New Jobless Claims Drop Unexpectedly

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JEANNINE AVERSA | January 8, 2009 07:20 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Graphic shows change in weekly jobless claims and employment level; 1 c x 4 1/2 in; 46.5 mm x 114.3 mm

WASHINGTON — The number of laid-off workers who are continuing to draw unemployment checks jumped more than expected to 4.6 million at the end of December and is likely to keep climbing this year _ fresh evidence that people are finding it increasingly difficult to get a new job amid a deepening recession.

The Labor Department's report Thursday also said first-time applications for jobless benefits dropped to 467,000 last week. But economists largely described that decline as a distortion, reflecting the government's difficulty in making seasonal adjustments over the holiday period. Even with the dip, the figure still signaled trouble in the labor market. A year ago, initial claims stood at 330,000.

Persistent economic woes _ housing, credit and financial crises _ along with a flurry of layoffs announcements in the opening days of 2009 all point to another terrible year for jobseekers, economists said.

Job hunter Barbara Slavin of Los Angeles knows that frustration.

"Many of the jobs I applied for I was qualified for and didn't get them," laments Slavin, 67, who was laid off last month as an executive assistant for a local Girl Scouts chapter. "I've got a lot of energy. I like to work, and I don't know anybody who can live on Social Security alone."

She has worked a variety of places over the years, including a catering kitchen, a corporate newsletter and a software company.

The government's report showed that the number of people continuing to collect unemployment benefits rose by a sharp 101,000 to 4.6 million for the week ending Dec. 27, the most recent period for which that information is available. It was worse than the 4.5 million level of claims that economists had expected.

That increase left continued claims at the highest since November 1982, when the country was emerging from a deep recession, though the labor force has grown by about half since then. A year ago, this figure stood at nearly 2.7 million. The increase underscored the painful deterioration that has occurred in the jobs market.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Workers getting laid off are not going to get hired any time soon," said John Silvia, chief economist at Wachovia.

Some economists believe the number of people drawing unemployment benefits could rise as high as 5.5 million this year _ even if a new government stimulus package is enacted.

President-elect Barack Obama called for a bold approach to revive the moribund economy.

"I don't believe it's too late to change course, but it will be if we don't take dramatic action as soon as possible," he said Thursday, the fourth straight day he talked about the economy, the No. 1 concern of most Americans.

"If nothing is done, this recession could linger," Obama warned. "The unemployment rate could reach double digits."

With employers throttling back hiring, the unemployment rate is expected to jump from 6.7 percent in November to 7 percent in December, which would be the highest in 15 1/2 years. The government releases that report Friday.

Obama, who takes over Jan. 20, is championing a massive package of tax cuts and government spending that could total $775 billion over two years. With add-ons by lawmakers, the package could swell to $850 billion, his advisers say.

With jobs disappearing, shoppers held tight to their wallets and pocketbooks at the end of 2008. The Federal Reserve said Thursday that consumers cut back on their borrowing on credit cards, and for such things as auto loans, at an annual rate of $7.94 billion in November, the biggest decline in 65 years of record keeping.

And retailers on Thursday reported dismal sales figures for December. Even Wal-Mart Stores Inc. finally buckled under the pressure of the sinking economy, with its sales rising less than analysts had expected. Among the many retailers that reported steep sales declines were Sears Holdings Corp., which operates Kmart and Sears stores, luxury retailer Saks Inc. and Gap Inc.

Consumers and companies are folding under the forces of the collapsed housing market, a global credit crunch and the worst financial crisis since the 1930s. The recession, which started in December 2007, already is the longest in a quarter-century.

"Only government can break the vicious cycles that are crippling our economy _ where a lack of spending leads to lost jobs, which leads to even less spending," Obama said.

This week alone, drugstore operator Walgreen Co., managed care provider Cigna Corp., aluminum producer Alcoa Inc., data-storage company EMC Corp. and computer products maker Logitech International all announced major layoffs to cope with a recession that has just entered its second year.

Pink slips are piling higher as companies scramble to cut costs even deeper. Electronic unemployment filing systems have crashed in at least three states in recent days due to the crush of Americans seeking jobless benefits.

For all of 2008, employers likely slashed payrolls by more than 2.4 million. That's based on economists' forecasts for a net loss of 550,000 additional jobs in December, as well as the job losses already reported every month last year by the government. Some, however, think the number of jobs cut last month will be higher _ around 600,000 or 700,000. That information also will be out Friday.

If the conservative 2.4 million estimate of net payroll reductions for 2008 proves correct, it would mark the first annual job loss since the previous recession in 2001. It also would be the worst year of job losses since 1945, when employers slashed nearly 2.8 million jobs, though the number of jobs in the U.S. has more than tripled since then.

On a more upbeat note Thursday, rates on 30-year mortgages this week fell to a new record low of 5.01 percent, a dose of good news for prospective home buyers _ if they can manage to get a home loan.

___

Associated Press writer Jacob Adelman in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — The number of laid-off workers who are continuing to draw unemployment checks jumped more than expected to 4.6 million at the end of December and is likely to keep climbing this yea...
WASHINGTON — The number of laid-off workers who are continuing to draw unemployment checks jumped more than expected to 4.6 million at the end of December and is likely to keep climbing this yea...
 
Comments
20
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- loki I'm a Fan of loki permalink
photo

I think someone is juggling the numbers, again. Remember, not only is this the administration who said they " would do anything to improve Bush's polls by the time he leaves office", but also worked hard to try to have fast food workers to be considered as Manufacturing , because they assemble food. So that would really make the monthly manufacturing numbers look fantastic.
Just some food for thought when you consider the numbers being released to the public.
and when considering those numbers, also remember the intel released to the public to win support during the lead up to the Iraqi war. Both are being cooked.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Today I was standing in line with my grocery cart. A Muslim woman came up to me with a small bag of food consisting of some bread and grapes. She said, "Sir, can you buy this for my children? We have no food." I told her of course I would. She then took the food and left and went to her little ones. I thought to myself that economic theories do matter -- they have real "bread and grape" repercussions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

I very much believe we are now beyond "recession". At least, as so defined by the useless panel of economists who make such pronouncements a year after everyone else knows what a recession feels like. I called the start of the recess on Huffington Post as well as on one of my own blogs, as did others.

From the consumer / small business perspectives, we have now entered a deflation phase - beginning in October or November - and that will only exacerbate the challenges that lie ahead.

According to many of those I've talked to, mostly small business owners, the initial rise in groceries and most everything else is attributed to increased transportation costs. But when petroleum fell out of bed in late Summer/Fall, there was no corresponding decrease in the price of essential commodities, including food.

Most of the sustained high cost of commodities, I am told, is attributable to transportation. While the cost of energy dropped into the "almost free" realm, transportation companies did not pass their savings on to wholesalers, retailers, or consumers. And transportation remains one of the fairly monopolistic and most problematic aspects of the U.S. economy.

So far, we've largely had to deal with zero liquidity. Now hording. But next at bat is deeply discounted prices that wholesalers and retailers paid far more to acquire than they will ever recover.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

Reporting error. Outgoing administration fiddling with the data. Can't keep up with workload.

Take your pick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

RED HERRING....

People have just given up using the system to find employment.

Barter and Cash are the rule of the day in these parts among the younger set.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

New Jobless Claims Drop Unexpectedly........man, we can all breathe a sigh of relief that the recession is over.......Less people working = less lay offs because, short of going out of business altogether, companies still need workers to run them, even if it is just a skeleton crew. My department has lost 23 workers since July and we are down to 12. This makes things more difficult for those of us who remain, but we still have jobs......for now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 01/08/2009
photo

These people are idiots!

The drop in unemployment claims are due to utter frustration with state unemployment offices. Because most states are "At Will" states(companies can fire without notice and deny benefits), the unemployed going through the system are forced to wait for months only to hear that their former employer denies their benefit and it will have to be arbitrated, a process that can take up to 120 days!

Anyone who has gone through the process of filing faces near insurmountable obstacles while their savings evaporate. Who can afford to wait for unemployment benefits when they're late on mortgage, auto, and loan payments, need food, to pay utility bills and the like?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 01/08/2009
photo

That is the real unreported story. The unemployment offices around the nation are not able to get benefits out for new claims due to understaffing. Might they hire a few more people? I know state budgets are strapped too, but people are starving.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 01/08/2009

What a mess.

I didn't contribute to this mess, I did not vote for Bush and help him destroy our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 01/08/2009
photo

Boy, am I withyou on that one

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 01/08/2009

Most headlines read ' States online and telephone systems cannot handle the influx of people trying to file claims, as their systems crash'. However a report comes out that tries to indicate jobless claims figures are down thus the inference is that, for Wall Street at least, things cannot be so bad. As this article points out the next few weeks will show a corrected story when the real figures get published. Another annoying example of the disconnect between Main Street and Wall Street!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 01/08/2009

I've read that 9% needs to be added to any unemployment rate since the Clinton's started shuffling the numbers in the 90's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 01/08/2009

You should cite a source for your statement. It may have a factual basis, or it may be more fabricated information from the troglodyte conservatives. The "I've read" source you cite is, well, not adequate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 01/08/2009

Topsailsman, I agree. We all know republicans believe any and everything they read or hear without an sourcing information.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 01/08/2009
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 01/08/2009

Jobless Numbers are still fudged. We would be doing great if we only had a 10% unemployment.
They are even lying about the jobs lost, saying a bit over 1.6 million jobs lost when December already had almost 700,000 and the month before that nearly 500,000. In fact, I have seen joblosses since
2001, when I interviewed for jobs posted and I was sent applicants interested in the position by the
bucketfull! I also noticed that as business closed more and more were not replaced and the buildings or offices stayed empty. So this took 8 years to develop and the numbers are still wrong!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 01/08/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect