Feinstein Backs Panetta For CIA, Changing Tune

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ERICA WERNER and PAMELA HESS | January 7, 2009 09:06 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the incoming chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Wednesday she intends to support President-elect Barack Obama's choice for CIA chief, Leon Panetta, despite earlier comments that she had reservations about the choice.

Obama chose Panetta, a former White House chief of staff who has no formal background in the intelligence community, without consulting with Feinstein. Obama later apologized to her for the lapse.

Feinstein said in an interview Wednesday that she spoke with Panetta, a fellow Californian, for about 20 minutes on Tuesday evening and came away reassured.

"I had a good discussion with him. I'm confident that he understands. I am supportive," Feinstein said. "I've known him for 20 years. I know him to be a man of credibility and a man of conscience and a man of talent, and I believe he will surround himself with top-notch staff from the intelligence community."

After Obama's choice of Panetta was disclosed by news organizations Monday, Feinstein and former Intelligence Committee chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., voiced doubts about Panetta's lack of grounding in intelligence matters. Obama contacted both key senators to acknowledge what Vice President-elect Joe Biden called a "mistake," and the incoming administration has continued efforts to press Panetta's backing before he comes up for a confirmation hearing.

Rockefeller has not yet publicly indicated his position on Panetta.

Nor has Obama made an official announcement about his choice for CIA chief.

"All I can say is Leon Panetta is an outstanding public servant with impeccable integrity, somebody who's worked on national security at the highest levels and if I were to select him, I think he would do an outstanding job," Obama said Wednesday in an interview with CNBC.

Story continues below
advertisement

Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., a member of the intelligence panel who said he was pleased with Panetta's nomination from the onset, said he had been contacted by Obama's staff and thanked for his vocal public support.

"I was thanked for my positive remarks and urged to keep making them," he said.

Feinstein earlier had expressed a preference for an intelligence professional to head the agency. But she said her confidence that Panetta would surround himself with good staff allayed that concern.

She declined to comment on whether she'd been given assurances that the agency's No. 2, Steve Kappes, would stay on, but indicated she wanted him to.

Obama's failure to consult with her before making the pick "is all behind us," Feinstein told reporters.

"I believe there was an oversight and I don't really care about that. What I do care about is the agency, and that it faces many issues and it has many problems," Feinstein said. "And what I do care about is that the White House is given crisp, good, as much as possible factual, intelligence, and it is not what they want to hear necessarily but it is what the agency believes is the truth.

"President-elect Obama made the comment that he doesn't want to be told what they think he wants to hear but what they think he should hear, and that's good enough for me."

Panetta continued to enjoy support from others.

"I certainly plan to vote for him," Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., a member of the intelligence committee, said in an interview.

Wyden said he expects Panetta will be "seriously grilled" during his confirmation hearing by members who want to ensure he's the best person for the job.

But after that, the country will have "someone who will be a change agent and an outstanding head of the CIA."

Rockefeller spoke with both Obama and Panetta on Tuesday, according to an aide to the senator, and all agreed that Monday's news leaks that surfaced Panetta's name as the CIA chief nominee before it was discussed with Feinstein and Rockefeller had not been handled well, the aide said. The aide is not a spokesman and spoke anonymously to describe the discussions.

Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., the committee's top Republican, is reserving judgment on Panetta until after the nomination hearing, one of his aides told The Associated Press.

Separately, Feinstein and Wyden began a push Wednesday for what is likely to be the first political challenge for Obama's intelligence team. They have introduced legislation that would close the jail at Guantanamo Bay and limit the CIA's interrogation procedures to the 19 methods used by the U.S. military.

President George W. Bush vetoed a bill last year that also sought to limit CIA interrogations. In 2007 he issued an executive order specifically authorizing the CIA to go beyond the Army field manual with "enhanced interrogation techniques." Bush's veto was supported by current CIA Director Michael Hayden, who argued that the Army field manual does not comprise all the methods that would be allowed by law.

Feinstein also sought Wednesday to rebut criticism from commentators on the left who accuse her, Rockefeller and other Democrats of not doing more to rein in the Bush administration on torture and other issues. Some of these critics interpreted her perceived opposition to Panetta as a reluctance to embrace Obama's desire to change the CIA.

"I want the same thing he wants. I mean this is a clean break, this is a new chapter, and I want that too," Feinstein said.

"One of the things that disturbs me is people interpret this as my wanting torture. I've been there from the very beginning against it."

___

Associated Press writer Anne Flaherty contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the incoming chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Wednesday she intends to support President-elect Barack Obama's choice for CIA chief, ...
WASHINGTON — Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the incoming chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Wednesday she intends to support President-elect Barack Obama's choice for CIA chief, ...
 
Comments
272
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
- Ohsnap I'm a Fan of Ohsnap 44 fans permalink

After a quite of bit of thought, Fenstein realized that since she got the majority of votes from California and not the entire United States, that she could only complain to the people of California. Because no one else gives a sh** what she thinks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 01/07/2009
- StellaRay I'm a Fan of StellaRay 212 fans permalink

Wow. Just wow. I am so f'ing sick of people's disdain for changing your mind when more facts appear.
In the old days they used to say a woman always has the right to change her mind. Quaint, I know, but maybe there's something to it. My only caveat would be that I'd like this old adage to be as applicable to men as women.

Flip flopping has become the phrase du jour, totally obscuring the fact that as things move faster than a log in a river at high tide, we would be well advised to keep our minds open and ready to change.

I understand Feinstein felt miffed to not have been consulted, and that's ok. In her position, she had a right to be informed But I salut her for considering the new facts and changing course.

If we don't get over this idea that it is never correct to change your mind, we are stuck in deep weeds. I change my mind all the time, because I prefer to make that organ a sieve that lets new information in and excretes old irrelevant information. The true test of intelligence is not conviction, but rather---f­lexibility­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 01/07/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 216 fans permalink

So, what additional facts appeared in either the Burris or Panetta decisions?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 01/07/2009
- StellaRay I'm a Fan of StellaRay 212 fans permalink

First of all Grunty1, Feinstein was the first high level dem to come out and say Burris should be seated. The fact that came out here, which apparently Harry Reid did not avail himself of, was the Blagojevitch was within his legal rights, period, no matter how many of us don't like it. She saw that it was a battle not worth choosing.

Second, both Obama and Panetta called Feinstein and explained where they were coming from. In other words, new information, new things to consider, call it facts, or not. But like I said, I don't want anyone to represent me who can't keep up with the fast flow of circumstances. Now more than ever, the world is never the same today as it was yesterday.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 01/07/2009
- CasperII I'm a Fan of CasperII 2 fans permalink

Senator Feinstein's response to my email in regards to torture and Bush and company's accountability for their atrocities.

Dear Mr. I:
Thank you for writing to me to share your concerns regarding the Bush Administration's interrogation policies.

I believe that there must be an effective program to detain and interrogate individuals who pose a potential terrorist threat to the United States. Nonetheless, it is imperative that the interrogation tactics practiced by U.S. intelligence agencies are lawful and not damaging to American efforts in the war on terrorism. Torture and other coercive acts violate U.S. and international law and the Geneva Conventions. The use of controversial detention and interrogation policies, such as waterboarding, have weakened America's credibility overseas, emboldened our enemies, and made the world a more dangerous place for U.S. troops.

Again, I appreciate your input on this important matter. Improving U.S. interrogation policies is one of my highest priorities in the Senate. If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact my office in Washington, D.C. at (202) 224-3841. Warm regards.
Senator Dianne Feinstein

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 01/07/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

A quid pro quo? What did you offer her, Obama?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 01/07/2009
- k1k2lee I'm a Fan of k1k2lee 15 fans permalink

The opportunity not to be trounced in her next bid for reelection in CA. I'm a Dem in CA and already not exactly pleased with Feinstein. Working against this very popular Pres. Elect this early in the game would only serve to darken her CA horizons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 01/07/2009

If the eyes are the window to the soul, then there are ghouls in our nation's Senate. Feinstein, Reid, et al have such a zombie-ized look, that it honestly isn't funny they hold any sway over the running of our government. I know politicians tend to get into a "fixed face" zone, putting on a public persona, but between Feinstein's zombie eye, Cheney's sneer and Reid's "I'm not there" stare, something's gotta give.

"The change comes from me"
Barak Obama

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 01/07/2009
- jazzifay I'm a Fan of jazzifay 5 fans permalink
photo

Of course she flipped. There's a new sherrif in town.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 PM on 01/07/2009
photo

"Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., the committee's top Republican, is reserving judgment on Panetta until after the nomination hearing, one of his aides told The Associated Press."

Translation: We weren't expecting this and are scrambling like crazy to come up with something, anything to object to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 01/07/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 216 fans permalink

True. That statement seems far to reasonable on the surface to be the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 01/07/2009
- lmvd3 I'm a Fan of lmvd3 18 fans permalink

You are soooo right, brynnrose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 AM on 01/08/2009

Feinstein should be tossed out of her leadership role. What she has shown during her tenure does not resemble leadership, but rather quiet cooperation with the people in the conservative movement who were doing the most to undermine our basic freedoms, and the civil protections we rely on to safeguard them.
Its time to change how things are done in washington.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 01/07/2009

"Quiet cooperation"? I'd call it "co-conspi­racy." Feinstein has been a big part of the problem, and she needs to be booted from power ASAP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 01/07/2009
- GJR227 I'm a Fan of GJR227 4 fans permalink

Amen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 01/07/2009
- blimie I'm a Fan of blimie 14 fans permalink

Good points. I didn't know anything about her before this. And how did a Rockefeller get into public office? They are probably even worse than the Bush's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 01/07/2009
- skyeapril I'm a Fan of skyeapril 32 fans permalink

Absolutely. She is my senator, but the emails from her, in response to my many emails, are pablum and that probably works for a lot of her constituents, but not me. She attempts to justify her abhorrent decisions on FISA, telecom immunity, the war, her multiple Bush-votes and then when facts emerge that counter these justifications she writes that P-E Obama wants to "look forward and not backward." THAT response seemed like a modern version of a parent "because I said so" routine when all other justifications fail. What a dodger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 01/08/2009

Diane got a little worried for her job methinks..­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 01/07/2009

me agrees!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 01/07/2009
- GuyFawkes I'm a Fan of GuyFawkes 28 fans permalink

I'm in California, and if any Dem that was halfway competent ran against her, I'd vote for that person no questions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 01/07/2009

For good reason. If someone good runs against her next time, she's gone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 01/07/2009
- Jessegirl I'm a Fan of Jessegirl 49 fans permalink

Oh no! Did you hear that everybody?????
Diane disaproves!!!! Can you believe that????
Ahhhhhhhh. The Hunchback of Notre Dame wants to suddenly come out and play.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 01/07/2009
- garymc8 I'm a Fan of garymc8 34 fans permalink

I AM A FAN OF RACHEL MADDOW. SHE ROCKS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 01/07/2009
- zendem1 I'm a Fan of zendem1 109 fans permalink

Fukshtein decided to get back on the boat. Must be something in it for her later on. Somebody probably gave hubby a new contract.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 01/07/2009
- garymc8 I'm a Fan of garymc8 34 fans permalink

Finestein is afraid that an outsider will dig into what happened the last 8 years and find her war profiteering. She knew about illegal torture,spying and everything else and she never did a thing. She will go down, so when they say they want somebody " experienced" that means someone "as dirty as her". As a lifelong democrat and union member she will never get my vote again. Billionaire politicians have never given a crap about 95% of Americans, including Diane Finestein. RETIRE NOW

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 01/07/2009

Good for you Diane, glad you realized you made a mistake, Leon Panetta will be good in the CIA or Obama wouldn't have picked him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 01/07/2009
- PennP I'm a Fan of PennP 26 fans permalink
photo

What Rachel said last night. If Diane Feinstein wants a clean break, who are we to keep it from her?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 PM on 01/07/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect