Coal Ash Piling Up Most In Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Georgia And Alabama

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DINA CAPPIELLO | January 9, 2009 08:20 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Dec. 22, 2008 file photo, an aerial view shows the aftermath of a retention pond wall collapse at the Tennessee Valley Authorities Kingston Fossil Plant in Harriman, Tenn. (AP Photo/Wade Payne, File)

WASHINGTON — Millions of tons of toxic coal ash is piling up in power plant ponds in 32 states, a situation the government has long recognized as a risk to human health and the environment but has done nothing about.

An Associated Press analysis of the most recent Energy Department data found that 156 coal-fired power plants store ash in surface ponds similar to one that ruptured last month in Tennessee. On Friday, a pond at a northeastern Alabama power plant spilled a different material.

Records indicate that states storing the most coal ash in ponds are Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Georgia and Alabama.

The man-made lagoons hold a mixture of the noncombustible ingredients of coal and the ash trapped by equipment designed to reduce air pollution from the power plants.

Over the years, the volume of waste has grown as demand for electricity increased and the federal government clamped down on emissions from power plants.

The AP's analysis found that in 2005, the most recent year data is available, 721 power plants generating at least 100 megawatts of electricity produced 95.8 million tons of coal ash. About 20 percent _ or nearly 20 million tons _ ended up in surface ponds. The remainder ends up in landfills, or is sold for use in concrete, among other uses.

The Environmental Protection Agency eight years ago said it wanted to set a national standard for ponds or landfills used to dispose of wastes produced from burning coal.

The agency has yet to act.

Story continues below

As a result, coal ash ponds are subject to less regulation than landfills accepting household trash, even though the industry's own estimates show that ash ponds contain tens of thousands of pounds of toxic heavy metals. The EPA estimates that about 300 ponds for coal ash exist nationwide.

Without federal guidelines, regulations of the ash ponds vary by state. Most lack liners and have no monitors to ensure that ash and its contents don't seep into underground aquifers.

"There has been zero done by the EPA," said Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W. Va., chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee. Rahall pushed through legislation in 1980 directing the EPA to study how wastes generated at the nation's coal-fired power plants should be treated under federal law.

In both 1988 and 1993, the EPA decided that coal ash should not be regulated as a hazardous waste. The agency has also failed to take other steps to control how the waste is stored.

"Coal ash impoundments like the one in Tennessee have to be subject to federal regulations to ensure a basic level of safety for communities," Rahall said.

The Tennessee spill was at a Tennessee Valley Authority plant covered 300 acres in a slurry of coal ash and water, destroying homes and tainting waterways and soil with high levels of arsenic.

The utility reported a second leak Friday at a pond at a northeast Alabama power plant that was storing gypsum, a material trapped in air pollution control devices that is different from the sludge that spilled in Tennessee. Some of the gypsum reached a nearby creek before the leak was stopped.

The spills have renewed a 20-year-old debate about whether stricter regulations are needed to govern them.

Rahall and Democrats in the Senate are also calling for tighter controls, including a requirement for ash ponds to be lined.

"The federal government has the power to regulate these wastes, and inaction has allowed this enormous volume of toxic material to go largely unregulated," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who chairs Senate committee that oversees the EPA.

In March 2000, the agency highlighted the risks posed by wastes in landfills and ponds. In an early draft of its proposal for a national standard, the EPA concluded that the wastes "have the potential to present danger to human health and the environment."

It also warned that the number of cases of contamination nationwide was likely to be underestimated because of poor state records and the lack of groundwater monitoring.

At the time, the agency said storage ponds posed an even greater risk than landfills when it came to leaks and spills.

"Surface impoundment controls occur at a significantly lower rate," the EPA concluded. And the pressure exerted by water "increases the likelihood of releases."

In 2006, the EPA once again found that disposal of coal waste in ponds elevates cancer risk when metals leach into drinking water sources.

The agency, which had set 2006 as a target for issuing a proposed regulation, says it is still working toward a national standard. A top EPA official also said there has been no "conscious or clear slowdown" by Bush administration officials who have run the agency since 2001 and often sided with the energy industry on environmental controls.

"It has been an issue of resources and a range of pressing things we are working on," said Matthew Hale, who heads the agency's Office of Solid Waste.

Over the years, the government has found increasing evidence that coal ash ponds and landfills taint the environment and pose risks to humans and wildlife. In 2000, when the EPA first floated the idea of a national standard, the agency knew of 11 cases of water pollution linked to ash ponds or landfills. In 2007, that list grew to 24 cases in 13 states with another 43 cases where coal ash was the likely cause of pollution.

The leaks and spills are blamed for abnormalities in tadpoles. The heads and fins of certain fish species were deformed after exposure to the chemicals.

Hale said the national standard would require monitoring for leaks at older, unlined sites and require the company to respond when they occur.

The industry already runs a voluntary program encouraging energy companies to install groundwater monitors. Industry officials argue that a federal regulation will do little to prevent pollution at older dump sites.

"Having federal regulations isn't going to solve those problems," said Jim Roewer, executive director of the Utility Solid Waste Activity Group, a consortium of electricity producers. "What you have to look at is what the current state regulatory programs are. The state programs continue to evolve."

Despite improvements in state programs, many states have little regulation other than requiring permits for discharging into waterways _ as required by the federal Clean Water Act.

In North Carolina, where 14 power plants disposed of 1.3 million tons in ponds in 2005, state officials do not require operators to line their ponds or monitor groundwater, safety measures that help protect water supplies from contamination.

Similar safety measures are not required in Kentucky, Alabama, and Indiana.

And while other states like Ohio have regulations to protect groundwater, those often don't apply to many of the older dumps built before the state rules were imposed.

"The solution is readily available to the EPA," said Lisa Evans, an attorney for Earthjustice, an environmental advocacy group. "We wouldn't like it, but they could say that municipal solid waste rules apply to coal ash. They could have done that, but instead they chose to do absolutely nothing."

WASHINGTON — Millions of tons of toxic coal ash is piling up in power plant ponds in 32 states, a situation the government has long recognized as a risk to human health and the environment but h...
WASHINGTON — Millions of tons of toxic coal ash is piling up in power plant ponds in 32 states, a situation the government has long recognized as a risk to human health and the environment but h...
 
Comments
12
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 50 fans permalink

I don't think that I'll be going west or south of the Lehigh River for a spell. We have some snow coming. It's kind of pretty when it's falling, if you're inside & have hot tea or coffee handy to sip as you watch the snow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 01/09/2009
- littlejohn I'm a Fan of littlejohn 2 fans permalink

I'm astonished that my native West Virginia isn't on the list. This former tourist's paradise is being destroyed by coal mining and coal-fueled power plants. My guess is the state's small population explains its absence. On a retention pond per capita basis, West Virginia would surely top this sorry list.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 01/09/2009
photo

I, too, was shocked that WVA was not on the list. I'm also a WVA native. I re-read the article and noticed that it was stated that power plants are associated with production of the coal ash. Perhaps WVA coal is used more for power plants outside of WVA? I know there are numerous sediment ponds in WVA (nearly a pond for every mountain and valley) but maybe the coal ash is different than sediment/sludge ponds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 01/09/2009
- captnEarl I'm a Fan of captnEarl 8 fans permalink
photo

My brother told me that there is a HUGE sludge pond on the mountain up stream from the town of Whitesville that has been having problems with leaking. From what I've learned the sludge if the extremely tall dam fails will wipe out the town of Whitesville, Wv. Coal is still king in Wv.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 01/09/2009
- Greytdog I'm a Fan of Greytdog 6 fans permalink
photo

No West Virginia isn't on the list because for most the US, they see West Virginia as just a redneck state and therefore less deserving. Of course the fact that people in WV have been screaming for decades about strip mining, mountaintop removal, unregulated coal ash lehars, etc. is beside the point. West Virginia is the red-headed stepchild in these discussions. Here's hoping that the Mountaineers raise holy hell about the destruction of their state and demand some ACTION and FUNDING NOW

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 01/10/2009
- BearsLeft I'm a Fan of BearsLeft 11 fans permalink

This would be the unseen dark side of electric cars. The pollution still occurs, just NIMBY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 01/09/2009
- alvdh1 I'm a Fan of alvdh1 25 fans permalink

When some of the bears left the woods a few of them left their brains behind. You, appear to be no exception. There will be no new coal fired power plants authorized to be built in the U.S. under the Obama Administration. In fact, it is the intention of Obama to build out the smart grid for sustainable, renewable energy which will begin replacing existing coal fired power plants. PG&E is in the testing phase of a smart grid in California that ultimately will allow auto's to hook up to the grid while parked and being charged by wind and solar. During peek demand periods the juice of thousands of electric cars can be tapped for their power and the owner will get paid for it. In case you didn't hear, we have a president elect who actually believes in protecting the environment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 01/09/2009
- lauriemann I'm a Fan of lauriemann 10 fans permalink
photo

Well, I hope that's the case, but politicians often change their minds. The fact the Obama talked so much about using some of the next round of stimulus money to stimulate green power is heartening. However, the coal interests still have many Democratic reprentatives in their pockets.

I'm surprised Pennsylvania's not on the list. I live about five miles away from the biggest gob pile (coal ash pile) east of the Mississippi. I hate to think what it's done to the ground water around here. When you look at the wetlands near the gob pile, you see many odd colors in the water that you don't tend to see in wetlands.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 01/09/2009

How much power does it take to charge a electric car?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 01/09/2009

Please help with the economic and global problems created by oil company greed and the resulting pollution caused by the use of this resource. A far better solution than an electric Hybrid is available.

There is a car that is getting ready for mass production. It runs on AIR. That's correct, AIR! This car needs to be brought to America. It is manufactured by MDI in France. It is referred to as the Air Car.

http://zeropollutionmotors.us/?page_id=46
No Fossil fuels! No pollution!
AIR! AIR! AIR!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 01/11/2009
- mcliberty I'm a Fan of mcliberty 3 fans permalink

I wish I knew exactly where these ponds were located. Living in Ohio and learning that we have a high number of these coal ash retention ponds kind of freaks me out. The list should be made public so citizens can learn if they live near one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 01/09/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

If the AP found the list, so can you! Start digging.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 01/09/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect