McCain Blogger Goldfarb: 'I Thought From The Beginning That We Would Lose'

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

January 28, 2009 03:21 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Columbia Journalism Review has an interview with McCain campaign blogger Michael Goldfarb, and it's clear that Goldfarb has emerged from the experience...uhm...well, he has emerged from the experience, anyway. Basically, Goldfarb is mad at the media, and is under the impression that he put one over on them, through his deft blogging about Dungeons and Dragons. I mean, at one point, he compares himself, favorably, to Tucker Bounds, which is just something sane people don't do. "I was a cudgel," Goldfarb enthuses, describing himself as a weapon that you wouldn't bring to any sort of fight if you wanted to be taken even the slightest bit seriously.

Actually, in truth, Goldfarb might be on to something. Check out this description of his time in the McCain campaign:

GOLDFARB: [The McCain campaign] assured me that they were looking for someone to attack the press. And that struck me as a really bad idea, but when a presidential campaign calls up and offers you a job you take it. I didn't think they'd follow through on the claim the way they promised, and I expected to be reined in pretty quickly--end up working on statements and the like. I didn't expect to have free reign to do what I wanted.


Occasionally they would task me with something and I wouldn't get to follow through. Like they were going to throw The New York Times off the plane, I wrote the memo explaining that [decision], and then they changed their minds. But day to day, in terms of picking lines of attack, I was giving a great deal of latitude. I was working with other communication guys--but there was a tremendous amount of latitude and that persisted well beyond the convention, which was surprising. I thought they'd end the blog after the convention. But it wasn't until about three weeks out from the election that I basically stopped blogging, because I decided it wasn't prudent to keep it going. There were other outlets for that. I decided to work on statements, and the blog just became a little bit risky because it didn't have to go through the normal channels. It left the campaign exposed and it left me exposed.

What Goldfarb describes, of course, is a campaign prone to making structurally unsound decisions on a regular basis. Like, say, "suspending his campaign," or "asking Sarah Palin to be vice-president." McCain and his campaign team mostly made structurally unsound decisions, and this is what the media covered. And, not surprisingly, the coverage tended to be unfavorable, especially in a post-pig lipstick environment!

There's also this:

GOLDFARB: I thought from the beginning that we would lose. I'm not a lunatic, the odds were always stacked against McCain. But there were a couple weeks there after the convention where [winning] looked like a possibility. People, for the first time, let themselves think that maybe it was possible that we could win. But then the markets collapsed, and everyone sobered up and realized it was an incredible longshot. But you don't do that because you think you're going to get some cushy job after. As a journalist you want the opportunity to see it from the inside out, and you have a candidate you really like, admire, and respect. You saw it with Linda Douglas and Jay Carney--there's no expectation that a journalist who gets that opportunity is going to pass it up. It's too interesting.

It's hard to pick through the contradictions contained in that paragraph! Joining the campaign wasn't about getting a "cushy job," Goldfarb says, it's about the impossible-to-pass-up opportunity to follow "a candidate you really like, admire, and respect." But Goldfarb clearly DOESN'T like, admire, or respect the candidate or his campaign! If you thought he could win, "from the beginning," you were a "lunatic." If you came to believe it during the campaign, you just needed to "sober up." For all the bitching about the media, the only disingenuous "journalist" who appears in the entire piece is Michael Goldfarb.

Anyway: everything was someone else's fault. If it wasn't the press it was the campaign, and if it wasn't the campaign, it was the stock markets. I guess it wouldn't be SOBER to suggest that at a time when the McCain campaign was in need of some coherent decision making and messaging, Michael Goldfarb was bloggin' about ABBA.

Columbia Journalism Review has an interview with McCain campaign blogger Michael Goldfarb, and it's clear that Goldfarb has emerged from the experience...uhm...well, he has emerged from the experience...
Columbia Journalism Review has an interview with McCain campaign blogger Michael Goldfarb, and it's clear that Goldfarb has emerged from the experience...uhm...well, he has emerged from the experience...
 
Comments
36
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

SO DID THE CLASS OF THE NEW GENERATION :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 01/29/2009
- grf67 I'm a Fan of grf67 35 fans permalink

What a bunch of mindless jerks. It is important that the country wins, not you. Have the republicans ever thought of anyone but themselves?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 AM on 01/29/2009
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 33 fans permalink
photo

Country can win with right leader...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 01/29/2009
photo

Goldfarbs own words are enough to make him look silly, but your assertions go beyond the pale. Twisting the facts to assert points that go way beyond anything he intimated is just weak writing. I haven't voted Republican since 1988, but I don't consider myself a Democrat either (I think of myself as a utilitarian pragmatist, for what that's worth, Obama is my kind of President), so I'm not writing out of a particular ideological bent. Your writing will improve when you don't have to use the words, "in other words," with the added benefit that your readers will get to enjoy a well-written article. Dang, that was kind of snarky, but it's meant well. If I didn't care I wouldn't waste the time on this comment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 AM on 01/29/2009

I know a lot of Republicans that wanted him instead of Bush the first time around but did not vote for him this time. The sad fact is that the party betrayed him and he remained loyal to the party line-not himself. In his defense, his party does not allow dissent. His sacrifices and bravery in the past will always be over shadowed by the parties actions and Palin-utterly tragic. We should at least remember his bravery and past sacrifices for this nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 01/28/2009
- gatogato I'm a Fan of gatogato 59 fans permalink
photo

Baloney. Before his war hero days and after he has shown himself to be less than heroic. Leaving your disabled wife to marry your mistress (Cindy) is hardly the stuff of a hero. The Keating 5 isn't either.
He did not put country first in his campaign. He put his own ambitions and ran a filthy shameful campaign and got his butt handed to him. He did and said anything to win and lost and I could not be happier.
He is the one who made us forget about his sacrifices. He is not the man he once was - that is for sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 01/28/2009

I really get tired of hearing about McCain's sacrifices for his country. His sympathizers try to make it sound like he is THE American Hero. I know of 57,000 or so American heroes who made the ultimate sacrifice in Viet Nam, some of them my friends and all of them my comrades.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 01/28/2009
photo

Sure it wasn't "I thought form the beginning we had a loser." ??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 01/28/2009
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 61 fans permalink
photo

Hey Goldfarb, I ALSO thought from the beginning you were going to lose. Millions of us did - this is not news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 01/28/2009
- Grunty1 I'm a Fan of Grunty1 216 fans permalink

[And that struck me as a really bad idea, but when a presidential campaign calls up and offers you a job you take it.]

Do I even need to type anything to get my point across?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 01/28/2009
- denholt I'm a Fan of denholt 6 fans permalink

Fans of S arah P alin will tell you that it was the economy, not Ms. Palin, which cost Mc Cain votes.

They conveniently ignore the fact that the Couric interviews aired at exactly the same time that the economy took its first major dive into the tank.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 01/28/2009
photo


If anything that helped Palin, as it diverted attention from her inglorious ignorance.

Fans should encourage Palin to use her gifts in the world of entertainment - talk show host, reality show star or country singer. Then they could applaud her every move without risking damage to women, the environment and America's foreign interests.

nailinpali­nnow.blogs­pot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 01/28/2009
- teacheng I'm a Fan of teacheng 4 fans permalink

Not to mention the first debate, which the public thought Obama won handily.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 01/28/2009
photo

Sounds like everybody here is bashing Goldfarb. I for one welcomed this interview. He confirmed my analysis of Nov. 30th on nailinpalinnow - Sarah Palin DID think that Africa was a country, she was a diva on the campaign trail, an insider who was supposed to protect her was so repulsed by her that he/she did the unthinkable and told the truth regarding BS or Bad Sarah. Then Repubs tried to cover these embarrasing leaks up by calling it a hoax.

This story is important. Bad Sarah does not now get a free pass on her ignorance. I know people who are undecided about Palin and it makes a difference to these people that she was actually this ignorant, and that the media wasn't just "attacking her with made up lies."

Please visit nailinpali­nnow.blogs­pot.com

for details on this story and topical information on exactly why BS Palin is unfit to hold public office.

And thanks, Goldfarb, for telling it like it was in this interview.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 01/28/2009
photo

Well, Well well, someone has figured out that "losers never win". Nice backbiting though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 01/28/2009
- Dhammi I'm a Fan of Dhammi 11 fans permalink
photo

I hope the nit-wit pick for VP choses Goldfarb if she is actually narcissistic enough to run in 2012. They will make a grand fit and will be doing America a favor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 01/28/2009
- zendem1 I'm a Fan of zendem1 108 fans permalink

"Well, I thought we would lose, and then we picked Palin, and that really sealed the deal. Then I knew we would lose because, well, because, she's an ignorant dicwad."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 01/28/2009
- memphisdem I'm a Fan of memphisdem 6 fans permalink
photo

GOLDFARB: I thought from the beginning that we would lose. I'm not a lunatic...

Yes you are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 01/28/2009
- Martha12 I'm a Fan of Martha12 92 fans permalink
photo

Goldfarb=l­oooooooooo­oooooooooo­oooooooooo­oooooooooo­ser

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 01/28/2009

The McCain campaign had no place to go but down especially when they picked a nit-wit for VP, sure glad they lost, that was all they could do that was right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 01/28/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect