Bird Strike: What May Have Brought Down The US Air Flight? (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post   |  Danny Shea   |   January 15, 2009 03:56 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

MSNBC is reporting that US Air Flight 1549, which has crashed into New York's Hudson River en route from LaGuardia Airport to Charlotte, NC, may have been felled by a flock of geese in what is known as a bird strike.

While it sounds absurd, the bird strike is a dangerous phenomenon well known to pilots and aviation enthusiasts alike.

Wikipedia says that bird strikes happen most often during take-off or landing, or during a low altitude flight. One potentially serious danger is jet engine ingestion, where the flock of birds is ingested into the engine:

Jet engine ingestion is extremely serious due to the rotation speed of the engine fan and engine design. As the bird strikes a fan blade, that blade can be displaced into another blade and so forth, causing a cascading failure. Jet engines are particularly vulnerable during the takeoff phase when the engine is turning at a very high speed.

As Wikipedia says, and as below photos demonstrate, bird strikes can cause serious danger to aircraft:

Bird strikes can damage vehicle components, or injure passengers. Flocks of birds are especially dangerous, and can lead to multiple strikes, and damage. Depending on the damage, aircraft at low altitudes or during take off and landing often cannot recover in time, and thus crash.

The Bird Strike Committe USA says that bird strikes cause over $600 million in damage in the US each year:

Bird and other wildlife strikes to aircraft annually cause well over $600 million in damage to U.S. civil and military aviation. Furthermore, these strikes put the lives of aircraft crew members and their passengers at risk: over 219 people have been killed worldwide as a result of wildlife strikes since 1988. Within the United States there was no one forum where information or concerns dealing with this problem could be addressed. Bird Strike Committee USA was formed in 1991 to facilitate the exchange of information, promote the collection and analysis of accurate wildlife strike data, promote the development of new technologies for reducing wildlife hazards, promote professionalism in wildlife management programs on airports through training and advocacy of high standards of conduct for airport biologists and bird patrol personnel, and be a liaison to similar organizations in other countries.

Bird strikes do have historical precedence in the United States. The Bird Strike Committee says that five large jet airlines have been brought down by birdstrike since 1975. Here is a list of bird strike occurrences.

Wikipedia also lists various bird strike incidents in the last few years:

In the summer of 2007, Delta Air Lines suffered an incident in Rome, Italy, as one of its B-767 aircraft, on takeoff, ingested yellow legged gulls into both engines. Although the aircraft returned to Rome safely, both engines were damaged and had to be changed. United Air Lines suffered a twin engine bird ingestion by a B-767 on departure from Chicago's O'Hare Field in the spring of 2007. One engine caught fire and bird remains were found in the other engine.


Virgin America Flight 837 performed an emergency landing at San Francisco International Airport on September 3 2007 due to a bird strike. The plane involved was "Air Colbert", named for host of The Colbert Report Stephen Colbert.

Story continues below
advertisement


On April 29, 2007, a Thomsonfly Boeing 757 from Manchester Airport, UK to Lanzarote Airport, Spain suffered a bird strike when at least one bird, supposedly a heron, was ingested by the starboard engine. The plane landed safely back at Manchester Airport a while later. The incident was captured by a plane spotter, as well as the emergency call picked up by a plane spotter's radio. The video was later published.


On November 10, 2008, a Ryanair flight FR4102 Boeing 737 from Frankfurt to Rome made an emergency landing at Ciampino Airport after multiple bird strikes put both engines out of commission. After touchdown, the left main landing gear collapsed, and the aircraft briefly veered off the runway before the crew regained control. Passengers and crew were evacuated through the starboard emergency exits. Three passengers and two crew members were injured, none seriously.


On January 15, 2009, US Airways Flight 1549, headed from New York's LaGuardia Airport to North Carolina, was down in the river after a failed takeoff. A police source said the pilot radioed that he had experienced a bird strike.

See a slideshow of bird strike photos from around the web (WARNING: may be graphic photos):

Watch various Bird Strike Videos:

Bird Strike video 1:

Bird Strike video 2:

Bird Strike video 3:

Bird Strike video 4:

Update: The New Yorker's Avi Zenilman writes that bird strikes were the subject of a 1993 Talk of the Town:

"Birds and planes are just incompatible," Ed Abrams, a supervisor with John F. Kennedy Airport's Bird Hazard Management Program, told Charles Siebert in 1993. (The plane that crashed today left from La Guardia.)


Siebert wrote in The Talk of the Town that J.F.K. implemented "bird sweeps" after a flock of gulls downed a DC-10 in 1975. Abrams rode around the runways with a megaphone, a horn, a starter pistol, and a shotgun. When the thermometer drops, Abrams said, birds flock to the busy runways, which are heated by the warmth of the engines.

MSNBC is reporting that US Air Flight 1549, which has crashed into New York's Hudson River en route from LaGuardia Airport to Charlotte, NC, may have been felled by a flock of geese in what is known a...
MSNBC is reporting that US Air Flight 1549, which has crashed into New York's Hudson River en route from LaGuardia Airport to Charlotte, NC, may have been felled by a flock of geese in what is known a...
 
Comments
178
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- Protoguy I'm a Fan of Protoguy 2 fans permalink

My father is a retired airline pilot and a former crash investigator. This sort of thing is not rare.

I agree that the pilot is a hero - but he's only a hero because he did what he was trained to do. He followed procedure, as did ther rest of the crew there. He didn't make any mistakes - other than not pressing the Ditch Switch which would have closed all the ports and hatches and allowed the plane to stay afloat higher in the water and for longer.

When I saw the report, I told my daughter that I am certain that the cockpit conversation was tight and controlled. "Birdstrike. Engines out. Landing spot? No fields. River. Check."

These guys go through years of training, reinforced with more training, re-reinforced with simulator training. I am even convinced they had training for particular airports and their particular hazards - including where to ditch in a takeoff or landing mishap.

He is a hero, but it shouldn't surprise anyone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 01/19/2009
- XME I'm a Fan of XME 26 fans permalink
photo

Just goes to show...no matter how big and important and superior we think we are on the planet, Mother Nature can woop our butts in a heartbeat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 AM on 01/17/2009

Landfills also attract birds that present a hazard to aircraft. Were there any landfills in proximity to the airport? Although there are rules about having landfills near airports now, some were "grandfathered" in from years ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 01/16/2009

What is even more incredible than the damage a bird can do to a plane, is the amount of damage a PLANE did to the PENTAGON.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 01/16/2009
- OlskoolDem I'm a Fan of OlskoolDem 3 fans permalink

and they never found that planes engins, hmmmmm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 01/16/2009
- Protoguy I'm a Fan of Protoguy 2 fans permalink

They found the engines. The news media reported un-verified info

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 01/19/2009
- MJinCanada I'm a Fan of MJinCanada 103 fans permalink

Unfortunately, almost all the major cities in the world are built on waterways, so many airports are located near marshes, rivers and lakes where waterfowl nest and raptors prey on waterfowl. Removing the water or the birds is environmentally out of the question so perhaps better monitoring of bird traffic is in order?

For certain -- the pilot is amazing, his crew are terrific and the passengers brave and sensible. And all so darned lucky I hope they remembered to buy lottery tickets this week. :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 01/16/2009

It's pretty scary how no one has figured out a way to make planes and helicopters more resilient to these types of incidents. Maybe a lesson will be learned after all....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 01/16/2009
- MoEls I'm a Fan of MoEls 2 fans permalink
photo

Planes are designed to be as light as possible. Each pound counts and costs gasoline. This is why they are designed for the purpose of standing the loading of speed. To make them bird proof would cost too much. At least nowadays they are in a shape that the passengers can be brought down safe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 01/16/2009

Quite a statement: "no one has figured out a way to make planes and helicopters more resilient". Sounds like the same type of gross generalization that rules our politics today - "no one is doing anything!".

The fact is that many people HAVE figured out ways to make our aircraft more resilient. Engines today are much bigger, much more powerful, and much more durable than they have ever been. Countless hours have been dedicated to designing and testing engines to withstand ingesting foreign objects of all kinds and especially birds. Across the US hundreds if not thousands of unfortunate birds a year (though certainly not millions as one hyperventilating poster screamed earlier) make there way through commercial engines. In the vast majority of these cases the modern designs of large chord fan blades do their jobs and the engines suffer little or only minor damage. There are simply limits to what you can reasonably design for, however. Occasionally a large bird will cause pieces of the engine to be broken off (or liberated) somewhere in the early stages of the engine. This liberated material can then cause more serious damage down the line. Even more rarely, the damage caused is severe enough to cause the engine to completely shut down. And EXTREMELY rarely this happens on more than one engine at a time due to a flock of birds. Commercial engines ARE tough - but they can never be made impervious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 01/16/2009

A couple more comments. Putting a grill in front of a modern high-bipass engine (as opposed to a small intake military engine) would be 1.) a large amount of weight 2.) an aerodynamically unacceptable disruption to smooth air flow in the intake 3.) and a large source of metal fragments to be sucked down the engine when it gets punctured by the large bird travelling at high speed it was meant to stop. I also suspect that when the final report on this incident is released you will find that the pilot did not lose complete power on both engines. Based on his ability to control the airplane the way he did and set it down as well as he did, it’s my bet that at least one and possibly both engines were resilient enough to provide some level of thrust even as they were being torn up internally. And, perhaps most importantly, the engines contained all the internal damage rather than slinging hot metal everywhere.

Bottom line, an unfortunate confluence of events occurred, the pilot did his job beautifully, the airplane stayed together due largely to good structural design, the engines did not completely disintegrate and throw metal through the wing and fuselage, and everyone survived a crash that they probably wouldn't have 30 years ago - because lots of hardworking people have figured out how to make aircraft more resilient. It is not time to panic about the safety of our air travel system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 01/16/2009

What you are arguing is that there is a trade-off between the cost of developing a safer engine design and risking the lives of 155 or more people/ flight, currently in favor of taking the risk and saving money. Does it not seem callous that manufacturers and airlines are fully aware of the danger yet willing to pay the insurance premiums and fly a machine that is vulnerable to being taken out by some birds? Titanium and other materials are very light and strong, and I do believe that it is not impossible to design a multimillion dollar engine that would not ingest flying objects that can destroy it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 01/16/2009

Airbus and Boeing aircraft are equipped with a fail-safe hydraulic control in case of both engines being severed and hydraulic lines are minimally severed, which is called the RAT. It, in simplest terms, is a fan-turbine which is retractable from the plane's body which uses the aerodynamic forces flowing over the wing and body of the aircraft to self-propel the turbine and power the hydraulic devices (flaps, landing gear, slats).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 01/17/2009

I think an engine is designed to pulverize one bird or two, then carry on as usual, but an entire flock?
That's gotta be tough. Kudos to the pilot though!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 01/16/2009

A bird, carries the equivalency of 1000 lb's being dropped from 10 ft, when hitting a moving plane at landing speed, let alone take-off speed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 01/17/2009

Unless someone designs software the control tower can use, to detect flocks of birds in the area, on the radar. Seems like that should be possible. Then they could warn the plane beforehand, or ask it to wait to take off, and even let them know mid-flight that there are birds around.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 01/16/2009

Would be impossible as it would register the movement of everything the size of a bird and larger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 01/17/2009
photo

I'm bummed that so many of those appeared to be raptors (who have a surprisingly high 'flight ceiling'). As predators, they're already stressed by humans and all their earthbound nonesense. They can't even get some peace in the great blue yonder.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 01/16/2009

Everyone keeps saying the birds hit the plane.

That is completely backwards. If a child riding a tricycle is hit by a car you don't say "the child hit the car".

Anytime a faster moving object hits a slower one the faster one is the one who did the hitting.

The plane struck the birds is the correct way to say it.

Bird-strike deflects the blame

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 01/16/2009

True, the plane hit the birds. The plane is made by humans,and we are not really supposed to be in the air in the first place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 01/16/2009
photo

WTF! The plane didn't intentionally hit the birds, nor did the birds intentionally hit the plane. It was a collision crash that happened. Let me guess you're one of the PETA members?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 01/16/2009

AGREED! I logged in to say the same thing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 01/16/2009
- gwhizz I'm a Fan of gwhizz 19 fans permalink

The first report I saw (MSNBC) called this latest strike a "bird attack."
As in, "A bird attack is suspected."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 01/16/2009
- Protoguy I'm a Fan of Protoguy 2 fans permalink

It's called bird-strike because that's what it is. A bird struck the plane, the plane struck a bird. Either way it's the same. What are they gonna call it? "Plane-strike"? "Plane-str­uck-bird"?

Too many people wasting too many of their limited brain cells looking for some sort of stupid conspiracy or looking for some way to make it seem like there's an evil undercurrent to everything. It's a phrase used to describe what happened. Get a grip.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 01/19/2009

This pilot saved over a hundred lives due to something out of his control and reacting on instinct. Hero.

Wall Street was given billions to save themselves from a problem they created and reacting on greed. Leeches.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 01/16/2009
- rogerze I'm a Fan of rogerze 4 fans permalink

Does the genius who wrote this article think citing Wikipedia gives you any credibility.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 AM on 01/16/2009
- MJinCanada I'm a Fan of MJinCanada 103 fans permalink

Wikipedia is being constantly updated and anything that is disputed or doesn't have enough verification is clearly marked as such.

Do you doubt that bird strikes are real? A wonderful gentleman I know spent an unexpected weekend in Malaysia some years ago after his plane collided with a turkey buzzard. He was seated behind the wing and the blood spattered on his window.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 01/16/2009
- deevee I'm a Fan of deevee 9 fans permalink
photo

Wikipedia is constantly being updated by anyone with access to a keyboard

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 01/16/2009
- Protoguy I'm a Fan of Protoguy 2 fans permalink

Why would you imply the article writer has a lack of credibility?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 01/19/2009
- getoffmedz I'm a Fan of getoffmedz 110 fans permalink
photo

When all these larger birds are gone, there won't be a problem.

heh

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 01/16/2009
- stimpy I'm a Fan of stimpy 3 fans permalink

Why don't they break the bird unions so they don't strike anymore? It's the new American way...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 01/15/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 107 fans permalink

That's why you never hear about something like this in Tennessee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 01/16/2009
- Betsy I'm a Fan of Betsy 14 fans permalink
photo

One of my favorite movies is "The Edge" with Anthony Hopkins and Alec Baldwin. The plane they're flying in is hit and disabled by migrating birds or geese and the plane nose dives into a freezing lake in the Alaskan wildnerness.

Those on board the plane that went down this afternoon have my sympathy. I can only imagine terror they felt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 PM on 01/15/2009
- Freesia2 I'm a Fan of Freesia2 280 fans permalink

Betsy, that is one of the scariest crashes in movie history. And it happens so fast and so suddenly and your thought is " you've got to be kidding me? Birds??" - til you see what it's doing to the plane.

The US Air pilot deserves a medal. What an amazing flyer and I'm sure the passengers and their families are beyond grateful for his skill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 AM on 01/16/2009

Reminds me of the great Bird Strikes of the 1930s... Solidarity!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 PM on 01/15/2009
- Blueline I'm a Fan of Blueline 3 fans permalink
photo

LMAO!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 01/16/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect