Cash-strapped states weigh selling roads, parks

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Cash-strapped states weigh selling roads, parks stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MARTIGA LOHN | December 27, 2008 03:39 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Feb. 2, 2005 file photo, the Tappan Zee Bridge, which connects New York's Westchester and Rockland counties, is seen across an icy Hudson River in South Nyack, N.Y. In New York, Democratic Gov. David Paterson appointed a commission to look into leasing state assets, including the Tappan Zee Bridge, the lottery, golf courses, toll roads, parks and beaches. (AP Photo/Stuart Ramson, File)

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Minnesota is deep in the hole financially, but the state still owns a premier golf resort, a sprawling amateur sports complex, a big airport, a major zoo and land holdings the size of the Central American country of Belize.

Valuables like these are in for a closer look as 44 states cope with deficits.

Like families pawning the silver to get through a tight spot, states such as Minnesota, New York, Massachusetts and Illinois are thinking of selling or leasing toll roads, parks, lotteries and other assets to raise desperately needed cash.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty has hinted that his January budget proposal will include proposals to privatize some of what the state owns or does. The Republican is looking for cash to help close a $5.27 billion deficit without raising taxes.

GOP lawmakers are pushing to privatize the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport and the state lottery. Both steps require a higher authority _ federal legislation in the case of the airport, a voter-approved constitutional amendment for the lottery. But one lawmaker estimated an airport deal could bring in at least $2.5 billion, and the lottery $500 million.

Massachusetts lawmakers are considering putting the Massachusetts Turnpike in private hands. That could bring in upfront money to help with a $1.4 billion deficit, while also saving on highway operating costs.

In New York, Democratic Gov. David Paterson appointed a commission to look into leasing state assets, including the Tappan Zee Bridge north of New York City, the lottery, golf courses, toll roads, parks and beaches. Recommendations are expected next month.

Such projects could be attractive to private investors and public pension funds looking for safe places to put their money in this scary economy, said Leonard Gilroy, a privatization expert with the market-oriented Reason Foundation in Los Angeles.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Infrastructure is more attractive today than ever," Gilroy said. "It's tangible. It's a road. It's water. It's an airport. It's something that is _ you know, you hear the term recession-proof."

Unions don't like privatization deals out of fear that worker wages and benefits will be squeezed as private operators try to boost their profit by streamlining services.

Taxpayers, too, can lose out if the arrangements don't work _ and sometimes even if they do, said Mark Price, a labor economist with the Keystone Research Center in Harrisburg, Pa. Higher tolls on privatized roads can push drivers onto state-operated roads, wearing them down faster and raising public costs over time.

"You're privatizing some profits in this process and socializing some losses," Price said.

Selling or leasing public assets can produce an immediate infusion of cash for the state, while foisting the tough decisions, such as raising tolls, onto private operators instead of the politicians.

"The downsides are often after they leave office," said Phineas Baxandall, a researcher with the consumer-oriented U.S. Public Interest Research Group in Boston.

Some states struck major privatization deals well before the economic crisis hit.

Indiana, for example, brought in $3.8 billion in 2006 by leasing the Indiana Toll Road for 75 years. Chicago stands to collect $2.5 billion by leasing Midway Airport, if the federal government approves, and has raised an additional $3.5 billion since 2005 through deals for the Chicago Skyway toll road, parking ramps and parking meters.

But in September, investors walked away from a $12.8 billion bid to lease the Pennsylvania Turnpike for 75 years after legislators failed to act on the deal. And Texas lawmakers uneasy over a proposed private toll road system approved a two-year moratorium on such contracts last year.

David Fisher, who managed Minnesota's state-owned properties a few years ago under former Gov. Jesse Ventura, warned that the state has a hard time finding buyers for properties such as old mental institutions.

Fisher said some public properties belong in private hands, such as Giants Ridge Golf & Ski Resort, a top-rated getaway in Biwabik, and Ironworld, a museum and library in Chisholm. Both are owned and subsidized by Iron Range Resources, a state agency.

"Certainly those things could be privatized, I think without harm to the state, but I don't know that you could find the right buyer," Fisher said.

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Minnesota is deep in the hole financially, but the state still owns a premier golf resort, a sprawling amateur sports complex, a big airport, a major zoo and land holdings the ...
ST. PAUL, Minn. — Minnesota is deep in the hole financially, but the state still owns a premier golf resort, a sprawling amateur sports complex, a big airport, a major zoo and land holdings the ...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
138
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

When are Americans going to wake up? They've been manipulated by the banks and corporations to sell off their assets. They don't have to. Just say NO.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 AM on 12/28/2008

The Elete have taught the working stiff a new word......­Socialist.­......."do­n't be a socialist, sell everything to us for pennies on the dollar". The public should own nothing. It appears that many have bought into this public property grab and will soon be demanding the sale of their Fire Departments, then they can be true paupers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 AM on 12/28/2008
- FZliveson I'm a Fan of FZliveson 82 fans permalink
photo

State Governments DO NOT OWN THE ROADS. They have no power to sell state property to private enterprise. This would be yet another step toward fascism. Resist this attempt to further privatize us. It could all be part of the big picture that got us the $835 billion bailout kickoff package. No it is NOT $700 billion as the radio and teevee are saying. We are being hoodwinked. BOHICA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 12/27/2008
- HWNA I'm a Fan of HWNA 9 fans permalink

I agree, the sad part is everyone will just let it happen as long as they can still sit in front of their television sets for three to five hours per day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 PM on 12/27/2008
- aweissnet I'm a Fan of aweissnet 24 fans permalink
photo

It is so true. I hate TV, and don't watch it (don't have it). I rent movies that I choose to watch when I'm in front of the tube. I'm even getting disgusted with them, and was just thinking (on my day off after watching) ... how people can watch this on a regular basis. Even a couple hours a week is too much for me. Hours at a time? Like punishment. I would not be sorry if that as entertainment, disappeared.

It's shaping people, the way they think, act, behave. I believe brainwashing in a sense. It's dumbing down the next generation, and pacifying people. If it did not exist we would not be sitting in our houses tolerating this. If movies and commercials didn't somehow let us know everything was ok, we'd think our government had waged w a r on us.

If enough people lose their homes, and don't have TV, things might actually change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 12/28/2008
photo

Depends on the road in question..­.. Interstate Highways are, of course, federally owned.. most other roads are either State or County.

That said, it's a HORRIBLE idea to do this... if we've learned nothing in the past 8 years, it is that the corporate sector does NOT have the public's interests at heart.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 12/27/2008
- FZliveson I'm a Fan of FZliveson 82 fans permalink
photo

You seem to dispute my comment. Roads are not OWNED BY GOVERNMENTS.
THEY ARE OWNED BY THE PEOPLE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 12/28/2008
- Oldtimer I'm a Fan of Oldtimer 19 fans permalink
photo

Let me get this right.
The economy collapsed as a result of free marketeers and now the State is
privatizing its assets.
I have never been in favor of a dictator but if we could get FDR or Andrew Jackson
back in the White House I would support them.
In my humble opinion free marketeers should be rounded up and lined up
in America's town markets and shot.
Then America could get on with the real business of building a sustainable society.
we are heading back into the Middle Ages.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

no post here.
huffington post censors.
sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 12/27/2008
- SammyD I'm a Fan of SammyD 11 fans permalink

how did these states vote in the election?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

its New York so take a wild guess

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

Minnesota.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

Try reading the ARTICLE instead of just looking at the pictures, kid.

It's about MINNESOTA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 12/28/2008
- Earl I'm a Fan of Earl 90 fans permalink
photo

I'll take two parks, three bridges, a superhighway, and four large fries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 12/27/2008
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 47 fans permalink

What will those who buy a states property use for money? The meltdown of 9/15/08 was a world wide, world changing event. There seems to be a world wide credit crunch. I've heard of a Mr Madoff who was managing wealth & selling a variety of financial instruments. Is he having problems with his enterprises?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 12/27/2008
- DMcD I'm a Fan of DMcD 11 fans permalink
photo

"what will they use for money" ? Well , there's always that $350 billion of chump-change (of ours) the banks have that can be spent , as they please. Oh the joy; the public paying for the privilege of being fleeced. The American taxpayer , getting it from both ends , as usual.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 12/27/2008
- Clarabell I'm a Fan of Clarabell 59 fans permalink

I heard about this sort of thing months and months, maybe even a year, before the crash. So whose plan was this anyway and what is the real purpose? Maybe someone can dig it out of the archives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 12/27/2008
- neem I'm a Fan of neem 4 fans permalink

I'm really worried that between now and January 20, the economy could free-fall to a very dangerous place. Can Congress or the Federal Reserve get some emergency money to the states in the next couple of weeks? I know Obama wants to help, but January 20 seems so far away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 12/27/2008
- DrBillo1 I'm a Fan of DrBillo1 6 fans permalink
photo

Try taking less money for bosses and employees and less inconsequential projects for the taxpayers---

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 12/27/2008
- Hempy I'm a Fan of Hempy 13 fans permalink
photo

The governors would do well if they got used to promoting American values of our founders. In Alexander Hamilton's 1791 report to Congress on manufactures, in speaking of hemp, he wrote:

"This is an article of importance enough to warrant the employment of extraordinary means in its favor."

In a 1998 report on the “Economic Impact of Industrial Hemp in Kentucky,” July 1998, the authors wrote:

“If just one-fourth of Kentucky’s 90 agricultural counties went into industrial hemp business, approximately 17,348 jobs would be created and $396 million in worker earnings generated yearly."

Neither Kentucky's governor nor the General Assembly seem too keen on following up on Hamilton's advice. They aren't even trying any means to legalize hemp much less "extraordinary means in its favor."

Gov. Schwartzneger (R-CA) has a black cloud hanging over California's budget due to his failure to sign into law an industrial hemp bill that the California legislature passed.

So, governors, is one of our founder's views too hot for you to handle? Not interested in creating millions of "green" jobs nationwide? Why create jobs when you can go to Congress and ask for a bailout?

American values can be real pesky to our nation's politicians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 12/27/2008

humm...Pri­vatization of public works and state -owned enterprise­s.. Sounds like the shock doctrine NC wrote about.
Why would the businesses bring in (?more) money to a private company than they do under state ownership? Anybody know? Or is this just an excuse for privatization?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 12/27/2008

oops! That would be NK for Naomi Klein. Now that Naomi has told the story for all the world to see, including the simple minded, are they really going to get away with this deregulation, privatization, economic shock $hit?
Un.effin.b­elievable

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 12/27/2008
- aweissnet I'm a Fan of aweissnet 24 fans permalink
photo

Great. Can't wait till the corporation owns every piece of us, rather than the 10-12 hours a day they currently do.

Life won't be complete till I'm beholden to them every second of my day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 12/27/2008
photo

Sounds like "planned abandonment" - wasn't that the Republicans dream all along?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 12/27/2008

Public funds paid for roads like Turnpikes; states have no moral right (they have the legal right, thanks to the Bush Administration) to alienate them from public use. Why should Spanish-owned company Citra be able to hike toll rates on the Chicago Skyway or the Indiana Turnpike when American tax dollars built them? Why should it be considered a good deal for the taxpayer that truck and other heavy traffic looking for a cheap way around the newly privatized roads is wearing down those roads and ratcheting up the taxpayer bills for road repairs on roads not meant to carry 18 wheelers? These deals are bad for everyone--truckers, taxpayers, residents along nearby roads--except the owners and shareholders of the private companies that benefit from our investments. Once these investments are given away then they can't be recaptured. I am hoping that the Obama Administration will put a stop to these impulses and save for Americans what Americans have already paid for over the years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 12/27/2008
- bikerdude I'm a Fan of bikerdude 68 fans permalink
photo

Maybe they should be looking at mergers. Create super states...O­r sell naming rights... If New York sold its name to say Warren Buffet, it would be known as the state of Buffet....­Or the churches could buy the states and Utah could become Mormonlatterstate or something.­...
Not much more absurd than selling highways or parks...Wh­y not just elect fiscally responsible people and make them adhere to a budget. That works in my home and my business..­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 12/27/2008
- ILibertine I'm a Fan of ILibertine 21 fans permalink
photo

I could go for Harleyconsin, or Wisdavidson. You?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 12/27/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect