Durbin Easing On Senate Appointment: 'We Want To Be Fair To Roland Burris'

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURIE KELLMAN | January 11, 2009 06:36 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — The Senate's second-in-command, Sen. Dick Durbin, said Sunday that he is moving away from resisting former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris as President-elect Barack Obama's successor and hopes a resolution to the disagreement will be reached soon.

For his part, Burris said he and his lawyers will be in Washington on Monday to begin paving the way for him to join the Senate. But Durbin said lawyers still need to sign off on Burris' paperwork and review his testimony before the Illinois House, which later impeached Gov. Rod Blagojevich on corruption charges.

"I started off obviously skeptical, as all of the Democratic members did," Durbin, D-Ill., said on "Face the Nation" on CBS. "But as time has gone on and we've looked closely, we want to be fair to Roland Burris. If he has the proper certification and papers, then we're going to take one look at the process and move forward from there."

Senate Democrats have opposed Burris' appointment because of federal charges that Blagojevich tried to sell the seat to the highest bidder. Although they have argued that any Blagojevich appointee is tainted because of the scandal, no one has accused Burris of wrongdoing.

Burris, also appearing on CBS, said his appointment by Blagojevich is legal. On Friday, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that under state law, Burris' appointment paperwork is valid and that it's up to the Senate to decide whether to seat him. But Durbin, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other Democrats have said that unless the appointment is signed by both the governor and the Illinois secretary of state, it violates Senate rules.

Durbin said Senate lawyers are reviewing a document received Friday night to see whether it complies. Democrats also want to review Burris' testimony before the impeachment panel, where the appointee said he promised Blagojevich nothing in exchange for the seat. Then, Reid said, the Senate would vote on whether to seat him.

The National Coalition for Fairness and Justice in the U.S. Senate, a Chicago group led by Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., said Sunday that it had sent letters to Durbin and Reid requesting Burris be seated immediately. The group accused Durbin of "playing political pingpong" and said it was planning a "massive mobilization effort" this week if Burris was not seated.

At one time, Senate Democrats were hoping that Blagojevich would be removed from office before the Senate resolved the Burris matter. In the last few days it's become clear that an Illinois Senate trial on whether to remove Blagojevich from office could take weeks. Democrats, from Obama on down, want the matter resolved before it overshadows more of the 111th Congress and the beginning of the new president's term.

"I want to do this in a fair and quick way so that Roland knows his fate," Durbin said.

Burris said he and his legal team aren't easing up the pressure.

"It is our position that those documents are now in compliance with the Senate rules," Burris said. "And therefore, after the lawyers have reviewed this, my attorneys will be Washington on Monday to confirm with the parliamentarian and the attorneys to confirm that all of this is in order."

WASHINGTON — The Senate's second-in-command, Sen. Dick Durbin, said Sunday that he is moving away from resisting former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris as President-elect Barack Obama's ...
WASHINGTON — The Senate's second-in-command, Sen. Dick Durbin, said Sunday that he is moving away from resisting former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris as President-elect Barack Obama's ...
 
Comments
8
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Intelligent people change their position, keep an open mind and remain flexible when faced with changed circumstances.

The statement below indicates that Durbin was faced with changed circumstances:

I started off obviously skeptical, as all of the Democratic members did," Durbin, D-Ill., said on "Face the Nation" on CBS. "But as time has gone on and we've looked closely, we want to be fair to Roland Burris.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 01/11/2009

"Let"s be fair to this man," Durbin said Sunday.
... shouldn't he of just said, "That One"

I have to say, this has been one of the most embarrassing moments for the Democratic party... Get your house in order or get out... we Have a new Prez, and a new dream... we have seen enuff games in the last 8 years, we don't need this!

what more hoops do you want Burris to jump through??

What didn't the Senate understand, about "Yes We Can" ?... SEAT THE MAN !!!!!

what a F'n mess!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 AM on 01/12/2009

I have said it once and I say it again, the RACE card was played. America is afraid of the RACE card. I would not seat Burris. His testimony to the Senate and the Impeachment committee is conflicting. He told the Senate he had not interacted with Blago nor any member of his staff. He told the impeachment committee he spoke to Blago's chief of staff on or about sometime in June/July that he wanted the Senate seat. His side shows are ridiculous. I hope the Senate stands it ground and not give him a seat anywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 AM on 01/12/2009

I have said it once and I say it again, the RACE card was played. America is afraid of the RACE card. I would not seat Burris. His testimony to the Senate and the Impeachment committee is conflicting. He told the Senate he had not interacted with Blago nor any member of his staff. He told the impeachment committee he spoke to Blago's chief of staff on or about sometime in June/July that he wanted the Senate seat. His side shows are ridiculous. I hope the Senate stands it ground and not give him a seat anywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 AM on 01/12/2009

Basically, after indicating that the appointment was illegal and would not be accepted, Reid and the Senate are attempting to re-establish the legality of the appointment.

It's like the "Wizard of Oz".

Although those traveling and seeking Oz already had what they sought,Oz had to bless them for credibility .

The appointment is legal but now it has to be made legal in the sight of the American public by the "all knowing, all encompassing "Oz"(Senate Rules).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 01/11/2009

You are correct - a self-made pickle to be in. Right now, Burris would not win the seat in 2010. If there were a Special Election (which would be ex post facto and cannot be done) no Democrat would win against any GOP.

If Obama's recovery plan "works" and therer is some light at the end of the tunnel, then maybe a Dem would stand a chance in 2010.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 01/11/2009

to to funny,,, so true, and to the point!!..

good one A+++++

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 AM on 01/12/2009

I have said it once and I say it again, the RACE card was played. America is afraid of the RACE card. I would not seat Burris. His testimony to the Senate and the Impeachment committee is conflicting. He told the Senate he had not interacted with Blago nor any member of his staff. He told the impeachment committee he spoke to Blago's chief of staff on or about sometime in June/July that he wanted the Senate seat. His side shows are ridiculous. I hope the Senate stands it ground and not give him a seat anywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 AM on 01/12/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect