AP Accuses Obama Artist Shepard Fairey Of Copyright Infringement

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP Accuses Obama Artist Shepard Fairey Of Copyright Infringement stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HILLEL ITALIE | 02/ 4/09 10:39 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A poster of President Barack Obama, right, by artist Shepard Fairey is shown for comparison with this April 27, 2006 file photo of then-Sen. Barack Obama by Associated Press photographer Mannie Garcia at the National Press Club in Washington. Fairey has acknowledged, the poster is based on the AP photograph. (AP Photo/Mannie Garcia/ Shepard Fairey)

NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warholesque red, white and blue and underlined with the caption HOPE.

Designed by Shepard Fairey, a Los-Angeles based street artist, the image has led to sales of hundreds of thousands of posters and stickers, and has become so much in demand that copies signed by Fairey have been purchased for thousands of dollars on eBay.

The image, Fairey has acknowledged, is based on an Associated Press photograph, taken in April 2006 by Mannie Garcia on assignment for the AP at the National Press Club in Washington.

The AP says it owns the copyright, and wants credit and compensation. Fairey disagrees.

"The Associated Press has determined that the photograph used in the poster is an AP photo and that its use required permission," the AP's director of media relations, Paul Colford, said in a statement. "AP safeguards its assets and looks at these events on a case-by-case basis. We have reached out to Mr. Fairey's attorney and are in discussions. We hope for an amicable solution."

"We believe fair use protects Shepard's right to do what he did here," says Fairey's lawyer, Anthony Falzone, executive director of the Fair Use Project at Stanford University and a lecturer at the Stanford Law School. "It wouldn't be appropriate to comment beyond that at this time because we are in discussions about this with the AP."

Fair use is a legal concept that allows exceptions to copyright law, based on, among other factors, how much of the original is used, what the new work is used for and how the original is affected by the new work.

Legal experts offered differing views on the Obama image.

Story continues below

Jane Ginsburg, a Columbia University law professor who specializes in copyright cases, questioned whether Fairey has a valid fair-use claim and says that he should have at least credited the AP.

"What makes me uneasy is that it kind of suggests that anybody's photograph is fair game, even if it uses the entire image, and it remains recognizable, and it's not just used in a collage," Ginsburg said. "I think that's pretty radical."

Robin Gross, an intellectual property attorney who heads IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization, believes that Fairey had the right to use the photo, saying that he intended it for a political cause, not commercial use.

"Fairey's purpose of the use for the photo was political or civic, and this will certainly count in favor of the poster being a fair use," said Gross, based in San Francisco. "Nor will the poster diminish the value of the photo, if anything, it has increased the original photo's value beyond measure, another factor counting heavily in favor of fair use."

A longtime rebel with a history of breaking rules, Fairey has said he found the photograph using Google Images. He released the image on his Web site shortly after he created it, in early 2008, and made thousands of posters for the street.

As it caught on, supporters began downloading the image and distributing it at campaign events, while blogs and other Internet sites picked it up. Fairey has said that he did not receive any of the money raised.

A former Obama campaign official said they were well aware of the image based on the picture taken by Garcia, a temporary hire no longer with the AP, but never licensed it or used it officially. The Obama official asked not to be identified because no one was authorized anymore to speak on behalf of the campaign.

The image's fame did not end with the election.

It will be included this month at a Fairey exhibit at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston and a mixed-media stenciled collage version has been added to the permanent collection of the National Portrait Gallery in Washington.

"The continued use of the poster, regardless of whether it is for galleries or other distribution, is part of the discussion AP is having with Mr. Fairey's representative," Colford said.

A New York Times book on the election, just published by Penguin Group (USA), includes the image. A Vermont-based publisher, Chelsea Green, also used it _ credited solely to Fairey_ as the cover for Robert Kuttner's "Obama's Challenge," an economic manifesto released in September. Chelsea Green President Margo Baldwin said that Fairey did not ask for money, only that the publisher make a donation to the National Endowment for the Arts.

"It's a wonderful piece of art, but I wish he had been more careful about the licensing of it," said Baldwin, who added that Chelsea Green gave $2,500 to the NEA.

Fairey also used the AP photograph for an image designed specially for the Obama inaugural committee, which charged anywhere from $100 for a poster to $500 for a poster signed by the artist.

Fairey has said that he first designed the image a year ago after he was encouraged by the Obama campaign to come up with some kind of artwork. Last spring, he showed a letter to The Washington Post that came from the candidate.

"Dear Shepard," the letter reads. "I would like to thank you for using your talent in support of my campaign. The political messages involved in your work have encouraged Americans to believe they can help change the status quo. Your images have a profound effect on people, whether seen in a gallery or on a stop sign."

At first, Obama's team just encouraged him to make an image, Fairey has said. But soon after he created it, a worker involved in the campaign asked if Fairey could make an image from a photo to which the campaign had rights.

"I donated an image to them, which they used. It was the one that said "Change" underneath it. And then later on I did another one that said "Vote" underneath it, that had Obama smiling," he said in a December 2008 interview with an underground photography Web site.

___

Associated Press writer Philip Elliott in Washington contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warhole...
NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warhole...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
532
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
- ThomasMc I'm a Fan of ThomasMc 10 fans permalink

Maybe Obama should accuse AP of making money off his image without paying royalties.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 02/05/2009

the AP shouldn't get a penny... if anything, the person responsible for taking that photograph should speak with Shepard Fairey and figure it out between the two of them.. the AP should get no credit.
http://www.vagabondstory.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 02/05/2009

Somwhere lost in the argument is the fact that this so-called "artist" is a total hack. Fairey grabbed two iconic images in the last 15 years, plastered them everywhere, and suddenly he's Andy Warhol? C'mon. He got famous using the face of Andre the Giant... which he still slaps on just about every one of his new "street art" creations (with or without the word "Obey"). He hasn't changed that same gimmick since 1994.
The New Yorker, Boston Globe, and countless other media outlets think he's some kind of revolutionary art hero. For what? A very Pepsi-like, ripped-off image of Obama? Please. Let AP bring this art fraud back to reality. The AP image did not belong to him. Copyrights are just that: rights to copy a work. Any artist worth his salt would be able to create more than two -- original -- works of art over the course of a decade and a half.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 02/05/2009
- Horus45 I'm a Fan of Horus45 35 fans permalink
photo

F u ck off!
M or on

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 02/06/2009
- batspaul I'm a Fan of batspaul 19 fans permalink

Apparently thinking it didn't blow badly enough with its biased coverage of the election from the tainted Washington bureau, AP is now pursuing new ways to totally bite.
Good one, AP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

total b.s. that just might have legs.

artists constantly work from everyday media print photos. now this common act has a risk involved. after being spoonfed by the corporations our entire lives they feel that they own all they feed us. who do they think pays for their exposure and promotions? we do.

i guess there needs to be a protectionist clause on anything ever leaving the privacy of our homes and entering the market place, in any form.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 02/05/2009
- huffy2001 I'm a Fan of huffy2001 50 fans permalink
photo

The original photo is of Barack Obama's face...not an image crafted by the photographer? Who, really, owns the rights to Obama's countenance? As a former news photographer, I say Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 02/05/2009
- XLintLuvR I'm a Fan of XLintLuvR 33 fans permalink
photo

I agree 100%. I'm not saying that he should step into this, but really. You take a picture of someone, with their permission of course, but then you want to cry when someone uses that and immortalizes the subject. Do they own the president? Do they own that pose? Did they not make money off the picture? Has it not increased in value as a result of the exposure? I think they need to drop this or they'll have the appearance of trying to squash the little guy. Besides, didn't the artist acknowledge and give credit to the AP? He said he's received none of the proceeds of sales.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 02/05/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

Sue me!

++++++++++#@++++++++++++
+++++++########++++++++++
++++++#####++###+++++++++
+++++##++++++++##++++++++
+++++#++++++++++##+++++++
++++#+++++++++++###++++++
++++#++++++++++++##++++++
+++#+++++++++######++++++
+++#++++##+ ########+++++
+++#+++#+#+++++++++#+++++
+++#++###++++++++++##++++
+++#+++++++++++++++#+++++
++++#++++++++##@++##++++
++++++++++@###++++##++++
+++#+#+++++++++++++#+++++
+++#++++++++####+++#+++++
++++++#++++#--#+++##+++++
++++#+#++++++++++###+++++
+++++#+#+++++++++#####+++
++++++++++++++++########+
++++++++##++++##########+
++++++++++@#######+#####+
++++++####++#####++#####+
++++######++++##++######+
+++#######+++##+++######+
+######### ++#++++######+
+#########+++++++##+++##+
+##########+++#++##+##+#+
+##########++++#+##+++##+
+##########+++#+####+###+
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 02/05/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

This image and better versions are available at:

http://www.vgatrader.com/boascii.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 02/05/2009

HAHAHAHAHA!!! RLMAO!!! DAUGHTER DOES IT AGAIN!!! Excelsior!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

ahem. in 1976 i copyrighted the 'pound' symbol, the symbol formerly known as the 'tictactoe'.
you'll be hearing from my attorney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 02/05/2009

Sigh. I have no idea how to explain my feelings on this. I am, however, getting tired of hearing about case after case of "copyright infringement." As an artist, AND someone who's done photography, I think this whole back and forth about "who owns what" usurps the spirit of the law. If the photographer must be paid, fine. If the AP, however, wants to sue, I say, "No." The AP represents the Fourth Estate. Their purpose is to report on public figures that represent our interests. The photographs printed in such a publication should be free to artistic reinterpretation and protected under the First Amendment. Otherwise, the only reason that intellectual property laws exist is for the sole purpose of lining the pockets of opportunists and parasites.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 02/05/2009
- Horus45 I'm a Fan of Horus45 35 fans permalink
photo

Shepard Fairey has been very clear about this from the start, he personally did NOT profit off of the sale of his posters.
Sure, there are a lot of people making a lot of money RESELLING them on Ebay, but Fairey does not see a dime of that.

Fairey has stated numerous times that all his work was donated to The Obama Campaign.
The money that was raised from his sales of singed posters was used to print up more FREE posters to be given out at rallies around the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 02/05/2009

I thought this photo summed up the whole argument humorously
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lostintransitzine/3205357644/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 02/05/2009
- RHCNYC I'm a Fan of RHCNYC 7 fans permalink

While I'm no fan of the AP, the fact is, it's not the AP that's being ripped off, but the photographer. Perhaps the AP is suing on behalf of the photographer, but the simple fact remains that Shepard Fairey is notorious for ripping off other people's work without, at minimum, giving them credit as the source.
As a graphic artist, I make my living on being sure that my works are protected. Otherwise, how do we make a living?
Even I have to be careful and aware of using other artists works as inspiration, such as using the images in a collage, etc.

Fairey might have had an easier time using this image in an unauthorized fashion if it wasn't for the fact that it wasn't "just for political/satire" but instead for big profit.

Even audio sampling has limitations, and there are all sorts of rules to ensure that Fair Use remains fair.

If you want a good example of how to get away with using other artist's works, look at DJ Dangermouse and his Gray Album. He spent a great deal of effort and talent making that album, which was a gigantic success. He never officially tried to sell it commercially. He was smart enough to know his real 'payment' would come in the form of publicity, which would bring him fans and thus allow him to really make the $.

Shepard Fairey violated that model.

http://www.art-for-a-change.com/Obey/index.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 02/05/2009

As a former AP stringer I think the real irony in this story is that the photog. probably made less the $300 for the assignment and then as part of his contract, surrendered all rights to the image. So what constitutes fair?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 02/05/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

You make an EXCELLENT point!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 02/05/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 02/05/2009

BRILLIANT! BRAVO! THANK YOU!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 02/05/2009
- StellaRay I'm a Fan of StellaRay 220 fans permalink

Thanks, Daughter. What a great article. I have Fairey's Hope poster in my dining room, and even though the election is long over, I wouldn't dream of taking it down. I love it as a piece of art. Loved seeing so many more examples of Fairey's art in the article you linked me too. Fabulous stuff. The Darfur Poster was exquisite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 02/05/2009
- blaharumph I'm a Fan of blaharumph 19 fans permalink
photo

great article. thanks for posting!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 02/05/2009
- lefty247 I'm a Fan of lefty247 5 fans permalink
photo

As a photographer- I know the Law says- the moment you click the shutter the photographer owns the copyright to that image- not AP, not Fairly and not the public. A lot of hassle and expense went into getting a shot like that- you can't just go out and steal 'my pic' - It's gonna cost you! - If he signed over the rights to AP then AP owns it and has the right to control it, sell it, or destroy it.
Ya can't go around pirating pro photos - ya got to buy the rights- I hope AP kicks his butt- and reminds the pirates out there in the public that nobody is above the law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 02/05/2009
- thaneb I'm a Fan of thaneb 13 fans permalink
photo

And, as you know, fair use is part of the law. The issue: is it fair use?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 02/05/2009
- gifu I'm a Fan of gifu 14 fans permalink

I know a few people who seem to be above the law in the USA.........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 02/05/2009
photo

How small a spirit. Obviously this artist didn't start out with the intent to begin an empire with this poster. And he did transform it into a work of art not a tabloid image. C"mon tame those greedy paws,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 02/05/2009

Actually he did.

He created BLK/MRKT, a "guerrilla" marketing company for the sole purpose of making huge bank.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 02/05/2009

BLK/MRKT is owned by Dave Knisey, not Shep Fairey.

Also, Fairey did not profit at all from the image. The proceeds from all sales went to political campaigns, particularly the creation of 'paster' versions of this image that could be posted up in support of Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

The photo is a very generic one, there is nothing unique about it. Barak Obama looks like this 200 times a day. There could be thousands of very similar photos. The fact the artist was honest with his source shows me there was no intention to "steal" anything.

I have a picture of the moon taken by a professional photographer. If I make a drawing out of it will I be in copyright infringement?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 02/05/2009

He wasn't honest. He says he found the picture on Google. Nothing more.
He's not some starry eyed artist. He's a businessman and knows plenty about how copyrights work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 02/05/2009
- huffnpuffn I'm a Fan of huffnpuffn 8 fans permalink

Honest with his source? Maybe after he got caught. Where was the original attribution?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 02/05/2009

He wasn't honest, he only said the picture was found on Google. Nothing more.
He's not a clueless, starry-eyed artist. he's a businessman and knows plenty about copyrights and permissions. He just chooses to ignore them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 02/05/2009
- lefty247 I'm a Fan of lefty247 5 fans permalink
photo

The postings here are borderline insane- absolutely no respect for the copyright laws of the land.
You all just don't get it.
If anybody pirates my images (and they have before) I'll see you in court if you don't pay up.
This Fairy guy stole that image and turned it into a commercial enterprise. He's a thief until he buys the rights- But now he's opened himself up for paying way more than if he would have if he had done it the legal way. - If you all hate the copyright laws in America...tough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 02/05/2009

You are the one that doesn't get it. How can you copyright a photo of an elected official? Just think about those stupid commemorative plates and coins of President Obama that are being sold. Do you think that the company selling them will give compensation to Obama for using his image? It doesn't seem possible to copyright an image of the President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 02/05/2009
photo

AP is being stupid about this, but they are becoming a right-wing outfit anyway. Copyright laws in this country have become ridiculous, making it easier for companies to make money from suing people than for actually producing anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 02/05/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect