Seattle Post-Intelligencer Put Up For Sale, Will Close If No Buyer

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GENE JOHNSON and PHUONG LE | January 9, 2009 08:08 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Thursday, June 30, 2005 file photo, a pair of workers stand atop the landmark globe on the roof of the building housing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer during maintenance work, in Seattle. On Friday, Jan. 9, 2009, the Hearst Corp. put Seattle's oldest newspaper, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, up for sale and said that if it can't find a buyer in the next 60 days the paper would likely close or continue to exist only online. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

SEATTLE — Hearst Corp. put Seattle's oldest newspaper, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, up for sale on Friday and said that if it can't find a buyer in the next 60 days the paper would likely close or continue to exist only online.

If it does become an Internet-only operation, the P-I, as the paper is known locally, would have a "greatly reduced staff," Hearst said in a statement. Hearst is a major media company that also owns TV stations, other newspapers and magazines including Cosmopolitan.

"In no case will Hearst continue to publish the P-I in printed form" once the 60 days are up, Hearst said. Steve Swartz, the head of Hearst's newspaper division, broke the news to employees in a meeting Friday.

Seattle is one of two major cities on the verge of losing its second daily newspaper as the industry tries to pull out of a tailspin brought on by falling circulation and advertising revenue. Denver's Rocky Mountain News recently put itself up for sale in the face of steep losses and could close if a buyer isn't found soon.

Hearst said it is not considering buying The Seattle Times, the city's other daily paper, which has handled non-news functions for the P-I since 1983 under a federally approved joint operating agreement. Hearst has owned the P-I since 1921, and the paper has had operating losses since 2000, including $14 million last year.

The mood in the P-I newsroom was grim.

"People are kind of depressed. There's some crying," said Candace Heckman, P-I breaking news editor who has worked at the paper since 2000.

Heckman told The Associated Press that Swartz was peppered with many questions by staffers but declined to say more.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Our journalists continue to do a spectacular job of serving the people of Seattle, which has been our great privilege for the past 88 years," Swartz said in the written statement. "But our losses have reached an unacceptable level, so with great regret we are seeking a new owner for the P-I."

Chris Grygiel, an assistant city editor, said that while the newspaper's Web site is strong, the print edition has always been the flagship, and it's not clear how an Internet-only operation might work.

"Right now people are just trying to digest what happened," Grygiel told the AP. "No one knows what to make of it."

The news was first reported by Seattle's KING-TV on Thursday night, taking even top editors at the P-I by surprise. Rumors of the P-I's imminent demise have surfaced repeatedly over the years, but the paper's footing seemed a little more solid after Hearst defeated an effort by The Times to dissolve the joint operating agreement two years ago.

Joint operating agreements allow newspapers like The Times and P-I to share business and production operations, which cuts their costs, while keeping their newsrooms separate and independent. They're exemptions to federal antitrust law allowed by the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970, designed to prop up failing papers. Of more than two dozen JOAs created since the law was passed, fewer than 10 remain.

Many industry analysts expected the P-I, backed by Hearst's deep pockets, to outlast The Times, which is controlled by the Blethen family. The Times, like newspapers around the country, has had severe financial troubles of its own and has cut 500 positions in the past year.

Also Friday, the Star Tribune of Minneapolis ended talks with a union representing employees after being unable to agree on a request for concessions, setting the stage for a possible bankruptcy filing by Minnesota's largest newspaper. Canada's Globe and Mail also said Friday it would cut 80 jobs, or 10 percent of its work force.

"We report on this stuff all the time, and everybody here knows this is a business and sometimes business decisions hurt," said David McCumber, the P-I's managing editor. "But even seeing colleagues and friends go through this at other papers doesn't prepare you for when it happens to a paper and to colleagues you love and admire and strive with every day."

In 1999, Seattle's joint operating agreement was modified to allow The Times to switch from afternoon to morning publication, directly competing with the P-I. Hearst began paying The Times $1 million a year for the right of first refusal should The Times be put up for sale.

The Times gave notice in 2003 that it was seeking to end the JOA, saying the agreement was no longer financially viable. Hearst sued to block The Times from doing so, and the matter was settled in April 2007, with Hearst paying The Times $25 million not to end the agreement before 2016.

As part of that settlement, The Times paid $49 million to settle Hearst's legal claims and to erase a provision of the JOA that called for Hearst to collect 32 percent of The Times' profits through 2083 should the P-I go out of business and leave The Times with a monopoly.

Times Publisher and CEO Frank Blethen said in a statement that the JOA structure is inefficient and had been a big part of the deep losses both papers have experienced.

"If the P-I does close and the JOA ends, it will enhance the chances that The Seattle Times can survive the recession," Blethen said.

Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels said he hoped a buyer can be found for the P-I. "And if that proves impossible, I look forward to seeing an electronic version of the state's oldest newspaper. Whatever the outcome, this is a big change for Seattle," he said.

The newspaper's signature 30-foot-diameter globe, spinning "It's in the P-I" in neon lights, is a popular Seattle landmark.

The P-I was founded as the Seattle Gazette in 1863 and has a weekday circulation of 117,000, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations. The Times' circulation is about 199,000.

___

AP writer Donna Gordon Blankinship contributed to this report.

SEATTLE — Hearst Corp. put Seattle's oldest newspaper, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, up for sale on Friday and said that if it can't find a buyer in the next 60 days the paper would likely clo...
SEATTLE — Hearst Corp. put Seattle's oldest newspaper, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, up for sale on Friday and said that if it can't find a buyer in the next 60 days the paper would likely clo...
 
Comments
28
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

Another liberal rag bites the dust.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 01/12/2009

That sucks, 'cause their political cartoonist David Horsey is pretty good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 01/12/2009

The great newspaper brands will live on--just not on newsprint. Great news reporting and editing will not disappear either; they will live digitally.
Products like Kindle and the future iterations of hand-held readers will eliminate the circumstances in which reading stories online is inconvenient.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 01/11/2009

Lot's of factors in the PI's demise. Even though Seattle is blue, there are still plenty of conservatives. It is just dumb for any business to continually spit in the face of 40-50% of the potential market.

The writing in the PI (and Times) is not very engaging. I came of age reading great writers like Mike Royko and Leanita Mclain in Chicago. When I read most of the PI writers I think, damn, I could write better than that.

Seeing Phuong Le's name (PI reporter) reminded me that she was an exception. She did a piece called "A Daughter's Journey" several years back that was one of the greatest things I've ever read.
Oh yeah here it is:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/adaughtersjourney/
Read it and see if it does not make you cry. Too bad the PI never really took much advantage of her talent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 01/11/2009

As one who has been the subject of several ad hominem personal attacks in the Pee-Eye, it will be a personal pleasure to wave bye-bye to this Hearst rag. We need good newspapers in the northwest, but the P-I has been anything but. When people call a Hearst newspaper "more liberal" than its competitor, you know you're getting the equivalent of a Fox news production.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 01/11/2009

It's not the economy that's really behind all this ...it really is the fact that so few people read newspapers anymore. What we need is an equivalent Web site for these papers (PI and Star and God knows what others) that still has the same well-researched articles on it. As a journalist and former newspaper reporter, I'll be the first to admit I don't read newspapers at all, and have not for years. They are basically an outdated form of communication.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 PM on 01/10/2009
photo

It should be the Seattle Times folding instead of the P-I.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 01/10/2009
photo

disagree...the Seattle P-I as been the most conservative/Rep piece around for years, I won't miss it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 01/10/2009
photo

Perhaps "it won't be in the P-I". lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 01/10/2009

The need for writers, editors and investigative reporters is as critical as it's always been. If the cost of manufacturing the news on paper is prohibitive, driving the information delivery to the web, so be it. But the Fourth Estate cannot be eliminated in the process.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 01/10/2009

I find it a shame that after the Seattle community has supported the P.I. for years
that Hearst with its deep pockets could not give back to the community and
continue to support the paper which is a mainstay in Seattle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 01/10/2009

What we are witnessing is evolution. And like the American car industry, it should be allowed to die off because something better is taking its place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 01/10/2009

Something better? All the stories that bloggers pontificate about come from newspapers. If newspapers die, there isn't going to be any original news on the Web.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 01/10/2009

I agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 01/10/2009
photo

Perhaps something better will come along, but I fear for people who believe they can get all the news they need from the blogosphere. Newspapers, for all their faults and for all the bias we show in the ones we chose to read, provide for a common national dialogue. As we boutique our on-line news or -- heaven forbid! -- find ourselves trusting Huffington Post-like headlines, we will be poorer for the loss of professional journalism than most people anticipate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 01/10/2009
photo

I don't think newspapers should die off but I would like to see them redefine their content and purpose in our modern world of internet and cable-based "news." Newspapers have a natural ability to switch to a 3-per-week or even once-a-week kind of news source, which goes beyond the puffery and slick stories, digging deeper into the meaning and various angles of news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 01/10/2009

What exactly is the "something better"?

An online version that's understaffed? That aggregates news rather than breaks it?

"A greatly reduced staff" does not sound like the paper plans to keep a lot of reporters and editors around. The P-I might not be the best paper in Seattle, but I see no reason to be gleeful over a newspaper closing. Until online news sites start hiring reporters and funding investigations, the loss of print is not a good thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 01/10/2009

I live in Seattle, but haven't read the P-I for years. Don't bother much with the Seattle Times either, which has opposed the Iraq Occupation but supported the execrable Dino Rossi in our recent governor's race. If you want to read a decent progressive newspaper in Seattle, here's what you need:

http://eatthestate.org/

These guys are the real deal. The print edition has cartoons by Ted Raal and Tom Tomorrow. You sure don't see those guys in the Seattle PI or Times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 AM on 01/10/2009

Eat the state is a good paper, but its national, not just local in its coverage. The PI is not ideal, but at least it covers local issues in some depth and provides an online feedback/posting system -- much better than the Times. I truly hope it does not go under.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 01/10/2009

The PI was known as the more liberal of the two Seattle newspapers...another reason that it sucks to be going under.
I hope it can stay alive as an online format b/c the writers and the stories are badly needed in this town.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 AM on 01/10/2009

The Seattle P-I is on my relatively short bookmarks list, having been an online reader for around a year, and I must say I prefer the digital version over the paper version any day. It's the editorials, especially a couple of columns in the Saturday edition, that I read avidly.

I'm not too concerned about weather, cars, real estate Etc. because I can access that kind of information on other sites, but the columnists are up there with the best of them.

I didn't read anything about the other local paper, The Seattle Times, being sold or going online exclusively, so maybe this is the P-I's chance to get a head start and pour all its resources into becoming a kick-a55 local/national resource.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 01/10/2009

Being an old toot, I remember the days when all major U.S. cities had two or more newspapers. Even today, I still receive a minor pleasure from retrieving the morning paper from the sidewalk. That little gratification is becoming less pleasing, though, since our local newspaper has drastically reduced the content of the publication. Except for local coverage, most of the state, national, and international stories are found on line, including HP.

While many may think that electronic media will supplant newspapers, please consider an informal poll I always conduct in my freshman college classes. When asked how they receive their news, few of the students read newspapers at all. The rest did not obtain news from the Internet, television, or even radio. My unscientific estimate is that no more than ten percent of them are current even literate, based upon my having to stop the lesson plan to educate them about today's political, international, economic, and social events. And don't even think about what they do not know about history....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 01/10/2009

Of all the scary things happening today, this is the scariest--that college students don't read and are ignorant of even the most basic current events. No Child Left Behind? Sounds like we've left most of them behind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 AM on 01/10/2009

weird

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 01/10/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect