iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nancy Killefer: Obama's Chief Performance Officer

MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN and LIZ SIDOTI   02/ 3/09 05:24 PM ET   AP

Killefer

WASHINGTON — Nancy Killefer withdrew her candidacy to be the first chief performance officer for the federal government on Tuesday, saying she didn't want her bungling of payroll taxes on her household help to become a distraction for the Obama administration.

Killefer was the second major nominee to withdraw. Within hours, former Sen. Tom Daschle also withdrew his nomination to be secretary of health and human services.

In a brief letter to President Barack Obama, Killefer, the 55-year-old executive with consulting giant McKinsey & Co., wrote that she had "come to realize in the current environment that my personal tax issue of D.C. unemployment tax could be used to create exactly the kind of distraction and delay" that must be avoided in responding to urgent economic problems.

She offered no further details of her tax difficulties.

In announcing his choice of Sen. Judd Gregg to be commerce secretary, Obama took no questions Tuesday and left the White House lectern ignoring a shouted question about why so many of his nominees have tax problems.

But White House press secretary Robert Gibbs later insisted Killefer and Daschle decided on their own to withdraw. "I think they both recognized that you can't set an example of responsibility but accept a different standard in who serves," Gibbs told a White House briefing.

When Killefer's selection was announced by Obama on Jan. 7, The Associated Press disclosed that in 2005 the District of Columbia government had filed a $946.69 tax lien on her home for failure to pay unemployment compensation tax on household help. Since then, administration officials have refused to answer questions about the tax error, which she resolved five months after the lien was filed.

It wasn't clear whether the administration was aware of Killefer's tax errors before Obama named her. Gibbs refused to say what administration vetters knew about the problem or when. Gibbs maintained that Obama has confidence in the vetting system. But late on the day Killefer was first named, an administration official asked an AP reporter how the AP had found the tax lien against her.

A Senate Democratic aide said the administration had advised the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that Killefer had tax problems involving her household staff. The administration did not view her problems as insurmountable in themselves but believed that in combination with Geithner and Daschle they made her nomination untenable, according to this aide, who was not authorized to speak on the record and demanded anonymity.

Obama's first choice for commerce secretary, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, withdrew when his confirmation appeared headed toward complications because of a grand jury investigation over how state contracts were issued to political donors.

More recently, Tim Geithner was confirmed as Treasury secretary despite belatedly paying $34,000 in income taxes, and Daschle acknowledged his late payment of more than $128,000 in income taxes.

On paper, Killefer brought impressive credentials to the two jobs Obama selected her for: deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget, which requires Senate confirmation, and a new White House post, chief performance officer for the entire federal government, which does not require confirmation.

Killefer oversees McKinsey's management consulting for government clients. During 1997-2000 in the Clinton administration, she was assistant treasury secretary for management. As such she was the chief financial officer and chief operating officer for the Treasury Department and its 160,000 employees, and she led a modernization of its largest component, the Internal Revenue Service.

The AP reported that on March 7, 2005, the D.C. Department of Employment Services slapped a tax lien on her home in the upscale Wesley Heights neighborhood. The local government alleged that beginning three years after she left the high-powered Treasury post she failed to pay unemployment compensation tax for a household employee. She failed to make the required quarterly payments for a year and half, the D.C. government said, whereupon a lien for $946.69 was placed on her home.

That sum included $298 in unpaid taxes, $48.69 in interest and $600 in penalties. Killefer didn't get the lien extinguished for almost five months, until July 29, 2005.

During that period, Killefer and her husband, an economics professor, had two nannies to help care for their teenage son and daughter, and she had a personal assistant to run things when she was on the road, she told Harvard business students back then.

Bobby Tucker, chief of D.C.'s unemployment insurance tax division, said filing tax liens is "not a common practice" for his office. D.C. law authorizes such liens when an employer "neglects and refuses" to pay the levy that helps pay for unemployment benefits for those laid off or fired. Tucker said his auditors have discretion to use tax liens based on "the number of attempts to collect contributions owed, whether or not the employer responds to written attempts, phone calls and-or in-person visits" to collect the tax.

Tucker said, however, that his department's lawyers would not let him discuss the specifics of Killefer's case.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — Nancy Killefer withdrew her candidacy to be the first chief performance officer for the federal government on Tuesday, saying she didn't want her bungling of payroll taxes on her ho...
WASHINGTON — Nancy Killefer withdrew her candidacy to be the first chief performance officer for the federal government on Tuesday, saying she didn't want her bungling of payroll taxes on her ho...
Filed by Stuart Whatley  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,334
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
10:53 PM on 02/03/2009
Could the IRS have leaked Bushes nominees tax problems as well? Why is the IRS, an illegal and unconstitutional organization, having this much effect on our politics? The only organization where the president has no authority to make appointment to. Now that brings up the question. If the IRS is not a department of government, doesn't that answer the question? There appear to be certain people they'd like to keep out. Considering they have leaked 3 to 4 nominees tax imformation in row. What good timing and hard workers we have at the IRS.

For an illegal and unconstitutional organization, they sure have a lot of power to determine what happens to our country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:14 PM on 02/03/2009
Who is vetting Obama's nominees? That is where Obama needs to make some changes FAST. Is it still Clinton loyalists whose ethics don't comply with Obama's higher standards?
08:53 PM on 02/03/2009
Maybe the IRS should investigate all politicians to ensure they pay their taxes. Course lot of them are able to write items off that the average Joe can't!
stateretiree
Yes, I know my micro-bio is empty!
08:59 PM on 02/03/2009
I would bet my entire retirement that there are a whole lot of people that cheat on their taxes. Not just politicians. Like Jesus said "Ye without sin cast the first stone" We all better watchout I think the boulders are flying back at us.
08:21 PM on 02/03/2009
A $950 'tax problem' with Washington, DC should NOT be a reason for the president to accept her resignation ... it is just plain silliness ... not at all in the same 'problem' league as Daschle and Geithner.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:16 PM on 02/03/2009
sounds like an excuse to withdraw. What's her real reason?
10:10 PM on 02/03/2009
That was my thought exactly. There must be some bigger problem, something that would be more damaging.
10:47 PM on 02/03/2009
Maybe all the drama wasn't worth it. I can't believe how long this article is given it is a new position that nobody cared about.
08:04 PM on 02/03/2009
No wonder dems like to raise taxes because they have no intention of paying what they owe so they need everybody else to pay on time.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rosal
JUSTICE always wins
09:19 PM on 02/03/2009
Where you upset when Repbs gave an standing ovation to Sen. Ted Stevens from Alaska after he was indicted? I have many, many, more examples of hypocrisy, too many for this space.
07:33 PM on 02/03/2009
Geez, the IRS must be chasing everyone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lcarliner
06:42 PM on 02/03/2009
I have tried and tried to get Intuit to come out with add-ins to deal with the treacherous tax and withholding traps that household help hiring poses, called NannyTax and NannyPay for TurboTax and Quicken respectively. I had a family accountant suggest using a third party company for ;hiring of household help because of the costly complexity of compliance. Over the years, I have received no response or acknowledgement from Intuit. I am now trying to get PaxChex's interest in this matter.
10:04 PM on 02/03/2009
How many people have to get skewered by this law for us to write some legislation that people can easily comply with? I feel sure most people who employ domestic help would do the right thing if it weren't made so ridiculously difficult. The law assumes that anyone who hires a babysitter or a cleaner has the time and resources to fill out quarterly paperwork and collect the money. There has to be a better way.
06:41 PM on 02/03/2009
Some opposers are using the IRS as a weapon to "discredit" President Obama's picks so that he can't re-organize the government with talented, competent to his liking people. I'm not excusing Daschle, but doesn't it seem odd that ALL of these picks are having some sort of "tax issue"? ALL OF THEM?? I say that the President should issue a congressional- wide audit! Now we'll get to see whose really clean, or is the pot calling the kettle black? DIG DEEPER, PEOPLE!!
07:41 PM on 02/03/2009
Once again I repeat, no one except Obamas vetting people are outing these clowns. They are tax cheats plain and simple.The only reason you find it odd is because they are Democrats and in your little world only Republicans are crooks.Once more, it is Obamas people that are calling the kettle black. There is no Republican conspiracy here.
06:29 PM on 02/03/2009
Obama needs to look around to staff some of those treasury/money jobs with Oriental-Americans. Rumor has it that they are damned good with numbers and they don't have a reputation for cheating on taxes.
07:35 PM on 02/03/2009
Did you mean Asian-Americans?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ranta
I don't need no ****** badges.
06:01 PM on 02/03/2009
O.K., let's check out every member of congress and see just how many haven't been paying taxes on their maids, nannies or gardeners. The guilty should all quit their positions. We would probably have to hold new elections.
10:13 PM on 02/03/2009
That would certainly be refreshing.
05:56 PM on 02/03/2009
All of these tax scandals just go to show how complicated our tax code has become. Maybe Obama can push through a simplified tax code- eliminate payroll taxes and maybe make just 5 or 6 levels of progressive income tax, and heavily tax executive pay and bonuses and dividend and capital gains income. This way the tax burden would fall heavily on the wealthy, and let off those at the bottom rungs of the economic ladder.
GHO
Sooner or later you run out of other peoples money
06:15 PM on 02/03/2009
Actually, it just goes to show how corrupt folks in the beltway are. I beleive Killefer's mistake was an honest one, but Daschle and Geithner? Sorry, no, they cheated.

"the tax burden would fall heavily on the wealthy, and let off those at the bottom rungs of the economic ladder."

You mean kind of like it is now? In 2007, the top 50% of wage earners paid 97.1% of the taxes,a nd the bottom 50% paid only 2.9%. The top 10% of earners paid over 70% of the taxes. How much more "let off" do those on the "bottom rungs" need to be?
07:44 PM on 02/03/2009
GHO, your talking to yourself here. These people don't believe the truth. If you have more income than they do, they want some of it.
11:11 PM on 02/03/2009
You left out one very important point. That top 50% an average or 30 times the bottom 50% combined. But of course the top 5% makeup the lions share of that. The rest of us in comparison, are working for slave labor. The bottom 50% still pay much much more then 2.9% in taxes. If it was only 2.9%, we just as well not pay anything at all.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodog
Honk if you believe in a public editor.
05:08 PM on 02/03/2009
A man in glad-handing cahoots with Saddam Hussein in the '80s, during the desert despot's chemical weaponized reign of terror, passes senate confirmation to run the defense department.

Rumsfeld was a shoo in for a Republican run congress, but a $900.00 tax bill sinks an Obama nominee.

Transparency works!

Change IS happening.
05:05 PM on 02/03/2009
You're right, Geranium. The feds lose tens of billions annually in back taxes. It makes for a lot of hate. http://hateonme.com/
05:05 PM on 02/03/2009
What about all the thousands of companies these days who call many of their workers "independent contractors," give them a 1099 form at the end of the year, and pay no taxes at all? If you're a so-called "1099 employee" and get laid off, you're not eligible for unemployment compensation, and if you dare complain about it, you'll be blackballed.
05:04 PM on 02/03/2009
The worst thing is this, these are people that are expected to know and obey the law. We just got done with Senator Ted Stevens R-Alaska, so who is to be next, Rangle, Dashel, etc. Can all the bums that have difficulty with things like taxes, remember, Biden said it is a privilege.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sherrill
06:26 PM on 02/03/2009
This says it all!