EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Salazar Likely To Kill Bush Offshore Drilling Plan, Slow Drilling In Rockies

DINA CAPPIELLO and H. JOSEF HEBERT   01/27/09 07:31 PM ET   AP

Salazar

WASHINGTON — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Tuesday the expansion of offshore oil drilling should be worked out with Congress as part of a broad energy blueprint and not independent action by his department.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Salazar indicated the drilling plan the Bush administration left on his desk likely will be scrapped. It would open the entire Atlantic and Pacific coasts for drilling.

Salazar declined to single out any waters considered automatically off limits to oil exploration.

"There are places that are appropriate for exploration and development and there are places that are not," Salazar said in an interview in his spacious and historic office, with a fire roaring in the fireplace beneath a full-length painting of George Washington.

Salazar, who resigned as Colorado senator to join President Barack Obama's Cabinet, said he wants to work closely with Congress on "a plan that makes sense" for offshore oil and gas development, but that any expansion of drilling should be part of a comprehensive energy plan.

Congress last year failed to renew the long-standing moratorium on oil and gas exploration across 85 percent of the nation's Outer Continental Shelf, leaving all waters potentially open to drilling. Congressional Republicans and energy lobbyists have argued against even a partial reimposition by Congress of an offshore drilling ban.

Four days before leaving office, officials in the Bush administration issued a draft of a five-year drilling plan that calls for energy leases to be made available in both the Atlantic and Pacific waters, including vast areas that until recently had been off limits for a quarter century.

But Salazar indicated that plan is all but dead.

"It seems to me the appropriate place to address the OCS and issues like royalty reform would be in the context of an energy bill," said Salazar, referring to Outer Continental Shelf development and an overhaul of the way his department collects royalties from drilling in federal waters.

Scrapping the Bush plan would be a mistake, said House Republican Leader John Boehner. "Moving forward with a reasonable and environmentally safe plan will ultimately lower gasoline prices for American families," the Ohio lawmaker said.

On other subjects during the interview, Salazar:

_Made clear that investigations into the gift and conflict-of-interest scandals at the Minerals Management Service that led to the firing of several people and disciplinary action against others is not yet resolved. He promised further reviews to determine if the investigations "led to the right actions."

_Cautioned against pushing too fast on oil shale development in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah until more is known about the impact on water resources and climate change. Oil shale extraction requires a lot of water that could strain the resources of the Colorado River and huge amounts of electric power that could impact climate change, he said. "We're going to have to be very thoughtful in the way it's going to be developed."

_Promised to review at least 10 "midnight regulatory actions" by the outgoing Bush administration, citing as examples regulations to limit the reach of the Endangered Species Act, oil shale permitting, and oil and gas permits issued near two national parks in Utah.

"I'm troubled by many of the midnight actions by the administration. We'll take a look at them one at a time and make the right decision going forward," said Salazar.

Salazar, 53, who was among a group of Cabinet nominations confirmed unanimously on the day of Obama's inauguration, has been quick to make his presence known at the Interior Department. He addressed employees on Jan. 22 and the next day made a trip to the Statue of Liberty in New York City, a monument managed by the U.S. Park Service. On Tuesday, he conducted separate interviews with a number of news organizations.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Tuesday the expansion of offshore oil drilling should be worked out with Congress as part of a broad energy blueprint and not independent action ...
WASHINGTON — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Tuesday the expansion of offshore oil drilling should be worked out with Congress as part of a broad energy blueprint and not independent action ...
Filed by Dave Burdick  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:34 AM on 01/29/2009
Amen. Too little oil there and what IS there won't be available for 10 years. The North Pacific coast is one of the last areas in America that hasn't been raped and plundered. And now is no time to start.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
03:15 PM on 01/28/2009
That's too bad. I was looking forward to saving 3 cents a gallon in the year 2025.
02:40 AM on 01/28/2009
drill until you have the alternativ­es in play
05:00 PM on 01/28/2009
So that means we don't have to drill any more. We have the alternativ­es. They are called Prius and Insight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
04:12 PM on 02/05/2009
ONLY if we take control of our own resources and quit letting the multinatio­nal corps have them would this be a good 1st step. Otherwise we're just psng them away, again. I remember very well when we opened the north shore of Alaska for drilling to "free ourselves from foreign oil". Well guess what? The vast majority of that petro went to Asia and did precious little to reduce the consumer's costs here. And, did it do anything to free us from foreign oil interests' control? I don't think so.
02:34 AM on 01/28/2009
You are the man Salazar. Help lead us to energy independen­ce.
12:43 AM on 01/28/2009
Great. Brace yourself for higher oil prices. Everyone will be hedging like crazy on this statement.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:43 PM on 01/27/2009
Honey, you are so out there. the fact that you consider our fragile, intact ecosystems "resources­" for Big Energy exploitati­on makes you just as bad as Bush. not that you don't already know it, but here it is again:

THERE IS NO NEED TO SLAUGHTER A SINGLE ACRE OF PUBLIC LAND FOR BIG SOLAR, BIG WIND, BIG TRANSMISSI­ON OR OTHERWISE. we have enormous solar and microwind resources right in our urban load centers - enough to power the US twice over, just with super cheap thin film on existing rooftops and brownfield­s.

please, reconsider your PROFITEERI­NG outlook on our taxpayer-o­wned open spaces. we need to PRESERVE that land, not kill it! the Mojave is also a highly effective carbon-abs­orbing ecosystem - why are you trying to blast it into oblivion? for more GHG-spewin­g transmissi­on? for crappy, inefficien­t Industrial Wind? for water-wast­ing Industrial Solar?

these projects are total dead ends for the environmen­t, ratepayers and taxpayers. please, make yours a CONSERVATI­ON mission, and leave our grandchild­ren a cleaner planet, a lower deficit, and some open spaces by supporting POINT OF USE solutions to the renewable energy needs of the nation. thank you.
05:28 PM on 01/27/2009
The US can drasticall­y reduce our dependence on foreign oil within 10 years if the leasing and permitting processes for domestic drilling are allowed and are expedited. Even though alternativ­e fuels are the best way to go, the technology does not presently exist to allow alternativ­es to replace oil. We are probably looking at 20-30 years or even more before we are able to develop alternativ­es in suffficien­t quantities to make a dent. In the meantime we send billions every year to foreign countries that would be better spent at home. It's not a matter of wanting oil independen­ce or not - it just a matter of when. And if you look seriuosly at the when, then you have to agree that we must increase domestic production of oil for several decades in order to allow time to develop alternativ­e technology
05:41 PM on 01/27/2009
Check the EIA from the Bush administra­tion. They have a report that says significan­t oil will not be produced from the proposed sites in the outer continenta­l shelf for at least another 21 years. Looks like we just have to conserve instead.

http://www­.eia.doe.g­ov/oiaf/ae­o/otherana­lysis/ongr­.html

From the report:

"The projection­s in the OCS access case indicate that access to the Pacific, Atlantic, and eastern Gulf regions would not have a significan­t impact on domestic crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030. "
06:43 PM on 01/27/2009
Try JSheep as a moniker. It fits better.