Digital TV Transition Delay: Obama Asks Congress For More Time

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOELLE TESSLER | January 8, 2009 07:50 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama is urging Congress to postpone the Feb. 17 switch from analog to digital television broadcasting, arguing that too many Americans who rely on analog TV sets to pick up over-the-air channels won't be ready.

In a letter to key lawmakers Thursday, Obama transition team co-chair John Podesta said the digital transition needs to be delayed largely because the Commerce Department has run out of money for coupons to subsidize digital TV converter boxes for consumers. People who don't have cable or satellite service or a TV with a digital tuner will need the converter boxes to keep their older analog sets working.

Obama officials are also concerned the government is not doing enough to help Americans _ particularly those in rural, poor or minority communities _ prepare for and navigate the transition.

"With coupons unavailable, support and education insufficient, and the most vulnerable Americans exposed, I urge you to consider a change to the legislatively mandated analog cutoff date," Podesta wrote to the top Democrats and Republicans on the Senate and House Commerce committees.

In 2005, Congress required that broadcasters switch from analog to digital broadcasts, which are more efficient, to free up valuable chunks of wireless spectrum. The newly available room in the airwaves can be used for commercial wireless services and for emergency-response networks.

Because Congress set the Feb. 17, 2009 date for the change, it would have to pass a new law to postpone it.

Obama's request for a delay is a victory for Consumers Union, which had asked for the digital transition to be postponed

"We are extremely pleased the incoming administration is supportive of consumer efforts to ensure that poor, elderly and rural consumers do not face economic hardship as we move broadcasting to digital transmission," said Gene Kimmelman, the group's vice president for federal policy.

Story continues below

The Obama team decided to push for a delay after the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, an arm of the Commerce Department, said Monday that it had hit a $1.34 billion funding limit set by Congress to pay for converter box coupons.

The coupon program allows consumers to request up to two $40 vouchers per household to help pay for the boxes, which generally cost between $40 and $80 each and can be purchased without a coupon.

The NTIA said it had no choice but to start a waiting list for coupon requests as of Jan. 4, meaning that consumers who have applied since then are unlikely to receive their vouchers before Feb. 17. At this point, the agency is sending coupons to people on the list only as unredeemed coupons now in circulation expire, freeing up more money for the program. The waiting list currently has requests for 1.1 million coupons.

Congress is considering whether to step in with new accounting rules and possibly more money to get the program back on track.

In his letter, Podesta said government funding for both the coupon program and consumer education and support efforts is "woefully inadequate." Obama plans to include resources to help viewers through the digital transition in his economic recovery package.

His proposal to push off the transition, however, is running into some resistance, particularly among Republicans.

Meredith Attwell Baker, head of the NTIA, said the Bush administration opposes a postponement since the government and industry have "invested so much in preparing for this date."

A delay, she said, "would create uncertainty, frustration and confusion among consumers."

Baker added that the current administration wants to instead focus on quickly fixing the problems facing the coupon program to meet last-minute demand ahead of the Feb. 17 cutoff. The NTIA is asking for another $250 million in funding for the program.

Meanwhile, Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, insisted there is no need to "bail out" the digital transition program because the NTIA can send out more coupons as unredeemed ones expire.

"Ditching the deadline and slathering on more millions of taxpayer dollars ... is just panic," he said in a statement.

But Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller, D-W. Va., said he would support delaying the digital transition "until we can do it right."

"The Obama administration deserves time to bring order to what has been an appallingly mismanaged process by the Bush administration," Rockefeller said in a statement.

That sentiment was echoed by Michael Copps, one of two Democrats on the Federal Communications Commission.

"More time can only help put in place the kind of consumer-focused outreach and assistance that should have been up-and-running months ago," he said.

For its part, the National Association of Broadcasters did not take a position on whether to postpone the switch to digital, but a spokeswoman said NAB believes the coupon program can be fixed without forcing a delay.

One organization that opposes the proposal is the wireless industry's main trade group, CTIA - The Wireless Association, which counts Verizon Wireless and AT&T Wireless among its members. Those two companies emerged as top bidders in the federal auction of much of the wireless spectrum being freed up by the digital transition.

The Consumer Electronics Association, too, opposes a delay.

"First responders urgently need the analog spectrum, as do innovators waiting to deploy innovative new wireless broadband services," said Gary Shapiro, who heads the group.

WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama is urging Congress to postpone the Feb. 17 switch from analog to digital television broadcasting, arguing that too many Americans who rely on analog TV ...
WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama is urging Congress to postpone the Feb. 17 switch from analog to digital television broadcasting, arguing that too many Americans who rely on analog TV ...
 
Comments
473
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

Some of you need to be careful you are sounding elitist. Try imagine what its like for someone in a rural community who have no access to the internet and their only way to link to the outside world is through a television.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 01/08/2009
- SCVADem I'm a Fan of SCVADem 15 fans permalink
photo

If we didn't go with satellite in my household, I'd be watching over-the-air and *gasp* dial-up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 01/08/2009

You still need rabbit ears with the DTV converter box!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Or more than likely a better antenna.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 01/08/2009
- Shadow08 I'm a Fan of Shadow08 235 fans permalink
photo

Any TV receiver needs some form of antenna.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 01/08/2009
- alguien I'm a Fan of alguien 16 fans permalink
photo

the whole TV issue is really frustrating for me. if i don't have cable then i'm stuck with crappy images and channels that barely come in. if i have cable, then i'm paying through the nose for a lot of channels i don't want or need.

it would be nice if there were a happy medium somewhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 PM on 01/08/2009
- clsmithj I'm a Fan of clsmithj 10 fans permalink
photo

That's what make DTV different. The picture image received through over the air DTV is sharp, vivid, and clear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Thankyou

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 01/08/2009

NetFlix, dude.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 01/08/2009
- tomas0808 I'm a Fan of tomas0808 12 fans permalink

I remember when television was free. There were fewer channels but it was still better. In the 70's in Norway (not sure about now) there were no advertisements on tv. It was freaking wonderful

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 01/08/2009

I'm thinking of emigrating to Norway. Can you give me any pointers?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 01/08/2009
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 83 fans permalink

Whoaaaaaaaaaa. Whoaaaaaaaaaaa. I say.

One president at a time, right ???

That's why you can't comment on the Israeli atrocities taking place. Right ?

But gee, don't mess with U.S. television. Golly, thanks Mr. President. Whew. Saved the day again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 01/08/2009

Excellent point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 01/08/2009
- SheaSF I'm a Fan of SheaSF 3 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, because foreign policy issues of suffering and death are the same thing as domestic economic policy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

internal vs external issues.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 01/08/2009
- markflour I'm a Fan of markflour 2 fans permalink

Delaying Digital TV will NOT cause bloodshed or confusion with other countries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 01/08/2009

Neither will letting it happen as planned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 01/08/2009
- Shadow08 I'm a Fan of Shadow08 235 fans permalink
photo

...when you eat an apple, you think it's an orange...right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 01/08/2009
- drblack I'm a Fan of drblack 19 fans permalink

The real issue is how poor digital TV is. It continually drops out. Any advantages of DTV are negated by its poor reception.
The NAB was always against the government forcing them to switch to digital.
The airwaves are Public Property and owned by the American people. Those who are poor should have access to them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Its all about signal strength, not the signal itself. A better antenna usualy solves the problem. Also better cable between the box and the tv could improve it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 01/08/2009
- userw014 I'm a Fan of userw014 2 fans permalink
photo

The airwaves were public property. The Republicans sold them to the oligopolies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 01/08/2009

Ah, television. Now there's an issue that's REALLY important to America's future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 01/08/2009
- Shadow08 I'm a Fan of Shadow08 235 fans permalink
photo

It is a medium of information amd entertainment to millions of hard working people and an effort to minimize is simply dumb.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 01/08/2009
- trudem2 I'm a Fan of trudem2 12 fans permalink

Wow! An activist, engaged president. What a delight!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 01/08/2009

Obama, needs to tell "TIME WARNER" to lower their rates!

ENOUGH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 01/08/2009
- geneven I'm a Fan of geneven 6 fans permalink

I would say that access to TV should be the lowest priority for the Obama administration, below anything else I can think of. It would be better to arrange for TV to be UNAVAILABLE for Americans for, say, three months EVERY YEAR, just to minimize their vegetable state.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 01/08/2009

There has been no broadcast or cable television in my house since I graduated from college and moved out of my parents' place. That was back in 1991.

Oh, we still have a set, but all it can show are DVD's. Every Friday night we watch a movie. The rest of the week, it's off.

My son is growing up in a commercial-free, propaganda-free home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 01/08/2009

Propaganda free thinking home. Sounds good, but I like to know what lies are being told on a regular...basis! Although I respect your decision. And other than news, and just a few shows, I don't watch much TV at all anymore. Don't miss it either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 PM on 01/08/2009

Propaganda free, is great. I still need to know the main stream media tactics, so I still like a few shows and the news. But that is all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 01/08/2009
- SheaSF I'm a Fan of SheaSF 3 fans permalink
photo

Not everyone watches Springer. Ever heard of the Emergency Broadcast System? Television, at its root, is a public service. The most effective means of disseminating information to the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 01/08/2009
- Shadow08 I'm a Fan of Shadow08 235 fans permalink
photo

Lucky for us you're not in charge of what's good for us. You could have done well in 1936 Germany.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

I disagree with Obama on this one, too. The coupons were available over a year ago. Once the change-over happens, and some people won't have a TV picture for a few nights, they will get on the ball with it. They have converter boxes everywhere, Kmart, Radio Shack, where I bought mine, and Wallmart. Every time I turn on my TV there's an announcement about the change-over. I don't see what there is to not understand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 01/08/2009
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

Because they are some people who are elderly and low income who dont understand whats going to happen. Not all of the people who dont have it are procrastinators some dont know they need it some understand whats going on.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 01/08/2009
- Samalabear I'm a Fan of Samalabear 73 fans permalink
photo

Yes, this is the point. It's called further disenfranchisement of the poor. It's easy when you have cable or satellite, or a new TV, to think that everybody has these things. When I first heard of this switch to digital my first thought was of all those who would be left behind. It's a big problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 01/08/2009

Some can't afford the boxes, and the availability of the boxes have ran out. So, that is the flaw.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 01/08/2009
- SunnyT I'm a Fan of SunnyT 9 fans permalink
photo

YOU're all set, so that means there's not a problem, right? Small mind, small world. That's why you don't see what there is to not understand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

I work 3-11:30 p.m. and program my current TV/VCR/DVD combo set to record shows I won't be home to see. I can program up to eight shows.

With the converter box, the "timer program" option is not available. I can only push the record button at the beginning of each show. . . which is impossible if I'm not even home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

I have heard that this is a problem due to how things are hooked up. The only solution i can offer is a recorder with a digital tuner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Thank you.

If I buy a recorder with a digital tuner, I wonder if I will be able to figure out how to run that through THE BOX.

I've never thought of myself as unintelligent, but that box was difficult to set up the first time, BEFORE I unhooked it after discovering it would not allow the timer record function.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 01/08/2009
- swlewis57 I'm a Fan of swlewis57 7 fans permalink

There are several models of converter boxes with a timer function built in. From the comments I have seen, the "DishPal" brand of converter works well. They can be bought at Sears, I do believe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 01/08/2009
- SheaSF I'm a Fan of SheaSF 3 fans permalink
photo

Perfect example of the real issue here: People have invested real money in equipment that will become obsolete next month. Allowing victims of this government standards change to recoup $40 is not going to make them whole, but it's a start.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 01/08/2009

It is not going to be as easy as they thought. What a mess brewing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 01/08/2009

I have a tv w/ a roof antenna and rabbit ears inside. I live in a rural area and only receive 2 network channels. I did not request a coupn earlier b/c they do expire and boxes and antennas were not available in my area. Now that the boxes are available in the area you can no longer get coupons.
I guess I am just going to listen to NPR and read a lot more than I already do.
And, to pay more than $100 for 2 channels is absurd. Is any television proramming worth $100?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 01/08/2009
- swlewis57 I'm a Fan of swlewis57 7 fans permalink

Apply for your coupons anyway. You will get them eventually. Also, if you have friends with satellite or cable, they can apply for coupons and can be used by you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 01/08/2009
- RButler I'm a Fan of RButler 62 fans permalink

He sure knows how to prioritize. I guess if he throws out a thousand policies or decisions, something will stick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 01/08/2009
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

Wrong he knows how to multi-task.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

President Elect Obama is addressing a concern that affects "the least of us." The poor, elderly, and disadvantaged.

I find that a refreshing change from the way we have not only been ignored but financially decimated over these past eight years by that current squatter in the W h i t e H o u s e..

Because he is addressing this issue does not mean he is ignoring the bigger problems that are facing him and us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Hey, ever heard of multi-tasking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 01/09/2009

Hopefully they will use the time to perfect the Digital transmission system so it works as well as Analog Broadcasting. I got my converter box and hooked it up several months ago. Based on my observations Analog is better then the new Digital. The picture quality under Analog was not as good with Digital but it also did not suddenly freeze or stutter the way Digital does when the signal strength drops below the minimum needed to generate a picture. This up to 100% drop in signal strength is something that happens on a regular basis often several times during a single network news story. Under Analog I did not need to adjust the rabbit ears every time I change channels or several times during an hour long TV show.

And for the record I do not live in a fringe area, I live in the middle of the second largest metro area in Oregon. I use rabbit ears because I live in an apartment without a roof top antenna and I am not permitted to put one up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Digital is very good and as it stands perty much perfected. You may need to get a better antenna and cable hooking it all up. It sounds like either you just have low signal or may be getting some ingress in that is enterfering with the reception. Once you get that solved you will find that the digitla quality is way better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 01/08/2009

Digital TV IS very good, but its broadcast is highly flawed. Just how much should a household be expected spend to get TV signals? Low signal is the norm, from what I can tell, and if aircraft and wind can completely disrupt the signal, what is a consumer to do about that? Buy more equipment? Give up and subscribe to cable or satellite? Both of those services convert the digital signals to analog for delivery to your TV, which sort of misses the point, doesn't it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 01/08/2009
- swlewis57 I'm a Fan of swlewis57 7 fans permalink

I have the same problem with a couple of stations in OKC.

First, after the transition, stations that are forced to use the same transmission line for the analog and DTV signals will then be able to power up the DTV at full power without blowing out the Line.

Second, concider getting a converter box with the "Smart Antenna" connection in the back. Although "Smart Antennas" are a little pricey right now (about $80), I am very hopeful for the technology.

Third, try moving your antenna to a postion by a window. That helps sometimes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Thanks, that is good info about the tv station end of it. They told me they where going to turn up the signal once they shut off the analog.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 01/08/2009

I'm in downtown Portland and have both rabbit ears (amplified) and an aerial, and there are many times when all of the local TV channels are unwatchable because of low signal strength, or airplanes flying over, or wind, or whatever. I'm a mere 3 miles from all of the broadcast towers, but in hilly terrain. I feel about cable & satellite the same way I feel about credit cards: we're being pressured to believe that these services are required in order to participate fully in society.
Those who got fair reception before the changeover will likely get NO reception with digital broadcasts and a digital convertor. Those who spring for a convertor but are served by analog translators will get NO reception unless they get a convertor with analog pass-through, and I didn't see any such convertors at Circuit City or other large retailers. Those who spring for digital-compatible television sets will also likely get NO reception in fringe areas and will have the same problem we have in hilly terrain.
This switchover has not been well planned and I doubt that local stations have (or are willing to commit) the resources to amp up their signals sufficiently to overcome problems of landscape and distance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

THey do not make them with analog pass thru. The analog will be going away so there is no use. As far as i know there are plans to amp up the signal but a better antenna should help most people. One of the big issues is the cable between the converter and tv. It can cause issues because of ingress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 01/08/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect