Senate Democrats Planning Cool Reception For Burris

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURIE KELLMAN | January 2, 2009 09:27 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich stands by as his choice to fill President-elect Barack Obama's U.S. Senate seat, former Ill. Attorney General Roland Burris addresses the media Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2008, in Chicago. Through numerous TV interviews and behind-the-scenes lobbying, Burris is campaigning hard for the Senate. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green)

WASHINGTON — Senate Democratic leaders plan to grant few if any privileges next week to Roland Burris, the man picked by Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich to represent the state in the Senate, even if Burris arrives on Capitol Hill with the proper credentials.

Senate officials involved in the tangle of legal and logistical planning said Friday that a Democrat will object to Burris being duly sworn with the rest of his class and will propose that his credentials be reviewed for a period of time by the Rules Committee.

That would give Burris the status of a senator-elect to the seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama in the juiciest of several dramas swirling around open Senate seats days before the 111th Congress convenes.

Senate Democrats are slow-walking Burris' appointment because they hope Blagojevich will be removed from office before the Rules Committee completes its investigation.

As early as next week Blagojevich _ federal authorities accuse him of offering to sell the appointment to the highest bidder _ could become the state's first chief executive to be impeached. A state Senate trial would follow and if he were convicted, Blagojevich would be removed from office.

For his part, Burris planned to argue his case in the news media and threatened to sue Senate Democrats if they refuse to swear him in as the chamber's only black member.

Race is a prominent force in the dispute. Rep. Donald Payne, D-N.J., said he called Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and "made it abundantly clear that we felt that they should reconsider."

No luck, Payne reported on Friday.

Story continues below

"I have heard no one say that they felt that he is not qualified," Payne said. Race would not be a factor, he added, were there black members of the Senate. "There is a legitimate opportunity to have the Senate at least start to look a teeny bit like America."

Democrats have said that their opposition to Burris is not about Burris but the fact that anyone appointed by Blagojevich would be tainted by the corruption charges against the governor.

And they're not budging, despite significant questions about whether they have the legal standing to block an appointee of a sitting governor.

The only way Burris will be allowed on the floor, according to Democratic officials who asked not to be identified, is if he possesses a certification of appointment signed by Blagojevich and Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White.

Burris would then be treated as a senator-elect, which by tradition means he'll be allowed on the Senate floor without voting or speaking privileges _ and he wouldn't be granted a desk, according to the officials. They requested anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

The man charged with letting people through the door of the chamber, Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance Gainer, said he expects the two sides to work out a deal before Tuesday.

Gainer has known Burris since their days in Illinois law enforcement, when Burris was attorney general and Gainer was the director of the state police.

"He is a good man," Gainer said in a telephone interview. "He plays by the rules. I don't think there's going to be a confrontation."

Republicans have been wary about commenting, pleased to see Democrats mucking through a political mess of their own party's making.

But Republican Whip Jon Kyl of Arizona said Friday that he wants to review state and federal law before opining on whether Burris should be seated. Still, he questioned whether the legal status of the patron is enough reason to block the appointee.

"The Senate has to be very careful of setting a precedent that just because it doesn't like the governor that appointed (Burris) we therefore refuse to seat a qualified appointee," Kyl said in a telephone interview.

Not that Republicans are against blocking people from being seated. Another Republican leader, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told reporters Friday that he would object to seating any new senator from Minnesota until an anticipated court case is finished and an official election certificate issued in the battle between Republican Sen. Norm Coleman and Democrat Al Franken.

In contrast, nobody's objecting to Denver Public Schools Superintendent Michael Bennet, who is expected to be named to replace Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., set to be Obama's interior secretary.

In the Illinois case, Senate Democrats believe the Constitution and their agenda-setting power give them the tools for a slow-motion rejection of Burris' credentials if they are not signed by both the governor and White, who has refused to certify anyone Blagojevich appoints.

If Burris appears at the Capitol with his certification signed by Blagojevich and White, the officials said, Burris would be permitted on the Senate floor.

Vice President Dick Cheney, as president of the Senate, would then ask whether anyone objects to the senators-elect being duly sworn. A Democrat would object and propose that Burris' credentials be referred to the Rules Committee for an investigation. If no one objects to that motion, the credentials go to the panel for a period of perhaps 90 days.

In the meantime, Burris gets the privileges of an unsworn senator-elect. The Senate's unofficial customs and traditions leave unclear whether that status would come with a pay check, but Burris could be accorded a stipend for staff and given office space.

____

Associated Press writers Steven K. Paulson in Denver, Brian Bakst in St. Paul, Minn., and Christopher Wills in Chicago contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Senate Democratic leaders plan to grant few if any privileges next week to Roland Burris, the man picked by Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich to represent the state in the Senate, even ...
WASHINGTON — Senate Democratic leaders plan to grant few if any privileges next week to Roland Burris, the man picked by Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich to represent the state in the Senate, even ...
 
Comments
865
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
- GaBu I'm a Fan of GaBu 23 fans permalink
photo

Ok people, what has Blago done wrong?

Seriously, what law did he break?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

The unjust use of a black cat?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 01/03/2009
- GaBu I'm a Fan of GaBu 23 fans permalink
photo

lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 01/03/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 244 fans permalink

The sand was kicked in Fitz's eyes by none other than those he failed to prosecute !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 01/03/2009
- Ant I'm a Fan of Ant 94 fans permalink
photo

It doesn't matter. The guy can not effectively govern anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 01/03/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 244 fans permalink

It does matter ! The "guy" has been governing .... part of that governance was to appoint a replacement senator for IL .... and he did !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

He hasn't been convicted of breaking any law, but that doesn't mean he hasn't. So far, though, he's innocent, but that does not erase the cloud of suspicion lingering over his head.

On the other hand, his appointment of Burris is well within his political means, and our party ought to just accept it and move on. Watching them behave in such a mal-iciously competitive way is very disappointing, to say the least. Not to mention the strain they are putting on their own web of relationships. That's just plain dum, especially now, when they need solidarity so much.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 01/03/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 244 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 01/03/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

gladys - you have nothing if you don't have me? You are so sweet! But, a lot of Huff posters feel that way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 01/03/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

gladys - you have nothing if you don't have me? You are so sweet! But, a lot of H u f f posters feel that way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 01/03/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 244 fans permalink

Haha ! Pronto, if we both agreed on everything, one of us wouldn't be necessary ! : )

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 01/03/2009
- GaBu I'm a Fan of GaBu 23 fans permalink
photo

Wow, first strong stand the dems have taken on anything, and it's against their own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

There is only one reason and that has to do with 2010.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 01/03/2009
- GaBu I'm a Fan of GaBu 23 fans permalink
photo

Indeed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 01/03/2009
- Ant I'm a Fan of Ant 94 fans permalink
photo

Which is a good thing because the far right will be out their trying to thwart the Democrats' mandate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

GaBu, do you say things you know are false, just to get a self induced giggle?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 AM on 01/03/2009
- GaBu I'm a Fan of GaBu 23 fans permalink
photo

What other strong stand have the dems taken?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

I wonder how many flavors of snake oil Burris sales for a living?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 01/03/2009

Starting with him self

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 01/03/2009

The old saying that the "Democrats know how to snatch defeat from victory", is so true.

I am sick of my party. They need to know which battles to fight. They let the Repubs get away with murder, but will fight another Dem to the end.
Look how some of the Dems fought Obama, and tried to sabotage his candidacy, with lies and vicious attacks.

There is nothing wrong with the Burris appointment. He is a Democrat, and it is legal.

We have this presidential victory and the Dems are trying to sabotage it, with this petty nonsense.

All of this infighting is self-destructive in the Dem party. If they had fought the Repubs this hard,m we would not be in the mess we are in today, in our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 01/03/2009
- Ant I'm a Fan of Ant 94 fans permalink
photo

"There is nothing wrong with the Burris appointment. He is a Democrat, and it is legal."

No one is questioning the legality. The Democrats said early on that they would not seat Blago's pick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Integrity?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 01/03/2009

And Burris didn't stand by the Unity of the Party he stood by his self interest and continue helping Blago make a mess of this situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 01/03/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 407 fans permalink
photo

The Republicans are taking great delight in playing the race card against the Democrats - anything to make the Democratic Leadership look bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Can some one please enlighten me as to what interest the Republican base has in throwing their support behind Burris?

I guess I'm slow on the uptake this a.m.

Brewing coffee, now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 01/03/2009
- Taita I'm a Fan of Taita 3 fans permalink

It's not support for Burris.

It's support for the rule of law.

Blago had the constitutional right to make the appointment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Republicans are only interested in rule of law when a Dem is involved.

Two sets of rules.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Then why all the mention of his heritage?

Your answer is a bit incomplete.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 01/03/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

The Repubs have been rather silent on this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Not the pundits, especially Pat Bu.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

There is no reason to get involved in the Self Mutilation going on here. Just get a front row chair and watch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

They are thinking that he won't win the 2010 election, the same thing that the Demos are fearing. From day one that has been their concern. At first, everyone seemed to want a general election on this including DIck Durbin( who vanished from the radar screen) until someone figured out that if they went to the public, they would lose the seat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

So they can act like champions of civil rights?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

They are thinking that he won't win the 2010 election, the same thing that the Demos are fearing. From day one that has been their concern. At first, everyone seemed to want a general election on this including DI-ck Durbin( who vanished from the radar screen) until someone figured out that if they went to the public, they would lose the seat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

I might be wrong, but I didn't think Burris was interested in running in 2010.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Thanks, Cat. I see you know your party well ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 01/03/2009
- DeenaB I'm a Fan of DeenaB 2 fans permalink

Well, you all seem to have this argument covered. It's a beautiful foggy morning, so I am going to walk.

May you all have a great day!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

testing

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 01/03/2009
- DinkSinger I'm a Fan of DinkSinger 11 fans permalink

"Burris ... threatened to sue Senate Democrats if they refuse to swear him in".

He needs better lawyers. Senators cannot be sued for what they do in the Senate. Article 1, Section 6 of the Constitution says "for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place. "

In the case Powell v. McCormick which concerned an exclusion of from the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, while finding the exclusion unconstitutional, affirmed the dismissal of the suit against McCormick and other members of Congress and ordered that it proceed only against employees of the House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 01/03/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

CC2 - good to see some Democrats siding with Burris on this. Others want to deny an opportunity for a well qualified Af r i c a n American to be the lone A f r i c a n American in a sea of white faces in The US Senate. "Hope & Change" Riiiiiight.

BTW - Harry R e i d is going to be on Meet The Press tomorrow. It will be a regular Saturday Night Live skit. His aides better bring the Jaws of Life so as to get his feet out of his mouth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Hoof and Mouth went human.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 AM on 01/03/2009
- Ant I'm a Fan of Ant 94 fans permalink
photo

So the Democrats should go back on their word because Burris is an A_frican American?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Well said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 01/03/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 407 fans permalink
photo

No, because Blago has yet to be indicted and there is nothing illegal about the appointment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 01/03/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

They've gone back on their word for much less.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 01/03/2009
- Misha1234 I'm a Fan of Misha1234 122 fans permalink
photo

That's the difference between dems & repubs. We don't practice "groupthink". We actually have opinions.

I agree with you on the Harry R e i d MTP though.

R e i d is a monitored word now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 01/03/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

I think words used by some posters will trigger the filter whereas the same words used by other posters will not. That's happened with me for the word K e n n e d y and others. Thus, I take no chances.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Why the outpouring of support for Burris from your side?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 01/03/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

I'm a fair minded Independent. And Burris is being treated unfairly by The Democrat "leadership".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 AM on 01/03/2009
- ChuckWhite I'm a Fan of ChuckWhite 11 fans permalink

For me it's simple. It's the rule of law.

1. Blago may be a jerk, but he IS the governor until proven guilty.
2. Blago made an appointment using his lawful powers.
3. Burris possesses the qualifications for residence, age, etc.
4. Burris has not been accused, much less convicted, of wrongdoing.

I know that Constitution Article I. Section 5. give the Senate authority to judge "elections", "returns" and "qualifications" of it's members. But, none of those apply in a situation where no election took place. So, ultimately, Senate Dems will lose a fight to prevent Burris from taking the seat. After all, it's not really about Burris, the appointee, it's about Blago ... two essentially unrelated issues.

Besides that, I cannot understand why Dems want to deprive themselves of an added vote at a time that every vote is needed. I'm convinced there's some nasty political pay-back going on and I don't like it.

The man is appointed according to law. Are we to deny him based on suspicion? Wrong!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 AM on 01/03/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 407 fans permalink
photo

I despise the injection of race, and the race-baiting that's going both by the Dems and the Thugs.

That said, there is no reason not to seat him and really, spending any political capital on this issue is an exercise in folly.

And I can't wait to watch that tool Gregory tear apart Reid, maybe some Dems will finally wake up!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

It's a TiVo all the way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 01/03/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

I'm with you on this, Mommy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Don't blame the "Thugs" for baiting this one. You folks own this, Hook, Line and Sinker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 01/03/2009
- rampage I'm a Fan of rampage 199 fans permalink
photo

That reminds me of "Mad" magazine's "Spy vs Spy"

Reid vs Gregory is "Tool vs Tool"

heh

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 01/03/2009
- GaBu I'm a Fan of GaBu 23 fans permalink
photo

Lieberman has more b@lls than toothless Harry, make him majority leader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Reid needs to go, but the Dems would never choose Lieberman. He bu rned that bridge when he campaigned for McC/SP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 01/03/2009
- DeenaB I'm a Fan of DeenaB 2 fans permalink

I thought Bi partisanship was the goal?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 01/03/2009

GaBu...You can keep your guy, Lieberman. You Repubs deserve him. We Dems don't want him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

the dems are quickly pissing away all the political capital theyve built up recently.the blagojevich thing in and of itself is kinda funny.however,the burris appointment is becoming an issue.caroline kennedy is a real nice woman,and a great advocate for liberals in general(specifically financially).however,she shouldnt be allowed anywhere near a senate seat.we cant laugh at conservatives for nominating sarah palin for office and then turn around and sell caroline kennedy as a legitimate candidate.if washingtojn democrats dont quickly get their sh** together,we could actually be looking at republican majotities as soon as 2010.and if that happens,al the potential of the obama administration would then almost certainly be squandered.those republicans would make newt gingrich look reasonable by comparison.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 01/03/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 407 fans permalink
photo

I agree with a lot in you post, with the exception to the CK stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 01/03/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 407 fans permalink
photo

Ufdah! Read what I meant, not what I typed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

No, your wrong. If Burris were a Republican, the GOP would have had no problem sitting him in the Senate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

right.but dems should never ever behave like republicans.democrats in general and pe obama in particular could start doing all sorts of slimy sh** which may be helpful inthe short term,and just say "well,its not as bad as what those guys did".however thats the quickest way to lose power.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 01/04/2009
- Misha1234 I'm a Fan of Misha1234 122 fans permalink
photo

We can laugh at Palin.

CK and Palin have nothing in common.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Every time I hear the name "Blagojevich", I cant help but think of that Jimmy Page song........."cuz I'm a radioactive."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

"Dazed and Confused?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Heh, morning CC, I'd go with that one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

A little......."wake and bake."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 01/03/2009
- GaBu I'm a Fan of GaBu 23 fans permalink
photo

Sen. Reid at re-election time: I fought corruption in my own party, I'm a maverick, vote for me!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 01/03/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 407 fans permalink
photo

Pretty much, he's been spineless when it counted and now he grows a pair.

Preposterous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 01/03/2009
- EdwardTx I'm a Fan of EdwardTx 2 fans permalink

I agree with the sentiment that the Democrats pick the wrong battles to fight. Too bad they have never had the spine to stand up to Republicans on important issues. Leave it to a Republican senator to add the most sensible comment in the whole article. That should tell the Democrats something about their actions.

The US attorney jumped the gun. And unlike most Democrats, the governor did not cave to pressure and resign. (Whether he should have is a separate issue because he has brought shame on his office) So as of the day he appointed Mr. Burris it was a legal and valid appointment. And if the governor of Illinois is impeached later, what legal theory allows them to invalidate the Burris appointment ex-post facto?

The Democrats are advocating a dangerous precedent. As Senator Kyl implied, you don't get to reject an otherwise qualified appointee just because you don't like the person who made the appointment. And if the governor of Illinois is impeached later, what legal theory allows them to invalidate the Burris appointment ex-post facto?

As far as the race card goes, I thought it was a distasteful argument from the start that because PE Obama is black and held that seat it meant that another black person should be appointed. The lesson of Illinois is that a black candidate can win an election statewide when he or she represents the interests of Illinois voters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 01/03/2009
photo

Interesting commentary yesterday that the Blago was playing the race card to get a sympathetic jury

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carl-jeffers/governor-blagojevich-sly_b_154888.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 01/03/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 244 fans permalink

That was quiet interesting Babs ! Suddenly Blacks are not acceptable jurors ... really ! Or is it the other way around for him now !??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 01/03/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 407 fans permalink
photo

Thanks for the link.

What is said about the connection between mania and brilliance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 01/03/2009
- rubygreen I'm a Fan of rubygreen 343 fans permalink
photo

Good Morning BabsfromKansas! It is a beautiful morning here in Fl. Just checking in to see what is going on. Can't wait to see what SNL does with this debacle in the new season.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 01/03/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect