Exxon Mobil Reports Record $45.2 Billion Profit For 2008

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Exxon Mobil Reports Record $45.2 Billion Profit For 2008 stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOHN PORRETTO | 01/30/09 02:21 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this May 1, 2008 file photo, a truck passes a pump at an Exxon Mobil station in Williamsville, N.Y. ExxonMobil Corp. shatters U.S. record with $45.2 billion annual profit Friday, Jan. 30, 2009, despite year-end oil plunge. (AP Photo/David Duprey, file)

HOUSTON — Exxon Mobil Corp. on Friday reported a profit of $45.2 billion for 2008, breaking its own record for a U.S. company, even as its fourth-quarter earnings fell 33 percent from a year ago.

The previous record for annual profit was $40.6 billion, which the world's largest publicly traded oil company set in 2007.

The extraordinary full-year profit wasn't a surprise given crude's triple-digit price for much of 2008, peaking near an unheard of $150 a barrel in July. Since then, however, prices have fallen roughly 70 percent amid a deepening global economic crisis.

In the fourth quarter alone crude tumbled 60 percent, prompting spending and job cuts in an industry that was reporting robust, often record, profits as recently as last summer.

With piles of cash and diversified operations, the majors like Exxon Mobil have fared better than many smaller oil and gas companies, but Friday's results show no one is completely insulated from the ongoing malaise.

Irving, Texas-based Exxon said net income slid sharply to $7.8 billion, or $1.55 a share, in the October-December period. That compared with $11.7 billion, or $2.13 a share, in the same period a year ago, when Exxon set a U.S. record for quarterly profit. It has since topped that mark twice, first in last year's second quarter and then with earnings of $14.83 billion in the third quarter.

Revenue in the most-recent quarter fell 27 percent to $84.7 billion.

Both the per-share and revenue results topped Wall Street forecasts. On average, analysts expected the company to earn $1.45 a share in the latest quarter on revenue of $69.1 billion, according to Thomson Reuters.

Story continues below

Shares rose $1.52, or 2 percent, to $78.52 in early trading.

The nation's second largest oil company, Chevron Corp., reported profits of $4.9 billion for the fourth quarter, though revenues slid 26 percent with oil prices in sharp decline.

It earned $2.44 per share in the three months ended Dec. 31. Like Exxon, Chevron easily beat expectations of analysts, who were looking for profits of $1.81 per share.

The industry went into retrenchment toward the end of the year with demand falling.

As expected, Exxon Mobil's bottom line took a beating from its exploration and production, or upstream, arm, where net income fell 31 percent to $5.6 billion. The culprit: lower crude prices, which the company said decreased earnings by $3.2 billion in the fourth quarter alone.

The company, which produces about 3 percent of the world's oil, said overall output fell 3 percent in the most-recent period, a troubling trend in previous quarters. Exxon, which generates more than two-thirds of its earnings from oil and gas production, said production-sharing contracts and OPEC quotas contributed to its lower output.

Results were better at its refining and marketing unit, where earnings rose 6 percent to $2.4 billion as higher margins overcame costs related to last summer's hurricanes and other factors.

The company's chemical division also took a hit, posting net income of $155 million versus $1.1 billion a year ago. Results were hurt by lower volumes and margins and hurricane-repair costs.

Exxon Mobil said it bought 119 million shares of its common stock in the quarter at a cost of $8.8 billion. Roughly $8 billion of that amount was dedicated to reducing the number of shares outstanding; the balance was used to offset shares issued as part of the company's benefit plans.

Exxon said it spent $26.1 billion on capital and exploration projects last year, up 25 percent from 2007. Its earnings release provided no information about its planned spending for 2009.

For the full year, Exxon Mobil's massive profit amounted to $8.69 a share, versus $7.28 a share a year ago.

HOUSTON — Exxon Mobil Corp. on Friday reported a profit of $45.2 billion for 2008, breaking its own record for a U.S. company, even as its fourth-quarter earnings fell 33 percent from a year ago...
HOUSTON — Exxon Mobil Corp. on Friday reported a profit of $45.2 billion for 2008, breaking its own record for a U.S. company, even as its fourth-quarter earnings fell 33 percent from a year ago...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
644
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (17 pages total)
- arthur2008 I'm a Fan of arthur2008 5 fans permalink

Quick! Give them a tax break.

Or maybe a bailout.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 01/30/2009
- Teritt I'm a Fan of Teritt 9 fans permalink

Wonder if they'll start laying people off like IBM is doing -making the recession worse - after their profit numbers. I'm sure they'll figure out some way to get hold of bailout money. I wish Obama would take away their tax cuts already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 01/30/2009
photo

"I wish Obama would take away their tax cuts already."

Which tax cuts are those?

Do you even have a clue how much a corporation pays in taxes? Or do you just hear about "tax breaks, tax breaks" in the news and then whine about them?

Exxon paid $36,530,000,000 in taxes, at a 45% tax rate.

Should they pay "more" taxes?

Have they paid their "fair share"?

Have you? Should you pay more taxes?

Should I?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 01/30/2009
- b93950 I'm a Fan of b93950 4 fans permalink
photo

What everyone should do is to use public transportation instead of their automobiles.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 01/30/2009
- pharm I'm a Fan of pharm 4 fans permalink

How do you get a 45% tax rate, when the top corporate rate is 35%/ $36 billion in taxes is less than what they made in profits, and that was only about 10% of income. Please explain your numbers!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 01/30/2009
- DIAGUY I'm a Fan of DIAGUY 9 fans permalink

Save your breathe !! The people that are OK with ridiculous taxes on corporations will never be directly affected by them. If one spends his entire life in mommy's basement , he will never be affected by anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 01/30/2009
- amluvinit2 I'm a Fan of amluvinit2 12 fans permalink
photo

And your point is?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 01/30/2009
- amessenger I'm a Fan of amessenger 7 fans permalink
photo

The ones that Bush/Cheney gave them in their secret energy policy, for offshore exploration and investments in research and blah-blah-blah.
Exxon' fully admits, Oil is a business of Big Numbers, so your effort to try and impress us with their so-called 45% rate (source please) is not right from the Big Pic Perspective.
They have not paid their fair share. They have engaged inprofits that are not transparent by investing in futures of their own commodity in trades hidden off-shore, not under the scrutiny of the SEC (the coke snortin, ballers who bit their bait).
Yes, I have paid my taxes, but believe that Americans making less than 24,000 a year as singles or 30-40 should pay zero taxes, other than SSAN.
Should you pay more taxes,....no you should spend time researching your remarks so they can impress us with some validity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 01/30/2009
- Peter007 I'm a Fan of Peter007 38 fans permalink
photo

Corporations should not pay any taxes. Why should they? They are not people but legal entities.
Most people don't realize corporate dividends are taxed twice. Once when the money is made and again when it its sent to share holders.
This country has taxed itself into a depression.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 01/30/2009
- chonus I'm a Fan of chonus 20 fans permalink
photo

Nationalize it already. Yeesh!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 01/30/2009
- SZM I'm a Fan of SZM 2 fans permalink

Alright people, why not start doing something about this? Build these electric cars, demand it of the government. There is absolutely no reason why most us of can't be driving electric cars. Exxon Mobile blocks every effort of manufacturers to cross into electricity, this is the only reason it hasn't happened. The technology is there, the manufacturing capability is there, the work force is there, get started. EXXON DEPENDS ON YOUR LACK OF WILL. YOU HANDED THEM THAT MONEY. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IT. I know all you folks want to blame somebody else, but the fact is, the person in the mirror is at fault.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 01/30/2009

Tax them President Obama. Tax them heavily!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 01/30/2009

where do you think the costs will be passed on to?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 01/30/2009
- donbrown I'm a Fan of donbrown 71 fans permalink
photo

Obscene....nationalize the oil industry and force them to funnel the profits into alternative energy research.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 01/30/2009

declare marshall law first...abandon constitution next. after that its all fair game...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 01/30/2009
- amessenger I'm a Fan of amessenger 7 fans permalink
photo

Marshall Law? YIPES! That puts the MILITARY in charge. Abandon the Constitution? Don;t think so,.....eventual Constitutional Convention or Congress for modernization and modification,......coming you betcha!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 01/30/2009
- donbrown I'm a Fan of donbrown 71 fans permalink
photo

Martial law and constitution suspension is going overboard. Using revenue to reform the way we use energy in a national emergency is not. In fact, it would be the most patriotic thing we could do... as you will see.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 01/30/2009
- Peter007 I'm a Fan of Peter007 38 fans permalink
photo

The are no profits if a company is nationalized.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 01/30/2009
- donbrown I'm a Fan of donbrown 71 fans permalink
photo

What happens to the money we pay for gasoline in a nationalized industry. If it's a bad idea, why have so many other countries done it? Venezuela is one of the few countries in the world NOT in trouble because of its nationalized oil industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 01/30/2009
photo

Can we just take this for California? We need the money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 01/30/2009

Standard Oil of California for the most part turned into Chevron . . . Exxon was largely Standard Oil of New Jersey

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 01/30/2009
photo

Where's the windfall profits tax I was promised. Betcha the Repubs vote against that too?? Can we get them out sooner than 2010?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 01/30/2009

You'll be lucky if he keeps the promise at all (from what he's said recently).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 01/30/2009
photo

Just wondering .. would it be feasible to make the Oil companies bail out the auto industry with their obscene profits ??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 01/30/2009
- davidly I'm a Fan of davidly 19 fans permalink

Making a deal like that seems preferable to me, than to tax than with the intent of using the money for the same purpose. As we know, earmarked funds have a way of losing their ears.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 01/30/2009
- fleaba I'm a Fan of fleaba 13 fans permalink

Exxon was already bailed out by the US supreme court when they reduced damages for the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Litigation to scratch for fishermen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 01/30/2009
- Forester I'm a Fan of Forester 107 fans permalink
photo

The "clean up" cost was already set aside at the time of the spill, the perception of an oil shortage allowed refineries to hike gas prices, and XOM stock spiked. I call it the Valdez effect. You are screwed, then you are screwed and finally, you are screwed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 01/30/2009
- Forester I'm a Fan of Forester 107 fans permalink
photo

I have held XOM since 1986, and none of my friends know about it.

I call it my blood money. There, I confessed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 01/30/2009
photo

Confessing may be good for the soul .. but it does nothing to help the collapse of the world finances. I hope you enjoy your profits .. I wouldn't want anyone to know I had anything to do with *them* either ! As a matter of fact .. I have been boycotting Shell, Exxon, etc. for quite a few years now .. it is only one car .. but .. I am sure there are others out there doing the same basic thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 01/30/2009
- Forester I'm a Fan of Forester 107 fans permalink
photo

you are right, of course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 01/30/2009

I own both Phillip Morris international and Exxon....

could be worse..could be owning GM, Ford, Kodak, Sears...LOL.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 01/30/2009

first ask your congressmen to stop bailing out auto/bank and airlines....then worry about oil companies. they dont come to govt. hat in hand.

where is the outrage when taxpayer money in spent on losers like banks and autos.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 01/30/2009

"where is the outrage when taxpayer money in spent on losers like banks and autos."

In a different thread....

But I agree with you. Mist people here can not confront the fact that Exxon earns so much because THEY are driving the manhood extenders.

I mean, there are good reasons why Exxon should have been brought under government control many years ago, but earnings are not among them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 01/30/2009

seeing how govt. does a bangup job of running a business, i dont see why not...NOT !!

govt. should just start with NOT SUPPORTING any industry. we say we practice capitalism...but we do it very half heartedly.

in a true capitalist system, companies would be allowed to fail. thats a precondition of capitalist system.

we have stopped allowing companies to fail. then saying we have a capitalist system is ridiculous. we need to let market weed out the bad players.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 01/30/2009

What should have been used to improve social conditions here was hijacked by Bush to wage a war that benefited only his cronies. Since the oil and military industries benefited the most from the Iraq war, they should be taxed to repay the entire war debt. If the lower and middle class get stuck repaying the loan, would be the biggest scam ever in the history of earth and a great injustice. The greed and cheating has to stop.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 01/30/2009
- fgr1111 I'm a Fan of fgr1111 2 fans permalink

You say "IF"

Of course we WILL be stuck with the bill.

That is the Amerikan way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 01/30/2009

Here's some data on how the greed's paying off:

"Jan. 30 (Bloomberg) -- The average tax rate paid by the richest 400 Americans fell by a third to 17.2 percent through the first six years of the Bush administration and their average income doubled to $263.3 million, new IRS data show. "

Some more:

"The richest 1% of Americans earned $1.3 trillion in 2004, an amount greater than the total national income of Canada. Further the top 1% of Americans has 33% of the country's wealth. "

Meanwhile, we have people losing their jobs, health care, housing and the ability to feed their families

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 01/30/2009
- DFL I'm a Fan of DFL 39 fans permalink
photo

I heard repubs want to give exxon another tax break so they can get back on their feet again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 01/30/2009

I had already noted the fact that the oil and pharmaceutical companies haven't come to us pandandling like practically everyone else. That's because we're being ripped off by them (not exactly a news flash).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 01/30/2009
- pharm I'm a Fan of pharm 4 fans permalink

Oil companies make a lot of income, that is why they are having big profits. I`m not defending them, but they "only" made about 10% profit, where the pharmaceutical companies make 19-20%.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 01/30/2009

how about govt. trying to get RID OF COMPANIES that do not produce any profits...!! money better spent i would say

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 01/30/2009
photo

"Oil companies make a lot of income, that is why they are having big profits. I`m not defending them, but they "only" made about 10% profit, where the pharmaceutical companies make 19-20%."

And your local grocery chain (Kroger, Publix, whatever) also makes more than double the profit margins of an oil company.

Interesting how many times the word "Obscene" has been tossed out in this thread.

I keep wondering, how exactly do the posters lamenting these "obscene profits" actually define the term?

Sort of like that old Supreme Court case, with a twist, I guess - there's no definition, but "they know it's obscene when they've been instructed to believe it's obscene".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 01/30/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (17 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect