Oprah's Holocaust Memoir Recommendation "Angel At The Fence" Defended By Author, Publisher Following Scrutiny

HILLEL ITALIE | December 26, 2008 04:38 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Sept. 25, 2008 file photo, Herman and Roma Rosenblat pose for a photo in their North Miami Beach, Fla. home. The author and publisher of a disputed Holocaust memoir defended the book's story of love between two survivors, but also called it a work of memory and not of scholarship. "This is my personal story as I remember it," Herman Rosenblat said in a statement issued Thursday through Berkley Books, which will release his "Angel at the Fence" in February. (AP Photo/J. Pat Carter, file)

NEW YORK — The author and publisher of a disputed Holocaust memoir defended the book's story of love between two survivors, but also called it a work of memory and not of scholarship.

"This is my personal story as I remember it," Herman Rosenblat, 79, said in a statement issued Thursday through Berkley Books, which will release his "Angel at the Fence" in February.

Berkley added its own comments, noting that a leading Holocaust expert, Michael Berenbaum, had found the story's "general outline" credible, but also saying that "any memoir based on the memories of a survivor is verifiable only by him or her alone."

Rosenblat's book is based on his well-publicized story _ embraced by Oprah Winfrey among others _ of how he met his future wife, Roma Radzicki, on opposite sides of a barbed-wire fence at a Nazi concentration camp. Scholars have questioned whether such an encounter could have happened.

"The events that are its background are part of history; the book, however, reflects my memories of how the events affected my life. I was a young child at the time my family was caught up in the Holocaust, and I saw things through a young child's eyes. But I know and remember what I saw," Rosenblat said in his statement.

"What I offer in this memoir are the images, sounds, smells and feelings that have stayed in my mind for some seven decades."

As the Rosenblats have recounted on numerous occasions over the past decade, he was a teenager in a concentration camp in Nazi-controlled Germany and she was slightly younger, her family pretending to be Christian and living nearby.

They met at the camp's fence, where for months she would sneak him apples and bread. Rosenblat was eventually transferred to another camp and lost track of his friend until years after the war, when both were living in New York and met on a blind date. Upon talking about their lives, they recognized each other and were soon married, in 1958.

Story continues below

The couple live in the Miami area in Florida.

Since going public with their story in the 1990s, the Rosenblats have been celebrated by Winfrey, among others, and have been the subject of a children's book, Laurie Friedman's "Angel Girl." A feature film is scheduled to begin production next year.

But scholars, some of whom were quoted in a recent story by The New Republic, have been highly skeptical, saying the layout of the camp _ Schlieben, a sub-camp of Buchenwald _ made it virtually impossible that Rosenblat could have approached the fence without being spotted. According to maps of Schlieben, the area where he and Roma might have met was located next to SS barracks.

"Some serious historians as well as other historical sleuths have done some pretty serious research on this story," Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies at Emory University, wrote on her blog on Dec. 15.

No one questions that Rosenblat was a prisoner, but Lipstadt worries that Holocaust deniers would be encouraged should his meetings with Rosa be disproved.

"There are also survivors who are very upset about this story," she wrote. "They just don't believe it."

___

Berkley is an imprint of Penguin Group (USA).

NEW YORK — The author and publisher of a disputed Holocaust memoir defended the book's story of love between two survivors, but also called it a work of memory and not of scholarship. "This is ...
NEW YORK — The author and publisher of a disputed Holocaust memoir defended the book's story of love between two survivors, but also called it a work of memory and not of scholarship. "This is ...
Filed by Danny Shea  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
279
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

Wow can't the man tell his story without these so called experts coming out the woodworks questioning his memory?....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

Amazing isn't it. Remeber when Hailey wrote "Roots"; every historian everywhere nitpicked it to death; as if it were a history textbook; instead of the story of his family.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 12/28/2008

For those that don't recognize the danger of accepting any/all accounts: this and other such "memoirs" have been peddled to the masses (ex. Oprah), school/college students forced to read, made into movies. The ultimate effect is the the manipulation of history and facts and leads to the creation of a profitable myth. Oh, what a business!
Want a recent example of a fraud: Misha: a Memoir of the Holocaust Years http://www.cbc.ca/arts/books/story/2008/02/29/jewish-memoir-wolves.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 12/26/2008
- yorkville7 I'm a Fan of yorkville7 3 fans permalink

we grew up watching these movies and books that were 90 percent fiction

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 12/28/2008

What about a PaIestinian memoir recomendation? Anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

The basic point here is, this is a novel. It is not supposed to be factual, it is supposed to be entertaining.

One of the more disturbing developments in bookmaking generally is thar non-fiction books have to dress up as narrations, while novels are now fact-checked. This makes no sense. It blurs all the lines.

http://cabal-thenovel.blogspot.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 12/26/2008
- CeeCee I'm a Fan of CeeCee 36 fans permalink

It's not a novel, it's a memoir (see article above, where it says that it's a "Holocaust memoir"), which means it has to be factually correct.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

Nah, a "memoir" mean memory; his memories; it is not a historical textbook

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 12/28/2008
- IkeChicago I'm a Fan of IkeChicago 18 fans permalink

If you run for the Presidency, people will go to all ends to investigate you. Some just want the truth out, some are jealouse.

If you go on the Oprah Show, people will go to all ends to investigate you. Some just want the truth out, some are jealouse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 12/26/2008
- Clare53 I'm a Fan of Clare53 15 fans permalink

Learn how to spell jealous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

ooohhh! The "witty" "Ad Hom"; the ammunition of the school yard

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 12/28/2008
- Eric8869 I'm a Fan of Eric8869 25 fans permalink

You can find a dictionary at the Harold Washington library.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 12/27/2008
photo

I wonder, if Oprah hadn't recommended it, would anybody be disputing it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 12/26/2008
- AlP I'm a Fan of AlP 4 fans permalink

Oprah is a corporation. Her book club is a company.

Of course she's going to be scrutinized.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 12/26/2008
- darkday I'm a Fan of darkday 3 fans permalink

Oprah's book club is not a company.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

I don't read a lot of memoirs but from the first one I read I've been skeptical - who can remember entire conversations and details of their childhood? So, I basically figure that a lot of them are reconstructions, as all memory is, and I don't get too bent out of shape except in the case of someone like Frey, who actually did harm by telling people that they could get off of drugs, etc. without help when he was never as badly off as he portrayed himself.

Maybe we need a new category for this type of book - faction, or something along those lines.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 12/26/2008
- Eric8869 I'm a Fan of Eric8869 25 fans permalink

No kidding - I thought the "scandal" over a million little pieces (or whatever that book was) was absurd.

I don't believe every word of RUNNING WITH SCISSORS by Augusten Burroughs or anything that David Sedaris writes but I don't care. I expect their stories are founded in fact but exaggerated for humor, drama and interest.

A good read is a good read and a good storyteller is the real draw. (I mean Angelas Ashes is about kids starving to death but it's told in a humorous way - Do I expect that the author remembers EVERY detail of their childhoods???)

It's just dumb.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 AM on 12/27/2008
- emstrem I'm a Fan of emstrem 11 fans permalink
photo

I'm sure he doesnt care if you believe him or not as long as you paid for the book he's happy. How many things do you remember as a child, then when a parent or relative tells you what actually happened its quite different? Quite a few I imagine. Plus imagine him retelling/rethinking these stories for the last 60 some odd years, I'm sure in his mind he actually believes everything that he wrote down. Cut the poor guy some slack, he's not long for this earth anyhow and he is hurting absolutely nobody.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 12/26/2008

Why not cut him some slack?

Because his fantasy humanizes genocide.

His story contains guards that are "good Germans" "who look the other way", little girls that are able to "pass for Christian" despite living in a totalitarian state that has fully documented their ancestry and knows enough to classify and identify them as Jews and mark them for extermination.

Make no mistake, few Jews could live openly by the end of the war. Those that survived, hid.

Secondly, there is plenty of documentation around to condemn the Nazi state. Anyone who wishes to condemn it should hold themselves to the same standard and not allow "memory" or "perception" to excuse inaccuracy or fantasy.

Once you do that, you let the deniers in. Feel like cutting them the same slack?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

Then you may well care to revisit the Anne Frank diary in all its variations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 12/26/2008
- darkday I'm a Fan of darkday 3 fans permalink

You keep assuming his story is false, and there's just no evidence of that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

Actually, Jews who survived because they claimed to be Christians, mostly with false papers, are not that uncommon. Its not like you can see it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 12/27/2008
- Mort I'm a Fan of Mort 38 fans permalink
photo

The public witch hunts are getting ridiculous. We have members of Congress who habitually lie and break laws, yet we wink and accept it as part of the game. Here's an old couple who survived one of the darkest times in history and came away with a nice memory. After that many years, some of the facts are bound to be a little fuzzy. You'd think they were running for president and had to be vetted. This isn't a court of law, fer pete's sake! It's just a sweet story. Oh, and Oprah... they'd be much better off without your "help."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 12/26/2008
- mspink I'm a Fan of mspink 12 fans permalink
photo

Here, here!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 12/26/2008
- VegasBabe I'm a Fan of VegasBabe 200 fans permalink
photo

that seems pretty nasty...what did Oprah ever do to you? by and large, i have yet to hear and author complain about Oprah promoting their work(s).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 12/26/2008
- Mort I'm a Fan of Mort 38 fans permalink
photo

If it were just a recommendation, that'd be nice. But in the end everything Oprah touches ends up being all about her. Here her book plug ends up being a major controversy with guess who right in the middle, instead of a simple encouragement to read a heartwarming story about two people in love. They're supposed to be the focus, not her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 12/26/2008
- AlP I'm a Fan of AlP 4 fans permalink

We can multi-task.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 12/26/2008
- sc92705 I'm a Fan of sc92705 5 fans permalink

I don't buy the story; the level of coincidence just to high to believe. And how many cases there of Nazi guards helping Jews survive? This could be the one and only offered up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 12/26/2008
- anonimost I'm a Fan of anonimost 8 fans permalink

I don't believe in truth when recounting history - - it's just someone's perspective .

Holocaust deniers, however, are sociopaths.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 12/26/2008

I really hope the romantic story is factual. But I have visited several concentration/work camps and they all have a similar setup to our modern prisons. They were surrounded by solid, thick, tall concrete walls with guard towers every so often. If there wasn't a concrete wall, then there was an electrified fence.

It seems pretty difficult to me that people could get away with exchanging communication at the fences. The walls were heavily guarded and well lit. I seriously doubt that people would taken their lives so lightly. It was all about survival in those days. Getting caught would have been torture and death for both parties involved, and their families.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 12/26/2008
photo

The camps as you see them today are replicas. The actual camps have been destroyed by the Allied armies in 1945.

I also highly doubt there were children in Buchenwald. This was a camp for political prisoners and POWs.

However, its a novel. it does not need to be true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 12/26/2008
- CeeCee I'm a Fan of CeeCee 36 fans permalink

It is not a novel! It is a memoir. Memoirs are supposed to be factually true. Reqad the article above!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 12/26/2008
- Eric8869 I'm a Fan of Eric8869 25 fans permalink

The children who survived were mostly for medical experimentation etc. - the others were all gassed because they were not needed for labor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 AM on 12/27/2008

Couple of other small inconsistencies.

This story describes a girl supplying apples for 7 months up until May 1945 where he tells her (somehow across a 10 meter gap) to stop because he is to be gassed at 10am the next morning.

But he survives the war because he is moved to another camp.

- May? Buchenwald was liberated 8 April 1945

- Germany surrendered 8 May 1945 after it had been reduced to the size of Hitler's bunker. How was he moved when the Germans had no more control of their country than could be acheived at the point of Hitler's personal pistol? If senior SS officers were having trouble escaping to the west to surrender to the US rather than the USSR how are we to believe a small boy in a camp could be effectively moved to another?

- 7 months (let's be generous) is August 1944 to late March 1945. Winter. Do apples grow in winter? In wartime Germany? In the 1940's prior to modern agriculture and international shipping? Don't think so.

- the boy is told he will be gassed. No gassing at Buchenwald, it was a labor camp. Even if there were, he is told? No other victim of gas chambers was ever told, they were all deceived by various ruses such as being told they were going to communal showers, and there is no way they were ever scheduled for death. They were just herded.

This story is so unbelievable it defies description.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 12/26/2008

You know what? It is a beautiful story in so many human ways. So if ya don't believe it, don't. Those of us that love happy endings instead of true to life, we will believe what we want to believe. Did they hurt anyone by this story? No, no matter what ya say. Is it offensive to other captives, maybe, but that's their problem, don't ya think. Come on, this is what I am beginning to hate about our country. Everyone's gotta jump on the hate stories, make em hate stories, make em lies, make em unhappy. Yet, ya all sit on your hands during the most important election of our time (60+) and let the lies roll off tongues as if honey/
I love the story and for all you know, it could damn well be true. They were children in a time a child should never live, let alone analyze as a child. Give em some slack and their memories, THEIR memories. Why do we all have so much time to sit and watch to see who we can attack next on what ever we can think of.
It is a beautiful story and that's all there is to it. Leave em alone in their twilight years and let them be happy. They earned it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 12/26/2008

You are imprisoned being slowly starved not knowing whether you will see the next sunrise. I suppose it may be possible to get a few things "not quite accurate." But so what, let them be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 12/26/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect