Obama Orders Guantanamo Prosecutors To Ask For Trial Freeze

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Orders Guantanamo Prosecutors To Ask For Trial Freeze stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FOX | January 21, 2009 05:18 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Dec. 6, 2006 file photo, reviewed by the U.S. Military, a shackled detainee, clutching paperwork of some kind, is escorted by two gloved U.S. Military personnel to an Annual Review Board Hearing, inside Camp Delta detention facility, at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, Cuba. Late on Jan. 20, 2009, the Department of Defense issued an order requesting a 120-day halt to Guantanamo Bay trials pending review. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley)

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The Guantanamo Bay war crimes court came to an abrupt halt Wednesday as military judges granted President Barack Obama's request to suspend proceedings while he reviews his predecessor's strategy for prosecuting terrorists.

The judges quickly agreed to a 120-day suspension of the cases of a Canadian accused of killing an American soldier in Afghanistan and five men charged in the Sept. 11 attacks. Similar orders are expected in other pending cases pending before the Guantanamo military commissions.

Judge Stephen Henley, an Army colonel presiding over the Sept. 11 trial, accepted the prosecution argument that it would be in the "interests of justice" to give the new administration time to review the commission process and decide what to do next, a decision tied closely to Obama's pledge to close the detention center.

The five charged in the Sept. 11 attacks had said they wanted to plead guilty to charges that carry potential death sentences and their alleged ringleader, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, told the court he opposes the delay.

"We should continue so we don't go backward, we go forward," said Mohammed, who shrugged off the prospect of a death sentence at a pretrial hearing at the base earlier in the week.

Another judge agreed to a suspension in the case of Canadian Omar Khadr with a one-sentence order.

Obama's order to seek a suspension of the proceedings came just hours after his inauguration.

Prosecutor Clay Trivett said all pending cases should be suspended because the new administration's review of the military commissions system may result in significant changes that could have legal consequences for the defendants.

Story continues below
advertisement

In Washington, the administration circulated a draft executive order that calls for closing the detention center within a year and reviewing the cases of all the nearly 245 still held. The government would release some, transfer others and put the rest on trial under terms still to be determined. It was not known when Obama intended to issue the order.

The suspension of the war crimes trials "has the practical effect of stopping the process, probably forever," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. William Kuebler, Khadr's defense lawyer.

Khadr, a Toronto native, faces charges that include supporting terrorism and murder for allegedly killing U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Christopher Speer of Albuquerque, New Mexico, with a grenade during a 2002 battle in Afghanistan when he was 15.

Khadr faces up to life in prison if convicted by the military commission. His lawyer says he should now be prosecuted, if at all, in a civilian court, though he would prefer to be repatriated to Canada.

"He is anxious. He doesn't know what's going to happen," Kuebler said after discussing the delay with the 22-year-old prisoner. "But we are all hopeful and somewhat optimistic that this ruling now creates a space for the two governments to do something constructive to solve this case."

Khadr has received little sympathy in Canada, where his family has been called the "first family of terrorism." His father was an alleged al-Qaida militant and financier who was slain by Pakistani forces in 2003, and a brother, Abdullah Khadr, is being held in Canada on a U.S. extradition warrant, accused of supplying weapons to al-Qaida.

Reached in Toronto, Omar Khadr's older sister expressed mixed feelings at the news.

"I'm glad my brother is not going to trial, but I really would have preferred he was coming home, and he's not," Zaynab Khadr said.

War crimes charges are pending against 21 men being held at Guantanamo. Before Obama became president, the U.S. had said it planned to try dozens of detainees in a system created by former President George W. Bush and Congress in 2006 and has faced repeated challenges.

Relatives of Sept. 11 victims, who were at the base this week to observe pretrial hearings, and listened as one of the Sept. 11 defendants said he was "proud" of the attacks, told reporters they oppose halting the trials.

"The safest place to have these trials is Guantanamo Bay. If they were to move to the homeland it would endanger all of us," said Lorraine Arias Believeau of Barnegat, New Jersey, whose brother, Adam Arias, was killed at the World Trade Center.

Jim Riches of Brooklyn, N.Y., whose 29-year-old firefighter son, Jimmy, was killed in the attacks, said he would support another system, but doesn't want to wait much longer. "We'll go along with whatever process it is, but let's get it done. It shouldn't take another eight years," he said.

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The Guantanamo Bay war crimes court came to an abrupt halt Wednesday as military judges granted President Barack Obama's request to suspend proceedings while he...
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The Guantanamo Bay war crimes court came to an abrupt halt Wednesday as military judges granted President Barack Obama's request to suspend proceedings while he...
Filed by Dan Duray
 
Comments
128
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- MissAngela I'm a Fan of MissAngela 2 fans permalink

We shouldn't execute anyone responsible for the 9/11 attacks - That would be making martyrs of them

which would suit them just fine as they are bored of prison and are ready for their bunch of virgins

waiting in the afterlife.

Kill them and it only encourages other marginalized people into action. We will be the stronger for it

when that place gets closed down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 01/21/2009

No need for executions. Just hold them indefinitely until they become blathering incoherents. Then release them to show the next gen. of would be J-dists the true, unglamorous face of the struggle against freedom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 01/21/2009

Hey folks, This tactic smells, just like Clinton's "gays in the miliatry tactic".

Obama as Commander in chief does not anyone's approval to close Gitmo, anymore than Bush relied on a military court or congressional approval to open Gitmo.

All it takes is an executive order. All it takes to integrate the Armed Forces for gays is an executive orer.

Have you not forgotten that is how Truman integrated the armed forces? I.E. with an excectuive order.

This is a tactic, in fact I smell neo con or plain conservative influence behind Obama. By allowing this charade to proceed, he gets offf the hook, and he can appear to honor his pledge to progressives.

This progressive isn't fooled. The President can close Gitmo with his pen, and as regards a 120 stay, pure nonsense. Transfer Khalid Sheikh Mohammad to Leavenworth, and if there are no charges against the rest, send them back to their home countries.­.. period. And never, ever do this again.
(And so what they claim their home countries will torture them, they should have thought that before they went on Jihad.. and Jihad is what they did, Allah will honor their sacrifice).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 01/21/2009
- zelduh I'm a Fan of zelduh 3 fans permalink
photo

Obama said there will be no more torture.

With this 120 stay of the prosecution in bogus Military court, the rights of Habeas Corpus may be restored!

What a great thing. The US may regain its self-respect.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 01/21/2009

Some of the prisoners who were caught on battlefiedls should be re-classified as POWs. No criminal trials are allowed for them. As per Geneva convention, they can be held as long as necessary or sent back to countries of their citizenship.
Define torture. Define the difference between it and allowable interrogation technique.
Exclude evidence obtain under torture.
Try the accused terrorists in military tribunals.

That's it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 01/21/2009
photo

YES! Great news. The process of closing Gitmo and giving the prisoners fair trials has begun!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 01/21/2009

Ehh, so now the prisoners will stay in jail 4 month longer before the trials resume in a new court?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 01/21/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 216 fans permalink

But with real trials with access to lawyers, evidence, etc. No show trials.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 01/21/2009
- GeoLee I'm a Fan of GeoLee 62 fans permalink

Although I can sympathize with their anger, pain and grief, unless trials relate directly to someone involved in the actual attack on 9/11/01, I don't believe it is appropriate for victims of the tragedy of that day to appear at any trials for Gitmo prisoners. It seems to me to me the only reason they would be there would be to increase the emotionality level for those hearing cases. Legally that is not right to do. Yes, I want justice for anyone directly involved, but I want justice as proscribed in the laws of our nation or we end up being no better than the people we are trying to defeat. If we lower our standards to their level, we have lost in the long run...and for 7 years we were losing our national soul. I have hope we will find our beter selves again with the institution of OUR constitutional procedures.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 01/21/2009
- bujeeboo I'm a Fan of bujeeboo 6 fans permalink

This is great news, but it's not all. Read this, particularly the part about rights for the LGBT Community:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/civil_rights/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 01/21/2009
photo

WOW! Thanks for that link.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 01/21/2009
- CharlesJ I'm a Fan of CharlesJ 16 fans permalink
photo

I wait for the time when Obama issues the order to close GITMO. It may take time to close it as may things will have to be sorted out as to what to do with those that are being detained, however, the order to close it is the key. Once you force their hand the tail dragging will stop, along with all those excuses and delay tactics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 01/21/2009
photo

What a relief. It feels like a weight has been lifted.

Rachel Maddow (I think it was her) said that two dozen detainees had simply been discharged, with a ticket home, but no apology.

Five years imprisonment without cause--can you imagine what that would do to your life? Your job would be gone, and perhaps even your family.

This is such a dark stain on America. It will take decades of hard work to scrub it away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 01/21/2009
photo

Hear, hear!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 01/21/2009
- lungfish I'm a Fan of lungfish 106 fans permalink
photo

An interrogator recently commented a common sentiment in the military in Iraq, apparantly, that the Abu Ghraib matter, torture and CIA Kidnapping, civilian deaths and Gitmo were prime rallying points for insurgent fighters and the prime motivation to fight the US..... The majority of US casualties in Iraq are the direct result of these actions.
Gitmo is truly a national embarassment, as is the CIA Kidnapping program and torture...­. either we condone it and become a tyrannical society like Stalinist Russia or we denounce it and clean house from top to bottom, full accountabiity and all sentences served fully....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 01/21/2009
- Samalabear I'm a Fan of Samalabear 66 fans permalink
photo

I can't imagine, plus the hatred for America that may not have been there previously. Imagine sitting somewhere, just picked up off the street and shut up in Gitmo for an indefinite period of time with no hearing, no charges, no lawyer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 01/21/2009

When we have another attack on our soil, I hope you liberal bloggers will point the finger at where it belongs. Since we now have a democrat as President and the democrats now control congress, the blame will not be able to be shifted as in the past.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 01/21/2009
photo

The two attacks on American soil occurred before Gitmo was built. Clinton found and prosecuted the perps for the first twin-towers attack. Bush Jr didn't.

If another attack happens on U.S. soil, especially in the first decade or so after Bush Jr's reign of terror, it will undoutedly be due to Bush Jr's failed administration and his wholesale manufacture of terrorists willing to die to attack America.

Bush Jr has left the U.S. in a very weakened, nearly moribund, position, with far more radical enemies than it had before.

That is Bush Jr's legacy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 01/21/2009
- GeoLee I'm a Fan of GeoLee 62 fans permalink

People like you never shifted the blame anyway...y­ou blamed Clinton for all that happened from 2000-2008 in most cases.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 01/21/2009
- NWBrunette I'm a Fan of NWBrunette 59 fans permalink

You mean unlike how the right has blamed Mr. Clinton for every error, every problem, big and small, of the bush administration?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 01/21/2009
- Strywever I'm a Fan of Strywever 28 fans permalink

And the "Democrati­c-controll­ed" Congress, don't forget! The right likes to blame them, too. If I follow their logic all the way through, it seems to me that since Bush wasn't responsible for a darn thing that happened on his watch, they must correspondingly believe there is no need for a President at all.

(Logic clearly isn't their strong suit.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 01/21/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 216 fans permalink

You had better old Obama to your same (low) standards as you held Bush. Remember, even in 2008, we heard repeatedly that everything was Clinton's fault. So that means Obama has a free pass until 2016 using YOUR standards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 01/21/2009
- Caliwoman I'm a Fan of Caliwoman 9 fans permalink

Seems to me 9 11 happened on the Republicans watch. The Republicans couldn't add 2 plus 2 to see it was coming though intelligence warnings were there. If you don't like civil liberties, rule of law, and a Constitutional government, then you can leave and go live in a country that tortures. I suggest Saudi Arabia as a possible place for you and your family. President Washington said no torture, the arrogance of the last administration to think they knew better than him was offensive. Welcome back Constitutional democracy! It is a good day for the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 01/21/2009
- 4Q-N4Q2 I'm a Fan of 4Q-N4Q2 7 fans permalink

Gitmo detainees should consider themselves very fortunate that they weren't "dispatched" on the battlefield, as they well could have been. But now we learn that at least 61 of the detainees that were released have returned to the battlefield and are again sho oting at Americans. So let's relese the rest of them on "humanitarian" grounds, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 01/21/2009
- CharlesJ I'm a Fan of CharlesJ 16 fans permalink
photo

Until the war in Afghanistan is over those captured should be interned in a POW prision...­.same applies to Iraq. Anyone captured during war are and should be considered enemy combatants, POW's not war criminals, unless there is proof that they committed a war crime. Just because they fight against us, does not make them a criminal, they are enemy combatants, nothing more or nothing less unless as I said you have concrete proof of war crimes.
We as Americans are setting a very very self destructive presidence here when we attempt to manipulate and redefine war. We need to be wary of this as anything we do and say, including the standards we apply to enemy combatants can and will be used against us during any future wars. Think about this... do we want our captured soldiers placed on trial for murder or terrorism if they are captured on the battle field? They are POW, prisioner's of war, nothing more unless there is concrete proof that they committed a war crime against captured soldiers or civilians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 01/21/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 216 fans permalink

Don't use the word "enemy combatants", use the proper term of POW.

POW is given explicit rights until the Geneva Conventions, which is why Bushco attempted to invent another team, to get around said Conventions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 01/21/2009
- NWBrunette I'm a Fan of NWBrunette 59 fans permalink

Having fair trials has consequences; incarcerating enemies as POWs has consequences. Following the Geneva Convention has consequences. The bush adminstration chose none of these paths. And that has consequences too. There is no reason America cannot fight and defeat terrorism and at the same time protect and honor the Constitution. I and many others expect no less.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 01/21/2009
- amdezurik I'm a Fan of amdezurik 35 fans permalink

all to many of them were NOT "on the battlefield" but were turned in by bounty hunters just wanting bodies to sell to America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 01/21/2009
photo

Just wanting to sell bodies because of the tribal warfare going on between those who were bought and sold and because of poverty. An absolutely disgraceful practice in America's history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 01/21/2009
photo

Gitmo detainees should consider themselves very fortunate that they weren't "dispatched" on the battlefield, as they well could have been. But now we learn that at least 61 of the detainees that were released have returned to the battlefield and are again sho oting at Americans. So let's relese the rest of them on "humanitarian" grounds, right?

---

If they weren't anti-American before, it's not surprising that they are after a few years at Gitmo.

Doncha think, or doncha?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 01/21/2009
- flatus I'm a Fan of flatus 36 fans permalink
photo

"But now we learn that at least 61 of the detainees ...."

So we are tracking these individuals with what ? Ankle bracelets, satellites, blood hounds, a team of Green Berets, a monthly census? And, oh yeah, can you really blame them after what they have been put through?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 01/21/2009
- darker I'm a Fan of darker 40 fans permalink

Everyone has ALWAYS had to sweep up after FRATBRAT GWBush.
Now it's Obama who must do this job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 01/21/2009
- jaslyn I'm a Fan of jaslyn 23 fans permalink

The cowboy mentality of the Bush administration, by bullying to show strength instead of using any brains or intellect, clearly missing in Bush, was abusive, without conscience, unethical, immoral,inhumane, and despicable. To erode ones morals and self respect and humanity by supporting Bush's tactics was an unfortunate outcome of supporting that party, right or wrong; too many have ignored their own consciences because they've always operated under the belief that they owed strict alliances to a party. Bush and Cheney should have blown the roof off of that premise. Axis of evil?: Bush, Cheney, Rove.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 01/21/2009
photo

It's interesting how the republican and Conservative Reicht tro//s are all over the "Bush was booed" article calling liberals and dems as classless yet, when it comes to DUE PROCESS of the LAW for a human being, ending of torture and a shameful wound on the American public such as Guatanamo, they'll FOR the BARBARITY of continued torture.

Again, it goes to show their "me first, sc*ew you" mentality and that heaven forbid we help another human being get a fair and humane trial.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 01/21/2009

very well said.

They want the law to hit hard as long as they make the law. Honestly, the sooner the USA returns to a just country the better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 01/21/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 216 fans permalink

They have no standards of behavior behind "What I say goes". There is no reason to expect consistency from a group with the behavioral norms of a three year old.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 01/21/2009

Yes. Rush Limbaugh is a CLASS ACT. And the entire Republican Convention was INCREDIBLY classy with Giuliani and Palin making fun of community organizers. And how about the classy way Republicans ran their cammpaign, insinuating Obama was a terrorist of Muslim? Finally, which is worse, booing an incompetent president, or shouting out, "Kill him!" in reference to Obama at a McCain campaign rally? Yes, Republicans are ALWAYS classy. Good point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 01/21/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect