Madoff Investigator Wants To Broaden Scope Of Inquiry

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

January 5, 2009 02:23 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

The investigation into federal regulators' complicity in -- or failure to detect -- the Bernard Madoff ponzi scheme could get a lot bigger, the lead investigator told members of Congress Monday.

H. David Kotz, the Inspector General of the Securities and Exchange Commission, was called before the House Financial Services Committee to brief lawmakers on the preliminary stages of the investigation that began shortly after Madoff confessed that he had been stealing investors' money and lying about the value of their accounts.

The hearing began with a debate between the parties as to whether the hearing was in fact a hearing. The highest ranking committee Republican, Spencer Bachus of Alabama, argued that because the 110th Congress had adjourned and the 111th has yet to officially be sworn in, the House Financial Services Committee "does not technically exist" but is rather in a "parliamentary gray area." Committee chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) countered that hearings rarely, if ever, count for anything official anyway, so it didn't matter what label was given to the meeting of the lawmakers.

The initial probe, Kotz told the committee in prepared testimony, sparked concerns that the failure of the SEC to detect Madoff's fraud may have been more rooted in a fundamental problem with agency regulatory practices rather than a case of sloppy work or coziness between the Madoff family and regulators.

That doesn't mean he's ruling sloppiness out entirely. Kotz said he will investigate whether the SEC broke its own rules "by not conducting timely reviews or examinations of Bernard Madoff's activities and filings."

Broadening the scope of the investigation could delay the report, Kotz acknowledged. "For this reason," he testified, "I am mobilizing additional resources to ensure that our office makes every possible effort to conclude our investigations and reviews as soon as possible."

Sensing the public need for a prompt conclusion of the inquiry, he said that he would consider releasing completed portions of the investigation on a "rolling basis."

Democrats appeared receptive to Kotz's push for a broader investigation. "Together, I hope that we can learn from this terrible event, figure out how we can improve our regulator structure, and undertake the most substantial rewrite of the laws governing the U.S. financial markets since the Great Depression," said Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Penn.), chairing the hearing.

House Republicans, however, were unenthusiastic about the call for a broader investigation, which could lead to tighter regulation of Wall Street. Rep. Bachus (R-Ala.) said in a prepared statement that he saw no need for "broad new legislative or regulatory mandates on the rest of the securities industry. What we may have in the Madoff case is not necessarily a lack of enforcement and oversight tools, but a failure to use them."

The investigation into federal regulators' complicity in -- or failure to detect -- the Bernard Madoff ponzi scheme could get a lot bigger, the lead investigator told members of Congress Monday. H. ...
The investigation into federal regulators' complicity in -- or failure to detect -- the Bernard Madoff ponzi scheme could get a lot bigger, the lead investigator told members of Congress Monday. H. ...
 
Comments
48
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Madoff bought-off the SEC. And I daresay, there are a -lot- of present and former Members of Congress (et al...) who do NOT want him to start saying where all the skeletons are buried.

We are naiive, as a People, if we believe for one moment that the Officeholders within our government are anything more (or, of course, anything less...) than "men and women." Corruptible, and very powerful. Plus, they've been living for fifty years in an environment where "money flowed like water," from an endless spigot (which they still believe exists...) of "borrowed" liquidity that they alone controlled.

"When the cat's away, the mice will play." And today, its' not that "hundreds of billions of dollars are 'gone,'" but rather, that "those dollars never actually existed in the first place." The SEC -knew- of the crime and, in what has become "very typical fashion," aided-and-abetted it. Facilitated its existence, blocked its prosecution.

"High Crime" rears its ugly head yet again.

"High Crime is REAL Crime," and (thus saith the Constitution...) "any civil officer" can do it.

Are YOU tired of being robbed, swindled, and lied to by the top civil officers in your own Government?

Yeah, me too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 01/06/2009

there are a few in congress that are actualy protecting him --------this mess goes straight to a sen.ator or two`s office---wait and see who they are------

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 02/04/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki permalink
photo

I dont feel sorry for the investors of Madoff's scam. These people all knew that this type of return was not obtainable legally. But they chose to do it anyway. I am sure that somehow the friends of the wealthiest who reside in the Congress, will find a way to funnel tax money to the greedy losers of Madoff's scam.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 01/05/2009

And down the rabbit hole we [probably won't] go!

I always wish we had a functional and impartial law enforcement system, where something like this really could travel up to the top. Madoff could be offered a deal if he gave all his information on similar schemes, leading to some even bigger players. Or have I been watching The Wire too much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 01/05/2009

I'm sure that he will either be "offered a deal," or found face-down in the Hudson. Anything to keep him from talking. Anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 01/06/2009

Enough!.....Send this man to Compton....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 01/05/2009

Time to bring Eliot Spitzer back. He would be perfect for head of SEC. Fearless prosecutor who would not be looking for Wall St. job as he has $$.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 01/05/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki permalink
photo

yes, I agree. This is why people like Madoff were so scared and hated him so. Because he actually knew what they were doing, and tried to stop the people. I dont care if Spitzer paid for a hooker, that is nothing compared to what many on walll street to everyday.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 01/05/2009

Kotz SEC attorney general should have been doing his investigating all long. Isn't that his job. What has he been doing all the while.Just collecting a pay check.Every cabinet position or appointment Bush has made has been incompetent. I guess that's what you get with appointing friends and fellow criminals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 PM on 01/05/2009
photo

SEC Inspector General? More like Inspector Clouseau. The fundamental problem with the agency's regulatory practices? Oh, like the fundamentals of our economy, I get it.Broadening the scope of the investigation might delay the report? Yeah, so what? And Rep. Kanjorski, in learning how to figure out ways to improve the regulator structure, where have you all been since Tyco, Enron, Anderson Accounting, et al. Haven't any of you guys in the Capitol heard that sooner is better than later.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 01/05/2009

you know the Vanno site is showing that the Germans have more regulations than we do, but guess what they have MORE ENTREPRENEURSHIP.... So much for trickle down and deregulation, just the quickest way to suck the blood out of the working class...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 01/05/2009

"House Republicans ... unenthusiastic ... could lead to tighter regulation ... Rep. Bachus (R-Ala.) ... saw no need ... not necessarily a lack of enforcement and oversight tools, but a failure to use them."

Rep. Bachus, Sir or Ma'am: Since the GOP (yes, and others) diluted regulation and withheld funding adequate for effective regulation, you are suggesting ... just... what?

Please, someone, bring on the regulation and regulators. Regulation and regulators cannot possible cost anything like the trillions we have lost and the trillions more which will certainly be lost very shortly. In spite of all the denials, major elements of this collapse have been gestating for decades and have been diagnosed by many a risk manager and regulator. The decision-makers insistent on quarter-to-quarter growth and the politicians in their pockets knew so much and still, they had their eyes wide shut.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 PM on 01/05/2009
photo

ok c e nsuuurs , da moonee is in is -r-ae-l bannnnkkss.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 01/05/2009
photo

the money is in israel banks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 01/05/2009

They know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 02/04/2009

CSPAN2 this morning is showing a hearing in the House on the Maddoff clusterfuck. Appearing in front on a bunch of angry Dems and as usual, forgiving Repubs is a little Bushie dipwad named David Kotz, the SEC Commission Inspector General, who apparently did little to no Inspecting of all of the investment scandals, and Stephen Harbeck, President of the Security Investment Protection Corporation, which apparently may be broke (they have about a billion and a half in their coffers) after all of Maddoff's loses are paid off...even though the losses run in the trillions...both are earnestly assuring the committee members that they will "look into these things" as this country slides into financial ruin. The missing man was the guy who has been warning the SEC for the past ten years that the Maddoff scheme HAD to be illegal because it was TOO GOOD to be legal...because of illness...SIGH! Carl

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 01/05/2009

"a little bushie dipwad"----the PAYOLLA on this is reaching staggering levels----and reaching far into the Bu$hCo. administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 AM on 02/04/2009
photo

The highest rank R epublican, S pencer B achus of 'bama, argued that because he was eating another cow pie was no excuse for sitting on one . . . or two.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 01/05/2009
- Joseph A. Palermo - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Joseph A. Palermo permalink

Hey Bernie, can I send some money to you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 01/05/2009
photo

How much money from the financial industry did Senator Bachus receive for campaign contributions or did any of those guys donate to a charity in Senator Bacus name? Always follow the money

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 01/05/2009

Put him in jail, warmup for prison!!!! Who else gets these breaks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 01/05/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect