Feinstein: Seat Burris In Senate

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURIE KELLMAN and ERICA WERNER | January 6, 2009 09:51 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Illinois U.S. Senate Appointee Roland Burris makes a statement after departing Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2009. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — Roland Burris failed to capture President-elect Barack Obama's old Senate seat Tuesday in a wild piece of political theater, but the Democrats' opposition cracked when a key chairwoman said seating him was simply the legal thing to do. Democratic leaders, set to meet with Burris on Wednesday, were searching for a way to defuse the dispute before it further overshadows the 111th Congress.

Knowledgeable Senate officials of both parties widely predicted that the saga would end with Burris being seated. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

Seating Burris seemed more likely late Tuesday, when Sen. Dianne Feinstein rejected the reasoning that all of the chamber's Democrats, herself included, had cited in a letter last week _ that corruption charges against Burris' patron, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, tainted his appointment.

"Does the governor have the power, under law, to make the appointment? And the answer is yes," said Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Rules Committee, which judges the credentials of senators.

Burris marched into the Capitol earlier Tuesday, declaring himself "the junior senator from the state of Illinois." But Secretary of the Senate Nancy Erickson rejected his certification, as he knew she would, saying it lacked Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White's signature and the state seal.

Late Tuesday, Feinstein urged the Senate to settle the matter.

"If you don't seat Mr. Burris, it has ramifications for gubernatorial appointments all over America," the California senator said. "Mr. Burris is a senior, experienced politician. He has been attorney general, he has been controller, and he is very well-respected. I am hopeful that this will be settled."

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Story continues below
advertisement

Earlier, Reid had said, "Mr. Burris is not in possession of the necessary credentials from the state of Illinois."

Burris, meanwhile, pivoted from his rejection at the Capitol to the Illinois Supreme Court, asking it to order White to certify his appointment.

Burris was expected to meet with Reid on Wednesday.

It would be his second appearance at the Capitol in as many days. His first included an escort by Capitol police officers to Erickson's third-floor office for what was described as a highly cordial, 21-minute meeting.

Burris, 71, then led a small mob of lawyers, consultants, police and reporters across the street in pouring rain, to a news conference which Burris aides said Reid had tacitly allowed.

Erickson, Burris reported, had advised him that "I would not be accepted, and I will not be seated, and I will not be permitted on the floor."

The former Illinois attorney general said he was "not seeking to have any type of confrontation" over taking the seat. In addition to his court filing late in the day in Illinois, Burris said he was considering a federal lawsuit to force Senate Democrats to seat him.

It was a distraction for majority Democrats eager to project an image of progress with Obama on an economic stimulus package estimated to cost as much as $800 billion.

Democrats and Obama have said that the corruption charges against Blagojevich would strip credibility from anyone he appointed to the seat.

Blagojevich denies federal accusations that he tried to sell the seat Obama has given up for the presidency.

In a written statement Tuesday, the governor said allegations against him shouldn't be held against Burris, whom he called a "good and decent man."

"The people of Illinois are entitled to be represented by two senators in the United States Senate," Blagojevich said.

An attorney for Burris, Timothy W. Wright III, said that "our credentials were rejected by the secretary of the Senate. We were not allowed to be placed in the record book. We were not allowed to proceed to the floor for purposes of taking oath. All of which we think was improperly done and is against the law of this land."

Some of Burris' supporters have bemoaned the fact that Democrats would stand in the way of the Senate gaining its only black member. Burris himself downplayed the issue of race, telling reporters: "I cannot control my supporters. I have never in my life, in all my years of being elected to office, thought anything about race."

"I'm presenting myself as the legally appointed senator from the state of Illinois. It is my hope and prayer that they recognize that the appointment is legal," he said on CBS' "The Early Show."

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus said Tuesday that Burris should be seated.

"A lot of people want to talk about race or the governor and his problems, but the bottom line is you have a sitting governor who has certain legal rights and authorities and he's made an appointment," said Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md. "This is an issue that goes beyond race."

___

Associated Press writer Ann Sanner contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Roland Burris failed to capture President-elect Barack Obama's old Senate seat Tuesday in a wild piece of political theater, but the Democrats' opposition cracked when a key chairwo...
WASHINGTON — Roland Burris failed to capture President-elect Barack Obama's old Senate seat Tuesday in a wild piece of political theater, but the Democrats' opposition cracked when a key chairwo...
 
Comments
387
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)

Just contacted Secretary of State Jesse White's office and requested he do his job and certify the appointment paper: Leave the politics to Madigan and others ... Yes, the person answering the phone said "this is the right place to call." Seems Mr. White needs to feel the heat ...

WHITE, Jesse 312-814-6165
Work Unit:
SECRETARY OF STATE
Agency:
SECRETARY OF STATE, OFFICE OF THE
Address: JAMES R THOMPSON CTR
FL 005 STE 400 CHICAGO IL 60601
WHITE, Jesse 217-782-2201
Work Unit:
SECRETARY OF STATE
Agency:
SECRETARY OF STATE, OFFICE OF THE
Address: CAPITOL BLDG
FL 002 RM 213 SPRINGFIELD IL 62756

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 01/07/2009

She cracks me up. I love the way she acts like she is so "ethical" and does everything by the book.

This is just a sampling of her voting decisions based on her husband's company's governmental "military" contracts that she "assisted" in.

"... As a member of the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee, Sen. Feinstein voted for appropriations worth billions to her husband's firms...

And that is only s morsel of her conflicts of interest. What a self-serving, cherry-picking DINO Dem.

Her opinion is worth nothing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 01/07/2009
photo

Y'know, it appears that Senate may not be able to stop the seating of Burris, LEGALLY-- but I think it was important that they made a CLEAR STATEMENT that they protested and did not approve of Blago making the appointment-- and that they were seating Blago's choice only under duress. What Blago chose to do was unconscionable. Senate had to make a position stand on that. "Political theater"-- yes, but there was an admirable message in that. Even if or when Burris gets seated-- cos courts will probably rule on his side-- he hasn't "won" anything-- cos no one feels good about him being there-- not even his constituents. What is the "honor" in that-- and what kind of "power" does he think he will wield with his peers? How much can he really get done in his new position? And by next election, Blago will probably be convicted-- and then the people of Illinois will surely oust his puppet, Burris.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 01/07/2009

I am an Illinois citizen and strongly believe that Blogjevich needs to be impeached ASAP. However, Feinstein is correct, there is nothing legally the Senate can do to not seat Burris. The only qualifications for Senator are age, citizenship and residency. Burris meets all three of those qualifications. Although I am disgusted with Blago for making and Burris for accepting the appointment, we are still a nation of laws. Laws are meant to be followed even when the result may be highly unpopular. If the Senate refuses to seat Burris because the Secretary of State of Illinois did not certify his credentials, what would happen in similar situation where a very conservative Secretary of State refused to certify the credentials of a very liberal Senator because he or she was pro-choice or supported gay marriage? The Senate has made a huge mistake and arbitrary political standards can only lead to corrupt government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 01/07/2009
photo

Oh, Feinstein, nose a wee-bit out of joint because Obama didn't consult you about the CIA Director position? I also believe you don't like the idea and even more that it might come to light how MUCH MONEY your husband has been making in contracts with Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 01/07/2009
photo

Yeah you hit the nail on the head! I am from California and she has been voting for Bush and his Bush Shinola for a long time now...she does not represent me or many other Californians! Boo!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 01/07/2009

Diane FRANKENSTIEN...you deal with your on politics in CA...WE t, THE PEOPLE OF ILLNOIS DON'T WANT BURRIS REPSRESENATION!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 01/07/2009

Takeing advice from one of the worse Senators in Washington? The senate needs to hold firm against Burris ! The people of Illinois need to circulate a pitition to keep him out!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 01/07/2009

arghhh... just the comment about being ordained by god should show how out of touch this guy is.

Does anyone have the stones to do the right thing? If he did, he would stand down and let the process take a different course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 01/07/2009

PLEASE BLOCK BURRIS...ILLINOIS DOES NOT WANT HIM!!!!! PLEASE!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 01/07/2009

With the economy tanking, the 2 wars the US is involved in and now the conflict in Israel, you would think Fienstien would not choose this time to undermine the president elect.

Just where was she for the last eight years? Does she want a "professional" to oversee the water-boarding etc. at Gitmo?

Now she wants Burris seated? Temper tantrums are for 2 year olds Diane. It looks like one sh*t disturber supporting another.

The following excerpt from this very Huffington Post; Burris To Senate: Don't "Deny What The Lord Has Ordained" "I Am The Solution To The Problem Quick Read | Comments (508)| Rod Blagojevich As for Senate Democratic leaders, thus far unwilling to allow him to be seated, he said, "I am a United States senator. They can't stop me from doing my senatorial duties." In fact, he is not, and cannot be unless he is administered the oath of office.

Burris a COMPLETE crackpot! Here is a link to the monument ( tomb) he built for himself, announcing that he is a "trailblazer" and an extensive list of his "accomplishments'. IF he were so revered and accomplished, he would not have to do THIS for himself; http://www.flickr.com/ photos/ southbound_07/ 2750018934/ sizes/ o/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 01/07/2009

Yes, she does want a professional in charge of the waterboarding........herself or maybe hubby. It might mean a pay cut, but when you are a gazillionair you can afford to. . . . Since she has not overseen the oversight committee she is not allowed to make demands. At this point she is pointless.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 01/07/2009
photo

The fact that Burris is even interested in the seat at Blago's fiat says he is a bad choice for the Senate. Feinstein's word is not a royal decree. After her torture waffle and the weak spine she has shown on Bush's criminal appointments, not to mention letting the telecoms off the hook for domestic spying, she isn't exactly a competent person to decide whether Burris ought to be seated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 01/07/2009

its not what feinstein says or thinks , i don't give a hec k .i myself consider he r another joe , a repubs. mole in demos. body .but burris has the right to be seated . it is his seat to fill , the govern.er who appointed him still on the job and has the right to assign him. the problem here is not her . its rie.d who must go ,step aside . we don't want any wea k lea.ders any more .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 01/07/2009

I am just curious what kind of man would allow himself to be a puppet and as an african american, dare i say it, knowingly or unknowingly playing the role of uncle tom.

what pride or sense of accomplishment is there in reaching the united states senate in such a way?

in my opinion he has brought no honor as being the only african american member in the senate and slightly stained the pride and jubilation we should have at welcoming the first AA POTUS...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 01/07/2009

How does this make Burris an Uncle Tom? Reid said that Burris doesn't have the "credentials" to be seated. Burris is well within his right to be seated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 AM on 01/07/2009
photo

Uncle Tom? That is a bit too strong. I do not think that Mr. Burris should have played the Blagovernator's game, but you have to look at the man's record and character before making such a strong statement.

He isn't Clarence Thomas, who is an Uncle Tom in more ways than one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 01/07/2009

Once again: Blagojevich is still the Governor, accused or not. He has not been convicted of anything. It is flawed thinking to postulate any taint on Burris because of the governor. The real problem is why lawmakers just do get it? The law is the law! Innocent until PROVEN guilty. As far as that Uncle Tom tag: Not fair at all. To Uncle Tom! To me this guy is more like Bledsoe from Ellison's Invisible Man!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 01/07/2009

Ok KKojei,the law is the law! Section 9: States the Gov. can seat a senator at the advice and councel of the Senate! Not do it alone!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 01/07/2009

Currently, there is not one(1) African American in the U S Senate. That's none, zippo, nada, zero, less than one, 1-1=0. What is about that number do you not understand.? Why should and African American turn down an opportunity to become a U S Senator. If not mistaken, there has only been three(3) totalo in modern times. Why does it make Burress an "Uncle Tom"? Remember, the President Elect was in the Senate. Why can't you be just as proud as another African American reaching the Senate? What does that make all of the other people attempting to get the position ?
What does that say for Caroline Kennedy who is attempting to be appointed by the Governor of New York to replace Hillary Clinton? You should be more settled minded in your use of words to desscribe a person who appears to have a long history in Illinois politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 01/07/2009

Interesting. All of the sudden there's nothing wrong with not achieving the position of United States Senator the old fashioned way.

Okay by comparison isn't this no different than people who say that the homerun record of Barry Bonds is tainted? Although there's been no admissions, confession, convictions there's still a cloud over the achievement.

Well put an asterisk next to the title of Senator

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 01/07/2009

I'm sure Reid won't mind as long as he sits at the back of the senate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 01/07/2009

burris must be seated .its shame to block him . i really think that blagojevich's problems with the law should not stop burris from claiming his seat . rie.d creating problems at the first day of 111 co.ng re.s s .rie d lack the strong lea.der ship and must be repla.ced before he gets us in more deeper troubles. new blood....new lea der ship needed more than ever. rie.d must move aside .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 AM on 01/07/2009

No shocker than Feinstein comes down on the wrong side of every issue as always

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 AM on 01/07/2009

In support of Feinstein, Burris indeed should be seated. Although he was appointed by a tainted Governor, Burris himself has done nothing wrong but accept the honor bestowed upon him. Unless someone can prove that Burris has bought his senate seat, then there is no reason he should not be sworn in. It is the Governor that does the appointing, and the last time I checked, that was still Blago! (crook or not). The Illinois Secretary of State is overstepping his remit and acting unconstitutionally!
Besides, Burris was an excellent servant of the Illinois people. And he does want to continue serving them. Even Obama made nothing but positive comments about Burris. He, Obama, claims to respect the constitution. He needs to show true leadership by respecting the constitution of Illinois, which he represented in the Senate.
I know what I'm saying here will not be popular by quite a few of you. My support of Obama does not mean my judgement should be clouded if he does something wrong. And on this score, the Democratic party has got it wrong in trying their utmost to prevent a legitimate appointee from taking his rightful position as Senator from Illinois!
If they did not want Blagojevich to act as he has, then they should have done their best to remove him from power before he made the appointment. They didn't. And so, the would-be only black Senator should be allowed to take his oath of office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 AM on 01/07/2009

Burris is a crackpot, a complete and utter crackpot and a racist to boot; Burris To DC: "The Lord Has Ordained This " In 1985, Rolando Cruz was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death for kidnapping, rape, and murder along with a co-defendant in a DuPage County Circuit Court. In 1992, Assistant Attorney General Mary Brigid Kenney, whom Burris had assigned to fight Cruz's appeal, sent Burris a memo identifying numerous errors in the investigation and trial in Cruz's initial conviction.[10] Burris ignored Kenney's warnings, and she resigned in protest. In September 1995, DNA tests showed that neither Cruz nor his co-defendant were the contributors of the semen found at the crime scene.[11] On November 3, 1995, a DuPage County judge acquitted Cruz on the basis of recanted testimony, the DNA evidence, and the lack of any substantiated evidence against Cruz. He was fully pardoned by Governor George Ryan in 2002.[12 In 1995, he ran for mayor of Chicago, losing to incumbent Richard M. Daley. In 1998 and 2002, he again unsuccessfully sought the Democratic Party nomination for Governor of Illinois, running in 2002 against, among others, Rod Blagojevich. ] In 1998, Burris caused a controversy by referring to his Democratic primary opponents " Jim Burns, Glenn Poshard (who eventually won the nomination) and John Schmidt " as "nonqualified white boys."[9]. The statement was considered to be prejudice by many and backfired politically.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 01/07/2009

What makes Burris a racist?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 01/07/2009

He may not be your choice for senator, but my point is simply this: Governor Blagojevich has acted constitutionally in appointing him. And in this regard, despite the other issues surrounding Blago, Burris has been appointed correctly. He should therefore be allowed to take up his seat. And this is what Feinstein's argument is. If we refuse to respect the state constitution on this score, how many other laws are we going to flout for the sake of pleasing some (and these are usually the ones who screw us up the most)? We are a nation of laws and these must be respected if democracy is going to survive! If we don't like a law, then we must follow the right channels in changing them.
I, for one, don't think Blago should serve another day as Governor, but he has - on this score - done what he was mandated to do. And even though I dislike Blago, he must only be removed from office by constitutional means. While he is still Governor, he must be accorded all his rights as Governor - period.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 01/07/2009
photo

What you said may or may not be popular, but it is correct. We are always screaming about the Rule of Law, aren't we? It needs to apply here as well, no matter how we may feel about what the Blagovernator has been alleged to have done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 01/07/2009

Exactly! I'm glad there are still many sensible people about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 AM on 01/07/2009
photo

Rice-A-Roni...she is such a treat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 01/07/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect