Blagojevich's Lawyer Ed Genson Off Impeachment Trial

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MIKE ROBINSON | January 16, 2009 08:31 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Dec. 22, 2008 file photo, Ed Genson, the lead attorney for impeached Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, argues during the Illinois House Impeachment Committee hearing at the State Capitol in Springfield, Ill.. Blagojevich's attorneys resigned Friday, Jan. 16, 2009, over a Senate impeachment trial that one compared to a "lynching," but Genson said he will still defend him on federal criminal charges. (AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File)

CHICAGO — Ten days before the impeachment trial that could cost Gov. Rod Blagojevich his office, his team of defense lawyers said Friday they have withdrawn from the proceedings, which two of the attorneys compared to a "lynching."

Lead attorney Edward M. Genson disassociated himself from any lynching talk but did say the rules of the state Senate trial, the first of its kind in Illinois history, "were extraordinarily unfair" and assured that the governor would be convicted.

"It's a foregone conclusion," Genson told The Associated Press. He said he decided "a few days ago" not to take part but since then has been directed by Blagojevich not to attend.

"I have been instructed not to participate in the impeachment trial," he said. He said he will still defend Blagojevich on federal charges of fraud and bribery.

Blagojevich was arrested Dec. 9 and charged with planning to trade or sell the U.S. Senate seat left vacant by Barack Obama's election. He was also charged with illegally using his powers to squeeze campaign contributors for money and planning to pressure the Chicago Tribune to fire editorial writers who wanted him impeached.

Attorney Sam Adam and his son, Samuel E. Adam, told the Chicago Tribune they have not had enough time to get ready for the Senate trial and don't have subpoena power to call their own witnesses.

"We cannot and will not degrade our client, ourselves, our oaths and our profession, as well as the office of the governor, by participating in a Potemkin-like lynching proceeding, thus making it appear that the governor is represented by competent counsel when in fact he is not," they said in a statement to the Tribune.

It appeared that Blagojevich's legal advisers were divided, though, with Genson saying that the strongly worded statement given to the Tribune was not from him.

Story continues below
advertisement

"I am not in contact with them," Genson said. Both Adamses are longtime Genson friends who have served as co-counsels in some of his most spectacular trials.

Genson _ a legendary Chicago defense attorney whose clients have included R&B star R. Kelly and media mogul Conrad Black _ represented Blagojevich during impeachment hearings in the Illinois House. He argued that there was no evidence the governor committed a crime and called the impeachment panel's proceedings unfair and perhaps illegal.

House members voted 114-1 last week to impeach Blagojevich, who now faces a trial in the Senate beginning Jan. 26.

The Senate is not considering any delay in the trial because of the attorney shakeup, said Cindy Davidsmeyer, spokeswoman for Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago.

Blagojevich faces long odds in the trial. The jurors are 59 politicians who have often feuded with him and ultimately answer to voters _ who according to polls strongly disapprove of Blagojevich.

And forget about "reasonable doubt." Each senator can decide independently what standard of proof to use in reaching a verdict. Senators can also vote to overturn rulings by the judge presiding over the trial.

A change in legal counsel gives Blagojevich a solid reason to request some delay in the trial, said Ann Lousin, former Illinois House parliamentarian and professor at John Marshall Law School. But the trial for an impeached governor shouldn't be postponed more than a week or so, she said.

Andrew Leipold, a University of Illinois law professor, said it's common to give new attorneys time to get familiar with a case, but the impeachment trial is political, not legal. That means courtroom rules don't always apply.

Genson said he didn't know whether Blagojevich is talking with other lawyers about representing him at the Senate trial.

Samuel E. Adam did not immediately return a phone message left by The Associated Press. Blagojevich spokesman Lucio Guerrero would not comment on the attorneys' decision or who will represent the governor now.

The attorneys' withdrawal was the latest surprising twist in the story that began with Blagojevich's arrest on charges that include plotting to sell or trade Obama's vacant U.S. Senate seat.

Blagojevich finally appointed Roland Burris to the seat and there has been no allegation of any wrongdoing on Burris' part.

Federal prosecutors have until April 7 to produce an indictment against Blagojevich and his co-defendant, former chief of staff John Harris.

The federal investigation of Blagojevich, his administration and his political advisers has been going on for years and until several months ago he had been represented by another law firm. Then it was announced that Genson, a colorful, wisecracking courtroom veteran who has achieved all but legendary status in Chicago, was taking the case.

___

Associated Press Writers Deanna Bellandi in Chicago and Andrea Zelinski in Springfield contributed to this story.

CHICAGO — Ten days before the impeachment trial that could cost Gov. Rod Blagojevich his office, his team of defense lawyers said Friday they have withdrawn from the proceedings, which two of th...
CHICAGO — Ten days before the impeachment trial that could cost Gov. Rod Blagojevich his office, his team of defense lawyers said Friday they have withdrawn from the proceedings, which two of th...
 
Comments
190
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- carnelld I'm a Fan of carnelld 10 fans permalink

Impeachment is a political act. Basically, it is not based on rules of evidence and law associated with court trials.

Why would a learned and experienced lawyer go forward with this type situation. It is already pre-determined what is to happen. The Illinois State Senate changed the rules of the trial to say , among other things,the Governor can not call or subponea witnesses?

George Armstrong Custer did not know what was to happen to his entire troop at the Little Big Horn. Going forward under the outlined rules and pre-determined outcome, it would be tantamount to Custer knowing what we know today, and still getting surrounded at the Little Big Horn.

Even Custer would not be that stupid

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 01/18/2009
- mjb5406 I'm a Fan of mjb5406 20 fans permalink
photo

You make quite a few allegations in your numerous posts here on HuffPo. Time to put up or shut up... what's your source for your allegation that "the Illinois State Senate changed the rules of the trial to say , among other things,the Governor can not call or subpoena witnesses"?

For one thing, there are few. if any, standing rules for conducting an impeachment trial by the Illinois State Senate so, if that's the case, how can you "change" something that is not in place to begin with?

If there is such a standing rule, please quote your source. If you read the statutes. it is the State Senate's responsibility to create the rules each time an impeachment trial is called for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 01/19/2009
- Shozen I'm a Fan of Shozen 8 fans permalink

I seam to remember from my law school days the moral imperative of lawyers to stand up for those being railroaded and facing kangaroo court justice. The greatest honor an attorney could ever aspire to: win over, with compelling rhetoric and unbeatable logic, those who peruse injustice. Why? Oh why, esteemed colleague do you abandon Blagojevich in his darkest hour of need?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 01/18/2009
photo

He's broke - LMAO. So much for lawyer ethics...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 01/18/2009
- katielady I'm a Fan of katielady 19 fans permalink

Hold on there, Kimo Sabe, if an attorney believes he is going to lose, he can bail??????­??????????­?
Well, now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 01/18/2009
- Faxus I'm a Fan of Faxus 12 fans permalink
photo

Oh the world will be a much duller place without Blago to kick around.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 01/18/2009

Is it possible this is a simple case of Pay-Rod running out of money? I assume Gernson gave the boy a discount, but I doubt he'd work for free. Pay-Rod was already complaining about money problems, and obviously he can't grant any political favors to his attorney (involving him in the same crime he's already accused of).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 AM on 01/18/2009
- sloreader I'm a Fan of sloreader 17 fans permalink

Blago's lawyers advised him to step down weeks ago and he ignored them. This looks like a good way to dump a client who refuses common sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 01/18/2009

Those who are complaining about Blago not getting a chance to defend himself need to read the ACTUAL rules adopted for the impeachment trial, which are posted at the Illinois General Assembly website, www.ilga.gov, under "Senate." These rules DO allow the defense to call witnesses and cross examine them. Either Genson didn't bother to read the rules too closely, or he is just blowing smoke -- and I suspect the latter.

The rules adopted by the Illinois Senate are almost exactly the same ones used in President Clinton's impeachment trial. Even though the U.S. Senate was controlled by Republicans at the time, Clinton was still acquitted, so the rules couldn't have been stacked TOO much in favor of the prosecution. Blago himself is an attorney, so he could plead his own case if he wanted to. And he was a member of Congress during the Clinton impeachment, so he should know how impeachments are done.

As for Genson's argument that just talking about committing a crime is no crime, tell that to people who get thrown in jail just for joking about bombs aboard airplanes, or calling in prank bomb threats to schools, or just "talking about" campus shooting rampages, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 01/17/2009
- PuddyKatz I'm a Fan of PuddyKatz 7 fans permalink

Impeachment is not strictly a legal procedure, it is a mix of legal and political. Big deal. It will be fair enough and then they can kick Blag out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 01/17/2009

Potemkin-like lynching proceeding­.....?

Potemkin was in regular frank contact with Catherine the Great
a honesty in operating procedure that Blagojevich cant come close to.

..... why don't these idiots know any history

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 01/17/2009
- naschkatze I'm a Fan of naschkatze 85 fans permalink

"Potemkin was in regular frank contact with Catherine the Great". Classic euphemism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 01/18/2009
- salamanca1 I'm a Fan of salamanca1 6 fans permalink

The stupid lawyers can call his trial before the Senate anything they want. At the end of the day, the Senate , by authority of the state constitution, makes the rules, and will toss his kiester the hell out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 01/17/2009

Blago is guilty of trash talk on the phone. That is not an impeachable offence. This is in fact a lynch mob.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 01/17/2009
- nomobull I'm a Fan of nomobull 45 fans permalink
photo

only because they stopped him before he could carry through. like hiring someone to kill someone but the only reason yoou're not guilty of murder is yu hired an undercover cop instead of an assassin . doi you think for a second he didn't intend te carry out his scheme. in that case i'll borrow from george strait " i got some oceanfront property in arizxona"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 PM on 01/17/2009
- naschkatze I'm a Fan of naschkatze 85 fans permalink

Really? How will we ever know now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 01/18/2009

The people decide what is impeachable. If they don't like the trash talk and decide they want him gone, as over 90% of Illinoisans do, he gets impeached.

Blago does not have some individual right to the office, he's granted his powers by the people. If the people feel he is not using this power to their liking, he gets rightfully impeached. The people giveth and they taketh away to.

Anything less would be undemocratic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 01/18/2009
- tcuoohjohn I'm a Fan of tcuoohjohn 21 fans permalink

Old defense scam....Ge­nson quits. Blagojevich demands a postponement of his impeachment pending the suit he files against Genson. Genson demands a hearing. Genson is allowed to withdraw. Blagojevich demands a further postponement while he seeks new counsel. New counsel demands a postponement so he/she can adequately review the record and prepare a defense...­.Yadda...y­adda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 01/17/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

Hmm. I don't suppose it has anything to do with his client being guilty and losing being a foregone conclusion­...under any rules.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 01/17/2009
photo

Do doubt Eddie was concerned that all of this representation was requiring way to much time away from the feedbag !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 01/17/2009

c'mon,,,thats not nice


pammie

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 01/18/2009
- jeliz I'm a Fan of jeliz 16 fans permalink

"Ed Genson, Learned Attorney, one never to miss an opportunity, sees an opening for lots and lots of free publicity to get his name recognized nationally­." Although having gotten R. Kelly out of his mess is not something one should necessarily be bragging about.

Maybe he knoweth more than he doth tell. Maybe Rod Boy was blackmailed for some free publicity knowing full well there was going to be a "lynching" mentality in the State Senate. And anyone who believes all attorneys are telling the truth needs to sit in on a few legal proceedings or listen to some Senate or Congressional hearings on C-SPAN. After having been a court reporter for 9 years, most of the legal field is greed-driven machine that cares for no one, and many will compromise their values to win regardless of who they ruin in the process.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 01/17/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect