Feinstein Backs Panetta For CIA, Changing Tune

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ERICA WERNER and PAMELA HESS | January 7, 2009 09:06 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the incoming chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Wednesday she intends to support President-elect Barack Obama's choice for CIA chief, Leon Panetta, despite earlier comments that she had reservations about the choice.

Obama chose Panetta, a former White House chief of staff who has no formal background in the intelligence community, without consulting with Feinstein. Obama later apologized to her for the lapse.

Feinstein said in an interview Wednesday that she spoke with Panetta, a fellow Californian, for about 20 minutes on Tuesday evening and came away reassured.

"I had a good discussion with him. I'm confident that he understands. I am supportive," Feinstein said. "I've known him for 20 years. I know him to be a man of credibility and a man of conscience and a man of talent, and I believe he will surround himself with top-notch staff from the intelligence community."

After Obama's choice of Panetta was disclosed by news organizations Monday, Feinstein and former Intelligence Committee chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., voiced doubts about Panetta's lack of grounding in intelligence matters. Obama contacted both key senators to acknowledge what Vice President-elect Joe Biden called a "mistake," and the incoming administration has continued efforts to press Panetta's backing before he comes up for a confirmation hearing.

Rockefeller has not yet publicly indicated his position on Panetta.

Nor has Obama made an official announcement about his choice for CIA chief.

"All I can say is Leon Panetta is an outstanding public servant with impeccable integrity, somebody who's worked on national security at the highest levels and if I were to select him, I think he would do an outstanding job," Obama said Wednesday in an interview with CNBC.

Story continues below
advertisement

Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., a member of the intelligence panel who said he was pleased with Panetta's nomination from the onset, said he had been contacted by Obama's staff and thanked for his vocal public support.

"I was thanked for my positive remarks and urged to keep making them," he said.

Feinstein earlier had expressed a preference for an intelligence professional to head the agency. But she said her confidence that Panetta would surround himself with good staff allayed that concern.

She declined to comment on whether she'd been given assurances that the agency's No. 2, Steve Kappes, would stay on, but indicated she wanted him to.

Obama's failure to consult with her before making the pick "is all behind us," Feinstein told reporters.

"I believe there was an oversight and I don't really care about that. What I do care about is the agency, and that it faces many issues and it has many problems," Feinstein said. "And what I do care about is that the White House is given crisp, good, as much as possible factual, intelligence, and it is not what they want to hear necessarily but it is what the agency believes is the truth.

"President-elect Obama made the comment that he doesn't want to be told what they think he wants to hear but what they think he should hear, and that's good enough for me."

Panetta continued to enjoy support from others.

"I certainly plan to vote for him," Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., a member of the intelligence committee, said in an interview.

Wyden said he expects Panetta will be "seriously grilled" during his confirmation hearing by members who want to ensure he's the best person for the job.

But after that, the country will have "someone who will be a change agent and an outstanding head of the CIA."

Rockefeller spoke with both Obama and Panetta on Tuesday, according to an aide to the senator, and all agreed that Monday's news leaks that surfaced Panetta's name as the CIA chief nominee before it was discussed with Feinstein and Rockefeller had not been handled well, the aide said. The aide is not a spokesman and spoke anonymously to describe the discussions.

Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., the committee's top Republican, is reserving judgment on Panetta until after the nomination hearing, one of his aides told The Associated Press.

Separately, Feinstein and Wyden began a push Wednesday for what is likely to be the first political challenge for Obama's intelligence team. They have introduced legislation that would close the jail at Guantanamo Bay and limit the CIA's interrogation procedures to the 19 methods used by the U.S. military.

President George W. Bush vetoed a bill last year that also sought to limit CIA interrogations. In 2007 he issued an executive order specifically authorizing the CIA to go beyond the Army field manual with "enhanced interrogation techniques." Bush's veto was supported by current CIA Director Michael Hayden, who argued that the Army field manual does not comprise all the methods that would be allowed by law.

Feinstein also sought Wednesday to rebut criticism from commentators on the left who accuse her, Rockefeller and other Democrats of not doing more to rein in the Bush administration on torture and other issues. Some of these critics interpreted her perceived opposition to Panetta as a reluctance to embrace Obama's desire to change the CIA.

"I want the same thing he wants. I mean this is a clean break, this is a new chapter, and I want that too," Feinstein said.

"One of the things that disturbs me is people interpret this as my wanting torture. I've been there from the very beginning against it."

___

Associated Press writer Anne Flaherty contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the incoming chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Wednesday she intends to support President-elect Barack Obama's choice for CIA chief, ...
WASHINGTON — Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the incoming chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Wednesday she intends to support President-elect Barack Obama's choice for CIA chief, ...
 
Comments
272
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

Feinstein is part of the problem, not part of any solution.

She went along with all of the abuses of the Bush Administration. She failed to hold anyone accountable. She used her powerful position in the Senate to enable the worst acts of Bush/Cheney.

i really don't care much about her opinion. In fact I hope the voters of California get rid of her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 01/07/2009

It's time for her to shut up and move on. As a Californian I am so over her (and Pelosi for that matter) that I will hold my nose if I have to vote for Feinstein again.

I voted for Cindy Sheehan in November. I refused to vote for Pelosi. Amazingly, Sheehan with no machine or money behind her got 15% of the vote in SF. More than a few San Franciscans feel the same as I do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 01/07/2009
- fredamae I'm a Fan of fredamae 35 fans permalink

Dear Reid, Pelosi and Feinstein.­.Please retire Now! I am a Dem and your positions, beliefs and actions do Not represent me.

Thank you,
FM

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 01/07/2009

Huzzah.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 01/07/2009

Ok! You only support people who represent you? And what about the millions who support them? She is to forget them for you? How narcissistic. Get over yourself. You aren't that significant despite your obvious delusions of grandeur.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 01/07/2009

"Feinstein flips out, accuses herself of being an alien in a body thats been dead for 31 years and plotting absolutely nothing significant for the human race."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 01/07/2009
photo

Dear Dianne,
Go away. If you just announce that you will retire in 2012 (when you will be 79), we'll be happy.

Sincerely,
The Democratic leaning people of CA who aren't sheep.

(Too few of us unfortumately)

PS Art Torres, this means you too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 01/07/2009
photo

As a fellow Californian, I second that motion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 01/07/2009
- k6007 I'm a Fan of k6007 233 fans permalink
photo

DeeDee, just wanted a little attention. Nancy can't keep him all to herself, you know;

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 01/07/2009
- kevlar0076 I'm a Fan of kevlar0076 2 fans permalink
photo

Weird, Feinstein flip-flopped on something- couldn't see that one coming...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 01/07/2009
- Tommygun264 I'm a Fan of Tommygun264 204 fans permalink
photo

Sounds like somebody got a spanking. Whatever it was, I'm glad it worked.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 01/07/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 122 fans permalink

OK, that was a bad visual.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 01/07/2009

As a former Californian who has watched Dianne Feinstein run for governor and the Senate, seeing her wave a challenge flag only to cave when confronted does not surprise me. Senator Feinstein is sleazy, the Democratic Party's answer to Richard Nixon. Her campaign tactics match anything from the GOP playbook and she has cut liberal Democrats off at the knees in primary battles. Yet she has done almost nothing for the Democratic voters who continue to support her over frighteningly reactionary Republicans. A liberal Republican candidate of the old school would be an improvement over her as California Senator. I'd trade her for either of the two Republican Senators from Maine if I still lived in California and thought Maine would take the deal.

She is backing down because she has no possibility of beating the President-elect in a fight right now. However, I predict she will be more likely to vote with Republicans against President Obama on a wide range of issues than even Senator John McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 01/07/2009

Thank you, Feinstein! Now let's rock.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 01/07/2009
- Speakchic I'm a Fan of Speakchic 4 fans permalink

What's with these wishy washy Dems? WTF? Make a decision and stick to it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 01/07/2009
- Cybesq I'm a Fan of Cybesq 27 fans permalink
photo

Yes, we should do it the Republican way. Stick to keeping Rumsfeld in charge even as body bags mount (at least until after an election is over).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 01/07/2009

sort of like how bush stuck with rummy for years and years, through all his missteps and mistakes? No thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 01/07/2009
- LeLoup I'm a Fan of LeLoup 30 fans permalink
photo

Not to be outdone, Keith get in the act:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28529928

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 01/07/2009
photo

I don't see AliBaba or what ever they call themselves on this thread today because Feinstein is now supporting the Panetta nomination.

They were sure Panetta would not get confirmed because their tro// buddies said it would not happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 01/07/2009
photo

And we know just how credible tr0//s can be. Not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 01/07/2009

I doubt she flipped or was even against it in the first place. She just wants to have a say even if she agreed with Obama. Typical politician­...

In any case, I don't agree with Obama on this choice. More than half of his staff are now ex-Clintonites. It's making me sick. I hope his other half work harder to make up for these choices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 01/07/2009
- ckfan I'm a Fan of ckfan 86 fans permalink
photo

And where is he supposed to get experienced Cabinet members from???????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 01/07/2009

People keep spouting this nonsense and continually ignore the fact that Obama is setting the NEWmission, not Clinton. Also, we need and want people with experience so that our new president can get things done without having to worry about his people needing a learning-curve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 01/07/2009
- LeLoup I'm a Fan of LeLoup 30 fans permalink
photo

Some interesting tidbits about how much of a two-faced hypocrite Dianne Feinstein can be:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#28530452

As usual, Rachel Maddow doesn't pull any punches.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 01/07/2009
- Tommygun264 I'm a Fan of Tommygun264 204 fans permalink
photo

Rachel was raised in the Bay Area, so she knows all about Feinstein's right leanings, and she has the journalistic integrity to tell it like it is regardless of the consequences. That's what happens when you hire someone with a PhD in Political Science and true journalistic experience to be a political commentator. Rachel ROCKS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 01/07/2009

Rhodes Scholar also.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 01/07/2009

That was definitely worth watching!
Rachel rocks!
DiFi should crawl under one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 01/07/2009
- McChimp I'm a Fan of McChimp 162 fans permalink
photo

If DiFi was allowed to have her way, Brennan would have been her pick. Brennan was the guy who complained about liberal blogs defeating his chances because they exposed his pro torture views.

About time DiFi got her head out of the sand and zipped it, she was one of the champions of Iraq and all of Bush's controversial picks. I'm glad the old guard are getting their p anties in a bunch over Obama's picks, proof that change is indeed coming to Washington after 30 years of Washington insiders gaming the system with their corrupt ideas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 01/07/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect