Study: Happiness Is a Size 14

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Telegraph   |  Last Updated: 12:12PM GMT 29 Dec 2008   |   December 29, 2008 12:50 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

According to a new study by cereal brand Special K, women who wear a British size 14 (US equivalent size 12) are the happiest with their life and looks.

Girls who wear the dress size rated their general happiness higher than any other with a quarter saying they were extremely happy.

More than 43 per cent of size 14 women also said they were as happy as they could be with their career, while almost a third say they couldn't be more content with their love life.

Second happiest, according to the research by Special K, are size 12 women, with almost three quarters saying they are completely satisfied with their friendships.

Forty-five per cent also enjoy a very successful career.

That said, of the 3,000 women surveyed, 48% across the board said that they weren't happy with their weight.

Keep reading...

According to a new study by cereal brand Special K, women who wear a British size 14 (US equivalent size 12) are the happiest with their life and looks. Girls who wear the dress size rated their ge...
According to a new study by cereal brand Special K, women who wear a British size 14 (US equivalent size 12) are the happiest with their life and looks. Girls who wear the dress size rated their ge...
 
Comments
73
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

I, personally, think that beauty comes in all different shapes and sizes, but it has to start within. At a size 20, I was unhappy inside; therefore, it transcended to my outside, as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 01/06/2009

I am a 40 year old black female and I am a size 8. When I was younger, age 26 year and younger, I always swore that I would never be get any larger than a size 4/5. After becoming a mother @ 26, years old, I went from a size 4/5 to a size 10, and I was devasted. From the age of 26 to 37 I grew from a size 10 to a 20 and I spent all of those years very miserably. At forty years old, and at a size 8, my husband thinks that I am the sexiest woman alive (he has never been attracted to large women, but loved me so much, he never complained about my serious weight gain), my 14 year old daughter loves showing me off to all of her friends, (at a size 20 she was so ashamed of me, but never told me, but worked out with me so hard that it motivated me to get the extra weight off. She told me that she was embarrassed of me only after I lost all of the weight), and I feel that I am more beautiful than I have ever been in my life. I am so proud of my weight loss and I consider myself a CERTIFIED DIVA. I personally feel that if someone is physically and emotionally fit, then happiness and confidence is evident.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 01/06/2009

The girl in that picture is not a size 12, she's closer to a 16.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 01/04/2009
photo

If we still wore handmade clothes, we wouldn't get caught up in this false ideals of ready-to-wear clothing sizes. Everyone has a different body type and fits into clothes differently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 PM on 01/03/2009

I haven't run into too many women who want to be a size 14. If they are heavier they would usually rather be slimmer if given a choice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 01/02/2009
- JRN I'm a Fan of JRN permalink

The woman in the photo accompanying this article is NOT a size 12, I don't care how tall she is. Seriously, I am about a size 10 at 5'1" (ten pounds above my "healthy weight" limit, after having my second child), am struggling to lose those extra pounds and maintain a healthy self-image. . . this photo is offensive. I do NOT look anything like that. People should not think that's what a size 10/12 is or is perceived as being. I expect more from Huffington Post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

You read my mind. No way is that girl a size 12. I think that photo is of a British singer, who is quite short.

I, too am a size 12, but after having 4 children I decided to stop beating myself up, I'm not doing so bad at my current size.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 01/01/2009

Yes, it's offensive, but not for the reasons you imply. She is fatter than you claim to be. She is a fat person presented as an object of ridicule and contempt. You seem to participate in that - *you're* not like *her*.
Huffpost, you are at fault. Can you never present a picture of a fat person in a pose, angle, dress and expression that does not intend disgust and invite contempt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 01/04/2009
photo

Guess I am a happy camper being a size12. When I was much younger I was a size 7 and when I was way younger I was a size 2. Gee time flys when you gain weight and get older!!! Too funny. I say from what I see while I am out and about most women are generally in the above size 10 range. The ones falling under that are most likely young or really really old!!! Just saying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 12/31/2008
photo

The most disturbing statistic is that 48% of these women say they are not happy. Wow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 12/31/2008

Are you really surprised? I don't think I know any woman who is 100% happy with their bodies. I know I always feel I can be more in shape.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 01/02/2009
photo

I have a couple of thoughts...first of all, Marilyn Monroe was no size 12, even 10. I attended an auction of her clothes and other items at Christy's a couple of years ago and got to see up close the dress she wore when she sang "Happy Birthday" to JFK...it was easily a size 2, by today's standards.

My daughter loves vintage clothes and she wears a size 10 in clothes from the 1950's...and she is 5 foot 4 inches tall and about 100 pounds. Clothing manufacturers have changed and adapted the way they size their wares to accomodate the growing American and European waistlines. (This is also evident among different clothing store chains...a size 6 at Ann Talbots is like a size 10 at Walmart....because wealthier women don't want to be reminded of their real size.)

That picture looks like Beth Ditto. She is still a young woman, so health problems haven't started for her yet...but I'd love to see her in 30 years if she continues on the path she is on..(I've read intervews with her and she basically eats anything she wants and doesn't care about her the quality of the food or nutrition.) You can say what you want about self acceptance and nurturing the body you have, but the fact is that diseases like diabetes are on an epidemic rise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 12/31/2008
photo

You are completely right on all your points. Of course, that dress Miss Monroe wore to sing to JFK was probably sewn onto her body (she couldn't even wear undergarments, it was so tight). But, yes, the woman was not what we think of as a size 12.
I've purchased vintage fashions and European clothing and the sizes are quite different from what is available in American stores.

People are getting larger and unhealthier. Have you ever seen a comparison between a "fast food" meal from the 70s and what is offered today? The hamburger and fries and soda from back in the 70s is the size of a kid's meal today. The portions today are huge. I'm saddened to see young people looking so large when they should be in the prime of health.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 12/31/2008

I would be so depressed if I ever wore a size 12.... I am a size 3 and delighted about it....

I got up to a 5 when I was pregnant and went right back down.... thin is in

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 12/30/2008

Well, it depends on your height. I'm a size 12 - tall & slim, if I were a 3 I'd be anorexic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 AM on 12/31/2008
photo

short and petite here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

I'm guessing you are under forty years old. Save the big depression for real life tragedy...cancer, car accidents, loss of jobs, etc. You have a lot to learn, unfortunately...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 12/31/2008
photo

I'm over 40 and a size 3.

I have nothing left to learn, sweetie darlin'

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 01/02/2009

if that woman is a size 14, sorry i'll stick with the '5 chinese boys'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 12/30/2008

I can't feel right in my body unless I'm size eight. Luckily, I can stay there if I eat right and exercise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 12/30/2008
- andj I'm a Fan of andj permalink

Then Keloggs should stop trying to sell us that horrible product they call a cereal.

It also contains too much sugar and salt to be healthy.

I always try and buy cereals that dont use filler and cheaper products like sugar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

Great comment. I'm sick and tired of cereal manufacturers pushing this false notion of healthy eating on the consumer. Read the ingredients in a box of Special K...you'll need a chemical dictionary...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 12/31/2008

I think that is Beth Ditto. I love her unapologetic outlook and confidence!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 12/30/2008

Yep, it's Beth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 01/03/2009

Wait a minute. Sorry to rain on the parade but I looked a little closer at the article and the statistics aren't that dramatic. 3000 was the total population of women surveyed, who were anything from size 6 to 24. Let's assume for a moment that it was evenly distributed and that only even sizes were measured (that's all I saw in the article). So, 10 sizes means 300 people per size. Therefore, if some 43% of size 14 are happy as they can be in their careers, for example. In other words, about 120 people. Not exactly strong evidence of a correlation between size and happiness (career or otherwise).

That's the trouble with statistics, to paraphrase Mark Twain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 12/30/2008

And it's kind of superficial to just ask people if they're happy. Some people will claim to be happy out of defiance even if their lives are a complete shambles.

For example, women in the UK drink a lot of beer. I can imagine that someone who's a size 14 because she drinks a few pints every night might just say she's happy with her beer bloat out of the defiance that comes with alcohol.

So how do the researchers know when they're measuring real happiness and when they're measuring bloated alcoholic defiance?

How does one measure happiness scientifically? How does one separate it from the things people call happiness when they're really unhappy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

I agree...perfect example of a study designed soley for the purposes of attracting readers to whatever venue it's published in. This is what they call 'junk science.'

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 12/31/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect