iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Issues First Veto Threat

Obama

First Posted: 02/13/09 05:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:00 PM ET

President-elect Barack Obama made his first veto threat Tuesday in a closed-door meeting with Senate Democrats. Obama told his former colleagues that if Congress passes a resolution blocking release of the second half of the financial bailout funds he will veto it, said Sen. Joseph Lieberman after leaving the caucus meeting.

Until today, an Obama veto of a so-called disapproval resolution had been discussed as a theoretical possibility. But the promise made to the Democratic caucus represents a firm stand on behalf of an extension of the $350 billion in Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) funds.

The original TARP legislation required the president to specifically request the second half of the funds. Congress then has fifteen days to disapprove of the request or else the money is dispersed. If Obama vetoes the disapproval, Congress would need a two-thirds majority to override that veto to prevent the money from being spent.

"I was glad that he said that," said Lieberman, an independent who still caucuses with Democrats, of the veto threat. "He made an appeal," he said, arguing that Obama "really needs this extension of the TARP money."

Obama told the caucus, according to Lieberman, that he expected to have the funds by the Presidents Day recess in February. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has also set the recess as a goal, saying that if the deadline wasn't met, there would be no recess.

Obama spoke for about fifteen minutes and then spent much of the rest of the hour-plus meeting answering questions. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) spoke on behalf of increased spending on energy independence and alternative energy as a way to stimulate the economy. "You add up all the benefits of it and it's really quite extraordinary," said Kerry.

A Senate leadership aide said he expects the package to be voted on Friday and doesn't expect it to drag in to the weekend, noting that Senators will have family in town for the inauguration and are less than enthusiastic about coming in to work.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a top Obama surrogate during the campaign, said that Obama repeatedly stressed the urgency of getting access to the TARP funds quickly and spent the bulk of the meeting on the subject. "The single message that was most consistent was that time is of the essence. There's a sense of urgency," she said.

Because of that urgency, McCaskill said, Obama told the group that he understood that the Senate may not have the time it needs to develop a proper oversight package. He asked his former colleagues not to let that slow down the release of the funds, promising to conduct the oversight they expect and operate with transparency.

GOP senators said Tuesday they were not enthusiastic about releasing the second half of the funds. Maine Republican Susan Collins said she is undecided, but that, "Right now, I'd have a lot of reservations about approving any more funding."

If Congress releases the funds without a new oversight bill, it will rely on a gentleman's agreement of sort between congressional Democrats and Obama. The framework for such an agreement was debated in a House Financial Services Committee hearing Tuesday. "This is a 'trust but verify' bill," said committee chairman Barny Frank (D-Mass.).

McCaskill, though, said she thinks Obama may get enough votes out of the Senate to approve the funds, obviating a veto. "We didn't take a caucus vote, but he needs fifty votes out of the caucus. I'd be shocked if he didn't get it," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

President-elect Barack Obama made his first veto threat Tuesday in a closed-door meeting with Senate Democrats. Obama told his former colleagues that if Congress passes a resolution blocking release o...
President-elect Barack Obama made his first veto threat Tuesday in a closed-door meeting with Senate Democrats. Obama told his former colleagues that if Congress passes a resolution blocking release o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,951
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
09:38 AM on 01/19/2009
bwahahah..check out this hilarious video i found of the election duel being fought in the world
of warcraft.. is obama realy an elf??..by far the funniest clip ive seen in weeks..a must watch
for any true warcraft fan!!
http://effinfunny.com/sketch-n-funny/election-duel!
09:32 AM on 01/19/2009
hahah..take that you cynics..despite all the odds he finally made it to this day..a mere 24 hours to go..check out this clip i found of
perhaps the funniest reason he wouldnt have made it to the oval office..:) pure gold..a must watch for anyone who appreciates good political satire
http://effinfunny.com/saleem-muhammed%0D/black-man-president
08:03 AM on 01/16/2009
If anyone doubts the Republicans look out for their own interests at the expense of their country, this should erase ANY doubt whatsoever. They gave Bush (through Paulsen) the first half of the $700B with no oversight, although they held out for lots of pork before they'd agree to it (they knew they'd get it--all they had to do was play hardball). Now, they don't want P-E Obama to have the remaining half, even though their own Republican leader squandered the first half away and did nothing for anyone but bank CEOs with it (CEOs MUST have their bonuses, you know!).

When the economic health of the country is at stake, the Republicans stand firm: No Republican in control, no money. Why does ANYONE still believe in ANYTHING they say?
12:36 AM on 01/16/2009
Just a few more days bush will be gone.!!!!

"bush DID MORE DAMAGE TO AMERICA THEN BIN LADEN AND ALL HIS HATE GROUPS

COULD HAVE EVER, EVER DONE!!!!!

DERUGULATION simply ment to all big bussness ROB+STEAL ROB+STEAL anything you can

DO to get the peoples money DO IT TO THEM, DO IT TO THEM, GET IT, ROB IT, STEAL IT !!!!!
05:48 PM on 01/15/2009
We need to restore the tax laws and rules that were in effect prior to Ronald Reagan. The tax brackets and the interest deduction rules along with the definitions of income that were in place then were better for Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beachbreak
06:19 AM on 01/16/2009
You are making WAY too much sense. And I absolutely agree with you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:52 PM on 01/14/2009
"Obama told the group that he understood that the Senate may not have the time it needs to develop a proper oversight package. He asked his former colleagues not to let that slow down the release of the funds"

That is scary stuff!
08:06 AM on 01/16/2009
Why so scary? The first half went with no oversight to a known group of thieves and liars. Obama has shown to be a man of integrity and great intelligence. I'd rather give it to HIM with no oversight than to the crooks that they gave the first half to!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:43 PM on 01/16/2009
Neither should have funds without oversight. The Senate needs to get its act together and develop an oversight package. I am tired of my government irresponsible spending of my tax dollars. If the companies involved had been subjected to greater oversight, many of our economic problems could have been avoided.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
01:28 PM on 01/14/2009
"Who needs oversight? I'll be good; I promise."

Meet the new boss... same as the old boss.
08:37 AM on 01/16/2009
Definitely not true.

Bush had no integrity and lacked good judgement.

Absolute Contrast: Obama
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:44 PM on 01/16/2009
Show me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bocababs
12:40 PM on 01/14/2009
We need this money if for nothing else to show the country how a transparent Administration is supposed to work, by putting this money to good use while showing the country where it is being applied and why.
12:19 PM on 01/14/2009
KEEP THAT PEN HANDY :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:54 AM on 01/14/2009
This guy is an embarrassment. Why doesn't he shut up until he swears in?
11:56 AM on 01/14/2009
What or who do you mean?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:36 PM on 01/14/2009
gi,
Sorry, I was referring to Obama.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bocababs
12:38 PM on 01/14/2009
I would like to be an embarassement with an approval rating that high.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fishingriver
Citizen
10:34 AM on 01/14/2009
Republican's goal is that Obama fail and the economy worsen. Complete tragedy is the only hope Republicans have for America considering them as an alternative in 2010. They are experienced at wrecking the country and unafraid to sacrifice our well being for political gain.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
01:31 PM on 01/14/2009
Pretty sure this article is about a Democratic President threatening to veto a Democratic Congress. And yet the Republicans are still to blame? Hmmm... they really are a bad party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fishingriver
Citizen
02:26 PM on 01/14/2009
You are right in saying they are.
04:38 PM on 01/14/2009
Two unavoidable truths about our country:
1. Minorities will always blame their problems on white people;

2. Democrats and liberals will always blame EVERYTHING on Republicans and conservatives.
04:28 PM on 01/14/2009
Even if that were true how would it be any differnt from the goals of the Democrats since 2000?
10:11 AM on 01/14/2009
Mitch McConnell, Bonier, and the rest of the Republican leadership want to deny Obama access to the bailout money, while Obama wants access to it.

So the Democrats in congress are going to have to choose whether they are going to support Obama, or are going to support McConnell, Bonior, and the rest of the Republican leadership. There is no way for them to avoid this. That is the choice they are facing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:56 PM on 01/14/2009
Has it escaped you that this should not be a question of siding with Obama or the Republicans, but "Doing the right thing".
Not everything is a Dem/Rep issue...sometimes it's as simple as right/wrong.
09:00 PM on 01/14/2009
Not to dems and libs. For them, if you don't follow the rest of the flock to the koolaid table, there is something wrong with you and they attack en masse! Look at how they treated Joe Lieberman!
09:56 AM on 01/14/2009
Why are the Democrats in congress, who were so pathetically spineless in standing up to Bush how hassling Obama? Are they really going to support the Republican leadership in congress in their effort to deny Obama access to the remainder of the bailout money?

If they side with Mitch McConnell and Bonier and against Obama, so that the resolution to deny Obama access to the funds passes, Obama will be absolutely right in vetoing the the resulution, as he has indicated he will do. The sooner Obama establishes that he will not let the Democrats in congress jerk him around, the better.

In dealing with the Democrats in congress, Obama needs to follow Teddy Roosevelt's advice to speak softly, but carry a big stick.
08:15 PM on 01/15/2009
Maybe the Dems know that if they allow Obama to use that money to underwrite mortgages defaulted by people who bought homes they couldn't afford on credit they should never have qualified for but for government intervention, they will have the devil to pay at the midterm election. This is a lightning rod issue for the millions of Americans who did not overextend themselves and who will be forced to pay for this with higher taxes.

I say let Obama and the lefty Dems on Congress push this issue to the hilt. It will end their encumbency all the sooner.
09:32 AM on 01/14/2009
This is the real Bush legacy. Thousands, perhaps millions, sure no president will do as he promised. And that we'll be cheated and lied to by anyone who we elect. We voted for change, but can't really imagine we'll get it. Is there a better way for Obama to prove he's on the people's side than by assuring the second half or the TARP money helps us? Yes, the real Bush legacy is that we can't even 'trust, but verify.' Too many are sure there can be no trust. So, here's a little reality. The big financial corps never expected to get the second half, even if McCain had been elected. They grabbed what they could get and 'hid' it fast. They knew it would be 'politically expedient' to use the second half to assist the people in a more direct fashion, and 'verification' would be required.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sugarfree
superuser
03:29 PM on 01/14/2009
You know i am tried of Congress, and the House what we have here is power players trying to make
a statement.
Dems, Nancy,Reed and Frank,should quite, Repubs. Mitch McConnell and John Boehner should quite
also.
They say this is TAX-PAYER money and we need over-sight to make sure they get paid back.
My question is was that Tax-payer money we gave to IRAQ?, and will we get paid back i don't so.
Sad we the American voters have to put up with this CRAP year after year and still pay the Politicans.