AP Accuses Obama Artist Shepard Fairey Of Copyright Infringement

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP Accuses Obama Artist Shepard Fairey Of Copyright Infringement stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HILLEL ITALIE | 02/ 4/09 10:39 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A poster of President Barack Obama, right, by artist Shepard Fairey is shown for comparison with this April 27, 2006 file photo of then-Sen. Barack Obama by Associated Press photographer Mannie Garcia at the National Press Club in Washington. Fairey has acknowledged, the poster is based on the AP photograph. (AP Photo/Mannie Garcia/ Shepard Fairey)

NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warholesque red, white and blue and underlined with the caption HOPE.

Designed by Shepard Fairey, a Los-Angeles based street artist, the image has led to sales of hundreds of thousands of posters and stickers, and has become so much in demand that copies signed by Fairey have been purchased for thousands of dollars on eBay.

The image, Fairey has acknowledged, is based on an Associated Press photograph, taken in April 2006 by Mannie Garcia on assignment for the AP at the National Press Club in Washington.

The AP says it owns the copyright, and wants credit and compensation. Fairey disagrees.

"The Associated Press has determined that the photograph used in the poster is an AP photo and that its use required permission," the AP's director of media relations, Paul Colford, said in a statement. "AP safeguards its assets and looks at these events on a case-by-case basis. We have reached out to Mr. Fairey's attorney and are in discussions. We hope for an amicable solution."

"We believe fair use protects Shepard's right to do what he did here," says Fairey's lawyer, Anthony Falzone, executive director of the Fair Use Project at Stanford University and a lecturer at the Stanford Law School. "It wouldn't be appropriate to comment beyond that at this time because we are in discussions about this with the AP."

Fair use is a legal concept that allows exceptions to copyright law, based on, among other factors, how much of the original is used, what the new work is used for and how the original is affected by the new work.

Legal experts offered differing views on the Obama image.

Story continues below

Jane Ginsburg, a Columbia University law professor who specializes in copyright cases, questioned whether Fairey has a valid fair-use claim and says that he should have at least credited the AP.

"What makes me uneasy is that it kind of suggests that anybody's photograph is fair game, even if it uses the entire image, and it remains recognizable, and it's not just used in a collage," Ginsburg said. "I think that's pretty radical."

Robin Gross, an intellectual property attorney who heads IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization, believes that Fairey had the right to use the photo, saying that he intended it for a political cause, not commercial use.

"Fairey's purpose of the use for the photo was political or civic, and this will certainly count in favor of the poster being a fair use," said Gross, based in San Francisco. "Nor will the poster diminish the value of the photo, if anything, it has increased the original photo's value beyond measure, another factor counting heavily in favor of fair use."

A longtime rebel with a history of breaking rules, Fairey has said he found the photograph using Google Images. He released the image on his Web site shortly after he created it, in early 2008, and made thousands of posters for the street.

As it caught on, supporters began downloading the image and distributing it at campaign events, while blogs and other Internet sites picked it up. Fairey has said that he did not receive any of the money raised.

A former Obama campaign official said they were well aware of the image based on the picture taken by Garcia, a temporary hire no longer with the AP, but never licensed it or used it officially. The Obama official asked not to be identified because no one was authorized anymore to speak on behalf of the campaign.

The image's fame did not end with the election.

It will be included this month at a Fairey exhibit at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston and a mixed-media stenciled collage version has been added to the permanent collection of the National Portrait Gallery in Washington.

"The continued use of the poster, regardless of whether it is for galleries or other distribution, is part of the discussion AP is having with Mr. Fairey's representative," Colford said.

A New York Times book on the election, just published by Penguin Group (USA), includes the image. A Vermont-based publisher, Chelsea Green, also used it _ credited solely to Fairey_ as the cover for Robert Kuttner's "Obama's Challenge," an economic manifesto released in September. Chelsea Green President Margo Baldwin said that Fairey did not ask for money, only that the publisher make a donation to the National Endowment for the Arts.

"It's a wonderful piece of art, but I wish he had been more careful about the licensing of it," said Baldwin, who added that Chelsea Green gave $2,500 to the NEA.

Fairey also used the AP photograph for an image designed specially for the Obama inaugural committee, which charged anywhere from $100 for a poster to $500 for a poster signed by the artist.

Fairey has said that he first designed the image a year ago after he was encouraged by the Obama campaign to come up with some kind of artwork. Last spring, he showed a letter to The Washington Post that came from the candidate.

"Dear Shepard," the letter reads. "I would like to thank you for using your talent in support of my campaign. The political messages involved in your work have encouraged Americans to believe they can help change the status quo. Your images have a profound effect on people, whether seen in a gallery or on a stop sign."

At first, Obama's team just encouraged him to make an image, Fairey has said. But soon after he created it, a worker involved in the campaign asked if Fairey could make an image from a photo to which the campaign had rights.

"I donated an image to them, which they used. It was the one that said "Change" underneath it. And then later on I did another one that said "Vote" underneath it, that had Obama smiling," he said in a December 2008 interview with an underground photography Web site.

___

Associated Press writer Philip Elliott in Washington contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warhole...
NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warhole...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
532
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
photo

Obviously, the greedy repubs think they own a copyright on Obama's image. I see a resemblemce as well....oh wait!...it's the same guy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 02/05/2009
- Skyhawk I'm a Fan of Skyhawk 25 fans permalink
photo

AP has been a corporate mouth piece for a while now. UPI used to be a top news service until the conservatives took control of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 AM on 02/05/2009
- metivo I'm a Fan of metivo 6 fans permalink

Not noted in the article is the fact that the image was flipped horozontally by Shepard. That alone made it very different.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 AM on 02/05/2009

Actually, it wasn't. That was the Jim Young photo, which turns out not to be the source. The Mannie Garcia photo is a perfect match.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/Shtick/Fairey-HopeOriginalcopy.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 02/05/2009
- metivo I'm a Fan of metivo 6 fans permalink

Thanks for the update, Shtick. I love HuffPo. Great source of information.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 02/05/2009
- lefty247 I'm a Fan of lefty247 5 fans permalink
photo

Dream on genius.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 02/05/2009
- HmblDog I'm a Fan of HmblDog 2 fans permalink

One of these days the whole copyright concept is going to get a bad image.
It seems like every week something stupid is in the news about how someone violated someones rights by portraying something that was copyrighted.
I'm surprised McDonalds isn't sueing someone everytime a picture of the golden arches appears in the background of a CSI scene.
Oops. maybe I'm going to get sued for using the name McDonalds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 02/05/2009
- Helzapoppin I'm a Fan of Helzapoppin 100 fans permalink
photo

I hereby declare all my personally identifying information to be my intellectual property. Anyone who shares or sells that information for marketing purposes without my express written permission is guilty of copyright infringement.

Hell, if it works for corporate America, why not me?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 02/05/2009
- rsaillant1 I'm a Fan of rsaillant1 25 fans permalink
photo

Let me see if I have this straight...an artist views a photgraph,
processes that image through his brain, and then, in an entirely
different medium, creates his version of that image, and now
the company that paid the photographer for the original photo
is seeking compensation.

Not a chance.

Did Campells sue Worhol?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 02/05/2009

Sorry, AP, I still don't see that much of a resemblance. Stop sounding like greedy Repubs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

Not sure if any of you a familiar with Fairey's "work" but he has a reputation for being a plagiarist and usurping other peoples work. People have researched his work, prior to his Obama fame, and have found that he basically takes other peoples work adds some color and then calls it his own original creation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

Are you serious? The AP does not have a copyright on Obama. This is an interpretation not a reproduction of their work. This is an image that they put out to the public. I can't believe that they feel that they have any right to anything. This is what is wrong with so many people in America - GREED!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 02/05/2009

I agree.....The AP is foolish for this ridiculous accusation....There is just no "HOPE" for the AP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 02/05/2009
- Bluesue I'm a Fan of Bluesue 26 fans permalink

Oh my they look exactly alike (not).

Until somone did a lot of research (I think there was an article on this site a week or so ago) the AP didn't even realize it was based on a picture taken by one of their photographers.

I think this is a very poor move on AP's part.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 AM on 02/05/2009
- cloudmaker I'm a Fan of cloudmaker 68 fans permalink
photo

I'm guessing that AP had nothing to say when they first saw the portrait,
but as it become more popular greed took over and now they want
their cut. I am sure that if you look further back than APs photo, you will
find something similar. So maybe that creator could sue AP who could
sue Fairey etc. Hope AP loses this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 AM on 02/05/2009
- tinarm I'm a Fan of tinarm 5 fans permalink

This all has to do with the ap hurting for cash, that's all. They could care less about the poster or the photo, they just think it's a way to make some money for a crumbling industry. I say the use was o.k., everyone just needs to chill out, and I'm sick of all these dam* lawsuits. Good grief, sometimes people should just leave it and go on. It's like everyone's got sue fever or something.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 AM on 02/05/2009

Then again, all you would have to do is to take a photo of President Obama and then draw or paint a portrait from it.

I'm not so sure that anyone has a copywrite if you paint or sketch from a photograph.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 AM on 02/05/2009

Though written by a variety of different detractors for a questionable array of reasons, the common thread binding them all—aside from a thinly masked veneer of obvious envy in most cases—is a nearly ubiquitous lack of understanding of the artist’s use of appropriated imagery in his work and the longstanding historical precedent for this mode of creative expression.

Read this http://www.supertouchart.com/2009/02/02/editorial-the-medium-is-the-message-shepard-fairey-and-the-art-of-appropriation/

The AP has no grounds for this silliness.
http://insidetherockposterframe.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

The flap that’s been raised over this is providing invaluable lessons for young, aspiring artists.

It’s all fun and games until you make a few dollars and/or gain some notoriety.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

The sad thing is that the artist did not make much money. He donated the image to the Obama campaign to help raise money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 02/05/2009

There might be a point to all of this..

HOWEVER....

These are serious times..
We are close to, if not in, a depression.

And they are worried about Copywright?

SHAME!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 AM on 02/05/2009

This isn't a political issue it's a copyright issue. Being in a deep recession has nothing to do with it in any way what so ever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 AM on 02/05/2009
- Simone I'm a Fan of Simone 6 fans permalink

And is the Obama campaign going to sue all that the right-wingers who are using and abusing his sunrise logo?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 AM on 02/05/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect