Horrific Holiday Season Fallout Begins

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANNE D'INNOCENZIO | December 29, 2008 08:29 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Dec. 20, 2008 file photo holiday shoppers make their way through the Northshore Mall in Peabody, Mass. Fallout from the dismal holiday sales season promises to have a lasting impact on how the retail industry operates. (AP Photo/Lisa Poole, File)

NEW YORK — The fallout from the horrific holiday season for retailers has begun, with the operator of an online toy seller filing for bankruptcy protection and more stores expected to do the same _ meaning more empty storefronts and fewer brands on store shelves.

A rash of store closings, which some experts predict will be the most in 35 years, is likely to cut across areas from electronics to apparel, shrinking the industry and leading to fewer niche players and suppliers.

The most dramatic pullback in consumer spending in decades could transform the retail landscape, as thousands of stores and whole malls close down. And analysts expect prolonged woes in the industry as the dramatic changes in shopping behavior could linger for another two or three years amid worries about the deteriorating economy and rising layoffs.

"You are going to see a substantial retrenchment in the retail industry," said Rick Chesley, partner in the global bankruptcy and restructuring group at international law firm Paul Hastings. "The downturn has been catastrophic."

A number of stores couldn't even make it to Christmas. Circuit City Stores Inc. filed for bankruptcy protection last month. It plans to keep operating, but toy seller KB Toys, which filed for bankruptcy earlier this month, is liquidating its stores and will shut down.

The survival prospects for many more stores are dimming as more sales data comes in about the crucial holiday shopping season, which can account for up to 40 percent of a retailer's annual profit.

Holiday sales fell from 2 percent to 4 percent compared to a year ago, according to SpendingPulse, a division of MasterCard Advisors. Excluding gas and car sales, they dropped between 5.5 percent and 8 percent from Nov. 1 through Dec. 24, as key categories from luxury to electronics posted double-digit sales declines. Sales of electronics and appliances fell almost 27 percent, for example.

ShopperTrak RCT Corp. which tracks retail sales and customer traffic at more than 50,000 outlets, said Monday that it now expects foot traffic to be down 16 percent and sales to decline 2.3 percent for the November and December period.

Story continues below
advertisement

The retail casualties, which were first among home furnishing stores and then many apparel stores over the past year or so, are expected to cut across all sectors as shoppers have slashed their spending on nonessentials, from TVs to jewelry.

About 160,000 stores will have closed this year and 200,000 more could shutter next year, said Burt P. Flickinger III, managing director of consulting firm Strategic Resource Group. That would be the industry's biggest contraction in 35 years. In March and April of next year, Flickinger expects 2,000 to 3,000 malls to shutter.

AlixPartners LLP, a turnaround consulting firm, predicts that 25.8 percent of 182 major retailers it tracks are either facing major financial distress or will face a significant risk of filing for bankruptcy in either next year or 2010 _ the highest level in the 10 years that the firm has been compiling the figures. That compares with the 4 percent to 7 percent that it predicted would face financial woes in the previous two years.

Among the most vulnerable are retailers that have debt coming due soon and had relied on solid holiday sales to generate cash, said Matthew Katz, managing director in the firm's retail performance improvement practice. But he said he's also watching merchants whose debt is not due until later in 2009 or 2010, but are paying big interest payments as they struggle with high debt loads and shrinking revenues.

Some of the retailers that analysts say they are watching carefully are struggling regional department store Bon-Ton Stores Inc., of York, Pa., and apparel retailer Goody's Family Clothing Inc., which filed for bankruptcy protection in June but emerged from Chapter 11 in October. Officials from Bon-Ton and Goody's did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

This week Parent Co., the operator of etoys.com, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and said it will consider selling some or all of its operations. Chris Byrne, a New York-based toy consultant, said that etoys.com couldn't compete with the aggressive tactics embraced by Toys R Us and Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the nation's top two toy sellers.

Retailers who do file for bankruptcy are also under more pressure now than in the past because of 2005 changes to the code that cut down the amount of time they have to file a complete reorganization plan, said Ken Simon, managing partner at Loughlin Meghji + Co., a restructuring advisory firm.

Another big problem for them, Simon said, will be securing additional financing to keep operating because of the tight credit markets.

The dire problems facing retailers also spell bigger problems for suppliers, which have already been seeing merchants cut or cancel orders.

Allan Ellinger, senior managing partner at New York-based MMG, an investment banking and strategic advisory practice, foresees a shakeout in the apparel industry and said those who survive are going to have a hard time meeting the financial needs of stores.

He estimated that apparel companies have slashed their 2009 spring inventory by 20 percent to 25 percent from a year ago, because they would rather be reacting to hot sellers than be stuck with too much merchandise.

"You have to go into deep survival mode," Ellinger added.

NEW YORK — The fallout from the horrific holiday season for retailers has begun, with the operator of an online toy seller filing for bankruptcy protection and more stores expected to do the sam...
NEW YORK — The fallout from the horrific holiday season for retailers has begun, with the operator of an online toy seller filing for bankruptcy protection and more stores expected to do the sam...
 
Comments
95
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Have the government throw $500 billion to the retail sector in a massive bailout. Problem solved. Next!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 12/31/2008

You can actually "recycle" empty malls; the Wash. Post recently had an article on that. Some towns are redoing them and housing their entire town government in a mall. They can be remodeled into apartments, knock out the central roof and have an open courtyard in the middle; use them as arts studios and galleries, etc. They don't HAVE to sit there, empty eyesores.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 PM on 12/30/2008

Awesome!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 AM on 12/31/2008

The quixotic, organization bankrupting policy of the Bush Bunch/Bernacke-True-Believers becomes unbelieveable when one realizes that we must absorb the vacancy of at least 50% of our commerical real estate. Are we to try to bail out trillions of dollars of bankruptcies of property that have been leveraged and unable to cope with the slightest change in economic conditions? What about the tax base that will be lost with vacant buildings? And where will we borrow the money? Printing it will not go over well with our creditiors.
It is clear to this innocent observer that our leaders have not considered the whole system nor the long term consequences of their actions. Squandering trillions on financial losses was the first colosal blunder. Evidently, They have surrounded themselves with sycophants and incompetents while average citizens cringe in horror at the world falling from under and around us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 12/30/2008

Rather well said if a tad overly simplistic. Ponying up taxpayer money to bail out banks was probably necessary but giving money without conditions wasn't very bright. What were seeing today is a perfect if tragic example of the law of unintended consequences and the consequences are going to be dire because the geniuses running the show never thought about negative consequences. We're also seeing perfect representations of the truism that political leaders world wide are ambitous often charismatic people who aren't very bright. I look at the American political landscape and the blatant supidity evident in both parties but especially on the right is shocking. At least Bernacke had the good sense to admit his ideology was broken and bailed on it resulting in the semi-nationalization of US financial institutions. Too bad we didn't take acutal control of these organizations: As things stand, banks still operate solely for the benefit of their shareholders and executives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 12/30/2008

A failed economic system witnesses corporations that have been leveraged through the manipulations of Wall Street. Now when times are hard, these corporations require bailouts. We are damned fools bailing out any of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 12/30/2008

I know all the talk for this moment is the Xmas woes of retailers, but looking at my own community, I'm wondering when we will hear more about the restaurant industry. The closures seem to be coming fastest with the mid-priced corporate chains (Outback steakhouse and the like). Don't people give up their designer shoes before they give up eating out?

Maybe it's small of me, but I happily envision a future without the Macy's and Nordstrom's "high end" junk imports. In a nation where people are dying from lack of basic dental care, the hypocrisy of supposedly "supporting the economy" by selling and buying ersatz prestige is a little stomach turning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

I despise malls. And Liz Claiborne, Jones New York and Ralph Lauren can eat my shorts because their clothes are ugly, not made in America and plain old not worth it!

I shop at the Goodwill allot. Brand new Liz/Ralph/Jones for 6 bucks... while the vintage is so much more nicely made.

Aspertame, excellent point. I'd prefer to spend my money and/or time supporting people here at home. Elderly going without medication, adults who can't read and write. Three new brands/stores to add to my Do Not Buy list.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 12/30/2008

Just so you know, more than 95% of clothing sold in the United States is made in whole or in part outside of the country. An alarming chunk of it is still made by underage and underpaid workers who toil in sweat shop like conditions. While basics manufacturers like American Apparel are bucking that trend, they are the exception rather than the rule. While you can rail on the designer brands all you want, the culprit that started the trend was WalMart. They pioneered the concept way back in the 80's (when they were caught displaying foreign made clothing on racks adorned with "Made in the USA" signs). Their sheer volume and vicious hold on suppliers forced most other retailers to follow suit or close shop. I'm not sure where you are finding "vintage" designer clothing at Goodwill (true vintage designer clothing never makes it to places like that), but chances are just about everything in your closet was NOT made here at home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 12/30/2008

But think about all the people who work in those Macys and Nordstroms and Kohls and Penneys. Without those stores, there would be a lot of people out of work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

Time for a diet: We can't consume like there's no tomorrow anymore. The bubble has burst. Maybe now we'll understand how most people in the world have to live every day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 12/30/2008

This situation is so far beyond Wall Street. Sure Wall Street played a roll but are you oblivious to what's happening world wide? Russia is about to tank. China is expecting no growth in 2009. Italy is considering oulling out of the EU monetary system because the EU opposes deficits. The world economic system is a disaster but not everything negativecan be laid at the feet of Wall Street. No...for that we need to look at the University of Chicago and what has come to be called the Washington Consensus. Friedman's ideollgy infiltrated not just Wall Street but every nation that participates in the worlds economic system. What we're seeing is nothing less than a paroxysm in the world's economy and my sense is that when things settle down--perhaps in 10 to 15 years--we will see a much different system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 12/30/2008

Malls are nothing but realty greed. The pet store in my local mall had to close after new owners renovated & tripled their rent. What kind of American past time is a Mall now days?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 12/30/2008

well between the high rents and the CEO and management compensation, what would you expect... The people at the bottom are really getting shafted...I would like to know how much of the excess debt of 15 million was due to deferred compensation for the CEO and how much that person has sucked out of the company in the last 5 years including 'business expenses'''...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 12/30/2008

The tougher bankruptcy regulations need to be abolished, both on the corporate and consumer end of things. This is one of the big things that has caused the economy to tank like this, though it never really gets any press.

Did the old ways reward a few bad seeds who abused the system to be "chronic bankruptees"? Absolutely. But it also gave companies and individuals the opportunity to acquire new credit a year or 2 after their bankruptcy cleared the courts.

Now with all this pushing people from Chap 7 to Chap 13, people and companies are just as broke emerging from bankruptcy as they were going in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 12/30/2008

Good point.

I hadn't thought of that before.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 12/30/2008

Even before the economic collapse, the tougher bankruptcy laws that credit card companies paid Congress for hadn't resulted in a decrease in filings.

All it did was create more hoops for the people who did file.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 12/30/2008

No, what it did was changed the type of bankruptcy they had to file.

Chapter 7 is "I'm broke, I can't pay anything, and I want all my debts to disappear". Your debts were cleared, you owed no money, and you got on with your life with a black mark on your credit report.

Now, everybody with a job has to do Chapter 13 which is "I'm broke" as well....but comes with the caveat that even though you're broke, you still have to pay a portion of your debts. The courts started putting people on these ridiculous "payment plans" which, sure, got a couple pennies on the dollar for the person's creditors....but in order for the person to be able to make those payments, they had to sacrifice other areas of their spending. End result being the bankruptcy served no purpose to them. They were still broke and barely hanging on, just the terms of their brokedness (my new made up word for the day) changed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 12/30/2008

Turn them into homeless shelters and animal sanctuaries. rip up the other ones and put in ponds and wetlands for geese and ducks. Wouldn't it be nice, just ONE TIME, to hear a story like this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 12/30/2008

Ah, you'd just have a bunch of NRA types coming in and shooting the Ducks in their nests anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 12/30/2008

How about we just plow the malls under and turn the land back into whatever it was before the developers got ahold of it and covered it with lameness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 12/30/2008

i thought corporate bankruptacies are awesome news. around here pretty much most people think corporate america is evil. so them going out of business should be great news no.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 12/30/2008

I went to a department store looking for a dress to wear to a wedding I'm going to in a few weeks. While I was there, I checked on two items I had been looking at, but would not pay full price for- a scarf and a purse. The scarf was marked down substantially and I bought it. The purse was not marked down and when I asked the sales woman if it would be, she gave me a sort of pitying look (very rude!) and said that those purses were never marked down. ( this was a decent handbag, but not a Coach or really high-designer item, so I don't think it was crazy to ask if it was marked down). This morning I did some research on the computer and found the purse at Zappos with free shipping for $40 less. I haven't bought it yet, but the store lost my business without even trying. I just can't feel that bad for retail stores who aren't willing to compromise. On the other hand, I didn't buy a dress there- couldn't find anything flattering that I liked. So I went to a local boutique and bought a beautiful handmade velvet tunic. I spent a little more, but it was for a completely unique item and supported a local business. Big department stores are going to have to offer better selection, service and prices to earn my business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

You expect minimum wage workers to give you a foot massage, and merch at cost.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 12/30/2008

I think you are exaggerating a bit. What, you never look for a bargain or comparison shop?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

That department store you're criticizing provides many jobs in your community, including full-time ones paying health insurance. I have nothing against your buying locally or online, but don't expect department stores offering a huge variety of merchandise (that local purveyors can't provide) and services (that online companies don't usually match) to be able to provide rock-bottom prices on every single object in sight. It's never going to happen. Variety, service, and decent jobs for the community come at a price some are willing to pay for. If you don't want to, fine, but don't expect Macy's, et al, to run charities for your benefit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 12/30/2008

Then, sadly, those companies will be out of business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 12/30/2008

Sounds very traumatic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 12/30/2008

I applaud you for supporting a local business where you can trace the entire life of the product and know who made it and how. The next step is to do just that...verify that the products they sell are made to ethical standards by workers who make a fair wage. I have found a number of local merchants here in Los Angeles who actually use their fair wage and working conditions as a selling point and they will always be among the first places I patronize (even if I have to spend a little more for their products or services). As far as some of the comments here criticizing you for being a bargain hunter, ignore them. You're as free to ask the questions you asked as Macy's is to charge whatever price they want for the product. While I get that malls and mass retailers provide jobs for thousands of people, let's not pretend that any of them are models of ethics, employee rights and excellent pay/benefits packages for front line workers. I've done the retail thing in my past and I wouldn't do it again for any amount of money. In an age when there are convenient and less annoying shopping alternatives to malls and department stores, old-guard retailers are going to have to figure out new ways to compete or be forced to go out of business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 12/30/2008

At least the stores can afford bankruptsy, the average poor American cant afford any legal intervention, to keep the wolves from the door.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

Why is a 4% drop in sales so catastrophic? Are business owners so ignorant of reality that they create business models dependent on exponential sales?

I work retail. There's a lot of services we can cut and products we can all live happily without. Of all the "crisis" stories out there, this comes in a sorry last place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 12/30/2008

Stick to flipping burgers, Jason.

It's apparent you know LESS than nothing about business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 12/30/2008

Because after all, demonstrating one's knowledge is best done by hurling insults.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 12/30/2008

If you read his post rather than making nasty comments about it, he is asking a pretty reasonable question. He also works RETAIL so I doubt there's a grill and spatula there for him to flip any burgers with. BTW...never assume the person flipping your burgers isn't as smart and savvy as the next person. Based on your insulting prose, it's a good bet they're a whole lot nicer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 12/30/2008

Search:
retail profit margins

2% is typical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 12/30/2008

That's not the question JASON_G was asking. The study you cite is also from 2006 and is very general. In fact, depending on the size of the retailers footprint and the type of products they sell, the profit margin fluctuates wildly. The study also cites an inaccurate "typical mark-up percentage" of 40%. In fact, the typical mark up is double or triple that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 12/30/2008

Had that 700B$ bailout gone to ordering Solar wind and green upgrades to all gov facilities.

The economy would already be recovering.

Kucinich beat the banks:

http://kucinich.us/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2656&Itemid=1

Pelosi and Ried got taken in the largest hiest in history.

FDR was right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 12/30/2008

All across America cities were zoning for retail sales tax and giving tax incentives to retail malls. For the last 15 to 20 years retailers were poached by competing cities. This trend collided with the rise in internet sales, catalog sales and TV shopping networks into a perfect storm of super saturated retail markets nation wide. The Wall Street collapse put a halt to buying on credit and pulled the rug out from under retailers nation wide.

To make matters worse there is a second wave of housing foreclosures coming as the Alternate Sub Prime Mortgages start to reset this year. All those McMansion are going to be converted to good old fashioned boarding houses. It will be the next generation before we dig out of this Bush depression.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 12/30/2008

I am hopeful we will spend the trillions needed on Infrastructure/energy and back on our feet in less than a year.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 12/30/2008

There will be no healing as long as the USA continues to outsource every little bit of production and manufacturing. A "service society" simply cannot exist on its own. The sooner someone realizes this and works on it , the better. Otherwise you are just doctoring on the symptons not the causes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 12/30/2008

I grow very tired of hearing this argument. I am sure if there were blogs when we abolished the Gold Standard from backing paper currency, you would be saying that this would render paper currency worthless. And it has been said by people lacking the intellectual capacity to absorb and render change at every economic shift in the history of human economy by pseudo-intellectuals like yourself. It's called abstract thought--kind of a core component of being human--the whole thinking and imagining thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 12/30/2008
photo

You've said nothing to disprove what Cologne said. Just hurling insults is counter-productive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 PM on 12/30/2008

If only more American sheeple had the intellectual capacity, they wouldn't follow blindly their butchers to be slaughtered. Now we find out what is the only reason for your existence: shop till you drop and if you refuse your country goes down big time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 AM on 12/31/2008
photo

One of the reasons the US continues to outsource production is that US consumers demand cheaper goods, and with the high cost of living in the US company overheads would be higher (and the companies less profitable) if they kept all their production here. Further, public US companies are constantly pressured by shareholders to provide better returns on their investments. For many companies, there is no choice anymore but to go overseas.

So the sooner that US consumers realize that they can't have everything, the better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 12/30/2008

You need to look no further than a dead mall near you to see how bad the ecological state of retailing really is.

Check these sites out, if you want further proof of this pheonemon:

http://www.labelscar.com
http://www.deadmalls.com
http://www.geocities.com/jaloweplays/woodmar.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 12/30/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect