India: Pakistani Authorities 'Must Have' Backed Mumbai Attack

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MUNEEZA NAQVI | January 6, 2009 12:01 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari, adjusts his hair during a joint press conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, unseen, at the presidential palace in Kabul Afghanistan on Tuesday Jan. 6, 2009. (AP Photo/Musadeq Sadeq)

NEW DELHI — India's prime minister said Tuesday that Pakistani authorities "must have had" a hand in the Mumbai siege, a remark dismissed by Pakistan as propaganda that could undermine efforts to bring the perpetrators to justice.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh repeated India's allegations that the November attacks were was carried out by the Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba. But in his most forceful speech on the subject, Singh stopped just short of accusing Islamabad of directly aiding the gunmen.

"There is enough evidence to show that, given the sophistication and military precision of the attack, it must have had the support of some official agencies in Pakistan," the Indian leader said, while criticizing what he called Islamabad's reluctance to crack down on militants operating in their territory.

Singh's comments seemed aimed at keeping tensions between the bitter rivals at a slow burn and reflected widespread belief that multiple power centers run Pakistan.

Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari meanwhile called for recognition of his country's efforts to crack down on extremists.

"We expect our friends to have the same understanding, to rise above these stateless actors who are trying to create a problem in the region," Zardari told reporters Tuesday in Afghanistan, where he was making his first official visit since being sworn in.

Pakistan's foreign ministry also dismissed Singh's comments as "a propaganda offensive" designed "to whip up tensions" in the region.

They "not only ratchet up tensions, but occlude facts and destroy all prospects of serious and objective investigations into the Mumbai attacks," the ministry said in a statement.

Story continues below
advertisement

Singh did not name any Pakistani officials, but New Delhi has accused Pakistan's military-controlled spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence, of being involved in attacks against India in recent years. Pakistan's civilian government is relatively new and weak, while the ISI is thought to have a high degree of independence.

One Indian analyst said Singh's speech was intended for several audiences: the Indian electorate, who will be heading to the polls in the coming months and have in the past supported confrontations with Pakistan; leaders in Islamabad, who India thinks should crack down on the terror network it says operates across the border; and the international community, which New Delhi hopes will help pressure Pakistan into action.

"The idea is to make it more than an Indo-Pak issue," said Mahesh Rangarajan, a prominent political expert in New Delhi.

But the comments were viewed in an opposite light across the border.

"It is a cost effective strategy to isolate Pakistan," said Rasul Bakhsh Rais, a professor of political science at Lahore University of Management Sciences.

Tuesday's verbal sparring came a day after India handed Pakistan evidence that New Delhi said proved the attacks were plotted in Pakistan. The dossier included details from the interrogation of the lone surviving gunman, recovered weapons, and intercepted communications with the suspected handlers back in Pakistan.

The investigation into the attack, which left 164 dead, showed the 10 gunmen could not have been working on their own, Singh said.

"We cannot choose our neighbors," Singh said before a meeting with Indian security officials. "Some countries like Pakistan have in the past encouraged and given sanctuary to terrorists and other forces who are antagonistic to India."

Calls for war in India have been largely muted, with even conservative opposition politicians, who endorse a hard line toward Pakistan, adopting a fairly conciliatory approach.

While Pakistan's own rhetoric has been fairly quiet in recent days, it has also moved some of its soldiers toward the Indian border and away from the Afghan border, where Islamabad is battling militants.

Predominantly Hindu India and Muslim Pakistan have fought three wars against each other since they gained independence in 1947.

On Tuesday, Singh was highly critical of how Pakistan has handled the investigations into recent attacks, indicating Pakistan has been unwilling _ or perhaps unable _ to crack down on terrorists operating on its soil.

"The more fragile a government, the more it tends to act in an irresponsible fashion," he said.

___

Associated Press reporters Ashok Sharma in New Delhi and Asif Shahzad in Islamabad, Pakistan contributed to this report.

NEW DELHI — India's prime minister said Tuesday that Pakistani authorities "must have had" a hand in the Mumbai siege, a remark dismissed by Pakistan as propaganda that could undermine efforts t...
NEW DELHI — India's prime minister said Tuesday that Pakistani authorities "must have had" a hand in the Mumbai siege, a remark dismissed by Pakistan as propaganda that could undermine efforts t...
 
Comments
29
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

And Islamabad was not terrorized by Hindu fringe terrorists....

It is more like frontier regions in Pakistan (Baluchistan, NWFP, Kashmir etc) are routinely terrorized by Islamabad. Secular democratic movemenst and protests are suppressed by targeted murders and violence. Sometimes, this terror spills across the border into India.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 AM on 01/07/2009
photo

Of course it's possible that he's right.

However I find it just a little too convenient that the larger, stronger country just so happens to find evidence that the government of the smaller, weaker country was involved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 AM on 01/07/2009

Here is what Gener@l Pasha , Chief of ISI has to say about T@liban:

Pasha is apparently adept at overcoming old divisions. However, it is worth listening closely when the Gener@l explained why he too was unwilling to apprehend the T@liban leadership, even though many claimed that T@liban leader Mull@h Om@r, for example, was in Quett@, a city where Pasha lived until a few years ago. "Shouldn"t they be allowed to think and say what they please? They believe that jih@d is their obligation. Isn"t that freedom of opinion?" he asked.

A quote from
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/07-Jan-2009/I-was-ready-to-visit-Delhi-ISI-Chief/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 01/06/2009

I find it interesting that using the same logic, why Pasha (and his govt.) doesn't think that India has an obligation to its citizens, to strike back at those who came from Pakistan and caused murder and mayhem in Mumbai...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 01/06/2009

Time for India to use it's Nuclear arsenal. They have more nukes and more accurate delivery systems than Pakistan

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 PM on 01/06/2009

While India's does mantain a decisive and overwhelming advantage since they thermonuclear capability the losses Pa.ki fission bombs if lobbed anywhere across the indo-gangetic plain will generate would be too high a price. They should remain political weapons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 01/06/2009

India can take care of business with the conventional means; I think India wants exhust all its diplomatic moves...and the Time to Rumble seems to be getting close....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 01/06/2009
photo

"Mr. President, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed. But I do say no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops. Uh, depending on the breaks. " - General Buck Turgidson

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 01/06/2009
- GPI I'm a Fan of GPI permalink

As I write this, the Indian news channels are giving out full details about the dossier given to Pakistan, and 14 other countries, with the evidence about the terror attacks. It seems to be full of details about the weapons, transcripts of phone conversations between the attackers and their handlers in Pakistan, their talk with the Rabbi's wife asking her to contact her Consulate with demands, their clothes, their accent and a lot of other things.

Pakistan, as usual, has buried its head in the sand. We didn't do anything! We just looked the other way!

I have a feeling that the Indian government is waiting for Obama to take office. Then the strike will happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 01/06/2009

Yep, with their head in the sand, time for a quick kick in the @ss....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 01/06/2009

Pak.i.stan must realize that Obama and Clinton will not be as cold to Indi,a as Condi and Co are. They continue to thump their che$ts in war rhetoric, close supply routes to pressure the US and rattle the only card they have which is Nuclear Blackmail.... the free world and India will come bearing down.

They have lost every war they started with India...it's never ceases to amaze how hurt pride and inferiority complex and religion go hand in hand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 01/06/2009

the next war, everyone loses,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 01/06/2009

"They continue to thump their che$ts in war rhetoric."
I don't recall the Pakistanis talking about Airstrikes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 01/06/2009

And Islamabad was not terrorized by Hindu fringe terrorists....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 01/06/2009

Mumbai 26/11 wasn't enough?? Now you want P@kistani Airstrikes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 01/06/2009

The Indians were the ones talking about Airstrikes in Pakistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 01/06/2009

Yes, to take out the Terror1st camps, which the P@k. govt. is not willing to deal with...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 01/06/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect