombs, biological and chemical weapons. "The other side is going to continue to learn more about doing things," he said.

Marked "for official use only," the report does not specify its audience, but the assessments typically go to law enforcement, intelligence officials and the private sector. When determining threats, intelligence officials consider loss of life, economic and psychological consequences.

Intelligence officials also predict that in the next five years, terrorists will try to conduct a destructive biological attack. Officials are concerned about the possibility of infections to thousands of U.S. citizens, overwhelming regional health care systems.

There could also be dire economic impacts caused by workers' illnesses and deaths. Officials are most concerned about biological agents stolen from labs or other storage facilities, such as anthrax.

"The threat of terrorism and the threat of extremist ideologies has not abated," Chertoff said in his year-end address on Dec. 18. "This threat has not evaporated, and we can't turn the page on it."

Story continues below
advertisement

These high-consequence threats are not the only kind of challenges that will confront the U.S. over the next five years.

Terrorists will continue to try to evade U.S. border security measures and place operatives inside the mainland to carry out attacks, the 38-page assessment said. It also said that they may pose as refugees or asylum seekers or try to exploit foreign travel channels such as the visa waiver program, which allows citizens of 34 countries to enter the U.S. without visas.

Long waits for immigration and more restrictive European refugee and asylum programs will cause more foreigners to try to enter the U.S. illegally. Increasing numbers of Iraqis are expected to migrate to the U.S. in the next five years; and refugees from Somalia and Sudan could increase because of conflicts in those countries, the assessment said.

Because there is a proposed cap of 12,000 refugees from Africa, officials expect more will try to enter the U.S. illegally as well. Officials predict the same scenario for refugees from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Intelligence officials predict the pool of radical Islamists within the U.S. will increase over the next five years due partly to the ease of online recruiting means. Officials foresee "a wave of young, self-identified Muslim 'terrorist wannabes' who aspire to carry out violent acts."

The U.S. has already seen some examples of these homegrown terrorists. Recently five Muslim immigrants were convicted of plotting to massacre U.S. soldiers at Fort Dix in a case the government said demonstrated its post-Sept. 11 determination to stop terrorist attacks in the planning stages.

The Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah does not have a known history of fomenting attacks inside the U.S., but that could change if there is some kind of "triggering" event, the Homeland assessment cautions.

A 2008 Interagency Intelligence Committee on Terrorism assessment said that Hezbollah members based in the U.S. do local fundraising through charity projects and criminal activity, like money laundering, smuggling, drug trafficking, fraud and extortion, according to the homeland security assessment.

In addition, the cyber terror threat is expected to increase over the next five years, as hacking tools become more sophisticated and available. "Youthful, Internet-savvy extremists might apply their online acumen to conduct cyber attacks rather than offer themselves up as operatives to conduct physical attacks," according to the assessment.

Currently, Islamic terrorists, including al-Qaida, would like to conduct cyber attacks, but they lack the capability to do so, the assessment said. The large-scale attacks that are on al-Qaida's wishlist _ such as disrupting a major city's water or power systems _ require sophisticated cyber capabilities that the terrorist group does not possess.

But al-Qaida has the capability to hire sophisticated hackers to carry out these kinds of attacks, the assessment said. And federal officials believe that in the next three to five years, al-Qaida could direct or inspire cyber attacks that target the U.S. economy.

Counterterrorism expert Frank Cilluffo says the typical cyber attack would not achieve al-Qaida's main goal of inflicting mass devastation with its resulting widespread media coverage. However, al-Qaida is likely to continue to rely on the Internet to spread its message, said Cilluffo, who runs the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington University.

Officials also predict that domestic terrorists in the forms of radical animal rights and environmental extremists will become more adept with explosives and increase their use of arson attacks.

WASHINGTON — The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasi...
WASHINGTON — The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East and Africa, persistent challenges to border security and increasi...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
261
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
photo

So, what ya'all are saying is that, if Bush hadn't invaded Iraq, there would be no terrorism coming from the Middle East??

Where's the evidence that supports that conclusion??

Besides your bigotry and hatred, I mean...

Michale...­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 12/26/2008
- indypete I'm a Fan of indypete 148 fans permalink
photo

And because bush invaded Iraq, Americans are safer, right?

What evidence supports that conclusion?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 12/26/2008
photo

I never made that conclusion.

So, why should I bother supporting it?

Regardless of that, are you claiming that if Bush hadn't invaded Iraq, then there wouldn't be any terrorism coming from the Middle East?

Michale...­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 12/26/2008

Skeletor knows a little something about "domestic terrorism". Don't you, Mr. Secretary?

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/movers-and-shakers/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 12/26/2008

In other shocking news: Water is wet!

it seems that occupation of lands that are not yours, stealing natural resources, war profiteering and cramming a cultural change down people's throats does NOT promote peace, love and understanding?

Wow. Wonder what the oddsmaker offered on that bet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 12/26/2008
- LHoney I'm a Fan of LHoney 42 fans permalink
photo

very well said...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 12/26/2008
photo

Thanks. That sums it up pretty well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 12/26/2008
- RoXXanne I'm a Fan of RoXXanne 3 fans permalink

Well, well, well... Who could have known..?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 AM on 12/26/2008

Somehow I didn't expect them to say, "Terror threat driven by insatiable greed and hording by US and some Western European countries.­"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 AM on 12/26/2008
- Rog49Thomas I'm a Fan of Rog49Thomas 192 fans permalink

"The Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah does not have a known history of fomenting attacks inside the U.S., but that could change if there is some kind of "triggering" event, the Homeland assessment cautions."

This statement might be made about almost any group.

This is intelligence?

Oh, wait, this is Pan's Administration

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 AM on 12/26/2008
photo

Has Inspector Clouseau Chertoff, interrogated the man sitting behind the desk in the oval office for clues regarding; "Terror Threat Driven By Instability In Middle East, Africa", and the current occupant of white house.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 AM on 12/26/2008

Great question.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 AM on 12/26/2008

By the way, this tactic of branding protesters as "domestic terrorists" is also getting old. The tradition of prostesting wrongdoing goes back to our nation's founders, and is as American as apple pie. While arson and bombing are, by anyone's standards, wrong, the FBI's domestic terrorist task force paints all protesters with the same brush.

Check out what the FBI's been up to over the past year, alone, targeting domestic terrorists. http://canarypapers.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/why-are-the-fbi-and-attorney-general-mukasey-in-cahoots-with-barney-fife/?preview=true&preview_id=34&preview_nonce=aaa281948f You don't need to read the whole post. Just scan down to the captions, "Are You Sure You're Not a Terrorist?" and "You May Be a Terrorist and Not Even Know It."

It's time to retire this increasingly gestapo-style approach to stifling political dissent in the United States.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 AM on 12/26/2008
- indypete I'm a Fan of indypete 148 fans permalink
photo

To maintain the current system, you need to have an "enemy". See points 3 and 7.....

http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 12/26/2008

This article gets the "DUH of the Year" award.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 AM on 12/26/2008
photo

I give it "5 Duh's"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 AM on 12/26/2008
- we0z I'm a Fan of we0z 7 fans permalink

Boy Chertoff is work of art.... a real Einstein. What part of the Mideast being a fertile ground for terrorists for the last 40 years has he not understood? Sorry Chertoff the fear card no longer works. Leave like all the other GOP sychophants that have used fear to rob our treasury blind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 AM on 12/26/2008
photo

Boy, how true - how true. This is nothing more than another "last minute" (before The Romper Room Gang leaves office) effort to move the blame from them and place it onto PE Obama & Co. Don't you just hate to have to look at pictures of "these" dudes? I mean, ugly skin-heads with hollow eyes and no indication of a soul?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 12/26/2008

Agree

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 12/26/2008
- Mahi Joe I'm a Fan of Mahi Joe 48 fans permalink

Bernie just epitomizes the incompetence of the Bush administration. Just who in the h3ll is talking to? Most of us figured this out years ago and he just now thought of this? Well, I suppose he will get the Medal of Freedom now for his insightful remarks. What a bunch of dolts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 12/26/2008
- grf67 I'm a Fan of grf67 36 fans permalink

So the ME instability caused by Bush's attack on Iraq has increased the threats to the US. Great job, Bushie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 AM on 12/26/2008
- eremite I'm a Fan of eremite 5 fans permalink

This presents a conundrum for obama. His cut and run policies may not help the stability of the Mideast or Africa. His meddling in kenya has stirred up more violence and he hasn't even been inaugurated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 AM on 12/26/2008

What Obama said is pretty much the same thing that Bush and Iraq agreed upon. that is the problem with neocons, they call it cut and run when dems talk about it, but when the neocons same pretty much the same thing it is not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 AM on 12/26/2008
- eremite I'm a Fan of eremite 5 fans permalink

obama has advocated cut and run from the very start of his campaign. Now that the reality has set in he is trying to change his committment. And I guarantee you that just because obama says now what President Bush has been saying all a long; it is not the same thing. obama is all talk and no action.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 AM on 12/26/2008
photo

"Terror Threat Driven By Instability In Middle East, Africa"

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 AM on 12/26/2008
- eremite I'm a Fan of eremite 5 fans permalink

As they say on Fox, the chickenhawks came before the eggheads. Whether the eggheads can imagine and implement a solution remains to be seen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 AM on 12/26/2008

Fox is now addressing the terror issue?

I thought they were still trying to find out why Barack Ob-a-ama-a sat in Rev. Jeremiah Wright's church for twenty years ....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 12/26/2008
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 260 fans permalink

"The terrorism threat to the United States over the next five years will be driven by instability in the Middle East"

... and that would be the instability which we fueled with Junior's knuckle-headed invasion?

"The other side is going to continue to learn more about doing things," [Chertoff] said.

Too bad the same can't be said of this "side".

"This threat has not evaporated, and we can't turn the page on it."

How can we ever thank you?

Oh, yeah... great job on Katrina.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 AM on 12/26/2008
photo

how about such drivers as the behavior of Fundamentalist in Chief Bush ?

http://e-blogules.blogspot.com/2007/08/universal-declaration-of-independence.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 AM on 12/26/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect