iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Orders Guantanamo Prosecutors To Ask For Trial Freeze

BEN FOX   01/21/09 05:18 PM ET   AP

Guantanamo Detainees

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The Guantanamo Bay war crimes court came to an abrupt halt Wednesday as military judges granted President Barack Obama's request to suspend proceedings while he reviews his predecessor's strategy for prosecuting terrorists.

The judges quickly agreed to a 120-day suspension of the cases of a Canadian accused of killing an American soldier in Afghanistan and five men charged in the Sept. 11 attacks. Similar orders are expected in other pending cases pending before the Guantanamo military commissions.

Judge Stephen Henley, an Army colonel presiding over the Sept. 11 trial, accepted the prosecution argument that it would be in the "interests of justice" to give the new administration time to review the commission process and decide what to do next, a decision tied closely to Obama's pledge to close the detention center.

The five charged in the Sept. 11 attacks had said they wanted to plead guilty to charges that carry potential death sentences and their alleged ringleader, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, told the court he opposes the delay.

"We should continue so we don't go backward, we go forward," said Mohammed, who shrugged off the prospect of a death sentence at a pretrial hearing at the base earlier in the week.

Another judge agreed to a suspension in the case of Canadian Omar Khadr with a one-sentence order.

Obama's order to seek a suspension of the proceedings came just hours after his inauguration.

Prosecutor Clay Trivett said all pending cases should be suspended because the new administration's review of the military commissions system may result in significant changes that could have legal consequences for the defendants.

In Washington, the administration circulated a draft executive order that calls for closing the detention center within a year and reviewing the cases of all the nearly 245 still held. The government would release some, transfer others and put the rest on trial under terms still to be determined. It was not known when Obama intended to issue the order.

The suspension of the war crimes trials "has the practical effect of stopping the process, probably forever," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. William Kuebler, Khadr's defense lawyer.

Khadr, a Toronto native, faces charges that include supporting terrorism and murder for allegedly killing U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Christopher Speer of Albuquerque, New Mexico, with a grenade during a 2002 battle in Afghanistan when he was 15.

Khadr faces up to life in prison if convicted by the military commission. His lawyer says he should now be prosecuted, if at all, in a civilian court, though he would prefer to be repatriated to Canada.

"He is anxious. He doesn't know what's going to happen," Kuebler said after discussing the delay with the 22-year-old prisoner. "But we are all hopeful and somewhat optimistic that this ruling now creates a space for the two governments to do something constructive to solve this case."

Khadr has received little sympathy in Canada, where his family has been called the "first family of terrorism." His father was an alleged al-Qaida militant and financier who was slain by Pakistani forces in 2003, and a brother, Abdullah Khadr, is being held in Canada on a U.S. extradition warrant, accused of supplying weapons to al-Qaida.

Reached in Toronto, Omar Khadr's older sister expressed mixed feelings at the news.

"I'm glad my brother is not going to trial, but I really would have preferred he was coming home, and he's not," Zaynab Khadr said.

War crimes charges are pending against 21 men being held at Guantanamo. Before Obama became president, the U.S. had said it planned to try dozens of detainees in a system created by former President George W. Bush and Congress in 2006 and has faced repeated challenges.

Relatives of Sept. 11 victims, who were at the base this week to observe pretrial hearings, and listened as one of the Sept. 11 defendants said he was "proud" of the attacks, told reporters they oppose halting the trials.

"The safest place to have these trials is Guantanamo Bay. If they were to move to the homeland it would endanger all of us," said Lorraine Arias Believeau of Barnegat, New Jersey, whose brother, Adam Arias, was killed at the World Trade Center.

Jim Riches of Brooklyn, N.Y., whose 29-year-old firefighter son, Jimmy, was killed in the attacks, said he would support another system, but doesn't want to wait much longer. "We'll go along with whatever process it is, but let's get it done. It shouldn't take another eight years," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The Guantanamo Bay war crimes court came to an abrupt halt Wednesday as military judges granted President Barack Obama's request to suspend proceedings while he...
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The Guantanamo Bay war crimes court came to an abrupt halt Wednesday as military judges granted President Barack Obama's request to suspend proceedings while he...
Filed by Dan Duray  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 128
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
03:58 PM on 01/21/2009
We shouldn't execute anyone responsible for the 9/11 attacks - That would be making martyrs of them

which would suit them just fine as they are bored of prison and are ready for their bunch of virgins

waiting in the afterlife.

Kill them and it only encourages other marginalized people into action. We will be the stronger for it

when that place gets closed down.
05:30 PM on 01/21/2009
No need for executions. Just hold them indefinitely until they become blathering incoherents. Then release them to show the next gen. of would be J-dists the true, unglamorous face of the struggle against freedom.
03:37 PM on 01/21/2009
Hey folks, This tactic smells, just like Clinton's "gays in the miliatry tactic".

Obama as Commander in chief does not anyone's approval to close Gitmo, anymore than Bush relied on a military court or congressional approval to open Gitmo.

All it takes is an executive order. All it takes to integrate the Armed Forces for gays is an executive orer.

Have you not forgotten that is how Truman integrated the armed forces? I.E. with an excectuive order.

This is a tactic, in fact I smell neo con or plain conservative influence behind Obama. By allowing this charade to proceed, he gets offf the hook, and he can appear to honor his pledge to progressives.

This progressive isn't fooled. The President can close Gitmo with his pen, and as regards a 120 stay, pure nonsense. Transfer Khalid Sheikh Mohammad to Leavenworth, and if there are no charges against the rest, send them back to their home countries... period. And never, ever do this again.
(And so what they claim their home countries will torture them, they should have thought that before they went on Jihad.. and Jihad is what they did, Allah will honor their sacrifice).
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
zelduh
Democrats: the REAL American patriots.
01:00 PM on 01/21/2009
Obama said there will be no more torture.

With this 120 stay of the prosecution in bogus Military court, the rights of Habeas Corpus may be restored!

What a great thing. The US may regain its self-respect.
12:26 PM on 01/21/2009
Some of the prisoners who were caught on battlefiedls should be re-classified as POWs. No criminal trials are allowed for them. As per Geneva convention, they can be held as long as necessary or sent back to countries of their citizenship.
Define torture. Define the difference between it and allowable interrogation technique.
Exclude evidence obtain under torture.
Try the accused terrorists in military tribunals.

That's it.
12:13 PM on 01/21/2009
YES! Great news. The process of closing Gitmo and giving the prisoners fair trials has begun!
12:04 PM on 01/21/2009
Ehh, so now the prisoners will stay in jail 4 month longer before the trials resume in a new court?
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
01:01 PM on 01/21/2009
But with real trials with access to lawyers, evidence, etc. No show trials.
11:43 AM on 01/21/2009
Although I can sympathize with their anger, pain and grief, unless trials relate directly to someone involved in the actual attack on 9/11/01, I don't believe it is appropriate for victims of the tragedy of that day to appear at any trials for Gitmo prisoners. It seems to me to me the only reason they would be there would be to increase the emotionality level for those hearing cases. Legally that is not right to do. Yes, I want justice for anyone directly involved, but I want justice as proscribed in the laws of our nation or we end up being no better than the people we are trying to defeat. If we lower our standards to their level, we have lost in the long run...and for 7 years we were losing our national soul. I have hope we will find our beter selves again with the institution of OUR constitutional procedures.
11:38 AM on 01/21/2009
This is great news, but it's not all. Read this, particularly the part about rights for the LGBT Community:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/civil_rights/
12:14 PM on 01/21/2009
WOW! Thanks for that link.
11:31 AM on 01/21/2009
I wait for the time when Obama issues the order to close GITMO. It may take time to close it as may things will have to be sorted out as to what to do with those that are being detained, however, the order to close it is the key. Once you force their hand the tail dragging will stop, along with all those excuses and delay tactics.
11:30 AM on 01/21/2009
What a relief. It feels like a weight has been lifted.

Rachel Maddow (I think it was her) said that two dozen detainees had simply been discharged, with a ticket home, but no apology.

Five years imprisonment without cause--can you imagine what that would do to your life? Your job would be gone, and perhaps even your family.

This is such a dark stain on America. It will take decades of hard work to scrub it away.
12:08 PM on 01/21/2009
Hear, hear!
01:06 PM on 01/21/2009
An interrogator recently commented a common sentiment in the military in Iraq, apparantly, that the Abu Ghraib matter, torture and CIA Kidnapping, civilian deaths and Gitmo were prime rallying points for insurgent fighters and the prime motivation to fight the US..... The majority of US casualties in Iraq are the direct result of these actions.
Gitmo is truly a national embarassment, as is the CIA Kidnapping program and torture.... either we condone it and become a tyrannical society like Stalinist Russia or we denounce it and clean house from top to bottom, full accountabiity and all sentences served fully....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
12:23 PM on 01/21/2009
I can't imagine, plus the hatred for America that may not have been there previously. Imagine sitting somewhere, just picked up off the street and shut up in Gitmo for an indefinite period of time with no hearing, no charges, no lawyer.
11:25 AM on 01/21/2009
When we have another attack on our soil, I hope you liberal bloggers will point the finger at where it belongs. Since we now have a democrat as President and the democrats now control congress, the blame will not be able to be shifted as in the past.
11:32 AM on 01/21/2009
The two attacks on American soil occurred before Gitmo was built. Clinton found and prosecuted the perps for the first twin-towers attack. Bush Jr didn't.

If another attack happens on U.S. soil, especially in the first decade or so after Bush Jr's reign of terror, it will undoutedly be due to Bush Jr's failed administration and his wholesale manufacture of terrorists willing to die to attack America.

Bush Jr has left the U.S. in a very weakened, nearly moribund, position, with far more radical enemies than it had before.

That is Bush Jr's legacy.
11:45 AM on 01/21/2009
People like you never shifted the blame anyway...you blamed Clinton for all that happened from 2000-2008 in most cases.
11:24 AM on 01/21/2009
Gitmo detainees should consider themselves very fortunate that they weren't "dispatched" on the battlefield, as they well could have been. But now we learn that at least 61 of the detainees that were released have returned to the battlefield and are again sho oting at Americans. So let's relese the rest of them on "humanitarian" grounds, right?
11:39 AM on 01/21/2009
Until the war in Afghanistan is over those captured should be interned in a POW prision....same applies to Iraq. Anyone captured during war are and should be considered enemy combatants, POW's not war criminals, unless there is proof that they committed a war crime. Just because they fight against us, does not make them a criminal, they are enemy combatants, nothing more or nothing less unless as I said you have concrete proof of war crimes.
We as Americans are setting a very very self destructive presidence here when we attempt to manipulate and redefine war. We need to be wary of this as anything we do and say, including the standards we apply to enemy combatants can and will be used against us during any future wars. Think about this... do we want our captured soldiers placed on trial for murder or terrorism if they are captured on the battle field? They are POW, prisioner's of war, nothing more unless there is concrete proof that they committed a war crime against captured soldiers or civilians.
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
11:56 AM on 01/21/2009
Don't use the word "enemy combatants", use the proper term of POW.

POW is given explicit rights until the Geneva Conventions, which is why Bushco attempted to invent another team, to get around said Conventions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
11:54 AM on 01/21/2009
Having fair trials has consequences; incarcerating enemies as POWs has consequences. Following the Geneva Convention has consequences. The bush adminstration chose none of these paths. And that has consequences too. There is no reason America cannot fight and defeat terrorism and at the same time protect and honor the Constitution. I and many others expect no less.
11:24 AM on 01/21/2009
Everyone has ALWAYS had to sweep up after FRATBRAT GWBush.
Now it's Obama who must do this job.
jaslyn
don't go away mad, just go away
10:48 AM on 01/21/2009
The cowboy mentality of the Bush administration, by bullying to show strength instead of using any brains or intellect, clearly missing in Bush, was abusive, without conscience, unethical, immoral,inhumane, and despicable. To erode ones morals and self respect and humanity by supporting Bush's tactics was an unfortunate outcome of supporting that party, right or wrong; too many have ignored their own consciences because they've always operated under the belief that they owed strict alliances to a party. Bush and Cheney should have blown the roof off of that premise. Axis of evil?: Bush, Cheney, Rove.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:24 AM on 01/21/2009
It's interesting how the republican and Conservative Reicht tro//s are all over the "Bush was booed" article calling liberals and dems as classless yet, when it comes to DUE PROCESS of the LAW for a human being, ending of torture and a shameful wound on the American public such as Guatanamo, they'll FOR the BARBARITY of continued torture.

Again, it goes to show their "me first, sc*ew you" mentality and that heaven forbid we help another human being get a fair and humane trial.
10:46 AM on 01/21/2009
very well said.

They want the law to hit hard as long as they make the law. Honestly, the sooner the USA returns to a just country the better.
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
11:58 AM on 01/21/2009
They have no standards of behavior behind "What I say goes". There is no reason to expect consistency from a group with the behavioral norms of a three year old.