Angry Democrats On Blagojevich Appointment: It's Not About Race

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURIE KELLMAN | December 31, 2008 05:44 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Former Ill. Attorney General Roland Burris, right, takes questions after Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich announced Burris as his choice to fill President-elect Barack Obama's U.S. Senate seat Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2008 in Chicago.(AP Photo/Paul Beaty)

WASHINGTON — Rep. Bobby Rush says he doesn't think any U.S. senator would be caught turning a black man away from serving alongside them.

He thought wrong.

No Senate Democrat responded to his racial challenge. And they got support from President-elect Barack Obama, who ignored Rush and restored the framework of the dispute: alleged corruption of Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

"I believe the best resolution would be for the governor to resign his office and allow a lawful and appropriate process of succession to take place," Obama said in a statement that did not acknowledge Rush or his comments.

It was far from clear whether Democrats have the authority to keep former state attorney general Roland Burris out. The Constitution says that the Senate is the sole judge of whether its members are qualified to serve. But it's uncertain whether being appointed by someone accused of corruption is grounds for disqualification.

Several experts said the matter could end up in court.

Moot or not, Burris' designation touched off a dispute that threatened to turn racial.

Burris is black, a fact that Rush invoked early and often during a news conference Tuesday. The Illinois congressman dared Senate Democrats Tuesday to block Roland Burris from becoming the Senate's only black member, urging them not to "hang and lynch" the former state attorney general for Blagojevich's alleged misdeeds.

Story continues below
advertisement

Obama, elected in November to be the nation's first black president, did not take the bait. Senate Democrats stood by their vow to block Burris from being seated.

"They cannot accept an appointment made by a governor who is accused of selling this very Senate seat," Obama said in a statement. "I agree with their decision, and it is extremely disappointing that Governor Blagojevich has chosen to ignore it."

Burris is well-regarded in Illinois and has no connection to Blagojevich's alleged attempts to sell the seat Obama occupied until after his election to the White House. The question, still unanswered, is how a replacement will be picked and installed to represent the state alongside Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin.

Republicans mostly were content to let Democrats deal with the spectacle unfolding in the new president's home state.

But in a telephone interview Wednesday with the Associated Press, Republican Leader Mitch McConnell acknowledged watching the developments in Illinois with "great interest" and repeated the GOP's call for a special election to fill the seat.

"I think the whole process up there has been obviously tainted," McConnell said by phone from Kentucky.

Democrats have long said that Blagojevich's alleged corruption would strip anyone he might appoint of credibility. But while the governor holds office, filling the seat is his job unless he relinquishes it.

Blagojevich on Tuesday declared himself the decider, defying the leaders of his party and naming Burris, 71, the next senator from Illinois. At a news conference in Chicago, he urged the Senate not to allow the charges that he tried to sell the same Senate seat to taint a well-respected man.

Then Rush stepped up to the microphone to offer his challenge.

"Let me just remind you that there presently is no African-American in the U.S. Senate," he began.

"I will ask you to not hang and lynch the appointee as you try to castigate the appointer," he added. "I don't think that anyone _ any U.S. senator who's sitting in the Senate right now _ wants to go on record to deny one African-American for being seated in the U.S. Senate."

In an interview Wednesday, Burris didn't back away from Rush's assertion. "It is a fact, there are no African-Americans in the United States Senate," he said on NBC's "Today." "Is it racism that is taking place? That's a question that someone may raise."

Democrats needed no reminder that blocking a black man from replacing another in the overwhelmingly white Senate might not go over well on the eve of Obama's ascension to the White House.

Their statement earlier in the day contained a carefully crafted note of support for Burris personally, saying their refusal to seat him was a reflection of Blagojevich and no one else.

"Anyone appointed by Gov. Blagojevich cannot be an effective representative of the people of Illinois and, as we have said, will not be seated by the Democratic caucus."

"The people of the state of Illinois should not be denied representation" when the new Senate convenes in January, Rush said on CBS' "Early Show."

Democrats said the dispute is about the Senate's constitutionally granted power to decide who is seated as a member.

Burris said Wednesday that Blagojevich "has the constitutional and statutory authority to make those appointments ... and I have absolutely nothing to do with those problems."

"I will not be tainted because the governor has followed the constitution," Burris told NBC. "And I am confident that when all is said and done, I will be a United States senator."

Senate aides of both parties said the question of whether Burris gets seated next month is moot.

Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White said Tuesday that he would not sign Burris' certification, as required by Senate rules.

If Burris does appear in Washington, senators could refuse to swear him in, or vote to expel him.

___

Associated Press writers Libby Quaid and Andrew Taylor contributed to this report from Washington. Bruce Schreiner contributed from Louisville, Ky.

WASHINGTON — Rep. Bobby Rush says he doesn't think any U.S. senator would be caught turning a black man away from serving alongside them. He thought wrong.
WASHINGTON — Rep. Bobby Rush says he doesn't think any U.S. senator would be caught turning a black man away from serving alongside them. He thought wrong.
 
Comments
631
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
- FORLOMC I'm a Fan of FORLOMC 11 fans permalink

Give me a break. This has nothing to do with Race. This has everything to do with selling a senate seat. He still sold it. Burris will just pay him off later. Burris already gave him $14,000, and is so stupid or a liar as he said he didn't know he had given him that much. I don't care what color they are, they can't get away with selling and buying a Senate Seat. Anyone that things otherwise is ignorant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 01/01/2009
- ElPerro I'm a Fan of ElPerro 26 fans permalink
photo

Bobby Rush is an embarassment to decent human beings everywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 01/01/2009

Bobby Rush is a Chicago Icon and a hero- what have you ever fought for or stood up for "ElPerro"? Do you think it was an accident when he trounced Barack Obama in his U.S. Congressional race some years ago? I wonder just how exactly is it that there are no African American voices in the most powerful body in the world the U.S. Senate? Hardly representative of our nation as a whole. A senate seat itself is obviously not solely a question of race but the obvious disparity and lack of representation apparent when there is little if any influence held by members of a substantial populace troubles me way beyond worrying about who will get the next job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 01/01/2009
- ElPerro I'm a Fan of ElPerro 26 fans permalink
photo

I'm all in favor of more black voices in the senate and elsewhere. But not race-bating, single-issue cry babies like Rush.

Rush may have beaten Obama ONCE back when Obama was not well known, but the obvious truth is that Obama then excelled and ar surpassed Rush to become a state senator, then US senator then the first black president of the US. And he did so because he represented ALL Americans, not just black Americans like Rush does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 01/01/2009

Qualification is not the only issue. The fact that Blagojevich is indicted but not convicted, alone, does not undermine Mr. Burris's appointment. The problem is that one of the many reasons Blagojevich is under investigation is because of his alleged lack of integrity regarding the very seat to which Mr. Burris has been appointed. The senate is challenging the election and return, not the qualification prong of the constitutional requirement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 01/01/2009

Bobby rush needs to shut his face. He is oldschool black politician and that is not what we need in the african american community. We need someone who is progressive

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 12/31/2008

I totally agree, him and Burris are making us look like idiots, I wish more black politicians would stand up against this, butmost of them are cowards anyway. He is totally taking us back, especially after the way president o won. This is what you call the old boys "black" politician network, and if anyone wants to say something smart, I am AA and even if I was anybody has the right to speak their opinion about the subject as long as they are respectful!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 AM on 01/01/2009

Bobby Rush is a divisive windbag. Senate Democrats said that they wouldn't approve a Blago appointee weeks ago. How DARE these morons assume that Burris's race should change that decision. Rush should be censored and if the Congressional Black Caucus has any integrity, they will call for just that...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 12/31/2008
- pir anha I'm a Fan of pir anha 4 fans permalink

man, this is one of the most unfortunate uses of the race card yet.

burris and rush are making this worse. why the hell did burris not refuse the appointment? that's what he should have done.

and even if he is 100% innocent regarding blago's dealings, burris is making himself look like a tool by the way he's handled the press conference, and the accusations that race has anything to do with this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 12/31/2008
- NotMcCain I'm a Fan of NotMcCain 67 fans permalink
photo

Burris can't (shouldn't) be held to a different standard than any other senator.

He's legally appointed. He's qualified and has done nothing criminal.

He should be seated. This is a "lose-lose" for Dems to prolong....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 12/31/2008

Bobby Rich has no reservations about playing the race card. He used it against Barack Obama when they were running against each other for the Democratic nomination for the seat Rich now occupies. He claimed President Obama wasn't "black enough" (could also be stated as not of a pure enough blood line.) As a former Black Panther Rich has never missed an opportunity to cash in on his ethnicity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 12/31/2008
photo

Fedupwiththis: Sure you know, but it's Bobby Rush, NOT Bobby Rich. Having said that, it's unfortunate Blagojevich appointed Burris and that Rush has decided to weigh in with his brand of pre-racial politics. I hope Illinois does have a special election, and Burris should run for the seat, not be appointed by an arrogant chief executive who's got plenty of chutzpah!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 12/31/2008

totally agree, he is a slime ball!! And I hope that the Dem finally grow a spine, b/c they lost it for eight years, but we will see. They are the reasons why I am an independent democrat that voted for Obama!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 01/01/2009
- eremite I'm a Fan of eremite 5 fans permalink

Doesn't Burris get to decide that issue?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 12/31/2008
- Ohsnap I'm a Fan of Ohsnap 35 fans permalink

All our sh** stinks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 12/31/2008
- Ohsnap I'm a Fan of Ohsnap 35 fans permalink

On Blago:

If a dipsh** could be dipped in sh**, how much sh** would it take to dip this dipsh** in sh**? That's a lot of sh**.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 12/31/2008
- eremite I'm a Fan of eremite 5 fans permalink

How is it that no one knew what a criminal Blago was? He's been around for over twenty years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 12/31/2008
- nogimmicks I'm a Fan of nogimmicks 28 fans permalink

Looks like a misplaced anger. The Dems should have been angry about appointing Gates, keeping Lieberman, the wallstreet bailout and plans to expand the Afghan war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 12/31/2008
- iblog I'm a Fan of iblog 23 fans permalink

why?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 PM on 12/31/2008
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 142 fans permalink
photo

You got that right, the fact that they even talk to Lieberman is enough to warrant a slap across the face from me. Lieberman is typical of the callous and morally offensive politicians who infect our nation's capital. Willing to do anything, say anything, just to get elected and hold his chairmanships.

And yes, Gates, a neocon from way back is now a major player in the Obama cabinet. Who would have thunk it? I was against Gates when Bush appointed him, so I'm not exactly a fan of him now either. But since even I am better than Rumsfeld would ever be, at least Gates is no Rumsfeld. So we'll see how it goes.

And why any single Dem voted for the bailout, I have no earthly idea. I'm not from Pluto, so obivously I can't understand their rationale. Banks and mortgage companies should be allowed to fail just like any other company. Nobody is too big, or too important, to fail. That's the great lie of capitalism. Placing profit, prestige and social standing over the importance of the country.

They were lied to again by the Bush administration, the case for the Iraq war Part 2. Bush and Paulson gave their fearmongering fingerpointing speeches and scared the Dems into doing what they wanted them to do, while trying to get them to sign away their Congressional powers. And the Dems fell for it again!!

That's another damning case against the Pelosi/Reid leadership.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 12/31/2008
- majorteddy I'm a Fan of majorteddy 7 fans permalink

Bobby Rush===Bull F*****G S**t. Was Burris candidate#5?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 12/31/2008

wow you are aday late and a dollar short....candidate 5 has already been determined to be Jessie Jackson Jr.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 AM on 01/01/2009
- swiss-ski I'm a Fan of swiss-ski 3 fans permalink

WHAT? Liberals upset with liberals! This cannot be. Blago is the Governor and he can appoint anyone he damn well pleases! Obama and his pals are worried bigtime as well they should be.
I can't wait for the fireworks. GO BLAGO.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 12/31/2008
- StillIRise I'm a Fan of StillIRise 511 fans permalink
photo

What exactly are "Obama and his pals" worried about big time? That Burris' appointment will be upheld? Obama and the Democrats have already said their argument is not with Roland Burris, but with Blagojevich. Obama has also said that Burris is a fine man and qualified for the position, and in fact endorsed Burris over Blagojevich when Burris ran for governor. So, if Burris is seated - and it's very likely that he will be - Obama and his Democratic colleagues will not have a problem with Roland Burris, who is worthy of this position, will make a good Senator and will serve the Democratic Party and the country well ...

But they do have a problem with Governor Blagojevich. Although he acted within his authority in making this appointment, he did so with the full knowledge that he had corrupted the process and that a consensus had been reached by both the Democrats and Republicans in the Illinois state legislature that any appointment made by him would not be recognizes. Even if Burris' appointment is upheld, it's Blagojevich who should be worried big time as well he should be. This appointment has not saved him from impeachment or an impending indictment, neither of which are problematic for PE Obama or the Democrats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 01/01/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect