Frank Willing To Take Obama's Word On Bailout Funds

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

January 12, 2009 01:37 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Barney Frank is willing to take Barack Obama at his word.

Frank introduced legislation at the end of last week that would have tied a number of strings to the second $350 billion in financial-industry bailout funds. But on Monday, he told fellow Democrats in a closed-door meeting that he wouldn't push for passage of his bill if President-elect Obama would give "his word" that he would implement major portions of his legislation, according to a House Democratic aide.

The agreement would give Obama freedom to spend the TARP funds -- confined by whatever promises he makes to Congress -- and side-steps what could be a difficult fight in both the Senate and the House.

Following the whip meeting with Democrats, Frank's office released a statement saying that Frank "agree[s] that the money should be made available under the appropriate conditions. We should not allow our disappointment at the Bush administration's poor handling of the TARP program to prevent the Obama administration from using the funds in more appropriate ways."

Frank said his oversight bill "creates a framework" that would allow Congress to release the money to Obama.

"I hope the House will pass a bill this week that sets forth the conditions we believe are necessary to assure that the public gets the full benefit of these funds. It seems clear the Obama administration agrees with what we are setting forward, and I believe this creates a framework so that the release of these funds can go forward," he said.

Frank's oversight bill would restrict executive compensation, force CEOs who took taxpayer money to give up private planes, meet certain benchmarks, report on the use of the funds and be forbidden from using any bailout money for mergers or acquisitions.

The legislation will go before his Financial Services Committee Tuesday and is expected to go to the House floor on Tuesday.

The rest of Frank's bill pushed priorities that Democrats couldn't get included last time. Frank wanted at least $40 billion of the TARP cash to be spent on foreclosure relief -- and up to $100 billion unless the banks can show why that much wasn't needed.

Reaching an agreement with Obama, rather than forcing his hand with legislation, could circumvent a balance-of-powers conundrum Frank laid out on Friday. "The problem that we have is that in the legislative branch, it's easier to prevent people from doing bad things than make them do good things," he said. By coming to terms, he could get assurance that Obama would do those good things -- but at the same time would be giving up a measure of congressional authority.

"If they give us their absolute word that they will abide by the bill, that will be enough," Frank is quoted in Monday's CQToday as saying. "I'm willing to accept their word."

Frank's offer comes a few hours after Obama economic adviser Larry Summers sent a letter to congressional leaders asking for authority to spend the funds and promising rigorous oversight. It's doubtful the letter was a surprise to Democratic leaders and appears to have been coordinated with them. The letter offers to implement a number of efforts that coincide with Frank's bill, including restrictions on executive pay and efforts to stem foreclosures.

Barney Frank is willing to take Barack Obama at his word. Frank introduced legislation at the end of last week that would have tied a number of strings to the second $350 billion in financial-industr...
Barney Frank is willing to take Barack Obama at his word. Frank introduced legislation at the end of last week that would have tied a number of strings to the second $350 billion in financial-industr...
 
Comments
64
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
photo

We don't need another "just trust me" presidency. I dont care who is in the White House, Congress has a RESPONSIBILITY (it's not an optional benefit, Barney) to enforce oversight. Congress must stop surrendering it's Constitutional duties.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 01/13/2009
- chewie2008 I'm a Fan of chewie2008 11 fans permalink
photo

Trust is good.Control is better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 01/13/2009
- Pupster I'm a Fan of Pupster 12 fans permalink

How do we possibly know what happened to the first $350B? We have only Paulsen's word that the money went to banks in need, but we don't know to whom or how much to each. How do we know if Paulsen and Kashkari and others aren't taking a few million here or maybe a billion there and depositing it into a personal offshore account? Where is the accountability and the transparency? How do we know that Paulsen is not just using taxpayer money to enrich friends and family?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 01/13/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 351 fans permalink
photo

Faith-based bailout.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 01/13/2009
photo

Yes! But Franks is hopefully fixing loopholes and building in limits so the funds are used for the UNDERLYING PROBLEM of HOUSING!

He should not go overboard trusting Geithner and Summers!

They are from a similar mold to Paulson!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 01/13/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 351 fans permalink
photo

Unlike many other people, I actually trust Barney. I do think he defended Fannie & Freddie in order to uphold their charters, and I believe that he opposed the way the oversight was being done. I also appreciate that he was very vocal in his support for Sheila Bair. So, I feel confident about Barney's contribution to this. And, if Obama gives his word, I guess I assume he'll keep it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 01/13/2009
- Rule Of Law I'm a Fan of Rule Of Law 144 fans permalink

Barney, have these last 8 years taught you nothing? I am so glad you do not represent me, as this lack of accountability is frightening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 01/13/2009
- quadman I'm a Fan of quadman 7 fans permalink
photo

As they say, a fool and his (bailout) money are soon parted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 01/13/2009
- pfrogger I'm a Fan of pfrogger 61 fans permalink

I Can't Believe It (part 1)

WTF???
"I'm willing to accept their word." ???
his word???

has Frank lost his mind? is populism and political clout that important?
I guess this just proves the Democrats are just as bad as Republicans in political-­favor-seek­ing behavior

his word??? Really?
did I miss something? did IQs drop sharply among Democrats?
we are supposed to be the intellectuals. the repubs may run from that word, but we are supposed to embrace it. we set a higher standard - responsibility to all Americans (not just the rich ones) aren't repubs supposed to cater to the needs of the rich

when do we take people on their word? with all the potential for corruption and misappropriation (and not necessarily directly due to Obama) we shouldn't take anyone's word!
this isn't some gentleman's agreement over a 100 dollar gambling situation
this is 350 billion dollars!!!
have we learned nothing? read David Sirota (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/four-reasons-to-oppose-th_b_157255.html)
the government has already shown in the last month that they are completely incompetent and essentially gave out 350 billion in corporate welfare that has NOT benefited the vast majority of Americans. and we want to do this again? Really?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 PM on 01/12/2009
- pfrogger I'm a Fan of pfrogger 61 fans permalink

I Can't Believe It (part 2)

Just because Obama is going to be in charge, all the corruption and greed of the corporations, developed over decades, is going to magically disappear? Really? In the last month lending from the institutions that received the bailout money has not increased. unemployment has increased however. They're hording it to make their companies look stronger and not helping the average American? We rewarded them once even though it was their bad decisions that led them where they are. they're upper echelon jobs are intact, ie those who made the decisions, and they're letting go of all the the lower tier jobs, ie those who do the actual work. Is that what capitalism has come to? Is that capitalism - reward the stupid, the incompetent, the ones responsible for their mess?
I can't believe it, the Democrats are in charge and they are just as bad as the Repubs.
To Frank and all the Democrats (and Repubs) - suck it. Suck it hard.
I can't believe this is happening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 01/12/2009
- Kartoffel I'm a Fan of Kartoffel 9 fans permalink

Barney: Okay, Barack, I've give you your $350 billion, but first you have to promise me you won't spend it all on candy bars and comic books.

Barack: I pwomise, Mista Fwank! You can twust me!

Barney: Good boy. Here's your money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 01/12/2009

Obama may give his word, but what about all the compromises he's made so far just in picking his cabinet? What if he has to take back all or some of his word?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 01/12/2009

While the subprime mortgage and following financial meltdowns are not the fault of Mr. Frank, there are several good reasons not to trust Mr. Obama with the bailout. This is a bailout that Mr. Obama did not even support only two months ago; ghe public perception of the bailout has shifted dramatically since then, and unsurprisingly Mr. Obama has shifted with the political winds. By the looks of it, Mr. Obama won’t be resolute, fearless leader some had hoped. As Senator McCain might say, “he’s no maverick.” But hell, we knew that already; you don’t get a 76% approval rating by opposing the populous.

As Mr. Obama has suggested, this bailout can't be economically or sexually discriminatory or anything but uniform among the economy. One problem we're having is that some people are getting richer while others suffer, supporting a growing inequality; here's a reference on that: http://www.killerbuffalo.com/2009/01/gouge-away-how-a-spike-in-fuel-prices-has-bakers-and-wheat-farmers-raking-in-the-dough/

The point is, we can't let that happen, no matter who endorses it, Mr. Frank or anyone else, particularly when Mr. Obama is as fickle and impossible to read as his approval ratings. So be quiet, Mr. Frank, and let the people decide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 01/12/2009
- lizr I'm a Fan of lizr 221 fans permalink
photo

Go Barney.

O deserves the benefit of the doubt and those homeowners need help NOW>

Let's give O the opportunity to do the right thing--

and we'll all be watching.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 01/12/2009
photo

No President ever deserves "the benefit of the doubt" no matter who it is. Our government was designed by the Founders on the primary premise that power cannot be trusted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 01/13/2009
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

We never ever learn.

We're being shafted again. How many times do we have to be fleeced before we get the government we need?

Barney, this just tells me that there is no way to save the economy, the country, and it's everyone for themselves -- AFTER the politicians and the elites make sure they've gotten their nests feathered and battened down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 01/12/2009

Frank and Dodd are as despicable as Maddoff

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 01/12/2009
- Melissa I'm a Fan of Melissa 23 fans permalink

I hope the people of Mass. & Ct. wise up and vote Barney & Dodd out of office. They have as much to do with this mess as as the rest of the crooks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 01/13/2009
photo

I would not give Obama's administration that much trust. If the Congress does they are abdicating their responsibility again.

Third Party time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 01/12/2009
photo

I wouldn't trust my own grandmother with $350 billion, let alone the Executive Branch. Well, ok, mainly because she's been dead for 25 years, but still, so has Congressional oversight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 01/13/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect