Study: Air Pollution Shortens US Life Span

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALICIA CHANG | January 22, 2009 07:33 AM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

LOS ANGELES — Cleaner air over the past two decades has added nearly five months to average life expectancy in the United States, according to a federally funded study. Researchers said it is the first study to show that reducing air pollution translates into longer lives.

Between 1978 and 2001, Americans' average life span increased almost three years to 77, and as much as 4.8 months of that can be attributed to cleaner air, researchers from Brigham Young University and Harvard School of Public Health reported in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.

Some experts not connected with the study called the gain dramatic.

"It shows that our efforts as a country to control air pollution have been well worth the expense," said Dr. Joel Kaufman, a University of Washington expert on environmental health.

Scientists have long known that the grit in polluted air, or particulates, can lodge deep in the lungs and raise the risk of lung disease, heart attacks and strokes. The grit _ made of dust, soot and various chemicals _ comes from factories, power plants and diesel-powered vehicles.

In 1970, Congress passed a revised Clean Air Act that gave the Environmental Protection Agency the power to set and enforce national standards to protect people from particulate matter, carbon monoxide and other pollutants.

The law is widely credited with improving the nation's air quality through such things as catalytic converters on cars and scrubbers at new factories.

For the study, scientists used government data to track particulate pollution levels over two decades in 51 U.S. cities. They compared these changes to life expectancies calculated from death records and census data. They adjusted the results to take into account other things that might affect life expectancy, such as smoking habits, income, education and migration.

Story continues below
advertisement

On average, particulate matter levels fell from 21 micrograms per cubic meter of air to 14 micrograms per cubic meter in the cities studied. At the same time, Americans lived an average 2.72 years longer.

"We saw that communities that had larger reductions in air pollution on average had larger increases in life expectancies," said the study's lead author, C. Arden Pope III, a Brigham Young epidemiologist.

Pittsburgh and Buffalo, N.Y., which made the most progress cleaning up their air, saw life spans increase by about 10 months. Los Angeles, Indianapolis and St. Louis were among the cities that saw gains in life expectancy of around five months.

The study was partly funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and EPA.

"This finding provides direct confirmation of the population health benefits of mitigating air pollution," Daniel Krewski, who does pollution research at the University of Ottawa in Canada, wrote in an accompanying editorial.

In a statement, the EPA said such studies provide critical information that can help the agency set standards on particulates. EPA data show that average particulate levels nationally have fallen 11 percent since 2000.

Last year, government researchers reported that U.S. life expectancy has surpassed 78 years for the first time. They attributed the increase to falling mortality rates for nine of the 15 leading causes of death, including heart disease, cancer, accidents and diabetes.

___

On the Net:

New England Journal: http://www.nejm.org

LOS ANGELES — Cleaner air over the past two decades has added nearly five months to average life expectancy in the United States, according to a federally funded study. Researchers said it is th...
LOS ANGELES — Cleaner air over the past two decades has added nearly five months to average life expectancy in the United States, according to a federally funded study. Researchers said it is th...
 
Comments
14
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- NWBrunette I'm a Fan of NWBrunette 67 fans permalink

After eight years of Bush with his disinterest in intelligence and his mangling of the English language, its probably helpful to many Americans that obvious truths are restated and documented with scientific rigor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 01/23/2009
photo

C'mon stop being critical of this type of study... You should know
that without the scientific evidence, absolutely nothing would be
done about air pollution. Even with positive proof of harmful air
pollution, it is still hard to accomplish much-needed goals, since
the coal industry, the diesel industry, etc, will bitterly fight any
change for the better, the public health be damned.

Of course with that malfeasant president out of office (we won't
mention names) perhaps the pollution picture can improve, and
lives be saved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 01/22/2009

Why do Republicans hate all life on Earth?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 01/22/2009
photo

A recent study shows that when it rains, things get wet....check please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 01/22/2009
photo

How much did this study cost....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 01/22/2009

Talk about a useless study.

This just in . . .

A new scientific study has found that eating foods high in calories and fat, coupled with absolutely no exercise will cause weight gain.
A new study in physics has concluded that repeatedly punching a brick wall bare-fisted will cause pain and discomfort to your hand.
A new study in economics proves that the more money an individual spends on gasoline for their vehicles, the more miles they will be able to drive with the same car.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 01/22/2009
- benne I'm a Fan of benne 10 fans permalink

This also: study shows that diets don't work. This is not a pointless study, as your words show: No one discusses environmental factors that shorten our lives because they want to curtail the liberty of the individual rather than restrict the actions of corporations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 01/22/2009

Please. It is a useless study probably supported by government funding that gives people useless jobs.

And my diet worked great, thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 01/23/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 167 fans permalink
photo

And this is news..?

First we could do any with diesel buses in our cities easily done and switch them over to running on hydrogen as are almost all buses in Germany already...they emit a known carcinogen NO2...

Buses share a common fueling station so this is much easier done than switching over to hydrogen for automobiles...

Second for California especially they must argue and demand that the Coal Seam Fires In China are addressed and put out..!

These fires burn underground and are a huge source of pollution heat and CO2 and they can be seen from space by the naked eye..!

The pollution from these Coal Seam Fires follow the pollution band and goes right to sunny California which is why Kyoto was a complete joke omitting China the world's greatest polluter or just barely number two and gaining on us...and or Russia another serious polluter..

These fires can now be put out by pumping foam into them which then will extinguish these fires which can burn for decades and some have one in Pennsylvania has been burning nearly 50 years..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 01/22/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 167 fans permalink
photo

Sorry I meant to say, do away with diesel buses, asap..go hydrogen..it's easily done..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 01/22/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

To create hydrogen fuel, you have to burn something else. There is NO pollution savings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 01/22/2009
- Semaj51 I'm a Fan of Semaj51 4 fans permalink
photo

Now exactly HOW does California "demand" that China put out their coal seam fires? These fires are extremely difficult to control requiring hugh amounts of effort and materials.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 01/22/2009

How about the coal seam fires in this country?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 01/23/2009
- Gumby123 I'm a Fan of Gumby123 15 fans permalink
photo

No DUH. How much money did they spend on this study?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 01/22/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect