Kristol's Last Times Column: An Era Of Phoning It In Ends

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

January 26, 2009 08:41 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

It's the end of an era, folks. Specifically, the end of the era where the New York Times offers column space to error-prone neo-conservative Sarah Palin booster Bill Kristol.

Kristol phoned in columns about his magical life: where he'd ponder books sold in airport duty-free shops and spin wild contrafactual fantasies. He was against Obama's inexperience until Sarah Palin forced him to be FOR inexperience. He likes the Wars, and so, attempted to Put A Ring On It, like a Single Lady. He seemed to be wrong about EVERYTHING, all the time, where the election was concerned. He was the last man to believe McCain had a chance at the presidency. At one point, he said on teevee that if the Red Sox could come back in the playoffs, McCain could win the election. But McCain COULDN'T win the election, not ever. All Kristol managed to do was doom the Red Sox.

And he did doom the Red Sox. By God, he doomed them, but good.

Kristol's first column featured an error. I think his next one did, too. Anyway, many of them did, because no one cared enough about what Kristol was writing to check and ensure some measure of quality. 23/6 offered its readers a feature by which you could write your own terrible Bill Kristol column, like the one I write today:

Tuesday's speech on religion by Pat Robertson was an interesting look at the dichotomy between hispanics and white people. No doubt the primary race between Herbert Hoover and Amy Winehouse will entrench each side of the electorate. Just last week Obama and his team were urging Ontario delegates to redo their primary. I used to think that Obama's cynicism would trump the cynicism found in cynics across this great land. Now I wonder.

Eventually Kristol sort of abandoned the whole idea of making an effort, because why not? What was the New York Times looking for in this relationship, anyway?

DUH:

Anyway, the New York Times has abused their readership by printing Kristol's effort-free nonsense for a year, and they've benefited from it because every time he's penned something, people everywhere react with outrage or mocking or fact-checking or criticism, and that's precisely why he was hired in the first place -- not for quality insight, but for the clicks that come from hosting a weekly intellectual highway accident.

At any rate, Bill Kristol's last column is up today. It's about Obama and Reagan and the end of the conservative era and pride and regrets and Harvey Mansfield and Pearl Harbor. Next week, Bill Kristol will be gone, leaving Times readers more time to read Bono's columns about Palm Pilots and counting to fourteen and writing songs with lots of guitar arpeggios.

It's the end of an era, folks. Specifically, the end of the era where the New York Times offers column space to error-prone neo-conservative Sarah Palin booster Bill Kristol. Kristol phoned in col...
It's the end of an era, folks. Specifically, the end of the era where the New York Times offers column space to error-prone neo-conservative Sarah Palin booster Bill Kristol. Kristol phoned in col...
 
Comments
82
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- LaurieLee I'm a Fan of LaurieLee 2 fans permalink

If his father wasn't Irving Krystol he'd be just another unemployed schmoe. He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Can't the Times find another William F. Buckley? I like to read different viewpoints, but most of the conservative commentators offer inaccuracies, fear mongering, xenophobia, tribalism, homophobia, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

Rest in Pieces to thee, the Other Billy Krystol.

You didn't make much sense, ever,

but You Looked MAHVELOUS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 01/27/2009

They all will be biting the dust,the time has come and gone for these
kool-aid"gulpers".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 01/27/2009
- rosal I'm a Fan of rosal 301 fans permalink
photo

What? No more error corrections and retractions? What is the error correction and retraction clerk is going to do? Another person will lose his job!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 PM on 01/26/2009
- Ginger5 I'm a Fan of Ginger5 3 fans permalink

Oh so now the rabid neocon is able to move to the bastion of conservatism and indeed mediocrity.
How about alabama

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 01/26/2009
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 88 fans permalink

Go to Israel Bill - its where you really wanna be-you can swim in the conservatve hostility you love so much.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 01/26/2009
- ladyvoter I'm a Fan of ladyvoter 5 fans permalink

Well, now Crush Boy Kristol will have time to record his secret dreams about Sarah Palin in his little diary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 01/26/2009

YIPEEE!! A tiny measure of justice for the craven, the shameless, the undeserving. I don't know why I took the offense of Kristol's NY Times column so personally. But, I did. It almost became an obsession! I wrote a number of letters to the editor. (3, I think - we're not talking stalker obsession). I feel very relieved. The injustice of Kristol being REWARDED for being so wrong and so craven about a) the Iraq war, b) Sarah Palin, c) advising McCain to go rabidly negative and use Bill Ayers in the campaign - oh, I could go on and on -- the injustice of it just made my blood boil.

Bye bye Bush. Bye bye Kristol. Hello fresh air and change. I love it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 01/26/2009
- Rapid Ray I'm a Fan of Rapid Ray 18 fans permalink
photo

Look at the bright side, Billy...

...now you can devote more time to fawning over Sarah Palin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 01/26/2009
- Slimsmom I'm a Fan of Slimsmom 4 fans permalink

I read the NY Times every day but I cannot recall reading one single column of Kristol's. I get enough lies and obfuscations from Fox News to waste my time reading drivel. I am surprised he lasted a year. Good riddance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 PM on 01/26/2009
- Querent I'm a Fan of Querent 61 fans permalink
photo

Kristol's out. Could the fact he's a national laughingstock have anything to do with it? Kristol has probably done more to discredit conservatism than any other single person, with the possible exception of Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 01/26/2009

Ha!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 01/26/2009
photo

Hey Billie-boy, I hear tell that there's an opening down at the Inquirer for an editor's coffee runner!
Better take it, Bill...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 01/26/2009

Two words: Bahgdad Bob.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 01/26/2009

NYT seems to have celebrity columnist syndrome. Instead of paying for the best investigative journalists out there, they have decided to go with name recognition. It must be a really tough out there if this is what they are reduced to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 01/26/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 141 fans permalink

If the Times expected intellectual honesty from Kristol they were way off the mark. That is why so many of these conservatives spin their fantasies on Fox news which itself deals in false narratives. When conservatives are reduced to using the facts only, their arguments suddenly vanish in smoke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 01/26/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect