Don't Fire My Husband, NASA Chief's Wife Begs Obama

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Don't Fire My Husband, NASA Chief's Wife Begs Obama stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

SETH BORENSTEIN | 12/31/08 09:13 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Wednesday, March 26, 2008 file photo, NASA administrator Michael Griffin, speaks to reporters at a news conference after space shuttle Endeavour landed at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Fla. Late on Christmas Eve, one last wish was sent, by e-mail: Please let NASA Administrator Michael Griffin keep his job. It was from his wife. There are other efforts, too, by those close to Griffin, and their lobbying on his behalf to President-elect Barack Obama is unusually bold, even for ego-heavy Washington. (AP Photo/John Raoux)

WASHINGTON — Late on Christmas Eve, one last wish was sent, by e-mail: Please let NASA Administrator Michael Griffin keep his job. It was from his wife. Rebecca Griffin, who works in marketing, sent her message with the subject line "Campaign for Mike" to friends and family. It asked them to sign an online petition to President-elect Barack Obama "to consider keeping Mike Griffin on as NASA Administrator."

She wrote, "Yes, once again I am embarrassing my husband by reaching out to our friends and 'imposing' on them.... And if this is inappropriate, I'm sorry."

The petition drive, which said the President George W. Bush appointee "has brought a sense of order and purpose to the U.S. space agency," was organized by Scott "Doc" Horowitz of Park City, Utah, an ex-astronaut and former NASA associate administrator.

A cash-strapped NASA last week also sent _ by priority mail costing $6.75 a package _ copies of a new NASA book called "Leadership in Space: Selected Speeches of NASA Administrator Michael Griffin, May 2005-October 2008."

And just before the presidential election, Griffin sent a letter to Obama saying, "I am deeply grateful to you, personally, for your leadership" on the vote to allow NASA to use Russian spaceships.

Efforts by those close to Griffin lobbying on his behalf are unusually bold, even for ego-heavy Washington. Past efforts on behalf of job hopefuls have been more behind-the-scenes so plausible deniability can be maintained.

"It sounds like the only thing left is to stencil Mike Griffin on the side of shuttle," joked Paul Light, a professor of public policy and a presidential transition expert at New York University. "I've never heard of a campaign to keep one's job that goes beyond the edge of private discussion. ... Maybe he should be texting next."

David Goldston, a former chief of staff for the House Science Committee and a lecturer on science policy at Harvard University, said, "This kind of public campaigning to keep a job is unusual and usually tends to backfire in new administrations."

Story continues below
advertisement

Griffin's press secretary, David Mould, said that Griffin is not campaigning to keep his job and figures that Obama will name a new NASA chief. However, Griffin would be "honored" to be asked to stay on the job.

"A lot of people seem to like and support Mike and think he's doing a good job," Mould said. He said he couldn't speak for the administrator's wife and she did not answer an e-mail from The Associated Press.

As for Griffin's book of speeches, it was a natural for the NASA history office and coincides with the end of the presidential term, Mould said. NASA printed 2,500 books at a cost of $57,000 with the ability to produce more, NASA spokeswoman Sonja Alexander said.

NASA did not publish a book of collected speeches for Griffin's two predecessors, said spokeswoman Ashley Edwards. The agency did produce a compact disk of speeches by Dan Goldin, NASA's longest-serving boss, just before he left in 2001.

Griffin, a rocket scientist who holds seven degrees, has been on the job since 2005. His background is strikingly different from his predecessor Sean O'Keefe, a former budget office official. Griffin oversaw the successful return to space flight two years after the 2003 Columbia tragedy when seven astronauts were killed.

He's used his scientific smarts in making hands-on crucial decisions about shuttle flights, but he's ruffled feathers with some of his choices involving the design of next-generation spacecraft for a return to the moon. Some engineers both inside and outside of NASA question the whole concept of the new spacecraft, which Griffin calls "Apollo on steroids."

Petition-drive organizer Horowitz, who used to be in charge of NASA's return-to-the-moon program that is Griffin's signature project, said Griffin had nothing to do with the petition effort.

"This is other people campaigning for him," Horowitz said. "There's a lot of things people should change, but the NASA administrator isn't one of them."

Several hundred people have signed the online petition, including astronaut Mike Fincke who e-mailed his signature from the international space station. Some of the signatures are false names and some are anonymous. Horowitz said he has removed the names of people who added comments saying Griffin should NOT be kept on.

Horowitz's effort also spurred a "remove Mike Griffin" counter-petition, which has just a few dozen signatures, mostly anonymous and personal, including some nasty comments. A few criticized the new space vehicle design.

Only a few weeks ago, Griffin had a public disagreement with Obama's NASA transition chief, Lori Garver, a former NASA associate administrator, about the transition team's efforts to get more information. The dispute wasn't too heated and voices weren't raised, said Smithsonian scholar John Logsdon, who was holding a book signing for his latest volume on space history when Griffin and Garver had their spat.

That conversation led some in the tight-knit space community to speculate that Griffin figured he would not be kept on. Garver has not been available for comment, and Griffin's spokesmen say he is not available until after the new year.

Former NASA Deputy Administrator Hans Mark, who recommended Griffin to the Bush administration, said Griffin and his friends are handling this wrong.

"Mike ought to play it the way (retained Defense Secretary) Bob Gates is playing it, which is to shut up," Mark said.

___

On the Net:

Petition to keep NASA Administrator Michael Griffin:

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/KeepMike/index.html

WASHINGTON — Late on Christmas Eve, one last wish was sent, by e-mail: Please let NASA Administrator Michael Griffin keep his job. It was from his wife. Rebecca Griffin, who works in marketing, ...
WASHINGTON — Late on Christmas Eve, one last wish was sent, by e-mail: Please let NASA Administrator Michael Griffin keep his job. It was from his wife. Rebecca Griffin, who works in marketing, ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
607
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (22 pages total)

NASA is an organization of 'Good Ol Boys' that appear to totally reject the notion of any diversity in the space program. I hope Obama looks closely at the entire leadership structure NASA has in place and hold that leadership accountable for what appears to be a totally insensitive to all forms of diversity. When I look at tv shots of NASA's control room scene during or following a launch, I cringe at the pictures showing virtually no diversity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 01/01/2009

You couldn't be more wrong. NASA has long had an outstanding track record on diversity. Visit any NASA center and you will see people of all races working together.

For example, the head of the Mars Exploration Program is Puerto Rican. The manager of the Delta II program at Goddard in the early 1970s was African American. Many women have served in high executive positions within the agency long before women were afforded similar opportunities in industry.

Whatever criticism one might level at NASA, and it deserves much of it, the agencies record on diversity is exemplary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 01/01/2009
- fireW I'm a Fan of fireW 15 fans permalink
photo

You are exactly correct on this. If anything, they may have gone too far sometimes such as the '90s (Goldin-era) Agency directive to restrict business contracts to minority-owned firms. This coupled with the center on-site workforce reductions resulted in shell companies run by figurehead women and minority CEOs receiving service contracts. However, as Moose states, the Agency has, if anything, been a model of workforce diversity. Atlanta is completely wrong in his assertion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 01/02/2009
- BryantG I'm a Fan of BryantG 44 fans permalink
photo

If Griffin is a Bush appointment then it should be relatively easy to find someone better at actually doing the job. The whole begging thing is a major red flag to me, and refusing to cooperate with the transition team is unacceptable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 01/01/2009

First off, the head of NASA serves at the pleasure of the President so Mr. Obama can ask him to step down at any time. It is customary for political appointees to tender their resignations at the beginning of a new adminstration.

Second, Dr. Griffin stated when he became Administrator that he did not intend to seek to remain in the job past the end of Bush's term in office. It is not clear to me why his wife seems to be off the reservation on this.

Third, charges of non-cooperation with the Obama transition team have been blown way out of proportion. Simply put, the Obama team made a singularly poor choice of the person to head the transition and long-exisiting rancor has surfaced. This too will pass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 01/01/2009
- zola77 I'm a Fan of zola77 29 fans permalink
photo

The obama transition team has not acted poorly as some assert. The transition team is headed by a qualified person, ex- NASA administrator. The transition team is not new to NASA, its inner workings and projects.

Griffin is just an arrogant Bushie who denies global warming and takes money from the climate science department, and censors their work.

His cronies made sure to change all NASA literature to read that evolution, the big bang and global warming are all just theories.

He has to go!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 01/01/2009
- Tropiholic I'm a Fan of Tropiholic 20 fans permalink

Is there another petition to fire him? Where can I sign?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

There is ~ read the whole article.
Try googling it and see if you can locate it to sign, if you're serious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 01/01/2009
- Lion24 I'm a Fan of Lion24 116 fans permalink
photo

What does Griffin's wife know about his job performance at NASA? Does she go to work with him every day?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 01/01/2009

As I posted earlier, Rebecca Griffin was a marketing manager with a leading aerospace company so she knows something about NASA. Interestingly, the compay she worked for won a large NASA contract when her future hubby, Mike, was NASA"s chief engineer and married to someone else. And, the company totally messed up the contract.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 01/01/2009
- Lion24 I'm a Fan of Lion24 116 fans permalink
photo

Velly inta-rr-esting.

Mike and Rebecca: I hear Target is hiring.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 01/01/2009

NASA outlived it's usefulness a long time ago.

Installing better toilets in the space station for billionaire visitors and creating colorized photos of distant star systems are luxuries that America can no longer afford.

There are people without food, healthcare and places to live. Knowing that there is ice on the moon seems a little less important when our fellow citizens are suffering.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 01/01/2009

Would that life were so simple. But the fact is that NASA's $17 billion a year budget contributes a great deal to the economy.

Consider that the NASA budget would pay for about six weeks of the war in Iraq. It is less than 2% of what we spend on the military each year.

As for the Space Station, I think you would find that most people in the space community would just as soon junk it or give it to the Russians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

If it wasn't for the space program we wouldn't have Tang.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 01/01/2009
- zola77 I'm a Fan of zola77 29 fans permalink
photo

You miss the point of NASA, and scientific progress in general. Science that is useful to society at large often comes out of big long term ambitious projects. It isnt just about toilets on the space station.

One useful invention i can think of that has come out of NASA of late is the ability to turn refuse water into clean drinking water. Useful technology for third world countries with bad drinking water, as well as developed countries once our access to freshwater dwindles due to ineffective faming methods and global warming.

Don't diss the science! We do need NASA technology to help us solve future problems. Science doesnt always develop in a straight line, many inventions over the years have been incidental by products of larger experiments, or mistakes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 01/01/2009
- Cuneo I'm a Fan of Cuneo 3 fans permalink

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/RemoveMikeGriffinNow/index.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 01/01/2009
- Chapmanp2 I'm a Fan of Chapmanp2 15 fans permalink

There are 100s of thousands of people being layed off every month right now anyone of os whom's spouses would ask the same "please don't lay off my spouse". This guy has had a killer job & probably has a lot of security in the way of benefits & retirement. Why don't you do a story about the guy who stands to lose everything??? Oh yeah no political implicatio­n... I'm really gettin' a little sick of the media's appetite for looking for something (anything) that will paint Obama as heartless or wrong or corrupt. That's what this story is essentially about...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 01/01/2009

If Griffin had been a bit more civil with the transition team I might have some sympathy for him...but not much. He is arrogant and opinionated with very slight "people" skills. Since the head of NASA is not necessarily an engineer or scientist but an administrator he seems poorly suited for the task. Couple that with his fanatical dedication to manned space flight at the expense of actual scientific exploration and you have the typical Bush appointee.­..looks good on paper but actually an empty suit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 01/01/2009

You are just as opionionated too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

"Don't look under the hood" does not sound like good management for an organization that sends Humans into space seven at a time. His temperament is absolutely wrong for NASA. He has to go!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 01/01/2009

The guy is smart, but his ego is bigger than Donald Trumps. This is the same guy who tried to keep information from the transition team in order to ensure that his approach to the space program remained the status quo. Unlike many Bush appointees, this guy is actually qualified, but his behavior and pride is too much. He needs to go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 01/01/2009
- gakota I'm a Fan of gakota 3 fans permalink

Give him the boot, he withheld information requested by Obama's transition team and has shown
contempt for his new boss.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 01/01/2009
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 01/01/2009
- kndam72 I'm a Fan of kndam72 14 fans permalink
photo

A Bush appointee in any Science/En­vironmenta­l position, is in all likelihood completely unqualified for the job, and probably a just a Bush loyalist willing to go along with their warped vie of science asnd the world. This guy is a poster child for that ethos of religion-first science last approach. Why he continues to think he has any relevance is beyond absurd. And t add insult to uselessness, he grandstanded earlier on in a defiant way to his immenent dismissal and now cowardly is having his wife beg for him. The man and his wife are nothing more that power driven folks who can't bear to loose the social stature they so undeservedly got as head of NASA.

I cannot even begin to imagine the institutional damage he has wrought on that Agency. and the years it will take to get them and all other Agencies on track after 8 years of shear incompetence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 01/01/2009

Griffin is certainly qualified for the position he holds. I would say that there are, however, issues with his ability to work and play well with others. Dr. Griffin has never held a job for very long.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 01/01/2009

Oh, and by the way, Griffin has been Administrator of NASA for only three years. The damage was done by his predecessor, Cheney's golden boy Sean O'Keefe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MichaelGriffinDickCheney2005-06-28.jpeg

This says it all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 01/01/2009
- Dace I'm a Fan of Dace 2 fans permalink

Oh you mean the guy that totally blocked the transition team from getting any information with an ego larger than space? Take your little hateful Mormon hubby and and go crying back to Utah - I am sure you have lots of work to do on taking away human rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

Another reason not to like him!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 01/01/2009

Actually, Griffin was right that the woman heading the NASA transition for Obama is not qualified to judge the work being done. Lori Garver is a space gadfly with no technical background.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 01/01/2009

That is your opinion. It is worth exactly what the reader pays for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 01/01/2009
- zola77 I'm a Fan of zola77 29 fans permalink
photo

You are wrong blue moose, lori garver is qualified to judge the work NASA is doing - you sound like the gadfly, not her.

...and before you ask, yes i have qualifications to make that assertion because i work in the space business in DC as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 01/02/2009
photo

Give him the boot. If bush appointed him send him home. His experence in appointments has been the worst in history. I have no interest in "heckajob Michael"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 01/01/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (22 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect