Four Felons Gained Special Access To Bush To Win Clemency

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

New York Times   |  CHARLIE SAVAGE   |   January 1, 2009 12:36 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON -- In December 2007, the names of about 700 federal prisoners seeking commutations reached President Bush's desk. He rejected all but one. Among the disappointed petitioners was Reed R. Prior, an Iowa man serving a life sentence for a drug conviction whose application had been pending for nearly five years.

Last month, Mr. Prior filed a new application with the Justice Department. Not much had changed. But this time, with help from the Iowa governor, Mr. Prior's lawyer secured a face-to-face meeting with the White House counsel, Fred F. Fielding. A week later, Mr. Bush commuted Mr. Prior's sentence.

Read the whole story here.

WASHINGTON -- In December 2007, the names of about 700 federal prisoners seeking commutations reached President Bush's desk. He rejected all but one. Among the disappointed petitioners was Reed R. Pri...
WASHINGTON -- In December 2007, the names of about 700 federal prisoners seeking commutations reached President Bush's desk. He rejected all but one. Among the disappointed petitioners was Reed R. Pri...
 
Comments
149
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

Just to be clear, are these 4 felons those who are not members of his cabinet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 01/01/2009

Isn't that the way these things are supposed to work ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

Well, let's ask the ultimate question: Can a sitting, er, or is it a vacationing President pardon himself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 01/01/2009

I've always detested President Bush, but I really don't see anything particularly wrong with what happened here. The president's ability to commute sentences is absolute and not subject to any oversight, it's the one power of the presidency not subject to a system of checks and balances. This means that a president can extend clemency to anyone, for any reason, period. Doesn't matter who the president happens to be. So, while we may disagree with Bush's pardonings in this case, it is entirely constitutional.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

umm thanks for clearing that up...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

That will teach me to read past the headline. I thought the story would include the names Cheney, Libby, Gonzalez, and Rumsfeld.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 01/01/2009

Not Libby - Rice

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

How to get a pardon. Lawyer talks to a lawyer and an aid then gives Bush a pen!

Or is it a "Mason" Lawyer talks to a "Mason" Lawyer who talks to the Skull & Bones President who then signs a paper?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 01/01/2009

The two border patrol agents will not be part of this group. Wait until his sycophants start asking for money for his library...this will be fun to respond not just no but hell no.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 01/01/2009

I was hoping the two border patrol agents would've received pardon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 01/01/2009

Meanwhile, he does nothing to help review requests from a legitimate candidate who has served more years than anyone after his "ideological" crime which was not for personal profit or gain. He even made a plea bargain that was never honored. This is something that needs to be taken care of before it goes on any longer.

http://www.jonathanpollard.org/facts.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

I did read the information on the website. I read it with cynicism and a junduced eye; especially because of the type of actions committed by Pollard.

Obviously, I haven't given the case remotely any "due dilgence"; but at first glance and first impression; I would support a commutation to time served.

Just for what it is worth. (which obviously, isn't much)
My first thought is; what was "Justice's" answer when they were asked (and surely they were) what do you want, what would it take, to support a commutation ?
My other thought , is that they are using Pollard to send a strong message to others that may have divided loyalties; regardless of how alturistic they may be.

I am further surprised that under the circumnstances that Pollard is (now) an Israeli and Israel is willing to accpet him there, that somebody is blocking this, but how exactly ?

Interesting case, that I only vaugely remembered until your posting; but 24 years is enough of a message.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 01/01/2009

Strange. You support commutation for a foreign agent who performed espionage damaging to the U.S. National Security and proudly admitted to it.
The nation he did it for is willing to take him in and makes him a citizen in absentia and that makes a commutation O.K. with you?
What if he were a Russian. Would that be O.K. then if they were willing to "take him in" after granting him citizenship?
What if he were a Palestinian. Would that be O.K. then if they were willing to "take him in" after granting him citizenship?
What if he were an Iranian. Would that be O.K. if they were willing to "take him in" after granting him citizenship?
You need to think this through.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

That's a horrible pardon to ask for! Pollard was a traitor. I worked for the feds as military and civilian. In all my government jobs, all of them required I take the same oath that all members of government are required to take.

Pollard sold us out. Pure and simple. No other way to say it, he sold us out. It doesn't matter if it was one of our allies. He breached his oath and trust placed on him. Once that is breached, it's over. He gave away State secrets for his own financial gain.

Some things you forget to mention, is that Pollard is a dual citizen. He was working for both of those countries while pretending to have sworn an oath to only one. Why did you leave that out? And why didn't you also include the fact that another reason the Israeli's refuse to negotiate with the Palestinians, is because we put Pollard in prison. And we are allowing them to use it against us to prolong hostilities in the Middle East.

That's why I'm against politicians, of which there are several in the current and incoming administrations, who are also dual citizens. They should be barred from serving in government until such a time as they renounce their citizenship to the other country that they are a citizen of. And we all know which country that is. They are starting to operate as a 5th column, controlling our government from the inside.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

George and his mighty musketeers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzalez and...?

Who am I missing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

Addington, David S.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

Rove.... I believe is Who You are looking for

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

From the story....

"...none of Mr. Bush"s decisions have been as controversial as President Bill Clinton"s last-minute pardon of the fugitive-financier Marc Rich."

The decision to commute Scooter's wasn't controversial?????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

Scooter's commutation was not total. Besides, most know that Scooter was almost assuredly a fall guy for Cheney, and the Fitzgerald prosecution was a comedy of government lawyer ineptitude.

What about Armitage, for example?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

True. He should be in jail, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

What constitutes "controversial" in those cases was the right wing's morally relativistic compulsion to cherry-pick certain decisions to spew about ad nauseum for political purposes. Would they have continued to be a subject of discussion if these jerks could actually tell the truth and admit the facts of past republican pardons? Probably not . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 01/01/2009

Hah! A liberal complaining about moral relativism? Isn't that what your entire philosophy is based on?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 01/01/2009

This really is wrong, bush shouldn't commute a drug criminals sentence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

Of course he shouldn't. He should hold himself to only commuting the sentences of all those white collar criminals who steal from us.

You have no idea what this drug conviction was for. If he is black and from the south, it could be for possession of marijuana.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

I am curious; why shouldn't he commute a life sentence for a non -violent crime? I really am asking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 01/01/2009

Espionage is a non-violent crime (yet a capital one).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 01/01/2009

He has every right to do so; the president can commute any sentence he wants. Furthermore, mandatory minimum sentences is highly controversial and, I would argue, immoral; it fails to take into account the particulars of a given situation. I, along with many others, would argue that a life sentence for a non-violent drug charge is wrong; the law, in this case, is simply not moral.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

Just wait for the pardons as Bu$h sl.ithers out of office....I'll bet there will be some "interesting" pardons of those with very close access to the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

....and in a related story, 84 members of the Bush administration will apparently walk away from felonies without prosecution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

And you know this how? Did you look into that crystal ball you bought at Walmart and it told you so?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

I would like nothing more than to see these criminals dropped in the slammer with no possibility for parole but the way it's looking I doubt that there will even be investigations.

My Wal-Mart crystal ball said, "You can certainly count on it." After spending 3 hours in the return line I was able to get the entire $2.48 back that I spent on it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 01/01/2009
photo

W just enjoys being amongst his peers

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

Birds of a feather?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 01/02/2009

Heres the list of the 4 felons who were close to Bush:

- Cheney
- Rove
- Condi
- Rummy

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 01/01/2009
photo

This is just the disgusting side of politics.

People serve as assistant white house counsel for one reason. Because after they have done it for a year it gives them a license to steal. They can charge outrageous rates to clients who want a pardon because they can deliver. They can get people pardons that they cannot get under the system for everyone else.

This has been the deal. It has been going on for so long by both democrats and republicans that it has become part of the American way. We need to stop it.

Bush can start, and kill any pardon coming through his old staff.

None of this explains the Marc Rich pardon, however, he had Scooter as his lawyer. Go figure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 01/01/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect