iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nine Muslim Passengers Kicked Off Plane

BRIAN WESTLEY   01/ 2/09 09:26 PM ET   AP

Plane

WASHINGTON — AirTran Airways apologized Friday to nine Muslims kicked off a New Year's Day flight to Florida after other passengers reported hearing a suspicious remark about airplane security. One of the passengers said the confusion started at Reagan National Airport just outside Washington, D.C., when he talked about the safest place to sit on an airplane.

Orlando, Fla.-based AirTran said in a statement that it refunded the passengers' air fare and planned to reimburse them for replacement tickets they bought on US Airways. AirTran also offered to take the passengers back to Washington free of charge.

"We apologize to all of the passengers _ to the nine who had to undergo extensive interviews from the authorities and to the 95 who ultimately made the flight," the statement said. "Nobody on Flight 175 reached their destination on time on New Year's Day, and we regret it."

AirTran said the incident was a misunderstanding, but the steps taken were necessary.

Two U.S. Muslim advocacy groups, however, were critical of the airline's actions. The Muslim Public Affairs Council called on federal officials Friday to open an investigation. And the Council for American-Islamic Relations filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Transportation, saying "It is incumbent on any airline to ensure that members of the traveling public are not singled out or mistreated based on their perceived race, religion or national origin."

Bill Adams, a DOT spokesperson, said the department thoroughly investigates discrimination complaints but would not comment further.

One of the Muslim passengers, Atif Irfan, said the family probably would not fly home with AirTran because members had already booked tickets on another airline, but appreciated the apology.

"It's definitely nice to hear," he said.

Irfan said when he boarded the flight Thursday, he mentioned something to his wife and sister-in-law about having to sit in the back. His sister-in-law replied that she believed the back of the airplane was the safest, but Irfan believed it was better to be by the wings.

"She said, 'Yes, I guess it makes sense not to be close to the engine in case something happens,'" Irfan recalled Friday. "It was a very benign conversation."

Shortly after taking their seats, members of the group were approached by federal air marshals and taken off the plane, Irfan said. They stood in the jet bridge connected to the airport and answered questions while other passengers exited and glared at them.

Irfan said he thought he and the others were profiled because of their appearance. The men had beards and the women wore headscarves, traditional Muslim attire.

"My wife and I are generally very careful about what we say when we step on the plane," he said, adding that they have received suspicious looks in the past. "We're used to this sort of thing _ but obviously not to this extent."

Irfan, 29, is a lawyer who lives in Alexandria, Va. He was traveling to a religious retreat in Florida with his wife, along with his brother and his family, including three children, ages 7, 4 and 2. They were joined by his brother's sister-in-law and a family friend.

Federal officials ordered the rest of the passengers from the plane and re-screened them before allowing the flight to depart about two hours behind schedule. The family and friend eventually made it to their destination on a US Airways flight.

Family members were upset that AirTran didn't allow them to book another flight. The airline said in a news release Friday that one of the passengers became irate, made inappropriate comments and had to be escorted away from a gate podium by local law enforcement.

"We felt very disrespected," Irfan said. He said FBI agents had cleared their names and asked AirTran to put them on another flight, but to no avail.

Christopher White, a federal Transportation Security Administration spokesman, said the security concern on the plane was handled appropriately.

White said the pilot, after being informed of the remarks, requested that two federal air marshals on board remove the nine passengers. TSA then alerted authorities, including the FBI, which conducted an investigation.

"Our role, basically, is to determine whether (those) in question pose a threat," FBI spokesman Bill Carter said.

He and White said that once authorities determined there was no security threat, it was up to the airline on how to proceed.

"If the pilot is uncomfortable with someone flying on their plane, that's their decision," White said.

Discount carrier AirTran Airways is a subsidiary of AirTran Holdings Inc. Its hub is in Atlanta.

___

Associated Press Writer Jennifer Kay in Miami contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Rachel Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 993
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
04:18 PM on 01/03/2009
What's most remarkable is how calm and gracious the family is being. I read the apology and thought it was a non-apology filled with corporate-speak, and the guy who got kicked off said how nice it was of Air Tran to apologize and how pleased he was about it.

It would be an insult to imply that this man and his family weren't always this nice and understanding, but I feel like we are entering the age of Obama where people (of all religions) are showing how effective it is when insulted to turn the other cheek.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Damaven
03:49 PM on 01/03/2009
Wow, this country has changed. You weren't even allowed on a plane at one time just because you were Black and not being watched for anything really, oh, yeah, breathing. This is refreshing.
photo
Mattie
My Daddy taught me to beware the good Christian
11:54 AM on 01/03/2009
This is horrible, I can't imagine what it must be like to be judged like that, but I believe more than an apology is order. I'm not a big believer in the lawsuit mentality, but some kind of very public acknowledgement needs to be done here, and some kind of compensation for their trouble. Perhaps they need a little education at this airline.
11:25 AM on 01/03/2009
this is the end result of the repubs using the muslim boogeyman to exploit low info voters as much as possible and it begs the question as to why the obama campaign removed two female muslims wearing hijabs from a denver rally for fear the optics would scare "real" americans?
09:05 AM on 01/03/2009
This must be a case of FWM - flying while Muslim.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
09:05 AM on 01/03/2009
If they had been English their comments would not have aroused suspicion.

At least they weren't lynched.

A lawsuit seems in order.

In the meantime there is no need to ride on the AirTran bigot specials.
08:31 AM on 01/03/2009
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall that the original story said that two female passengers had overheard these comments and brought it to the attention of airlines personnel? Shouldn't these two females also apologize (maybe more so) to these people for causing them this unjust treatment?
08:01 AM on 01/03/2009
I agree with Stilts9: Boycott AirTran. I, for one, will never fly with them again.
07:59 AM on 01/03/2009
I wonder what made them apologizes? They are going to still sue the airline company for embarrassment.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AnnfromCA
10:56 AM on 01/03/2009
Yes, because then FBI cleared them, and the airline still refused to allow them to fly. Moreover, they were treated horribly by the airport.

They need to sue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:45 PM on 01/03/2009
I read that they did fly them home, free of charge.
07:45 AM on 01/03/2009
The terrorists have won.
06:13 AM on 01/03/2009
i'm thinking another pilot on cocaine and bigotry still running rampant because of all the crazytalk about Muslims since 9/11 ingrained in the non-brained.
photo
MorpheusXNYC
Artist, web designer, writer, rationalist
03:49 AM on 01/03/2009
Absolutely repulsive. The first thing that needs to happen in an Obama administration is the reinstitution of the right to privacy and social justice.

I would fine the airline 1 million dollars per passenger kicked off for that intolerable display of bigotry, paranoia and sheer hatred and make sure the passengers get every red cent.

THEN they'll be extra careful about what criteria they use.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AnnfromCA
10:57 AM on 01/03/2009
FISA was an opportunity for Obama to stick to his promise. He reversed. Don't look to him for help.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:40 AM on 01/03/2009
What complete and utter BS.

I hope they sue Air Tran into the next century and they're joined in the suit by the other 95 people inconvenienced for this pilots stupidity.

Since when are WORDS about airplane safety a crime? If TSA was doing their jobs there would have been no reason to freak out to this extent. They put them thru the same screening ALL of us go thru.

This makes me sick. I'll never fly Air Tran again.
08:40 AM on 01/03/2009
Some of those other 95 were who alterted the pilot.....................
02:36 AM on 01/03/2009
typical in this increasingly paranoid country. eight out of nine family members were born in michigan, for goodness' sake. they were denied seats on the next airtran flight going out, so the TSA got them booked on USAir instead.

racist, humiliating, and wrong. these people deserve far more than a mere apology and ticket refund. boycott airtran.
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
02:15 AM on 01/03/2009
What's truly pathetic is that real ter.rorists probably wouldn't be caught or stopped from flying on a U.S. plane. I feel so much safer when I read about airline stu.pidity like ths....