Timothy Geithner Confirmed As Treasury Secretary

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Timothy Geithner Confirmed As Treasury Secretary stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURIE KELLMAN | January 26, 2009 10:16 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Vice President Joe Biden swears-in Timothy Geithner, right, as Treasury Secretary at the Treasury Department Monday, Jan. 26, 2009, in Washington, as his wife, Carole Geithner holds the Bible. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

WASHINGTON — New York Federal Reserve Bank President Timothy Geithner won confirmation Monday as President Barack Obama's treasury secretary despite personal tax lapses that turned more than a third of the Senate against him. Obama immediately put him to work fixing an economy in "dangerous jeopardy."

"We can't waste a day," Obama said, standing beside Geithner as he was sworn into office by Vice President Joe Biden.

The Senate voted 60-34 to put Geithner in charge of the administration's economic team as it races to halt the worst financial slide in generations. The swearing-in followed less than an hour later, the administration seeking to emphasize that it was wasting no time in trying to address the financial crisis.

Obama said there had been a "devastating loss in trust and confidence" in the U.S. economy.

In his remarks, Geithner said the new administration would work first to stabilize the financial system and get the economy growing again and then would move to reform the system.

"We are at a point of maximum challenge for our economy and our country," Geithner said to a standing-room only audience in Treasury Department's ornate Cash Room. On hand were Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, now director of Obama's National Economic Council.

Referring to Geithner's tax problems, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Geithner had made amends _ he has paid the taxes and penalties _ and possessed the talent needed to steer the nation out of the crisis.

Geithner, 47, served as undersecretary of the treasury for international affairs during the Clinton administration. As president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, he's been a key player in the government's response to collapsing financial institutions and the housing and credit markets since last summer.

Story continues below
advertisement

The ambivalence dogging lawmakers was reflected in the fact that a third of the chamber voted against Geithner, in large part because of his failure to pay all his taxes on income received from the International Monetary Fund in 2001 and in three subsequent years.

Ten Republicans overlooked that matter and voted for confirmation. One Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, told reporters earlier in the day that he would vote yes, only to change his mind and vote no.

Three Democrats and one independent voted against Geithner's confirmation, including Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., the longest-serving senator in history.

"Had he not been nominated for treasury secretary, it's doubtful that he would have ever paid these taxes," Byrd said in a statement.

For the prevailing majority, the real reason for Geithner's likely confirmation appears to be less a matter of bipartisan cooperation than political survival. Lawmakers of all stripes are eager to set the economy in the right direction long before voters judge their progress in the 2010 midterm elections.

"People make mistakes and commit oversights," said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. "Even the most intelligent and gifted _ two adjectives that certainly apply to Mr. Geithner _ make errors in their financial dealings."

Even so, not everyone was convinced that the need for a speedy confirmation should trump concerns about the candidate. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, didn't buy Geithner's contention that he skipped paying some taxes because he was confused by the complexities of the tax code.

"They were described by the nominee himself as 'careless mistakes,'" Collins said in prepared remarks. "It has become clear to me that this is not merely a matter of complexity leading to mistakes, but of inexcusable negligence."

Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., agreed and noted that his is one of the few voices of dissent.

"Nominees for positions that do not oversee tax reporting and collection have been forced to withdraw their nomination for more minor offenses. They have been ridden out of town on a verbal rail," Enzi told the Senate. "The fact that we're in a global economic crisis is not a reason to overlook these errors."

"The Senate," he scolded, "is not supposed to be a group of 'yes' men."

It wasn't. Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa lined up against the nominee, asking how someone of Geithner's "financial sophistication" could innocently not pay the taxes and then head up the agency that oversees the IRS.

"How can Mr. Geithner speak with any credibility or authority?" Harkin said.

Specter earlier in the day had told WHP radio in Harrisburg, Pa., that he planned to vote for confirmation, only to change his mind and vote no later in the evening.

"I'm prepared to back Obama on this issue," Specter had said in the interview. "The economic situation is so tense right now and I don't want see us go back to square one and wait several weeks or longer for the process to bring in a new treasury secretary."

The 10 Republicans who voted yes were Sens. Bob Corker of Tennessee, John Cornyn of Texas, Mike Crapo of Idaho, John Ensign of Nevada, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, Hatch of Utah, Richard Shelby of Alabama, Olympia Snowe of Maine and George Voinovich of Ohio.

The Democrats voting no were Sens. Byrd, Russell Feingold of Wisconsin and Harkin of Iowa. Also voting no was Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who caucuses with Democrats.

Sens. Kit Bond, R-Mo., Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass. and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., were absent. Senate seats representing Minnesota and New York are vacant.

The Senate Finance Committee approved Geithner's confirmation in an 18-5 vote last week.

WASHINGTON — New York Federal Reserve Bank President Timothy Geithner won confirmation Monday as President Barack Obama's treasury secretary despite personal tax lapses that turned more than a t...
WASHINGTON — New York Federal Reserve Bank President Timothy Geithner won confirmation Monday as President Barack Obama's treasury secretary despite personal tax lapses that turned more than a t...
Filed by Rachel Weiner
 
Comments
725
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
- Beamreach I'm a Fan of Beamreach 4 fans permalink
photo

FWIW Feingold had this to say:

[... while I am troubled by Mr. Geithner's track record on some of the issues that have contributed to the credit market crisis, I do not base my vote on what is, to a certain extent, a matter of policy disagreement.

"Mr. Geithner's tax liability is a different matter, however. I am deeply troubled by his failure to pay the payroll taxes he owed, despite repeated alerts from his employer at the time, the International Monetary Fund, that he was responsible for paying those taxes. Moreover, his earlier interactions with the Internal Revenue Service over his failure to pay sufficient payroll taxes for his household employees make Mr. Geithner's explanations of his failure to pay his own payroll taxes even less satisfactory. The failure to comply with our nation's tax laws would be problematic for any Cabinet nominee, but it is especially disturbing when it involves the individual who will be charged with overseeing the enforcement of our tax laws.

"With the condition the economy is in, and the state of our country's financial institutions, the stakes could not be greater for the next Treasury Secretary. While I could not support his nomination, I respect Mr. Geithner's abilities and I look forward to working with him to address the serious problems facing our country."]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 01/27/2009
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

What would be great is if the IRS stopped ruining the lives of little people. If they can go soft on Geithner, they can go soft on the rest of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 01/27/2009
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 264 fans permalink
photo

But they never do!

:[

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 AM on 01/27/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

Hypocrisy does not work that way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 01/27/2009
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

Yes, having Vitter pass judgment on who is fit to serve, isn't?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

They did not "go soft" on Geithner. He made a mistake that many people make.

So, how many people on your side of the aisle do you suppose have set up off-shore tax shelters to avoid paying US income taxes? To me that's a much greater sin than making an honest mistake on your taxes. That's what I would like to see our IRS concentrate on. During the Bush years, the IRS spent way more time going after the little guy than they did going after the rich tax cheats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 01/27/2009

You missed the big picture.

Geithner did make a presumably 'honest mistake' which the IRS discovered when they audited two years returns.

What Geithner failed to do was to correct his other returns that contained the same 'honest mistake'. It was scrutiny and correction from the Obama people that caused Geithner to cough up the rest of the missing money. He didn't do it on his own.

Did he intentionally hide the 'honest mistake' for the other years? I have no idea - but if it walks like a duck......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 01/27/2009
- Eidolas I'm a Fan of Eidolas 5 fans permalink

Bush who - That retired guy in Texas? What does he have to do with this guy making a "mistake" with his tax filing. Try going four years without paying payroll taxes and see what kind of slack the IRS cuts you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 01/27/2009

yeah, an honest mistake, his kids going off to some camp for years, he was writing it off for big bucks as what? as a business expense? If you think this was an honest mistake you should first put down that crack pipe my friend. He certainly is not the first to get creative on the tax returns, won't be the last. I just wish Obama backedout and chose someone else, but it boils down to who he was, in charge of the Fed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

As Geithner describes himself as apologetic careless and I might add that leads to incompetence.
he and Bernake are pursing a quantitative easing policy where they now buy up the assets they sell, so the snake is eating it's tail.

Whats different in the Treasury they are always adding Zero's to the mix.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

If he was prone to adding zeroes where they don't belong, he would not have the sterling reputation he has and Obama wouldn't have hired him.

God, you conservatives really do need to get over yourselves. There are way more tax cheats among your ranks than there ever could be among ours. And your tax cheats are cheating the government out of millions, not hundreds or thousands.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 01/27/2009
- Eidolas I'm a Fan of Eidolas 5 fans permalink

So, if "they" (whatever that means) have more tax cheats than "you", it's OK that this guy cheated because, after all, it was only "thousands" compared to the "millions" of which you apparently have firsthand knowledge. Something tells me that you would not apply the same economy of scale had this been a Republican nominee - Of course, then it would have been one of "them." This type of partisan thinking gets the country nowhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 01/27/2009

This guy has lots to prove to the American people after not paying his own taxes. The nation will be watching too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 01/27/2009
- teasley I'm a Fan of teasley 6 fans permalink

"The nation will be watching too" Unfortunately they won't. Many believe it is merely a partisan stance to believe that the treasury sec. should pay his taxes. Many others couldn't even tell you his name.And this will be forgotten by most of the rest inside of a week.His name will only be mentioned on these sites the next time Obama installs a crook to some important position. Change we can believe in, indeed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 01/27/2009
- Pulemerci I'm a Fan of Pulemerci 9 fans permalink

I'm curious to know how the Democrat controlled Senate would have voted to confirm a Treasury Secretary appointed by former President Bush that had failed to pay his taxes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 01/27/2009
- MossyOak I'm a Fan of MossyOak 59 fans permalink
photo

What difference does it make? Since the Repubs have been left in the dust bin of history, living in the past must be tempting for you, but you'll have more fun if you join in and enjoy the ride.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 01/27/2009
- huffposeur I'm a Fan of huffposeur 22 fans permalink

"Since the Repubs have been left in the dust bin of history"

LET ME GUESS: one week into the obama administration you think it's time to repeal the 22nd amendment.

by the same token, i bet you think a one party state is the best form of government, as long as that one party has a donkey as its logo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 01/27/2009
- Eidolas I'm a Fan of Eidolas 5 fans permalink

Makes no difference which party is in charge, we see the same sense of entitlement from both sides and they work together to ensure the status quo - That is, a two party political system. Given what I've seen at all levels of government, the Democrats have as much corruption as the Republicans, while the public engages in useless partisan bickering over which side is worse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 AM on 01/27/2009
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 264 fans permalink
photo

MNmommy See Profile I'm a Fan of MNmommy I'm a fan of this user permalink
Heh.

(I'm not allowed to *speak* directly to Abby - could you tell her that it's past time that she read some of Naomi Klein's work...)

Posted 07:47 AM on 01/27/2009
_____________________________________________________________

I prefer the way Tiffany suggests something, without sarcasm and in an adult way. I also prefer that someone who was telling a bunch of us about 10 days ago that we should not use the thread for private, off-topic conversations, not use the thread HERSELF for just that, as MN has been doing today on this thread. If it's past time I read Klein, it's past time you grew up and stopped the games. Your post, above, was completely uneccessary and completely uncalled for .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 01/27/2009
- jdmccl I'm a Fan of jdmccl 4 fans permalink

Too much Mtv on this site, like you know? Games, Drama, lame relationships with Trolls who can't speak face to face but type flames all day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 01/27/2009
- Misha1234 I'm a Fan of Misha1234 106 fans permalink
photo

It was uncalled for. It's hypocritical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 01/27/2009
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

Many of the P O R K expenditures in the 'stick-it-to-us' bill will NOT see the light of day. A major overhaul will occur in the Senate. The CBO has actually released their FULL report and confirmed our fears.......P O R K, P O R K, and more P O R K..............most of the proposed expenditures won't kick in until AFTER 2011!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 AM on 01/27/2009
- lj9283 I'm a Fan of lj9283 67 fans permalink
photo

Please provide a link to the report.

The first time you folks bashed the Bill the fake CBO report didn't exist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 01/27/2009
- Misha1234 I'm a Fan of Misha1234 106 fans permalink
photo

Why are y'all on this thread instead of the main? Just curious.

Good Morning BTW.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 AM on 01/27/2009
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 264 fans permalink
photo

YGM

Morning.

@:)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 AM on 01/27/2009
- Misha1234 I'm a Fan of Misha1234 106 fans permalink
photo

Back @ ya Abby.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 AM on 01/27/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

g'morning, abby!

Another spanking hat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

Good morning. Is there a brand-new main? You must forgive me, it's just my second cup of coffee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 AM on 01/27/2009
- Misha1234 I'm a Fan of Misha1234 106 fans permalink
photo

Yes, but I just looked at the pending 340+. I've been posting just fine, but it is really moving slow.

It's a great article though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 AM on 01/27/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

We didn't think y'all would find us here, Mish.

(You know I don't mean that, I hope. I just wanted to use the "word" "y'all")

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 01/27/2009
- Misha1234 I'm a Fan of Misha1234 106 fans permalink
photo

Be careful. It's one of those words you can't STOP using. I can't think of another word to refer to a group of people.

Use at your own risk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 01/27/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

g'morning Misha!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 01/27/2009
- Misha1234 I'm a Fan of Misha1234 106 fans permalink
photo

GM Bear!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 01/27/2009
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

Though, I believe the confirmation would and (maybe should) have been made regardless of his TAX problems, it's nice to see a LOYAL OPPOSITION taking shape on the RIGHT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

Pronto See Profile I'm a Fan of Pronto I'm a fan of this user permalink
No. I wrote that to Tiff (which, fortunately, she ignored . . . :) . . . ) but I'd NEVER write that to you. I guess abby didn't appreciate being treated like Pronto. I, on the other hand, LOVE to be treated like Pronto.
***********************************************************

You and Superbus would totally miss me if I ignored you. I will never, ever do that to you.

:)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 AM on 01/27/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

You had better not ignore me, Tiff. If you do, you can bet that I really will F L A G AND R E P O R T you!!!!!!!! For example: "F l a g g e d and r e p o r t e d for emotional abandonment"

:)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 01/27/2009
- abby4ever I'm a Fan of abby4ever 264 fans permalink
photo

May I know what you are talking about? How was I treated like Pronto? When? Where?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 01/27/2009
- Pronto I'm a Fan of Pronto 32 fans permalink

abby - Tiff didn't claim that you were treated like Pronto. I did. Tiff re-posted MY post. I was joking, too, by the way. Calm down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 01/27/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

I never realized quite how kookey R on P aul is ...

wonder how President Obama will handle him/his adherents.

Does he have many adherents left?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

He got around 36,000 votes (I think), but he was only a write-in candidate in three states. If you listen to C-Span in the morning you will still hear them calling in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 AM on 01/27/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

Thanks, brynnrose, I'd forgotten about the C-Span callers! He seems to
have retained a small cult following, then.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 AM on 01/27/2009
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

It's amazing how many of his supporters are unaware of some of his kookier views.

I heard enough in 10 mins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 AM on 01/27/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

:-) Kind of like that one guy in every town convinced that aliens are
destined to come "back" and sweep him away to a better existence.

Or maybe that's just my town.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 AM on 01/27/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 379 fans permalink
photo

Batshitcrazy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 01/27/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

LOL ... was hoping to hear that one, MNm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 01/27/2009

He is what you might call batshitcrazy.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 AM on 01/27/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

;-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 01/27/2009
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

Will AG Holder pursue Conyers case against Rove? If so, will Pres Obama let Rahm testify when Fitz's case comes around? I think, soon to be AG Holder will not pursue the Blago case once he is IMPEACHED. He will let it pass away QUIETLY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 01/27/2009
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

My Senator, Burr, continues to surprise me. Now when this 'stick-it-to-us' bill comes around, I'm hoping he does the right thing and VOTES it DOWN!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

Hmm. I just wish you had some of that for the folks who told us that the Eyerackies would fund their own occupation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 AM on 01/27/2009
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

See, apparently, you actually BELIEVED them, thus disappointment.......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

MNmommy,

Did you hear the email from the 58 year old black female Democrat?

I loved it. Pat is loved all around.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 01/27/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 379 fans permalink
photo

Which segment?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 AM on 01/27/2009
photo

It was after the first commercial break with Pat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 01/27/2009
- jazzman I'm a Fan of jazzman 236 fans permalink
photo

Bing! One more confirmed. Two to go.

I notice that on Whitehouse.gov they already have the entire cabinet listed so I'm guessing that Obama's not too worried about Republicans attempts to hold up his choices for Justice or Labor either.

Yuk! Yuk!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 AM on 01/27/2009
- MNmommy I'm a Fan of MNmommy 379 fans permalink
photo

Doesn't the word designate appear with the cabinet members that have yet to be confirmed?

That's how they appeared last week - has that changed?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 01/27/2009
- jazzman I'm a Fan of jazzman 236 fans permalink
photo

No. I was being snarky!! However, even putting the designates up there indicates what Obama expects the outcome will be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 01/27/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect