Mr. Burris Goes To Washington: The Inside Story

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

January 12, 2009 07:50 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

When disgraced Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich appointed Roland Burris to fill a vacant Senate seat on December 30, Senate Democrats reacted strongly, refusing to grant the appointment. On Monday, they reversed course. Burris was deemed acceptable as the junior Senator from Illinois.

"How were we supposed to react?" asked Harry Reid on January 7, as it was becoming increasingly clear that Burris was on course for Congress. After all, Reid reminded reporters, Blogojevich had referred to the Senate seat as "an effin' goldmine."

Reflecting on what happened, Reid spokesman Jim Manley argued on Monday that once Blagojevich was arrested for allegedly trying to sell the Senate seat, leadership had to go big.

"We're not going to apologize for coming out with such a strong statement initially. In light of the charges against him there was no other tack to take," he said. "Certainly the Senate felt it wasn't dealing with your everyday politician. 'Who knows what's in that man's mind?'" Manley said, in reference to the Illinois Governor.

And yet, while each individual step that Senate Democrats took through the Burris minefield may have been the right one, by the end of the two-week stroll the process still blew up in their faces. Democrats were left with a colleague whose volatile two weeks of media performances did little to assuage concerns about the next two years.

"The party ended up looking bad on this," said one Senate aide. "We hardly know anything about Burris... The only bright spot is the circus is over."

Added Stu Rothenberg, of the Rothenberg Political Report: "It looks to me as if Senate Democrats crawled out on a limb without looking to see if someone else had an axe. Burris played his hand well, and Senate Democrats probably didn't have the law on their side on this one."

Light first began shining through the cracks in the Democratic wall when Majority Leader Reid (D-Nev.) went on NBC's "Meet the Press" on January 4. He began with a hard line. "We determine who sits in the Senate," he said. "So there's clearly legal authority for us to do whatever we want to."

Story continues below
advertisement

The interview, however, ended on a bit of a backpedal. "There's always room to negotiate," the Majority Leader offered.

Burris made his first offer on January 6, when he showed up in a frigid rain to present his credentials to the Secretary of the Senate and was told that, without a signature from Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White, his paperwork wasn't in order.

Later that day, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the outgoing chair of the Rules Committee, said that from a legal standpoint, Burris ought to be seated. According to a senior Democratic Senate aide, Feinstein called Reid personally to press Burris' case. "All due respect to Dianne," said Reid, "it's not a legal appointment."

The next day, Burris met for 45 minutes with Reid and Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). They emerged to tell the press corps and assembled TV cameras - without prompting - that Burris didn't think their refusal was racially motivated.

"Roland Burris, one of the first things he said to us, 'This is nothing that's racial. I understand that,'" Reid recounted.

When Durbin took the mic stand, he replayed the Burris exoneration.

"At the outset, he said, 'I want to make it clear: I understand that this controversy has nothing to do with my race and I understand that both of you have excellent records when it comes to racial relations,'" Durbin offered. "So, I want to make sure that everyone understands, we are trying to deal with this in terms of the rules of the Senate, the laws of our land, the laws of the state of Illinois and our constitutions."

But despite the public proclamations, race clearly was playing a role. Shortly after Burris was nominated, he broached the issue on NBC's "Today" show. "It is a fact there are no African-Americans in the United States Senate," said Burris. "Is it racism that is taking place? That's a question that someone may raise."

Whatever the dynamics, Burris had made a good impression on Reid. Asked later that afternoon if he was concerned that a Senator Burris might not be able to win reelection, the Majority Leader shrugged off the suggestion. "You should meet the guy," he said. "He's a pretty impressive guy."

Certainly, the way Burris' team got around the signature requirement showed a bit of political skill. White, who refused to sign Burris' certification papers, nevertheless signed paperwork certifying that he had filed a document registering that he had received the appointment from Blogojevich.

Good enough, argued Burris.

Good enough, said Senate Democrats, no doubt looking to put the matter to bed.

"The Secretary of the Senate has determined that the new credentials presented today on behalf of Mr. Burris now satisfy Senate Rules and validate his appointment to the vacant Illinois Senate seat," said Reid and Durbin in a joint statement Monday afternoon.

By that point, however, legal matters were overwhelming the politics. Several Constitutional scholars told the Huffington Post early after the Burris appointment was announced that the former Illinois attorney general was likely on the Senate track. He met all the requirements -- age, citizenship and residence - and had been appointed legally.

"Legal advice left Senate without a leg to stand on," said one Senate aide, though Reid spokesman Manley insists that the legal argument was in their favor and that the Senate can set additional requirements - such as state certification - for its members.

Burris now faces one final hurdle: the GOP. "Accordingly, barring objections from Senate Republicans, we expect Senator-designee Burris to be sworn in and formally seated later this week," said Durbin and Reid.

It doesn't look like Republicans will block him. "Well you know Americans are clearly tired of hearing about ethical issues in Washington," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Friday. "My colleagues, my Republican colleagues, I think to a person would prefer a fresh start that allows the people of Illinois to choose their new Senator, but candidly, if Mr. Burris presents the correct paperwork, he's going to be a Senator."

Burris, upon hearing the news, released a statement of gratitude for the "autograph" that made him a Senator.

"Secretary of State Jesse White, whom I have known for more than 30 years, is also owed a debt of gratitude," he said after thanking Reid and Durbin. "He also happens to be someone whose autograph I cherish."

 
Comments
162
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

This entire flap over Roland Burris really comes down to two objections.

The number one objection to Burris's taking Obama's Senate seat has NOTHING to do with his race (good as it would be to have a Black fill it) - and EVERYTHING to do with our disgraced Governor, Rod Blagojevich who - in a deliberately antagonistic move - named him to fill that post. Under NORMAL circumstances Blagojevich could have appointed Burris who would have been seated without controversy. End of story.

The second objection to Burris is that he ACCEPTED this tainted offer from our disgraced and now-impeached Governor. Technically, in purely legal terms Blagojevich was empowered to name, in this instance, Roland Burris, to fill that seat. Technically, in purely legal terms, Roland Burris was entiltled to accept the offer. HOWEVER, MOST REGRETTABLY, an inescapable shadow of disgrace hangs over this appointment.

For the above reasons Burris would have earned himself far more good-will and respect from his public, and greatly improved his chances in a special election, had he graciously and firmly told Blagojevich, "Thank you, Governor, but I cannot IN GOOD CONSCIENCE accept this Senate seat (even though, truth be told, I very badly want it!)"

That Roland Burris accepted Blago's nomination speaks volumes (to me, anyway) about his true character. I am NOT therefore heartened by the prospect of Burris serving out Obama's term.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 01/13/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

Thank you for your post. I am very concerned that Burris is going to be sworn in, and I wish this guy would have been vetted. I feel his owning a lobbiest consulting business is going to be a conflict of interest, esp. with his having a customer like Comcast Cable/tele­phone/inte­rnet. How is he going to be unbiased when any issue regarding cable,telephone or internet come before the Senate? I have a feeling that he will get in trouble, and he might find himself under impeachment proceedings in the Senate.

BTW he needs to stay away for the cameras. I for one am sick and tired of him, Blango and the rest of these looney tunes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 01/14/2009
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 72 fans permalink


"The PARTY" didn't end up looking bad; just REID.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 01/13/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

Blango as well as Burris gave the party a black eye.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 01/14/2009
photo

Ultimately the people of Illinois will decide whether they want Roland Burris as their senator. I now suspect he will run for that office in 2010. He might win the Dem nomination, but he will have a difficult time in the general election. His fate is now completely tied up with that of Blagojevich. If Blago is indicted, or perhaps by then even convicted, it will cast a long, dark shadow over Burris's prospects--he's the only politician in Illinois who was willing to throw Blago a lifeline in the current scandal. If the Republicans nominate a strong candidate, they will probably win the seat in two years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 01/13/2009

As a resident of Illinois Burris has much moire of a history than the recent association with Balgo. Then there is the fact that there are no real Republicans that they can come up with to gain statewide popularity.

Maybe the can bring back Alan Keyes........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 01/13/2009
photo

The "chatter" is, Rep Mark Kirk is emboldened to try for the seat in 2010.

Rep Mark Kirk, an apologist for Mark Foley, wanted to run against Obama in 2004, but was told not to. Now he's drafting a bill to prohibit Blagojevich from getting his hands on any bail out dollars (a positive thing, imo) trying to look like a champion for the people, rebuilding his creds.

Oh yes, he's being prepped by the GOP to take the seat in 2010, and with the help of a self-deprecating Democratic Party, he just might succeed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 01/13/2009
photo

I disagree.

Burris will attempt to run for the democratic primary in 13 months, and he will loose. There's no way democrats will chance him running for senator, given all of this Blago nonsense it will be too risky.

Rep. Mark Kirk is going to attempt to run for the senate seat, and he would be a formidable opponent. But I still believe that we democrats can hold on to the seat. We just need to get Burris out of the way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 01/13/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

That is probably why all the Repubs were coming out to voice their support for Burris, they want him to run in 2010. I have felt that all along. All I can hope is that he screws up, and he won't be able to run even in the primary. I also feel he can't win a primary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 01/14/2009
photo

No Democratic Party embarrassed themselves - because the law and public opinion was never on their side. Burris's record is clean as snow and he appears to be competent. You have to know when you have a fight worth fighting - this was never a fight worth fighting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 01/13/2009
- britethere I'm a Fan of britethere 15 fans permalink

Lie down with dogs get up with flees. trhe appointment was tainted from the start....as Obama pointed out " No appointment of Blago's should be seated". Danny Davis has the integrity to turn down the manipulative and spiteful appointment

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 01/13/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

Yes, I agree

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 01/14/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

Why are you, a Repubican, fighting for Burris? It's not because you feel Burris is good, because he is a Democrat, and his stance, certainly is not one that you would back. I am just curious why all Republicans are coming out and making these statements.

BTW, no Blango and Burris started this whole thing, therefore they did embarrasis the Democratic party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 01/14/2009

What Burris did was embarrass the Democratic Party, What Burris did was embarrass the AA Community and What Burris did was embarrass the state of Illinois a no amount of so call rule of law will change that.

He may have the law of his side but it still won't save him from public opinion

If you don’t believe me ask O J

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 01/13/2009
photo

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

And to equate Sen. Burris to OJ, well once again I remind you, your prejudice is showing, and it's wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 01/13/2009

O J got away with it because of the rule of Law so what's the difference; or do we embrace the rule of law when it is convenient

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 01/13/2009
- britethere I'm a Fan of britethere 15 fans permalink

He's not saying he is OJ, only that OJ had the law on his side like Burris did...still morals and ethics shows and public opinion is against both....check out the Gallup and Marris polls on Burris

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 01/13/2009

How you can compare Mr. Burris to OJ Simpson is beyond comprehension. Nevertheless, I will assume you are not African American. If he were White would he have embarrassed the White community? Mr. Burris was legally appointed to his senate seat and deserves some respect, he hasn't done anything wrong. Your blanket statements about embarrassment are just silly and misplaced. Why do you dislike this man so much whom I am assuming you probably know nothing about?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 01/13/2009

OJ was found innocent according to the rule of law so why is this beyond comprehension

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 01/13/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

He sure would have embarrased the white race, that said this is not a racial issue. Just curious are you a Republican? I think that if Reid had done more homework about Burris's background, he would have brought up about his owning his own lobbiest consulting company, the money he gave Blango ( $25000), and the money Burris was paid ( $295000) from the State of Ill, after he gave Blango the campaign money. Man, I would like to see an investigation into these issues.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 01/14/2009
- Aldyth I'm a Fan of Aldyth 9 fans permalink
photo

When I first heard that Blago had appointed Burris, my reaction was that it was a brilliant move on Blago's part.

Roland Burris isn't squeaky clean. There isn't anyone in Illinois politics who is - not even Barack Obama. But, he is cleaner than most. And he was essentially retired from public office. He met the definition of a successful Illinois politician - he managed to escape indictment. And, he's black.

Burris has played this one out well. He has been persistent and used the law to his advantage. He is expressing the intent to let bygones be bygones. He'll be sworn in and he'll be a perfectly good place holder Senator for the next two years. He may take a shot at running for re-election, but there are other good candidates out there who will run for the seat.

A Republican win that seat? Highly unlikely. The Republican party has been decimated in Illinois. They will have a hard time scraping together a ticket for statewide offices that stands a chance of anything other than public embarrassment.

Nope. Blago made a brilliant move. He's deflected attention from himself and let Burris have the limelight for the moment. Now, let's have Illinois focus back on completing the process and putting Blago on trial before the Illinois Senate and kick his @#$ out of office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 01/13/2009
- Boadicea I'm a Fan of Boadicea 64 fans permalink

I haven't read anything about Burris that suggests he would not be a good senator. People may disagree with some of his positions, but whether a person can please all of the people all of the time is not the measure of a good senator.

Let's see how he performs over the next year or so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 01/13/2009

I haven’t read anything that said Roland Burris would be a good senator; in fact the behavior he has demonstrated so far has been embarrassing; when ask what will he do once he become senator he was incapable could providing a cognitive answer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 01/13/2009

Then, for God's sake, why don't we have some kind of law or amendment that has ALL states fill vacancies by general or special election and not just a checkerboard of those that do and those that don't.

It's OK to state "let the people decide" but if it applies to one, it applies to all, not just Illinois.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 01/13/2009
- 1099 I'm a Fan of 1099 6 fans permalink

"It's OK to state "let the people decide" but if it applies to one, it applies to all, not just Illinois"

Not a states' rights fan huh? Read some history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 01/13/2009
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 72 fans permalink


The answer is: "State's rights."
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 01/13/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

They have a good point, when a national position is at stake, perhaps it is a good idea to have all states have the same election laws. Not only for this position, but also when it comes to ballots, voting machines, etc. We would probably have all the senators seated, no court actions going on, etc. The ballot in MI is ridiculous, when people don't know how to fill out a circle, or a butterfly that people don't punch all the way.

I am all for term limits, campaign reform, and changing laws to have consistency in elections.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 01/14/2009
- Budokan I'm a Fan of Budokan 172 fans permalink
photo

Make Reid and the spineless Dems look bad? Face it. That's not hard to accomplish. Especially when Reid does most of the work for you....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 01/13/2009

Where was Senator Reid's spine when addressing the president and vice president's war crimes. No challenge, no stance, but silence - spine bent or broken. Now, he takes a stand against the law while the unjust go off into the sunset.

Also calling Senator Burris a clown is unnecessary. Look, he took advantage of the circumstances. He would have never been a senator under any other way, so he jump. Now, in two years the Democrats will have a stronger candidate that will beat him in the primary, and Burris - Senator Burris will be a footnote in history. At least the lovable loser of Illinois, will have another claim to fame...and maybe that's all he wanted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 01/13/2009
photo

And what would you call Burris if he was representing your state? I could think of a few choice words worse than 'clown'.

When this man was AG of IL, he wanted to put an innocent man on death row because he was running for governor and didn't want to appear soft on crime. This is a man that insists on everyone calling him 'senator', but when questioned about his upcoming legislative agenda, he doesn't think he should comment on such issues until he's sworn in as senator. Lord, can you imagine if Obama had said "well, I want to be your president, but I won't comment on my agenda until I'm in office".

Let me say this again. This man doesn't care about representing the people of Illinois. He is just looking for more glory to inscribe across his monumental crypt. Why else would he one week be calling for Blago to immediately step aside, and then the next accepting an appointment from him? He is, if anything, a JOKE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 01/13/2009
- sasson I'm a Fan of sasson 21 fans permalink

No, Burris keeps indicating that he will run in 2010. That means, no more black Senator. RB has no chance and if another african american runs, it will split the vote. I hope that the short term gain was worth it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 01/13/2009
- britethere I'm a Fan of britethere 15 fans permalink

Danny Davis will win the primary if he runs. Burris even loses in primaries...and even lost before lying down with Blago by accepting the tainted appointment

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 01/13/2009

"He would have never been a senator" because he is a serial loser.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 01/13/2009
photo

If Democrats keep cutting their noses to spite their faces and continue to besmirch Burris this way, a republican will win his seat. Sad thing is, they'll blame Sen. Burris for this as well, never realizing their own spite is what caused their loss.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 01/13/2009
photo

Nope. See because Burris is not going to win the democratic PRIMARY for his seat.

Democrats will hold on to this seat. Roland Burris will not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 01/13/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

Why are you for Burris? I am trying to find out why Republicans are supporting this jerk? Is it because you are hoping to pick off that Senate seat in 2010, if he runs?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 01/14/2009

See, this bull scrap!
For poor and working class Black folks,

AmeriKKKa covers them 24/7 like a bottomless can of Raid Insecticide spray
or like the Israeli Government & Military on kids in Gaza.

And there aint no affirmative action for those Black folk who really need a helping hand.

But there sure is for clowns like Jessie Jackson and Roland Burris who shuck, jive, grin, connive and lie their way into the Big House on Easy street. I guess AmeriKKK has got to crack the door
open for them because they see more than a little bit of themselves in these poverty pimping con artists.

Shame, shame, shame. And mark my words, he will shine the right shoes and be reelected, as he's done all this life

Spook out!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 01/13/2009
- mjb5406 I'm a Fan of mjb5406 20 fans permalink
photo

Just keep smoking whatever it isd you're on and you can make even less sense than you already do (if that's at all possible).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 01/13/2009
- ChiGuy I'm a Fan of ChiGuy 316 fans permalink
photo

It will be one of the shortest stints as a U.S. Senator on record, because he won't be elected to the position in 2010.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 01/13/2009

He won't even be recognized in the senate; don’t think they are going forgive this man for embarrassing the party and the beginning of Obama’s Administration. And if he believes for one instant that he would have any contact with Obama he can think again. There is one thing I have noticed about Obama has zero tolerance for those who can not excise discipline behavior.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 01/13/2009
photo

I agree. He's merely a seat warmer, his sole purpose is going to be to fill Obama's vote. He can claim he's not a rubber stamp all he wants, but unfortunately, that's the way the majority of IL democrats are going to view him for the next two years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 01/13/2009
- chitown I'm a Fan of chitown 4 fans permalink

The Democratic leadership embarrassed themselves, by not following the rule of law. Burris' appointment was legal. End of story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 01/13/2009
- apoyo I'm a Fan of apoyo 39 fans permalink

You can't fault Burris for playing the cards he was dealt very well. But, remember, who dealt the cards, Blago and Reid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 01/13/2009
- mjb5406 I'm a Fan of mjb5406 20 fans permalink
photo

As I've said before, call Burris the Senate's Homedics Seat Warmer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 01/13/2009
- 1099 I'm a Fan of 1099 6 fans permalink

You mean exercise disciplined behavior don't you? Yeah you do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 01/13/2009

This entire flap over Roland Burris really comes down to two objections.

The number one objection to Burris's taking Obama's Senate seat has NOTHING to do with his race (good as it would be to have a Black fill it) - and EVERYTHING to do with our disgraced Governor, Rod Blagojevich, who - in a deliberately antagonistic move - named him to fill that post. Under NORMAL circumstances Blagojevich could have appointed Burris who would have been seated without controversy. End of story.

The second objection is that Burris ACCEPTED this tainted offer from our disgraced and now-impeached Governor. Technically, in purely legal terms Blagojevich was empowered to name him to fill that seat. Technically, in purely legal terms, Burris was likewise entiltled to accept the offer. HOWEVER, MOST REGRETTABLY, an inescapable shadow of disgrace hangs over this appointment.

For the above reasons Burris would have earned himself far more good-will and respect from his public, and greatly improved his chances of winning in a special election, had he graciously and firmly told Blagojevich, "Thank you, Governor, but I cannot IN GOOD CONSCIENCE accept your offer of this Senate seat (even though, truth be told, I very badly want it!)"

That Roland Burris accepted Blago's nomination speaks volumes (to me, anyway) about the man's true character. I am therefore NOT heartened by the thought of Burris's serving out Obama's term.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 01/13/2009

I'm going to kick Burris out of the Senate

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 01/13/2009
photo

It's going to take one heck of a steel toed boot to do that I'm afraid :(

The only good thing is that he'll only be there for two years. There's no way he'd win an election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 01/13/2009

It took me along time to get over my n egative impression of HillaryClinton because of the antics that occurred during the primaries and I can honestly say that I wasn’t too happy with her as Secretary of State but I respected Obama’s choice because in the end HillaryClinton was the one who put her party first; she could have dragged this out during the convention but she had more class and dignity and in her most powerful speech she showed that it wasn’t just about her but it was about all of us.

And after what we have just gone through with Roland Burris the Clown and his traveling circus, HillaryClinton has now fully regained my support and respect; HillaryClinton in the end showed what Roland Burris is morally bankrupt in showing and that is her integrity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 01/13/2009
- mjb5406 I'm a Fan of mjb5406 20 fans permalink
photo

The phrase "Man of Integrity" will never be engraved on his mausoleum, that's for sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 01/13/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 45 fans permalink
photo

standing up to clap

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 01/14/2009
- Mdazes I'm a Fan of Mdazes 9 fans permalink

As I said several days ago....."it is about what is legal" it is not about who you want or who can win elections.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 01/13/2009
photo

... or what the court of public opinion decrees.

The only people helped by this who dog and pony show, are the Republicans.

They're chortling on the sidelines, gearing up to run a Repub in 2010. If Illinoisans have acute loss of memory of the past 8 years, focusing on this non-scandal instead of seeing the forest for the trees, the Repubs will win back the seat, guaranteed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 01/13/2009
- Mdazes I'm a Fan of Mdazes 9 fans permalink

Sound like the same ying yang (noise) that people were saying about Obama winning the Presidential Election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 01/13/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect