New York Times Profit Tumbles, Ad Revenue Down, Explores Red Sox Sale

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANICK JESDANUN | January 28, 2009 05:17 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Jan. 21, 2009 file photo, a newspaper vendor displays the New York Times and a magazine featuring President Barack Obama, in downtown Seattle. The New York Times Co. said Wednesday, Jan. 28, 2009, earnings plunged 48 percent in the fourth quarter because of lower advertising revenue in a weak economy. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)

NEW YORK — The New York Times Co. said Wednesday that fourth-quarter earnings plunged 48 percent and online sales fell for the first time as the recession depressed spending by advertisers. The results still beat analyst estimates, and its shares rose nearly 7 percent.

The Times also announced it has retained investment firm Goldman Sachs to help explore a sale of its 17.8 percent stake in New England Sports Ventures, which owns the Boston Red Sox baseball team, Fenway Park, a portion of a cable sports network and other properties.

The Times company, which publishes the Times, The Boston Globe, the International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers, earned $27.6 million, or 19 cents a share, in the October-December period, compared with $53 million, or 37 cents per share, in the same quarter of 2007.

Excluding various one-time charges, earnings totaled 36 cents a share, above the 27 cents per share that analysts polled by Thomson Reuters had expected.

Shares in the company rose 38 cents, or 6.8 percent, to close at $5.98.

Revenue totaled $772.1 million in the fourth quarter, slightly above expectations of $767.5 million but 11 percent below the $865.8 million in the year-ago period.

Like other newspaper companies, the Times has suffered from plunging ad revenue as the recession exacerbates weaknesses from the migration of readers to the Internet. Last week, Lee Enterprises Inc., publisher of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and other newspapers, said its fiscal first-quarter earnings tumbled 69 percent. Media General Inc. and Gannett Co. report their results later this week.

"The disruptions of the global economy are affecting all businesses and industries, especially companies, such as ours, that generate a significant portion of their revenues from advertising," said Janet L. Robinson, the company's chief executive.

Story continues below
advertisement

Robinson said the company has responded by cutting its dividend by 74 percent and agreeing to a $250 million cash infusion from Mexican financier Carlos Slim, which comes at a hefty 14 percent interest rate.

In a setback for the Times' digital ambitions, the company reported that Internet revenue decreased 2.9 percent to $92.5 million and online ad sales fell 3.5 percent to $81.9 million on weak sales in graphical display ads, where the Times newspaper site has typically shined given its brand and audience.

Although online revenue represents only 12 percent of total revenue, an increase from 11 percent at the same point a year earlier, that is where the Times and other newspapers are pinning their hopes for the future.

Online advertising has been slowing across the industry after years of rapid growth. The latest numbers show that even the Internet isn't immune to the weak economy, and advertisers might be spending their smaller budgets on the tried and true.

"As people hunker down, they are probably less inclined to try new things," said Rick Edmonds, a media business analyst for the journalism think tank Poynter Institute.

In print, the company saw increases from financial services trying to reassure their customers and from advocacy groups tapping into the political campaigns and worries about the economy and the environment. That was offset by declines from studios releasing fewer films and publishers delaying new book releases.

The current quarter so far doesn't look much brighter.

Robinson said print ad revenue was dropping faster in January compared with December as retailers pull back following a disappointing fourth quarter. She said January's online decline was stable compared with December, when digital ad revenue fell 12.7 percent, the second consecutive month of reductions.

Overall ad revenue in the news media group, which includes newspaper Web sites but not About.com, fell 18 percent during the fourth quarter, the steepest quarterly drop all year, though the decline in December wasn't as steep as the previous two months.

The Times company did see a 3.7 percent gain in circulation revenue to $234 million, largely resulting from higher prices at the Times, the Globe and other papers.

Debt stood at $1.1 billion at year's end.

The Times has been trying to raise $225 million from its new, 52-story midtown Manhattan headquarters, either by selling the building and leasing it back or borrowing against it. Times officials have refused to disclose the full value of the building, and the city assessor's office has been unable to provide it.

Wednesday's announcement on the hiring of Goldman Sachs confirms the company's interest in selling the stake in the Red Sox and related properties. Barclays Capital credit analyst Hale Holden has valued the Times stake in those properties at $140 million to $166 million.

During the quarter, the Times took an accounting charge of $19.2 million, or 7 cents a share, to reflect the declining value of the International Herald Tribune as revenue prospects worsen. The company also charged $24.1 million, or 10 cents a share, for severance costs related to the closure of a retail and newsstand distribution subsidiary.

The Times also said that its pension obligation is underfunded by about $625 million because of market declines. The company said it might have to fund the deficiency over seven years, although no contributions will likely be required in 2009.

For the full year, the Times reported a net loss of $57.8 million, or 40 cents a share, compared with net income of $208.7 million, or $1.45 per share, in 2007. Sales fell 7.7 percent to $2.95 billion.

___

AP Business Writer Andrew Vanacore in New York contributed to this story.

NEW YORK — The New York Times Co. said Wednesday that fourth-quarter earnings plunged 48 percent and online sales fell for the first time as the recession depressed spending by advertisers. The ...
NEW YORK — The New York Times Co. said Wednesday that fourth-quarter earnings plunged 48 percent and online sales fell for the first time as the recession depressed spending by advertisers. The ...
 
Comments
30
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- lmvd3 I'm a Fan of lmvd3 18 fans permalink

My recommendation? Subscribe. I'm nowhere near New York, and still I subscribe to the NY Times-- delivered nice and dry to my driveway by 6 a.m. every morning. I love it waking up to a hot cup of coffee and the Times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 01/29/2009
- andyg I'm a Fan of andyg 5 fans permalink

Maybe they can get some money of caroline kennedy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 AM on 01/29/2009

After more than 8 years kowtowing to the right wing, hiring Kristol, and all the shoddy reporting (even now they bury important news in the back pages) they find themselves hurting? Hmmm, I wonder why? They are as pathetic as the US auto industry executives who seem blind to the writing on the wall.

The Times executives have tarnished the brand beyond repair. Good riddance. I hope all the other major media outlets who forsake journalism for infotainment soon follow suit. There is an urgent need for unbiased, fact-based reporting that can stand up to spin and smears -- from all sides. If media outlets like the Times can't deliver, then I'll just tune in to the best infotainment out there: The Daily Show and The Colbert Report.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 AM on 01/29/2009

Hmm... I think Goldman Sachs should contact Red Sox Nation. I, for one, would be willing to buy in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 01/28/2009
- dhfsfc I'm a Fan of dhfsfc 6 fans permalink

Jason Blair. . . Judith Miller. . . hiding the Plame story until after Bush's 2nd "election" . . . And never, ever admitting fault.

THIS is a newspaper??????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 01/28/2009

There is nothing like reading the real newspaper. I think the company should intensify efforts to sell subscriptions. I got no problem giving up Starbucks, as they burn inferior beans and are only selling crap of all kinds, but giving up the Times in the morning would be very hard!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 01/28/2009
- Daniboy I'm a Fan of Daniboy 19 fans permalink

It's all Bil Kristols fault. No more conservatives!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 01/28/2009

I read the NYT every day. It'll be sad to have them cut back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 01/28/2009

As long as they keep annoying people with login to their site to read each freaking redirected article, they'll keep losing. I don't bother to even click anymore on NYT articles because of that. They conditioned me well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 01/28/2009

Things are really looking bleak at The NYT.

What will Pinch do if the lease deal doesn't work, or the Pesos from the Mexican bigshot aren't enough? Will the Times Center bring enough revenue now that CSPAN is cablecasting events from that space?

How about selling climbing tickets!

It's not such a crazy idea.

Put a ticket booth out on 8th Ave., rig up a set of long bungee safety lines from the building's roof.

Charge according to skill level, and expected height. Let's say $20 for 20 floors, $100 for the full climb.

They could also set up bleachers on various floors ($5 for spectators), and Pinch could act as an MC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 01/28/2009
- DennyCrane I'm a Fan of DennyCrane 23 fans permalink

That's what happens when you hire people like Judy Miller and Bill Kristol.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 01/28/2009
- Bystander I'm a Fan of Bystander 8 fans permalink

No, it's because the NYT is no longer an honest, objective source of news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 01/28/2009

About 1 year ago I was a NY Times suscriber but cancelled my subscription after the hit piece on the bogus John McCain affair that any High School paper in the country wouldn't have went with. If the story would have had any legs or anyone else would have went with it other than MSNBC and the NY Times it would have been good reporting.

I did not vote for McCain but rather Bob Barr this election but really believe the the news industry relies on TRUST and that as almost important as the stories themselves. Once that trust is gone, expect to see your readership base walk away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 01/28/2009
photo

I love reading the NYT. They have great columnists, and they have a good online site. However, I will say that they are persnickety about allowing comments. I've also had some customer service issues when I subscribed.

Still, the paper itself is great. I would be heartbroken if it went under.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 01/28/2009

Love the Times...st­ill my home page. As objective as one finds these days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 01/28/2009
- tfoley I'm a Fan of tfoley 3 fans permalink

Your kidding, right? At least when I read Huffpost or Drudge I know what bias Im reading, while NYTimes pretends to be fair it clearly slants left

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 01/28/2009

Come on, they made a profit!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 01/28/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect