GOP Rep: We Can't Be "The Party Of No"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |  Rachel Weiner   |   January 29, 2009 08:39 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

In an editorial in Politico, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor says that Republicans can't simply be the "no" party.

At a moment when the country needs our help, it would be a great mistake for the House GOP to turn inward and simply become the party of "no." We want our new president to succeed, and America needs our new President to succeed, which is why we will contribute the full force of our ideas to help him navigate the choppy waters. That's why our leadership met with the president three times to offer him our ideas on the stimulus, including among other proposals a reduction in small business tax liability by 20 percent.

Of course, all 178 Republicans in the House refused to vote for the stimulus package. And while they requested one meeting with Obama, it was the president who invited them in and brought them back twice. Not only did he listen to Republican ideas, he incorporated them into the stimulus -- including tax cuts and asking for some Democratic provisions to be removed.

So the Republicans have pinned the blame on a different Democrat. "The onus is on Speaker Pelosi. She needs to meet with us," Cantor said after the vote. "She needs to open her doors. We need to begin to work truly in a bipartisan fashion."

Read the whole editorial here.

In an editorial in Politico, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor says that Republicans can't simply be the "no" party. At a moment when the country needs our help, it would be a great mistake for the H...
In an editorial in Politico, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor says that Republicans can't simply be the "no" party. At a moment when the country needs our help, it would be a great mistake for the H...
 
Comments
681
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
photo

How about the Party of "O" -- as in OBSTRUCT?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 AM on 01/31/2009
- rasit I'm a Fan of rasit 10 fans permalink

Cantor: Democrats are the majority, Nancy Pelosi will meet with ya all, when she is ready to do so....She DOESN'T have to.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 01/30/2009
- rasit I'm a Fan of rasit 10 fans permalink

BUT, YOU ARE!!!

DEEDS COUNT, NOT JUST BS!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 01/30/2009
- TomInJax I'm a Fan of TomInJax 21 fans permalink
photo

...Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

God I love Shakespeare.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 01/30/2009
- lunchlady I'm a Fan of lunchlady 17 fans permalink

No vision. No plan. No bipartisanship. No leaders. I could go on all day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 01/30/2009
photo

Just say 'yes' to 'no', Eric. It's what you're good at. If we want ideas, we'll talk to someone else.

Enjoy the view from outside the White House. You guys won't be getting back in for a very long time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 01/30/2009

http://www.pubrecord.org/law/654-rove-has-absolute-immunity-ex-white-house-counsel-says.html

Rove Has 'Absolute Immunity', Ex-White House Counsel Says

One of former President Bush’s last acts before he left office was to have White House Counsel Fred Fielding write a letter stating that Rove was protected by “absolute immunity” and that he can legally ignore a congressional subpoena.

The letter Fielding wrote was addressed to Robert Luskin, Rove’s longtime Washington, D.C. attorney. It appears that Luskin requested the letter on behalf of Rove who was likely aware that Congress would continue to pursue his testimony after Bush left office.

“On behalf of your client, former Senior Adviser to the President Karl Rove, you have previously asked us whether, in view of the President’s assertion of Executive Privilege over Mr. Rove’s testimony relating to the U.S. Attorneys matter, he must appear, give testimony, and produce documents to the House Judiciary Committee," Fielding’s letter says, according to a copy obtained by The Public Record. “We have previously been advised by the Department of Justice that Mr. Rove has absolute immunity from compelled Congressional testimony as to matters occurring while he was senior adviser to the president.”

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 01/30/2009
- isisdawnra I'm a Fan of isisdawnra 3 fans permalink

Finally, we hear something intelligent from the GOP

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 01/30/2009
- seenitall I'm a Fan of seenitall 9 fans permalink
photo

what he means is, they can't be the party of no, but hell no!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 01/30/2009
- richdoll I'm a Fan of richdoll 5 fans permalink

it's time to vote mr cantor out of office

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 01/30/2009
- grata2ude I'm a Fan of grata2ude 61 fans permalink

Did another Republican just burp? do they realize how totally insignificant the GOP has become.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 01/30/2009

we will see how fast Nancy destroy's the Democrats. If the Democrat;s were smart they would figure out how to remove her from the Speakers role. she is a wing nut. and a big problem for Obama.You know why? She has no respect from her peer's. without respect no one will follow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 01/31/2009
- jadeba I'm a Fan of jadeba 9 fans permalink

Too late, the "r"s already have proven they maintain their "party of no" status. They are rapidly proving to the country why they are hypocritical, passe and irrelevant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 01/30/2009
- labman57 I'm a Fan of labman57 36 fans permalink
photo

Actions speak louder than words. All evidence points toward the GOP embracing the slogan, "No you can't!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 01/30/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 94 fans permalink

I like that:

Democrats: YES WE CAN!

Republicans: NO WE CANNOT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 01/30/2009
- Spinman I'm a Fan of Spinman 4 fans permalink
photo

Democrats: Yes, we can.
Republicans: No, we won't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 02/01/2009
photo

This is amazing, the loosing party , GOP Members of the House , go and write there own stimulus plan, line with TAX CUT, TAX CUT and very LITTLE to fix falling bridges, crumbling schools, train new teachers and increase their salary etc. Failing to recognize that their way of doing business for the last 8 years has been REJECTED on Nov 4th by the majority of the American people. Cantor, Boehner and the rest of the SOUR PUSS Bush Republicans, need to be taught a reality check lesson!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 AM on 01/30/2009
- likeicare I'm a Fan of likeicare 8 fans permalink

If Cantor says the party shouldn't be known as the party of "no," why is that all we seem to be hearing from them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 01/30/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect

 

svn