Obama Is First Independent President: John Heilemann

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

New York Magazine   |   January 12, 2009 09:58 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

The 55 inaugural addresses before the one Barack Obama will deliver next week have run the gamut from poetic (rarely) to prosaic and platitudinous (often), but all have shared a common premise: the promise of newness. Though claims of fresh starts and clean breaks are de rigueur for incoming presidents of both parties, the Democrats have tended to be more explicit--and extravagant--about it. Franklin Roosevelt spoke of "writing a new chapter in our book of self-government," John Kennedy of "creating a new endeavor, not a new balance of power, but a new world of law." Jimmy Carter said his election augured "a new beginning, a new dedication within our government, and a new spirit among us all." Bill Clinton proclaimed (redundantly) in his first inaugural that "a new season of American renewal has begun," and in his second he uncorked a veritable neoteric orgy: heralding the coming of "a new century in a new millennium ... on the edge of a bright new prospect in human affairs"; calling for a "new vision of government, a new sense of responsibility, a new spirit of community"; intoning that "the promise we sought in a new land we will find again in a land of new promise"--invoking that final phrase five times for good measure.

Obama, of course, will not need to strain so hard to cloak himself in the aura of novelty (though his people apparently aren't taking any chances--the event's official theme, borrowed from the Gettysburg Address, is "A New Birth of Freedom"). As much as the country has grown accustomed to seeing Obama's mug on their TV screens, the sight of a black man taking the oath of office still promises to shock. But the signifiers of Obama's newness extend far beyond his race: They are generational, temperamental, intellectual, experiential. He has no real precedent as an occupant of the Oval Office.

Read the whole story here.

The 55 inaugural addresses before the one Barack Obama will deliver next week have run the gamut from poetic (rarely) to prosaic and platitudinous (often), but all have shared a common premise: the pr...
The 55 inaugural addresses before the one Barack Obama will deliver next week have run the gamut from poetic (rarely) to prosaic and platitudinous (often), but all have shared a common premise: the pr...
 
Comments
65
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- StellaRay I'm a Fan of StellaRay 221 fans permalink

This is a very thoughful article with a view far above and beyond the carping of both sides---many interesting insights and a very good read. It is a pleasure to read a well stated, civil argument, whether you agree with it all or not. It is a pleasure to find yourself thinking about it after you read it because it engaged your intellect and your reasoning.

If only there were more of this kind of jouralism. I am not looking forward to the next stop on Palin's Pity Party Press tour----and the endless clips of her innanity, played over and over on every channel, as if there wasn't anything else happening in the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 01/12/2009
- Grannysue I'm a Fan of Grannysue 133 fans permalink
photo

I thought this was a good article, one thing is for sure it's not going to be the same old Government anymore, at least we hope and pray it's not. Time for all the good ol boy's to be good ol gone! All the platuitudes about getting along, flag pins, country first, keeping us safe, while Rome burns belong in the trash, along with Bush his entire administration, and a good many of our Congressmen and Senators on both sides. Time to change the water, the tone, the goal. I think Obama and his administration get it, now if only we can see some progress instead of the same old whiners and obstructionist clamering for the cameras and their paychecks, while doing nothing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 01/12/2009
photo

James "dark horse" Polk was all these..writers need to check presidential history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 01/12/2009
- cdub1991 I'm a Fan of cdub1991 64 fans permalink

Obama has a strong idea of what he wants to accomplish before he is done. That is his driver, more so than party mechanics. That being the case, he is willing to forge his own governing majority, if that's what it takes, and he certainly has the political skill to do so. The danger for the Democrats with this is that such a majority may not survive into a post-Obama period.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 01/12/2009
- ohmetoo I'm a Fan of ohmetoo 27 fans permalink
photo

Yes this was an outstanding piece of journalism. I believe independents made a big difference, and since the election I have returned to the Independent Party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 01/12/2009
photo

Now that's what I call journalism.

And it is spot on. The msm, repubs and dems are all trying to position themselves to stand up to PEBO and find a credible way to attack him. Heck Harry Reid has even found his man parts.

Most of them are too wedded to the old ways and status quo world to get what it is PE is doing and thus have no defense to it.

I believe he absolutely means what he says about bringing change to Washington.

I'm loving it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 01/12/2009
- lynettema I'm a Fan of lynettema 57 fans permalink

The author seems to suggest that only Independents can be moderates or pragmatic. Some of my friends who claim to be Independents are the most RW radicals I know. They are just too cheap to join the Republican Party. We know Conservatives have become radicals as observed over the last 14 years, yet the media treats them as if they are moderates. And yet Conservatives seem to think they should move further to the right to win elections. How much farther to the right can they get? And the media still does not call them out for the radicals they are. 20 years ago, I was considered a moderate - very much like Obama. Today I am considered a liberal while my views haven't changed an iota. I wish someone would explain this phenomena to me. The average voter seems to have figured out that the Conservatives have moved to the radical right. Would that the media would keep up with us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 01/12/2009
- StellaRay I'm a Fan of StellaRay 221 fans permalink

Great post, lynettema.

Calling the GOP conservative seems an oxymoron in these days. They have absolutely pursued a radical course from the war in Iraq to the rape of the middle class through their zealous belief in totally free markets, and a free tax ride for the wealthy. If you look at the taxes the wealthy paid under Eisenhower you begin to understand just how radical the tax cuts for the wealthy have been in the last 30 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 01/12/2009
- TheHandyman I'm a Fan of TheHandyman 111 fans permalink
photo

It is already beginning to show that this so-called "Independant" President is owned by the same wealthy elite and corporatocracy that owns all but a handful of Congress. His so called New Thinkers are the same Old Thinkers that worked for Clinton. Clinton only had a hair breadths seperation from being a Republican and had the Repugs spent as much time working with Clinton as much as they tried to remove him, they could have gotten us where we are much sooner. Clinton enthusiastically embraced the Repub aganda. Some off Obama's appointees are up to their necks in torture, deregulation, genocide, and corruption. So where is the change? If I promise change and I surround myself with people are the source of the problems I face am I a liar or just incompetent?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 01/12/2009

All this blather about BO's position on the political spectrum, and the potential impact of his initial message to the populace...

He is not an independent. He is part of a political organization that, despite its victory in November, remains splintered between right and left - witness all the sneering remarks toward those pesky lefty wing nuts here on HuffPo.

His victory at the polls affords Obama the opportunity to begin addressing the real problems that this country, and the world, have to face. He SHOULD span both sides of the political spectrum but perhaps embrace neither. Any objective (if that's possible) observer will note that draconian corrections are in order and that there will be groups who are ideologically against those changes. Obama will anger a lot of people, myself included, when he promotes legislation or government activity that runs against their base political beliefs. His inaugural address shouldn't be limited to inspirational platitudes, but should focus on pointing out that there must be a severe attitude adjustment for all citizens - that the resources are running out, that the population has already grown too large to maintain, and that secularism and absolute miscegenation are the only applications that can save this world from the self-defeating dogma to which so many people cling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 01/12/2009
- lafrance I'm a Fan of lafrance 40 fans permalink

obama has been redefining things since he was a state senator here. He is not wedded to dogma and is not good at being pinned to anything.
It is funny to see the press scratching their heads as they did in the primary. They clung to their conventional wisdom and kept saying that Obama was not doing things the way a real pol should and would scare off the voters. And yet, he kept defying them. Even progressive ones like Rachel Maddow, who was convinced he was going to lose by trying to pick up red states and when others like Penn. looked at risk. For a week it was all doom is near kind of stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 01/12/2009
- swan1 I'm a Fan of swan1 9 fans permalink

Obama is neither left nor right. He sees things from both sides then has the intelligence to decide the best. Neither the left nor the right is correct on all issues. Both parties have made some horrifc mistakes. I am glad we have a POTUS (Obama) that will put party aside for the betterment of the nation. It is time to grow up and get over the left-right deal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 01/12/2009

The author of this piece needs to lay off the crack pipe. Obama is NOT an Independent is any way, shape or form. He is the most Uber-loyal Democratic Party member in decades to hold office and he will dutifully tow the "Party Line" and govern from conservative/centrist position.

As much as I would love to think of him as an Independent rebel type -there is NOTHING Independent about this guy - he is a Democrat through and through.

Perhaps what the author really meant to say is that he is the First Black President because that "first" is absolutely his honor to own and that would be absolutely true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 01/12/2009
- lafrance I'm a Fan of lafrance 40 fans permalink

the reason you don't see it is that your are too caught up in your ideology and think anyone who is not 100 percent pure is just controlled by a party.
You need to let go of your hard grip to ideology first to see it clearly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 01/12/2009
- vjoseph I'm a Fan of vjoseph 65 fans permalink
photo

QUE?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 01/12/2009
- 111 I'm a Fan of 111 34 fans permalink

i don't get the Independent part. Obama never claimed to be an Independent. He never claimed to be a liberal.

Obama has shown that he is a right leaning DLC democrat who has embraced "political realism" or "real politik".

The only thing that is different is that the POTUS will have brown skin - so? Maybe I'm jaded because I'm from NYC but he would have to do a lot more than have skin a shade darker than mine to shock me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 01/12/2009
- allonfla I'm a Fan of allonfla 39 fans permalink

Obama has claimed to be none of the things you listed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 01/12/2009

Yeah, you are jaded.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 01/12/2009
- vjoseph I'm a Fan of vjoseph 65 fans permalink
photo

YAWN

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 01/12/2009
photo

Watch! Change is Coming!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhtE2EfFXvY

"Not everyone can be president now, but everyone can serve now"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 01/12/2009
- Coinyer101 I'm a Fan of Coinyer101 734 fans permalink
photo

he is a centrist democrat. period. he is not a neocon and he is not a liberal. he is, politically, in the same old center as the last 4 presidents.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 01/12/2009

GWB was in the center? Hardly...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 01/12/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect